Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dina Popovic is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dina Popovic.


European Neuropsychopharmacology | 2012

POLARITY INDEX OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS USED FOR MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF BIPOLAR DISORDER

Dina Popovic; M. Reinares; J.M. Goikolea; C.M. Bonnin; Ana González-Pinto; Eduard Vieta

Over one half of bipolar patients have been reported to be more prone to either depressive or manic relapses. This study aimed to define profiles of drugs used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) by the means of Polarity Index. Polarity Index is a new metric indicating the relative antimanic versus antidepressive preventive efficacy of drugs. Polarity Index was retrieved by calculating Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for prevention of depression and NNT for prevention of mania ratio, as emerging from the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Included trials were randomized and double blind, with a minimal duration of 24 weeks, assessing effectiveness of a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic drug alone or in combination with a mood stabilizing agent versus a placebo comparator in BD maintenance treatment. Polarity Index value above 1.0 indicates a relative greater antimanic prophylactic efficacy, number below 1.0 a relative greater antidepressive efficacy. The polarity index for the drugs used in maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder was 12.09 for risperidone, 4.38 for aripiprazole, 3.91 for ziprasidone, 2.98 for olanzapine, 1.39 for lithium, 1.14 for quetiapine, and 0.40 for lamotrigine. Polarity index of valproate and oxcarbazepine may not be reliable due to the failure of their maintenance trials. The polarity index provides a measure of how much antidepressant versus antimanic a drug is in bipolar disorder prophylaxis, and may guide the choice of maintenance therapy in bipolar patients.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2012

Long-term outcome of cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder.

Carla Torrent; Anabel Martínez-Arán; C.M. Bonnin; M. Reinares; Claire Daban; Brisa Solé; Adriane Ribeiro Rosa; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Dina Popovic; Manel Salamero

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the longitudinal course and outcome of cognitive deficits and their clinical correlates in bipolar disorder. METHOD One hundred thirteen participants (68 patients and 45 healthy controls) were assessed by the means of a neuropsychological battery targeting attention, psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and executive functions at baseline: 68 euthymic outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder (53 bipolar I and 15 bipolar II) were enrolled at the Bipolar Disorder Unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Forty-five patients completed the follow-up. The assessments started in February 1999 and finished in July 2010. The primary outcome of the study was the change in the neuropsychological performance in the patient group. RESULTS Repeated-measures analyses showed significant effects of time in 2 cognitive domains: attention and executive functions. Attention slightly improved (P = .043) but executive function worsened (P = .001). Regression analyses showed that the duration of illness and baseline subdepressive symptoms were associated with poor performance in executive function. Subdepressive symptoms at endpoint were associated with poor functioning. The best predictor of low functioning was verbal memory dysfunction at baseline. CONCLUSIONS The cognitive impairment remained stable across the follow-up period in many measures assessed except for a worsening of executive measures, which have been found to be associated with the duration of illness and subdepressive symptoms.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2011

Gender differences in a cohort study of 604 bipolar patients: The role of predominant polarity

A.M.A. Nivoli; Isabella Pacchiarotti; Adriane Ribeiro Rosa; Dina Popovic; Andrea Murru; Marc Valentí; C. Mar Bonnín; I. Grande; J. Sanchez-Moreno; Eduard Vieta; Francesc Colom

BACKGROUND Some clinical differences between gender regarding the course and outcome of bipolar disorders have already been described and some others remain still controversial. AIMS To explore gender differences regarding clinical and socio-demographic characteristics amongst bipolar patients with particular attention to predominant polarity and depressive symptoms. METHOD Data were collected from DSM-IV type I and II bipolar patients (n=604), resulting from the systematic follow-up of the Bipolar Disorders Program, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, over an average follow-up of 10 years. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected in order to detect gender-related differences. RESULTS Bipolar women are more likely than men to show a predominance of depressive polarity as well as a depressive onset whilst men would be more likely to suffer from comorbid substance use disorders. Women significantly have a higher lifetime prevalence of psychotic depression and a higher prevalence of axis II comorbid disorders. Bipolar women are also more likely to have a family history of suicide and a lifetime history of attempted suicide. Suicide attempts are more often violent amongst bipolar men. In a backward logistic regression model, two variables were responsible for most gender-related clinical differences: type of predominant polarity - more likely to be depressive amongst women - (B=-0.794, p=0.027, Exp(B)=0.452; CI= 0.223-0.915), alcohol abuse (B=-1.095, p=0.000, Exp(B)=2990; CI= 1.817-4.919) and cocaine abuse (B=0.784, p=0.033, Exp(B)=2.189; CI= 1.066-4.496) - more prevalent amongst men. CONCLUSION The main characteristic featuring bipolar women is depression, both at illness onset and as a predominant polarity all along the illness course. This may have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2012

Neurocognitive impairment and psychosocial functioning in bipolar II disorder.

Brisa Solé; C.M. Bonnin; Carla Torrent; V. Balanzá-Martínez; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Dina Popovic; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Eduard Vieta

Solé B, Bonnin CM, Torrent C, Balanzá‐Martínez V, Tabarés‐Seisdedos R, Popovic D, Martínez‐Arán A, Vieta E. Neurocognitive impairment and psychosocial functioning in bipolar II disorder.


Psychological Medicine | 2011

Are bipolar II patients cognitively impaired? A systematic review

Brisa Solé; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Carla Torrent; C.M. Bonnin; M. Reinares; Dina Popovic; J. Sanchez-Moreno; Eduard Vieta

BACKGROUND There is evidence that bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with significant neurocognitive deficits and this occurs in individuals with BD type I (BD I) and with BD type II (BD II). Only a few studies have focused on cognitive impairment in BD II. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of cognitive impairment in patients with BD II, in order to identify specific cognitive deficits that distinguish BD II from BD I patients as well as from healthy subjects. METHOD We performed a systematic review of the literature of neuropsychological studies of BD II published between 1980 and July 2009. Fourteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. RESULTS Main cognitive deficits found in BD II include working memory and some measures of executive functions (inhibitory control) and approximately half of the studies also detected verbal memory impairment. CONCLUSIONS There are subtle differences between the two subtypes regarding cognition. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two subgroups which will be helpful in order to determine cognitive endophenotypes in BD subtypes.


Bipolar Disorders | 2011

Bipolar mixed episodes and antidepressants: a cohort study of bipolar I disorder patients.

Marc Valentí; Isabella Pacchiarotti; Adriane Ribeiro Rosa; C. Mar Bonnín; Dina Popovic; A.M.A. Nivoli; Andrea Murru; I. Grande; Francesc Colom; Eduard Vieta

Valentí M, Pacchiarotti I, Rosa AR, Bonnín CM, Popovic D, Nivoli AMA, Murru A, Grande Í, Colom F, Vieta E. Bipolar mixed episodes and antidepressants: a cohort study of bipolar I disorder patients.
Bipolar Disord 2011: 13: 145–154.


Bipolar Disorders | 2011

Six-month functional outcome of a bipolar disorder cohort in the context of a specialized-care program

Adriane Ribeiro Rosa; M. Reinares; Benedikt Amann; Dina Popovic; Carolina Franco; Mercè Comes; Carla Torrent; C. Mar Bonnín; Brisa Solé; Marc Valentí; Manel Salamero; Flávio Kapczinski; Eduard Vieta

Rosa AR, Reinares M, Amann B, Popovic D, Franco C, Comes M, Torrent C, Bonnín CM, Solé B, Valentí M, Salamero M, Kapczinski F, Vieta E. Six‐month functional outcome of a bipolar disorder cohort in the context of a specialized‐care program. Bipolar Disord 2011: 13: 679–686.


CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics | 2012

Neurocognitive impairment across the bipolar spectrum.

Brisa Solé; C.M. Bonnin; Carla Torrent; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Dina Popovic; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Eduard Vieta

Bipolar disorder is a severe mental illness that affects nearly 4.4% of the general population when bipolar spectrum disorders are taken into account. Neurocognitive impairment is thought to be a core deficit of this illness since it is present during euthymia. In fact, 40–60% of euthymic patients present with neurocognitive disturbances. Not only the clinical factors but also disturbances in neurocognition can influence the functional outcome of BD patients. Hence, further research is needed in order to clarify the relationship between these variables. Despite the growing body of evidence that has emerged during the last decade, no unique neurocognitive profile has been proposed yet for either BD subtype. The majority of the studies recluted heterogeneous samples (including both bipolar I and II) or focused on BD‐I patients only. The aim of this review is to give an overall picture of the main neurocognitive disturbances found in the bipolar spectrum and particularly in BD‐II, where the findings are more ambiguous. An extensive review of all the literature has been done regarding this subtype (from 1980 until July 2009). Data available until now suggest that deficits are present across the bipolar spectrum (BD‐I and BD‐II), but they seem slightly more severe in BD‐I. The extent to which either subtype share—or not—some similarities is still unknown. More studies are required but it would also be interesting to reach a consensus in the neuropsychological assessment of BD to facilitate comparisons between the different studies.


Acta Neuropsychiatrica | 2010

Has number of previous episodes any effect on response to group psychoeducation in bipolar patients? A 5‐year follow‐up post hoc analysis

Francesc Colom; M. Reinares; Isabella Pacchiarotti; Dina Popovic; Lorenzo Mazzarini; Anabel Martínez-Arán; Carla Torrent; Adriane Ribeiro Rosa; Rosario Palomino-Otiniano; Carolina Franco; C.M. Bonnin; Eduard Vieta

Colom F, Reinares M, Pacchiarotti I, Popovic D, Mazzarini L, Martínez-Arán A, Torrent C, Rosa A, Palomino-Otiniano R, Franco C, Bonnin CM, Vieta E. Has number of previous episodes any effect on response to group psychoeducation in bipolar patients? A 5-year follow-up post hoc analysis. Objective: One of the main utilities of staging in bipolar disorder is enhancing the formulation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies. Hence, it is essential to ascertain whether the number of previous episodes influences treatment response. Hereby, we present a 5-year post hoc study on the efficacy of group psychoeducation for bipolar disorders according to the number of previous episodes. Methods: For this subanalysis, we have compared the 5-year outcome of 120 euthymic psychoeducated versus non-psychoeducated bipolar patients according to the number of previous episodes at study entry. Results: Patients with more than seven episodes at study entry did not show any significant improvement with psychoeducation according to time to recurrence. Patients with more than 14 episodes did not benefit from psychoeducation in terms of a reduction of time spent ill. Patients with 7 or 8 episodes showed a benefit in terms of fewer days spent in hypomania, depression, mixed episodes or any episodes but not mania, while patients with 9–14 episodes showed a benefit in terms of fewer days spent in hypomania and depression but not in mixed states or mania. Only patients who presented up to 6 episodes showed reduction in time spent in any episode polarity. Conclusion: The number of previous episodes clearly worsens response to psychoeducation, perhaps in a more subtle way than that observed with other psychological therapies. Psychoeducation should be delivered as soon as possible in the illness course, supporting the idea of early intervention.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2012

Risk factors for antidepressant-related switch to mania.

Marc Valentí; Isabella Pacchiarotti; C.M. Bonnin; Araceli Rosa; Dina Popovic; A.M.A. Nivoli; J.M. Goikolea; Andrea Murru; Juan Undurraga; F. Colom; Eduard Vieta

OBJECTIVE Treatment of bipolar depression with antidepressants is strongly debated on the basis of the methodologically poor and insufficient data supporting their use and the widely held belief that antidepressants can induce new episodes of abnormal mood elevation or accelerate the rate of cycling. The present study aimed at identifying clinical risk factors for switch into hypomania, mania, or mixed states, within 8 weeks after introduction of an antidepressant or after increasing its dosage, in a prospective, longitudinal design. METHOD 221 consecutive DSM-IV-TR depressed bipolar I and II disorder patients were treated with antidepressants, which were added to previously prescribed mood stabilizers and/or atypical antipsychotics. No patient was on antidepressant monotherapy. The patients were enrolled from October 2005 through January 2010. The primary outcome was the assessment of switch to mania or hypomania within 8 weeks after the introduction or dose increase of an antidepressant. Both groups were compared with analysis of variance and χ² procedures. RESULTS Treatment-emergent affective switch was detected in 54 patients (24.4%) (switch group) while 167 patients (75.6%) (nonswitch group) did not experience a treatment-related switch. The main clinical differences significantly associated with the occurrence of an antidepressant-related switch, after performing logistic regression analysis, were higher rate of previous switches (P < .001) in the switch versus the nonswitch group, lower rate of responses to antidepressants (P < .001) in the switch versus the nonswitch group, and earlier age at onset (P = .026) in the switch versus the nonswitch group. DISCUSSION Bipolar patients with an earlier age at onset and an illness course characterized by lower rate of response to antidepressants and higher rate of switches into mania or hypomania were found to be the ones with higher switch risk. Nevertheless, a greater number of previous antidepressant exposures was not associated with the occurrence of an antidepressant-associated switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503489.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dina Popovic's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eduard Vieta

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Murru

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.M. Bonnin

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brisa Solé

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Reinares

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge