Dirk G. Kieback

Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Aromatase inhibitors improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen when given as an initial adjuvant treatment or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen to postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We therefore compared the long-term effects of exemestane monotherapy with sequential treatment (tamoxifen followed by exemestane). METHODS The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) phase 3 trial was conducted in hospitals in nine countries. Postmenopausal women (median age 64 years, range 35-96) with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to open-label exemestane (25 mg once a day, orally) alone or following tamoxifen (20 mg once a day, orally) for 5 years. Randomisation was by use of a computer-generated random permuted block method. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. Main analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00279448, NCT00032136, and NCT00036270; NTR 267; Ethics Commission Trial27/2001; and UMIN, C000000057. FINDINGS 9779 patients were assigned to sequential treatment (n=4875) or exemestane alone (n=4904), and 4868 and 4898 were analysed by intention to treat, respectively. 4154 (85%) patients in the sequential group and 4186 (86%) in the exemestane alone group were disease free at 5 years (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·88-1·08; p=0·60). In the safety analysis, sequential treatment was associated with a higher incidence of gynaecological symptoms (942 [20%] of 4814 vs 523 [11%] of 4852), venous thrombosis (99 [2%] vs 47 [1%]), and endometrial abnormalities (191 [4%] vs 19 [<1%]) than was exemestane alone. Musculoskeletal adverse events (2448 [50%] vs 2133 [44%]), hypertension (303 [6%] vs 219 [5%]), and hyperlipidaemia (230 [5%] vs 136 [3%]) were reported more frequently with exemestane alone. INTERPRETATION Treatment regimens of exemestane alone or after tamoxifen might be judged to be appropriate options for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. FUNDING Pfizer.

Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor As Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Endocrine Therapy: A Prospectively Powered Pathology Study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Trial

PURPOSE The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial included a prospectively planned pathology substudy testing the predictive value of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression for outcome of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) early breast cancer treated with exemestane versus tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pathology blocks from 4,781 TEAM patients randomly assigned to exemestane versus tamoxifen followed by exemestane for 5 years of total therapy were collected centrally, and tissue microarrays were constructed from samples from 4,598 patients. Quantitative analysis of hormone receptors (ER and PgR) was performed by using image analysis and immunohistochemistry, and the results were linked to outcome data from the main TEAM trial and analyzed relative to disease-free survival and treatment. RESULTS Of 4,325 eligible ER-positive patients, 23% were PgR-poor (Allred < 4) and 77% were PgR- rich (Allred ≥ 5). No treatment-by-marker effect for PgR was observed for exemestane versus tamoxifen (PgR-rich hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.05; PgR-poor HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.19; P = .88 for interaction). Both PgR and ER expression were associated with patient prognosis in univariate (PgR HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65; P < .001; ER HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.86; P = .002), and multivariate analyses (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). A trend toward a treatment-by-marker effect for ER-rich patients was observed. CONCLUSION Preferential exemestane versus tamoxifen treatment benefit was not predicted by PgR expression; conversely, patients with ER-rich tumors may derive additional benefit from exemestane. Quantitative analysis of ER and PgR expression provides highly significant information on risk of early relapse (within 1 to 3 years) during treatment.

Thymidine kinase gene therapy with concomitant topotecan chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

Introduction: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus containing the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) followed by administration of an anti-herpetic prodrug and topotecan.Materials and Methods: A total of 10 patients with stage IIIc epithelial ovarian cancer underwent secondary debulking to ≤0.5 cm residual tumor. Patients with normal i.p. flow received i.p. delivery of adenovirus. Two patients each were treated on dose level 1 (2 × 1010 vector particles (VP)), dose level 2 (2 × 1011 VP), and dose level 3 (2 × 1012 VP); four patients were treated on dose level 4 (2 × 1013 VP). Acyclovir and topotecan were started 24 hours after vector delivery.Results: No patient treated at any dose level incurred unanticipated toxic effects, and all side effects resolved. The most common adverse event was myelosuppression: grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia with grade 2–4 anemia in three patients and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in eight patients. Three patients developed thrombocytosis and three patients had a mild elevation of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase. Temperature elevations that were not associated with detectable infection occurred in two patients.Discussion: I.p. delivery of adenoviral vector with concomitant topotecan chemotherapy was well tolerated without significant lasting toxicities. Side effects were independent of the dose of adenoviral vector.

A germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism in the progesterone receptor gene in ovarian carcinoma

Clinical outcome in ovarian carcinoma is predicted by progesterone receptor status, indicating an endocrine aspect to this disease. Peripheral leucocyte genomic DNAs were obtained from 41 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma and 83 controls from Ireland, as well as from 26 primary ovarian carcinoma patients and 101 controls in Germany. Southern analysis using a human progesterone receptor (hPR) cDNA probe identified a germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) defined by two alleles: T1, represented by a 2.7 kb fragment; and T2, represented by a 1.9 kb fragment and characterised by an additional TaqI restriction site with respect to T1. An over-representation of T2 in ovarian cancer patients compared with controls in the pooled Irish/German population (P < 0.025) was observed. A difference (P < 0.02) in the distribution of the RFLP genotypes between Irish and German control populations was also observed. The allele distributions could not be shown to differ significantly from Hardy-Weinberg distribution in any subgroup. Using hPR cDNA region-specific probes, the extra TaqI restriction site was mapped to intron G of the hPR gene.

Coxsackievirus–adenovirus receptor expression in ovarian cancer cell lines is associated with increased adenovirus transduction efficiency and transgene expression

The expression of coxsackievirus–adenovirus receptor (CAR) and the integrinsαvβ3 and αvβ5 was analyzed quantitatively (flow cytometry) and qualitatively (immunocytochemistry) in five human ovarian cancer cell lines (PEO1, PEO4, PEO14, SKOV-3, and OVCAR-3) and three control cell lines (293, HeLa, and CHO-K1). The transduction efficiencies were evaluated by adv/rsv-β-Gal transduction followed by X-gal staining. The effects of 17β-estradiol on cell growth, CAR and integrins αvβ3/5 expression, adenovirus transduction efficiency, and cell-killing efficacy of adv/rsv-tk plus ganciclovir were determined. The levels of CAR, integrin αvβ3, and integrin αvβ5 showed great variation between the cell lines. Whereas the expression of CAR appeared to be essential for and positively correlated with adenovirus transduction efficiency, the integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 were not absolutely necessary for adenovirus transduction even though their presence may facilitate transduction. In PEO4 and PEO1 cells, proliferation was stimulated by 17β-estradiol in a dose-dependent manner. In PEO4 cells, and much less pronounced in PEO1 cells, this was accompanied by an increase in CAR expression. The stimulation of CAR expression was paralleled by an increased transduction efficiency resulting in an increased cell-killing efficacy. Our data suggest that the expression of CAR is one of the most important prerequisites for successful adenovirus-mediated gene therapy of ovarian cancer. Cancer Gene Therapy (2001) 8, 168–175

Mutational Analysis of PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway in Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Pathology Study

PURPOSE Deregulation of key PI3K/AKT pathway genes may contribute to endocrine resistance in breast cancer (BC). PIK3CA is the most frequently mutated gene in luminal BC (35%); however, the effect of mutations in helical versus kinase domains remains controversial. We hypothesize that improved outcomes occur in patients with estrogen receptor–positive (ER positive) BC receiving endocrine therapy and possessing PIK3CA mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS DNA was extracted from 4,540 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded BC samples from the Exemestane Versus Tamoxifen-Exemestane pathology study. Mutational analyses were performed for 25 mutations (PIK3CAx10, AKT1x1, KRASx5, HRASx3, NRASx2 and BRAFx4). RESULTS PIK3CA mutations were frequent (39.8%), whereas RAS/RAF mutations were rare (1%). In univariable analyses PIK3CA mutations were associated with significantly improved 5-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.91; P = .003). However, a multivariable analysis correcting for known clinical and biologic prognostic factors failed to demonstrate that PIK3CA mutation status is an independent prognostic marker for DRFS (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .4012). PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in low-risk luminal BCs (e.g., grade 1 nodev 3, node-negative v -positive), confounding the relationship between mutations and outcome. CONCLUSION PIK3CA mutations are present in approximately 40% of luminal BCs but are not an independent predictor of outcome in the context of endocrine therapy, whereas RAS/RAF mutations are rare inluminal BC. A complex relationship between low-risk cancers and PIK3CA mutations was identified. Although the PI3K/AKT pathway remains a viable therapeutic target as the result of ahigh mutation frequency, PIK3CA mutations do not seem to affect residual risk following treatment with endocrine therapy.

Effects of exemestane and tamoxifen on bone health within the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre (TEAM) trial: results of a German, 12-month, prospective, randomised substudy

BACKGROUND Adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitors may be associated with increased bone loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred patients were randomised to receive exemestane or tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 6 and 12 months treatment. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-one patients were assessable. Tamoxifen treatment resulted in a 0.5% increase from baseline in BMD at the spine, which was maintained at 12 months. Exemestane-treated patients experienced a 2.6% decrease from baseline in BMD at the spine at 6 months and a further 0.2% decrease at 12 months. There were significant differences in the changes in BMD between tamoxifen and exemestane at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0026 and P = 0.0008, respectively). The mean changes in BMD from baseline at the total hip were also significantly different between exemestane and tamoxifen at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference between tamoxifen and exemestane in mean changes in BMD from baseline at the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS Exemestane treatment resulted in an increase in bone loss at 6 months; bone loss stabilised after 6- to 12-month treatment.

Mammostrat As an Immunohistochemical Multigene Assay for Prediction of Early Relapse Risk in the Tamoxifen Versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Trial Pathology Study

PURPOSE Some postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer remain at high risk of relapse despite endocrine therapy and, in addition, might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The challenge is to prospectively identify such patients. The Mammostrat test uses five immunohistochemical markers to stratify patients regarding recurrence risk and may inform treatment decisions. We tested the efficacy of this panel in the Tamoxifen versus Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter (TEAM) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pathology blocks from 4,598 TEAM patients were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed. The cohort was 47% node-positive, and 36% of patients in the cohort were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Triplicate 0.6-mm(2) TMA cores were stained, and positivity for p53, HTF9C, CEACAM5, NDRG1, and SLC7A5 was assessed. Cases were assigned a Mammostrat risk score, and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. RESULTS In multivariate regression analyses, which were corrected for conventional clinicopathologic markers, Mammostrat provided significant additional information on DRFS after endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER) -positive node-negative patients (n = 1,226) who did not receive chemotherapy (P = .004). Additional analyses in all patients not exposed to chemotherapy, irrespective of nodal status (n = 2,559) and in the entire cohort (n = 3,837) showed Mammostrat scores provided additional information on DRFS in these groups (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively; multivariate analyses). No differences were seen between the two endocrine treatment regimens. CONCLUSION The Mammostrat score predicts DRFS for patients treated with exemestane and patients treated with tamoxifen followed by exemestane irrespective of nodal status and chemotherapy. The ability of this test to provide additional outcome data after treatment provides additional evidence of its use in risk stratification of ER-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Tissue and plasma expression of the angiogenic peptide adrenomedullin in breast cancer

Adrenomedullin (ADM) is an angiogenic factor that has also been shown to be a mitogen and a hypoxia survival factor for tumour cells. These properties point to ADM as a potential promoter of human malignancies, but little data are available concerning the expression of ADM in human breast cancer. In the present work, we have examined ADM peptide expression in a series of malignant breast tumours by immunohistochemistry using a newly developed anti-ADM monoclonal antibody. In addition, ADM plasma concentrations in breast cancer patients and healthy controls were determined by radioimmunoassay. Of the examined breast cancer samples, 27/33 (82%) showed a moderate to strong staining intensity. ADM-peptide expression in breast tumours was significantly correlated with axillary lymph node metastasis (P=0.030). Analysis of ADM plasma concentrations showed no significant difference between the circulating ADM levels of breast cancer patients and healthy controls. However, a significant positive correlation was found between tumour size and plasma ADM levels (r=0.641, P=0.017). Moreover, ADM levels in breast cancer patients correlated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (P=0.002). In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that ADM peptide is widely expressed in breast cancer and that the degree of expression is associated with lymph node metastasis. ADM peptide in plasma of breast cancer patients reflects the size of the primary tumour, but is unlikely to be a useful tumour marker for the detection of breast cancer. Plasma ADM might represent an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis. The clinical implications of these findings remain to be evaluated.

Multiplex PCR screening detects small p53 deletions and insertions in human ovarian cancer cell lines

Mutations at the p53 tumor suppressor gene locus are a frequent genetic alteration associated with human ovarian carcinoma. Little information exists regarding whether mutational events occur other than point mutations and large deletions, causing loss of heterozygosity. Small intragenic deletions and insertions in the p53 gene have been observed in various human neoplasias. We developed a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) screening assay to amplify the complete p53 coding region from genomic DNA in a single step. Deletions and/or insertions were found in six out of 11 newly established ovarian carcinoma cell lines. MPCR detected deletions as small as 2bp, as confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis. Most of the observed alterations (6/7) were homozygous or hemizygous. Structural aberrations of the p53 gene possibly leading to loss of p53 cell cycle control may be a consequence of a slipped-mispairing mechanism in rapid DNA replication during repetitious ovulation and wound repair of ovarian epithelial cells. MPCR may be a valuable tool for screening for possible p53 deletion and insertion mutations not only in ovarian cancer but also in other malignancies.