Dirk von Hollen

Mesh nebulizers have become the first choice for new nebulized pharmaceutical drug developments

In the 24 years since first being marketed, the mesh nebulizer has been developed by five main manufacturers into a viable solution for the delivery of high-value nebulized drugs. Mesh nebulizers provide increased portability, convenience and energy efficiency along with similar lung deposition and increased ease of use compared with jet nebulizers. An analysis of EU and US clinical trial databases has shown that mesh nebulizers are now preferred over jet nebulizers for clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. The results show a strong preference for the use of mesh nebulizers in trials involving high cost and niche therapy areas. Built-in capability to optimize the way patients use their mesh nebulizer and manage their disease will further increase uptake. [Formula: see text].

Delay Between Actuation and Shaking of a Hydrofluoroalkane Fluticasone Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are used to treat pediatric asthma. The shaking of a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) is required to ensure consistency of emitted dose. Delays between shaking and actuating the pMDI are frequent during administration of aerosols to children where a valved holding chamber is used. METHODS: In a recent clinical trial, we used a monitoring device to record shaking and actuation of the pMDI and the inhalation profiles of children with asthma while they were inhaling fluticasone hydrofluoroalkane from a valved holding chamber onto an external filter. During the procedure, in vitro and transport samples were generated without a delay between shaking and actuating the pMDI. Emitted dose, expressed as percentage of ex-actuator nominal dose, obtained from the second actuation following a recorded shake-actuation interval for subjects and from in vitro/transport samples (no delay) were compared. RESULTS: The mean emitted dose was 158.6% (95% CI 150.1–167.2%) (subjects) and 106.8% (95% CI 104.7–108.9%) (in vitro + transport) of the ex-actuator nominal dose (P < .001). The mean delay between shaking and actuating the pMDI was 12.9 s (95% CI 11.9–13.9 s) for the subject samples. A strong correlation was observed between shake and actuation delay and the emitted dose of the second actuation following the delay (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.61). A 10-, 20-, and 30-s delay resulted in an emitted dose of the second actuation following the delay of 147, 187, and 227% of the ex-actuator nominal dose, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delays between shaking and actuating a corticosteroid suspension pMDI resulted in an increase in the emitted dose of the second actuation following the delay. This can be a common occurrence when doses are administered by a caregiver to a patient via a holding chamber. This should be addressed by practitioners educating patients and parents on proper inhaler use. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01714063.)