Dion Paridaens

Amniotic membrane transplantation in the management of conjunctival malignant melanoma and primary acquired melanosis with atypia

AIM To evaluate the efficacy of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for the management of conjunctival malignant melanoma and primary acquired melanosis (PAM) with atypia. METHODS Four consecutive patients with histologically proved invasive, primary conjunctival malignant melanoma were treated with wide surgical excision and AMT. Amniotic membrane grafts were harvested and processed under sterile conditions according to a standard protocol. The grafts were sutured to the margins of the surface defect. In one case, AMT was combined with a corneoscleral graft. RESULTS A satisfactory result and rapid postoperative recovery with few, transient side effects was noted in three patients with limbal/epibulbar melanomas. In another patient with an extensive lesion, involving the epibulbar, forniceal, and palpebral conjunctiva, AMT following wide excision was complicated by symblepharon formation and restricted ocular motility. Monitoring of local recurrence was facilitated by the transparency of the thin graft in all cases. The postoperative follow up time varied between several months and 3 years. In one case, local recurrence of PAM was observed and treated using topical mitomycin. CONCLUSIONS AMT is a useful technique for the reconstruction of both small and large surface defects that result from the surgical excision of conjunctival malignant melanoma and PAM. This method facilitates wide conjunctivectomy, although its role in repairing larger defects involving the fornix or palpebral conjunctiva still needs to be established. The transparency of amniotic membrane allows for monitoring of tumour recurrence, which is—together with superior cosmesis—an advantage over thicker (for example, buccal) mucous membrane grafts.

Clinical significance of immunohistochemistry for detection of BAP1 mutations in uveal melanoma.

Uveal melanoma is a lethal cancer with a strong propensity to metastasize. Limited therapeutic options are available once the disease has disseminated. A strong predictor for metastasis is the loss of chromosome 3. Inactivating mutations in BAP1 encoding the BRCA1-associated protein 1 and located on chromosome 3p21.1, have been described in uveal melanoma and other types of cancer. In this study, we determined the prevalence of somatic BAP1 mutations and examined whether these mutations correlate with the functional expression of BAP1 in uveal melanoma tissue and with other clinical, histopathological and chromosomal parameters. We screened a cohort of 74 uveal melanomas for BAP1 mutations, using different deep sequencing methods. The frequency of BAP1 mutations in our study group was 47%. The expression of BAP1 protein was studied using immunohistochemistry. BAP1 staining was absent in 43% of the cases. BAP1 mutation status was strongly associated with BAP1 protein expression (P<0.001), loss of chromosome 3 (P<0.001), and other aggressive prognostic factors. Patients with a BAP1 mutation and absent BAP1 expression had an almost eightfold higher chance of developing metastases compared with those without these changes (P=0.002). We found a strong correlation between the immunohistochemical and sequencing data and therefore propose that, immunohistochemical screening for BAP1 should become routine in the histopathological work-up of uveal melanoma. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that loss of BAP1 may be particularly involved in the progression of uveal melanoma to an aggressive, metastatic phenotype.

Comparison of artificial eye amplitudes with acrylic and hydroxyapatite spherical enucleation implants

PURPOSE To compare artificial eye amplitudes in patients who randomly received either a hydroxyapatite or an acrylic, scleral-covered spherical implant after enucleation. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent enucleation because of an intraocular melanoma and 21 healthy control participants from the hospital staff. METHODS Eligible patients randomly received a hydroxyapatite or an acrylic, scleral-covered spherical orbital implant. Fourteen patients were fitted with a hydroxyapatite implant, and 16 were fitted with an acrylic implant. We measured horizontal and vertical saccadic amplitudes of both the artificial eye and the healthy eye. Measurements were performed with the magnetic search coils technique. Saccadic amplitudes of the artificial eye were compared with the healthy eye of the patient. The amplitudes of the healthy eyes were compared with saccadic amplitudes of control participants. The interval from surgery to measurements was at least 3 months in all patients. Saccadic gain (artificial eye and eye amplitude divided by target amplitude) and saccadic symmetry (artificial eye amplitude divided by healthy eye amplitude) were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Saccadic gain and saccadic symmetry. RESULTS The gain in the healthy eyes of the patients was comparable with the gain of the control eyes. Saccadic symmetry was 1.0 in control participants. In patients, it was 0.334 in horizontal saccades and 0.577 in vertical saccades. However, saccadic symmetry did not differ significantly between the acrylic group and the hydroxyapatite group (P: > 0.1 for any saccadic direction). Equivalence was detectable with a power more than 90% for horizontal saccades and more than 80% for vertical saccades. Curvilinearity was rejected for both patient groups and for all saccadic directions (P: > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS When no motility peg is placed, acrylic and hydroxyapatite spherical implants yield comparable saccadic amplitudes of the artificial eye. Artificial eye amplitudes were markedly more restricted horizontally than vertically. In all saccadic directions, the relation between target amplitude and artificial eye amplitude was linear.

Characterization of complex chromosomal abnormalities in uveal melanoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and comparative genomic hybridization

Several nonrandom recurrent chromosomal changes are observed in uveal melanoma. Some of these abnormalities, e.g., loss of chromosome 3, gain of the q arm of chromosome 8, and chromosome 6 abnormalities, are of prognostic value. Cytogenetic analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used to detect these changes. In some cases, however, detailed cytogenetic analysis is not possible due to the presence of complex abnormalities. To define more accurately these cytogenetic changes, we have applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and/or spectral karyotyping (SKY) to two uveal melanoma cell lines and five primary uveal melanomas, with partially defined and/or complex abnormalities. SKY provided additional information on 34/39 partially defined aberrant chromosomes and revealed a new abnormality, a der(17)t(7;17)(?;q?), that had not been recognized by conventional cytogenetics. Additionally, using SKY, abnormalities involving chromosome 6 or 8 were found to be twice as common as observed with cytogenetic analysis. CGH was especially useful in assigning the abnormalities identified by SKY to specific chromosomal regions and, in addition, resulted in the detection of a small deletion of chromosome region 3q13∼21. We conclude that SKY and CGH, as methods complementary to cytogenetic and FISH analysis, provide more complete information on the chromosomal abnormalities occurring in uveal melanoma.

Higher percentage of FISH-determined monosomy 3 and 8q amplification in uveal melanoma cells relate to poor patient prognosis

PURPOSE To investigate the relation between patient survival and incrementally increasing percentages of fluorescence in situ hybridization-determined complete loss of chromosome 3 (monosomy 3) and gain of chromosome 8q in primary uveal melanoma cells. METHODS Clinicopathological factors were related to disease-free survival. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using probes on chromosomes 1, 3, 6, and 8. The percentages of UM cells with monosomy 3 or chromosome 8q gain were classified in groups with incrementally increasing percentages and related to disease-free survival. Correlations between clinical factors and cytogenetic aberrations were also analyzed. RESULTS Two-hundred twenty choroidal and ciliary body melanomas were analyzed. The following proved to be significant predictors of survival in univariate analysis: older patient age (P = 0.003); large tumor diameter (P < 0.001); mixed cell type (P = 0.001); presence of closed microvascular loops (P < 0.001); loss of chromosome 1p (P = 0.006); monosomy 3 (P < 0.001); gain of 6p (P < 0.001); and gain of chromosome 8q (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis displayed monosomy 3 (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.83, P = 0.002) and gain of chromosome 8q (HR 3.13, P = 0.002) as the most important independent prognostic factors of poor survival, followed by older patient age (HR 1.02, P = 0.017). Increasing percentages of monosomy 3 and gain of chromosome 8q in tumor cells showed a correlation with worse prognosis (Log-rank test 49.9 and 40.4, both P < 0.001) and increased number of additional copies of 8q correlated with shorter disease-free interval (Log-rank test 45.7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A high percentage monosomy 3 and chromosome 8q gain in primary UM cells showed a strong relation with poor disease-free survival compared with low percentage aberrations.

Gene expression profiling in uveal melanoma: two regions on 3p related to prognosis.

PURPOSE Although studies on uveal melanoma (UM) revealed prognostic significance of chromosomal aberrations, they resulted in classification errors in survival prediction. A robust prognostic classifier with strong predictive value and further insight in genes responsible for poor prognosis were obtained by performing a gene-expression profile in tumors of UM patients for which extensive clinical, histopathologic, cytogenetic, and follow-up data were available. Furthermore, the UM microarray expression data were compared with cytogenetic data. METHODS Gene-expression profiles of 46 UMs were obtained with microchip assays. Data were analyzed with cluster-analysis and predictive analysis of microarrays (PAM) software and validated with real-time PCR. The prognostic significance of UMs with specific molecular signatures was determined. Furthermore, LAP analysis resulted in the identification of differentially expressed chromosomal regions. RESULTS The primary UMs were classified in two distinct molecular classes with a strong prognostic value (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 7.7). Classifier gene sets for microarray class and disease-free survival were validated with real-time PCR, and the predictive value of the UM class marker set was validated with gene-expression profiles of tumors provided by other institutions, showing a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 1.00 for class II tumors. A locally adaptive statistical procedure identified two regions on the short arm of chromosome 3 with decreased gene-expression in tumors with shorter disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Microarray classification outperforms known prognostic indicators for UM, such as clinical, histopathologic, and cytogenetic parameters. In addition, the identified regions with lower expressed genes on 3p could harbor genes that are responsible for the poor prognosis of patients with UM.

Chromosome 3 intratumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma

PURPOSE To investigate the presence of focal or diffuse heterogeneity of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma, by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). METHODS Direct interphase FISH in a series of 151 uveal melanomas revealed 82 tumors with loss of chromosome 3. Tumors with monosomy 3 were suspected to be heterogeneous if there were low percentages of monosomy 3, triploid clones, inconsistencies between FISH on centromere 3 and the long arm of chromosome 3, or discrepancies between fine-needle-aspiration biopsies (FNABs) and the main tumor. These tumors (n=16), all choroidal melanomas, were selected and analyzed for intratumor heterogeneity by using FISH on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. RESULTS Different sections of each tumor were evaluated with FISH: 6 tumors showed monosomy 3 in the same percentage throughout the tumor, and 10 showed multiple clones with different percentages of monosomy 3. However, these tumors did not show focal heterogeneity with respect to chromosome 3 status, and differences in monosomy 3 distribution between the base and apex of the tumor could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS Although a small number of uveal melanomas show heterogeneity for chromosome 3, it does not affect survival. In the presence of triploid clones, the loss of chromosome 3 is more difficult to interpret. In general, tumor biopsies in uveal melanoma provide an accurate prediction of the patients prognosis.

Genetics of uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma: two of a kind?

Cutaneous melanoma and uveal melanoma both derive from melanocytes but show remarkable differences in tumorigenesis, mode of metastatic spread, genetic alterations, and therapeutic response. In this review we discuss the differences and similarities along with the genetic research techniques available and the contribution to our current understanding of melanoma. The several chromosomal aberrations already identified prove to be very strong predictors of decreased survival in CM and UM patients. Especially in UM, where the overall risk of metastasis is high (45%), genetic research might aid clinicians in selecting high-risk patients for future systemic adjuvant therapies.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification equals fluorescence in-situ hybridization for the identification of patients at risk for metastatic disease in uveal melanoma.

In uveal melanoma, loss of chromosome 3 and gain of chromosome 8q are associated with a high risk of metastasis. In this study, we validated the use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in detecting patients at risk for metastatic disease in comparison with the predictive power of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). For 64 uveal melanoma samples, the MLPA results of chromosome 3 and 8 were compared with the results obtained by FISH. For seven samples, a single nucleotide polymorphism array was performed to clarify discrepancies. Clinical information together with the histopathology and chromosomal aberrations of chromosomes 1, 3, 6, and 8 were evaluated for correlation with the patients’ prognosis. Loss of chromosome 3, loss or gain of 8p, and gain of 8q, found with MLPA, correlated with a significantly lower disease-free survival (P<0.001). On the basis of the clinical outcome, 12 patients would have been classified incorrectly using MLPA results of chromosomes 3 and 8. FISH results led to the same incorrect classification. Four patients with abnormalities of chromosomes 3 and 8 in the tumor, detected with MLPA, are still alive without metastasis. Eight patients without concurrent aberrations of chromosomes 3 and 8 in the tumors died due to metastasis. The sensitivity of MLPA to detect patients at risk for metastatic disease is higher than with the results obtained with FISH (0.795 vs. 0.692). The specificity is equal for both techniques (0.840). MLPA is able to detect patients at risk for metastasis using the results for chromosomes 3 and 8. There is no significant difference in the predictive power of MLPA compared with FISH.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival uveal melanoma with known clinical outcome

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in the Western world. Cytogenetically, this tumor is characterized by typical chromosomal aberrations such as loss of 1p, 3, and 6q, and gain of 6p and 8q. Routinely, karyotyping and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on fresh tumor-biopsies are used to identify chromosomal changes. In addition, archival UM samples can be examined using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In the presented study, we used CGH on a series of 46 archival uveal melanomas to identify chromosomal changes. In 44 tumors aberrations were present and classic prognostic markers as loss of 1p (12 tumors, 26.1%), monosomy 3 (26 tumors, 56.5%), loss of 6q (10 tumors, 21.7%), and gain of chromosome arm 8q (27 tumors, 58.7%) were observed. Gain of chromosome arms 18q or 21q was found in three UMs. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a novel technique in UM, was performed to verify this low number of chromosome 18 and 21 abnormalities, but we could not confirm the previously reported gain of 18q11.2 and 21q11.2 as poor prognostic factors in UM.