Domenico C. Corsi

Predictive value of thymidylate synthase expression in resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Recent investigations have focused on the prognostic value of thymidylate synthase (TS) assessment in metastases of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In order to evaluate the prognostic impact of TS expression after resection of metastases of colorectal cancer followed by systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, we performed an immunohistochemical characterisation of TS in the primary tumours and in the corresponding radically resected hepatic and pulmonary metastases. An additional objective was to compare the levels of TS in primary and metastatic disease. TS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody TS 106. The study population consisted of 60 patients: 48 underwent liver and 12 lung resection. All of them received adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy according to the Mayo Clinic schedule. In the 49 evaluable primary tumours, TS score was high in 53% and low in 47% of patients, while in the 60 metastatic samples TS immunostaining was high in 33% and low in 67%. There was a significantly smaller number of high TS expressors in metastatic than in primary tumours (P<0.04). No correlation was observed between TS expression and the site of the metastasis. TS status did not significantly correlate with the median disease-free interval (DFI) after metastasectomy, although this parameter was longer for patients with low TS immunoreactivity in the resected metastases than for those with high TS lesions (19.6 versus 13.8 months). Patients with high TS levels, however, had a significantly shorter median overall survival (OS) (27.6 months) than those with low TS expression (36.3 months) (P<0.008). TS status in the resected metastases confirmed its independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis and was the only prognostic marker of OS in the subgroup of patients with resected liver metastases. These results suggest that high TS levels in resected metastases of colorectal cancer are associated with a poor outcome after surgery and 5-FU adjuvant therapy; therefore, a prospective assessment of TS levels in resected colorectal metastases could be useful to define which patients will most likely benefit from 5-FU adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy. Chemotherapeutic agents that target TS may not be the appropriate adjuvant treatment after metastasectomy for patients with a high TS expression in the resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma with a 5-fluorouracil-based or a cisplatin-based regimen: two parallel randomized phase II studies.

Although many drug combination therapies have been proposed, there is no standard therapy for patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. The superiority of combination therapy over monochemotherapy has not been demonstrated convincingly. To explore the role of monochemotherapy, the authors evaluated 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU), modulated by 6S‐leucovorin (6S‐LV) and a cisplatin‐containing regimen, which was comprised of epirubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin with the addition of the reversal agent lonidamine (EEP‐L).

Triple positive early breast cancer: An observational multicenter retrospective analysis of outcome

We recently found that trastuzumab benefit may be lower in a small subset of early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with tumors expressing high levels of both hormonal receptors (HRs), i.e. triple positive (TP). To better investigate the role of HRs in HER2 positive BC, we retrospectively identified 872 TP BC pts treated with adjuvant chemotherapy alone (cohort A-366 pts), or plus trastuzumab (cohort B-506 pts). Relapse-free-survival (RFS) and breast-cancer-specific-survival (BCSS) were evaluated. Trastuzumab improved RFS and BCSS in all the subsets analyzed, but the effect on BCSS in tumors expressing both HRs in >30% of cells (TP30), and even on RFS in tumors with both HRs expressed in >50% of cells (TP50) was not significant. Distinct patterns of relapse were observed in TP50 and no-TP50 tumors, the former showing low and constant risk in the first 5 years, a late increase beyond 5 years and modest trastuzumab effect. Trastuzumab effect tended to disappear in pts whose tumors expressed ER in >50% of cells. Multivariate analysis of RFS confirmed a significant interaction between trastuzumab and ER expression, with benefit confined to pts whose tumors expressed ER in ≤50% of cells. Our data suggest that the pattern of relapse of TP tumors with high HRs is similar to that of “luminal”, HER2 negative tumors, without clear benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab, which remains the standard treatment even in TP tumors. Confirmatory findings on the extent to which quantitative expression of HRs may impact clinical behavior of HER2 positive BC are warranted.

Weekly Gemcitabine and 24-Hour Infusional 5-Fluorouracil in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase I–II Study

Objective: In this phase I–II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. Methods: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2, GEM 1,200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2, or GEM 1,200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. Results: Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1–2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 ± 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 ± 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 ± 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2–28), median survival was 11 months (range 3–32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. Conclusion: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.

Activity and Safety of Cetuximab Plus Modified FOLFOXIRI Followed by Maintenance With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance The combination of a triple-drug chemotherapy regimen with an anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agent as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity along with safety concerns in single-arm phase 2 trials. The role of maintenance following chemotherapy and anti-EGFR and the optimal regimen to be adopted are not established. Objectives To evaluate the activity and safety of cetuximab plus modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI) and explore the role of maintenance with cetuximab or bevacizumab in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Design, Setting, and Participants In a prospective, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial, patients aged 18 to 75 years with unresectable, previously untreated RAS and BRAF wild-type (before amendment, KRAS wild-type) mCRC were recruited from 21 oncology units in Italy from October 19, 2011, to March 1, 2015 (followed up through May 31, 2017). In total, 323 patients were screened and 143 were randomized to 2 treatment arms to receive as a first-line induction a regimen of mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab followed by cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) until disease progression. Primary analyses were conducted in a modified intention-to-treat population. Interventions mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab repeated every 2 weeks for up to 8 cycles, followed by maintenance with cetuximab or bevacizumab until disease progression. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the 10-month progression-free rate (PFR); secondary end points included progression-free and overall survival, response rate, rate of metastases resection, and adverse events. Results Of 143 patients randomized, 116 (81.1%) (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 59.5 [53-67] years; 34 [29.3%] women) had RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 44.0 (30.5-52.1) months, 10-month PFRs were 50.8% (90% CI, 39.5%-62.2%) in arm A and 40.4% (90% CI, 29.4%-52.1%) in arm B. The overall response rate was 71.6% (95% CI, 62.4%-79.5%). Main grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 36 patients [31%]), diarrhea (in 21 patients [18%]), skin toxic effects (in 18 patients [16%]), asthenia (in 11 patients [9%]), stomatitis (in 7 patients [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (in 3 patients [3%]). Conclusions and Relevance Although neither of the 2 arms met the primary end point, the findings indicate that a 4-month induction regimen of mFOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab is feasible and provides relevant activity results, leading to a high surgical resection rate. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02295930

Vinorelbine and Alternating Cisplatin and Ifosfamide in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In order to explore the activity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNL) and alternating cisplatin (CDDP) and ifosfamide (IFX) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a phase II study was performed. Seventy chemoradiotherapy naive patients with NSCLC, stage IIIA, IIIB and IV disease, PS (ECOG) ≤2, were treated with CDDP 40 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3, IFX 1,800 mg/m2 on days 22, 23, 24 and VNL 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, 29 every 6 weeks up to 6 courses. In the 67 evaluable patients, an objective response rate was observed in 47.8 ± 12% (95% CI) with complete responses in 6%; responses occurred more frequently in patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIA/IIIB) and/or performance status 0. The median duration of survival was 12 months: 19.9 months in stage III patients who received an integrated treatment and 10 months in metastatic disease. The median time to treatment failure was 10.5 months. Toxicity was mainly hematological, even though it was not dose-limiting and easily manageable. This combination seems to be active, and the good safety profile is probably the result of the use of an alternating schedule of CDDP and IFX. Median overall survival was also encouraging in stage IV disease. The prolongation of survival obtained when surgery and/or radiotherapy is applicable needs confirmation through a larger study.

Predictive Role of ERCC1 Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Surgery and Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation.

Objective: ERCC1 (excision repair cross-complementation group 1) expression predicts survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with chemoradiation. In order to evaluate the predictive role in the adjuvant setting, we investigated ERCC1 expression in radically resected HNSCC patients who underwent surgery and cisplatin chemoradiation. Methods: ERCC1 expression levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in primary tumor tissues from 48 patients with stage III-IV cancers. The median follow-up was 38.5 months (range: 5-121). Results: High ERCC1 expression was observed in 36 (75%) patients. Univariate analysis showed that patients with high levels of ERCC1 had significantly worse disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) than patients with low levels (HR = 7.15; 95% CI, 1.68-30.35; p = 0.008 and HR = 9.90; 95% CI, 1.33-73.96; p = 0.025, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, high ERCC1 expression (HR = 7.36; 95% CI, 1.72-31.4; p = 0.007) together with high-risk category (HR = 2.69; 95% CI, 1.01-7.18; p = 0.048) were the best predictors for relapse. High ERCC1 expression was the only unfavorable independent determinant for OS (HR = 9.53; 95% CI, 1.27-71.35; p = 0.028). Conclusions: This investigation suggests that ERCC1 expression might be useful to predict prognosis in radically resected HNSCC patients treated with surgery and chemoradiation.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients ≥75 Years Old in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Analysis.

Background Colorectal cancer patients have a median age of incidence >65years although they are largely under-represented in phase-III trials. This large population contains patients unfit for treatment, those suitable for monotherapy or for doublets and the impact of chemotherapy outside clinical trial is unclear. The aim of the study was to retrospectively analyse Overall Survival(OS) of elderly metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients treated with chemotherapy in daily practice. Methods Kaplan-Meir method was used for OS, the log-rank or Tarone-Ware test for differences between subgroups, Cox’s proportional hazard model to assess the impact of known prognostic factors and treatment. Results 751 patients with mCRC observed between January 2000 and January 2013 were collected. Median age was 79 year(75–93); Male/Female 61/39%, ECOG-PS 0-1/2 85/15%; colon/rectum 74/26%; multiple metastatic sites 34%, only liver metastasis in 41% of patients. KRAS status was studied in 35% of patients: 44% of them showed gene mutation. 20.5% of patients did not received any kind of treatment including surgery. Comorbidities observed: cardiovascular 34%, diabetes 14%, hypertension 50%. Primary tumor was resected in 80.6%; surgery of liver metastasis was done in 19% of patients (2.3% of patients >80years). 78% of patients underwent chemotherapy. Median follow up was 12 months(range 1–124). Median OS was 17 months (CI 95%15–19);median OS in no-treated patients was 5 months (4–6); mOS of patients with at least one treatment was 20 months (18–22). In KRAS mutated group median OS was 19months (15–23) while in KRAS wild type patients median OS was 25 months (20–30). At multivariate analysis sex(Female), age(<80y), performance status(0–1), chemotherapy, Surgery of metastasis, Surgery of primary tumor and Site of metastasis(liver) were prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion The results of our study show that in clinical practice treatment has a positive impact on OS of elderly patients, confirmed at multivariate analysis, included patients with age >80 years old or with a poor performance status (respectively p<0.0001 and p<0.0001). KRAS analysis deserve further evaluation.

Effect of cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil plus (S)-leucovorin

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently being investigated in advanced colorectal cancer. In an attempt to improve the results obtainable for the association of 5-FU and leucovorin, we decided to add cisplatin to 5-FU and (6S)-leucovorin (S-LV) after disease progression. The hypothesis was that a pharmacological enhancement of the efficacy of 5-FU would result in responses in 5-FU-unresponsive patients or in a second response in previously responding patients. A group of 28 5-FU+S-LV-pretreated patients, with advanced measurable colorectal cancer, were treated with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 80 mg/m2 S-LV every 4 weeks. We obtained 3 partial responses (response rate: 11±11%), while 11 patients had stable disease (39±18%). Among the 3 responders, 1 patient had earlier achieved a partial response, a second stable disease and 1 had disease progression after the previous 5-FU+S-LV treatment. The median survival time for all 28 patients was 11 months. Toxicity was minimal and consisted of mild and reversible gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. We believe that further studies must be carried out to establish the real impact of the synergism between cisplatin, 5-FU and S-LV in untreated patients.

Bevacizumab as first-line treatment in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: pros and cons.

Purpose Bevacizumab, a humanized, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in a number of cancers. However, its use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains controversial. Methods A literature review using the PubMed database was performed to update the currently available clinical trials evidence on bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of breast cancer. In addition, the proceedings of selected oncology annual meetings were searched for relevant presentations. Results This article reviews the available evidence for bevacizumab as first-line therapy for MBC and discusses its current and future applicability in the management of MBC. Three phase III trials (ECOG-2100, AVADO, RIBBON-1) demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy is well-tolerated and improves progression-free survival and objective response rates in the first-line setting. These findings were supported by a large clinical practice-based study (ATHENA) and a recent clinical trial in which bevacizumab added to paclitaxel showed notable activity in triple-negative MBC. However, bevacizumab has thus far not demonstrated a significant benefit in overall survival. Conclusions The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy is well-tolerated and produces substantial improvements in overall response rate and progression-free survival, compared with chemotherapy alone, in advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. Nevertheless, it has thus far not demonstrated a significant benefit in overall survival. Whether prolongation of progression-free survival is enough to consider bevacizumab efficacious is unclear. Based on the available clinical trials results, bevacizumab is a part of the complex therapeutic strategy of advanced HER2-negative breast cancer.