Dirk C. Strauss

Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncological Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IFO, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany; Institut Curie, Paris, France; NORDIX, Athens, Greece; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio-CIBERONC, Seville, Spain; Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano; Ospedale Regionale di Treviso “S.Maria di Cà Foncello”, Treviso, Italy; Integrated Unit ICO Hospitalet, HUB, Barcelona, Spain; Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Skane University Hospital-Lund, Lund, Sweden; N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Scientific Hospital Care (IRCCS), Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome; Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan; Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Firenze, Florence, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Turku University Hospital (Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala), Turlu, Finland; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), Helsinki, Finland; Royal Marsden Hospital, London; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University Hospital Motol, Prague; Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Maria Skłodowska Curie Institute, Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland; Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel; Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Cita della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Fundacio de Gestio Sanitaria de L’hospital de la SANTA CREU I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; YCRC Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Finland; Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University College Hospital, London, UK; Gerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre Leon Bernard and UCBL1, Lyon, France

Technical considerations in surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: Position paper from E-Surge, a master class in sarcoma surgery, and EORTC-STBSG

BackgroundSurgery is the principal treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. These tumors typically involve or abut multiple organs and therefore require multivisceral resections. Despite the complexity of such operations, a standardized approach has not been described. As a result, referral centers often see patients who have undergone suboptimal surgery, with gross disease left behind. This is one of the causes of the dismal prognosis of this disease.MethodsThese consensus statements came out from E-Surge, an educational symposium with live sarcoma surgery, performed by European and North American expert sarcoma surgeons illustrating an optimal technique to an international audience, held in 2010 and 2011. The content was then shared among members of the local subcommittee of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)–Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG).ResultsAn attempt to describe a reproducible and standardized approach to these tumors is illustrated. A detailed description of the different procedures according to the variety of different presentations is made.ConclusionsThe approach described herein should be used as the reference standard in clinical practice and serve to perform quality check of local treatment in future trials.

Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma

Local recurrence after surgical resection is the main cause of disease‐related mortality in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). This study analysed predictors of local recurrence and disease‐specific survival.

Variability in Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS): A Report on 1007 Patients From the Multi-institutional Collaborative RPS Working Group

Background:Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors composed of several well defined histologic subtypes. The aim of this study was to analyze patterns of recurrence and treatment variations in a large population of patients, treated at reference centers. Methods:All consecutive patients with primary RPS treated at 6 European and 2 North American institutions between January 2002 and December 2011 were included. Five, 8, and 10-year overall survival (OS) and crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) were calculated. Multivariate analyses for OS, CCI of LR, and DM were performed. Results:In all, 1007 patients were included. Median follow-up was 58 months (first and third quartile range 36–90). The 5, 8, and 10-year OS were 67% [95% confidence interval (CI), 63, 70), 56% (95% CI, 52, 61), and 46% (95% CI, 40, 53). The 5, 8, and 10-year CCI of LR and DM were 25.9 (95% CI, 23.1, 29.1), 31.3 (95% CI, 27.8, 35.1), 35% (95% CI, 30.5, 40.1), and 21% (95% CI, 18.4, 23.8%), 21.6 (95% CI, 19.0, 24.6), and 21.6 (95% CI, 19.0, 24.6), respectively. Tumour size, histologic subtype, malignancy grade, multifocality, and completeness of resection were significant predictors of outcome. Patterns of recurrence varied depending on histologic subtype. Different treatment policies at participating institutions influenced LR of well differentiated liposarcoma without impacting OS, whereas discrepancies in adjuvant systemic therapies did not impact LR, DM, or OS of leiomyosarcoma. Conclusions:Reference centers are critical to outcomes of RPS patients, as the management strategy requires specific expertise. Histologic subtype predicts patterns of recurrence and should inform management decision. A prospective international registry is under preparation, to further define our understanding of this disease.

The Role of Core Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Suspected Soft Tissue Tumours

Controversy surrounds the biopsy method of choice for the histological diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients referred with the suspicion of a soft tissue sarcoma.

Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group

IntroductionRetroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors. Surgery is the mainstay of curative therapy, but local recurrence is common. No recommendations concerning the best management of recurring disease have been developed so far. Although every effort should be made to optimize the initial approach, recommendations to treat recurring RPS will be helpful to maximize disease control at recurrence.MethodsAn RPS transatlantic working group was established in 2013. The goals of the group were to share institutional experiences, build large multi-institutional case series, and develop consensus documents on the approach to this difficult disease. The outcome of this document applies to recurrent RPS that is nonvisceral in origin. Included are sarcomas of major veins, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of psoas, ureteric leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Excluded are desmoids-type fibromatosis, angiomyolipoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, sarcomas arising from the gut or its mesentery, uterine LMS, prostatic sarcoma, paratesticular/spermatic cord sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, alveolar/embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcoma arising from teratoma, carcinosarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, clear cell sarcoma, radiation-induced sarcoma, paraganglioma, and malignant pheochromocytoma.ResultsRecurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up. It is a rare and complex malignancy that is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, but some patients may experience prolonged disease control also at recurrence, when the approach is optimized and follows the recommendations contained herein.ConclusionsInternational collaboration is critical for adding to the present knowledge. A transatlantic prospective registry has been established.

Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management

INTRODUCTION The retroperitoneum can host a wide spectrum of pathologies, including a variety of rare benign tumours and malignant neoplasms that can be either primary or metastatic lesions. Retroperitoneal tumours can cause a diagnostic dilemma and present several therapeutic challenges because of their rarity, relative late presentation and anatomical location, often in close relationship with several vital structures in the retroperitoneal space. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed. Relevant international articles published in the last ten years were assessed. The keywords for search purposes included: retroperitoneum, benign, sarcoma, neoplasm, diagnosis and surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy. The search was limited to articles published in English. All articles were read in full by the authors and selected for inclusion based on relevance to this article. RESULTS Tumours usually present late and cause symptoms or become palpable once they have reached a significant size. Retroperitoneal tumours are best evaluated with good quality cross-sectional imaging and preoperative histology by core needle biopsy is required when imaging is non-diagnostic. Sarcomas comprise a third of retroperitoneal tumours. Other retroperitoneal neoplasms include lymphomas and epithelial tumours or might represent metastatic disease from known or unknown primary sites. The most common benign pathologies encountered in the retroperitoneum include benign neurogenic tumours, paragangliomas, fibromatosis, renal angiomyolipomas and benign retroperitoneal lipomas. CONCLUSIONS Complete surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment modality for retroperitoneal sarcomas and is best performed in high-volume centres by a multidisciplinary sarcoma team. The ability completely to resect a retroperitoneal sarcoma and tumour grade remain the most important predictors of local recurrence and disease-specific survival.

Genome sequencing of mucosal melanomas reveals that they are driven by distinct mechanisms from cutaneous melanoma.

Mucosal melanoma displays distinct clinical and epidemiological features compared to cutaneous melanoma. Here we used whole genome and whole exome sequencing to characterize the somatic alterations and mutation spectra in the genomes of ten mucosal melanomas. We observed somatic mutation rates that are considerably lower than occur in sun‐exposed cutaneous melanoma, but comparable to the rates seen in cancers not associated with exposure to known mutagens. In particular, the mutation signatures are not indicative of ultraviolet light‐ or tobacco smoke‐induced DNA damage. Genes previously reported as mutated in other cancers were also mutated in mucosal melanoma. Notably, there were substantially more copy number and structural variations in mucosal melanoma than have been reported in cutaneous melanoma. Thus, mucosal and cutaneous melanomas are distinct diseases with discrete genetic features. Our data suggest that different mechanisms underlie the genesis of these diseases and that structural variations play a more important role in mucosal than in cutaneous melanomagenesis. Copyright

The mutational burden of acral melanoma revealed by whole-genome sequencing and comparative analysis

Acral melanoma is a subtype of melanoma with distinct epidemiological, clinical and mutational profiles. To define the genomic alterations in acral melanoma, we conducted whole‐genome sequencing and SNP array analysis of five metastatic tumours and their matched normal genomes. We identified the somatic mutations, copy number alterations and structural variants in these tumours and combined our data with published studies to identify recurrently mutated genes likely to be the drivers of acral melanomagenesis. We compared and contrasted the genomic landscapes of acral, mucosal, uveal and common cutaneous melanoma to reveal the distinctive mutational characteristics of each subtype.

Post‐relapse outcomes after primary extended resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A report from the Trans‐Atlantic RPS Working Group

Despite a radical surgical approach to primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), many patients experience locoregional and/or distant recurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze post‐relapse outcomes for patients with RPS who had initially undergone surgical resection of their primary tumor at a specialist center.