Domenico Milite

Carotid artery endarterectomy in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: Perioperative hazards and late results

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the perioperative hazards and late results of internal carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with and without contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. From March 1980 to April 1990, 375 consecutive patients underwent 439 CEAs at the First Department of Vascular Surgery of Padova Medical School. Patients were divided into two groups; group 1 (61 patients) had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and group 2 (314 patients) did not (378 CEAs, 64 bilateral). Indications for CEA were similar in both groups. The only significant difference in patient characteristics was a higher rate of previous stroke in group 1 (11% vs. 3%,p< 0.001). General anesthesia, continuous EEG monitoring, selective intraluminal shunt, and arteriotomy closure with a polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE) were used routinely in both groups. An intraluminal shunt was inserted more frequently in group 1 than in group 2 (69% vs. 17%,p<0.001). Major perioperativestroke occurred in one patient in each group (1.7% vs. 0.31%, respectively; NS). Early fatal stroke rates were 0% and 0.95% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (NS). All patients had neurologic examinations and duplex scans every 6 months (range 6 to 118 months; mean 42 months). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were virtually identical in the two groups; the majority of deaths were caused by myocardial infarction and cancer. There were no stroke-related deaths in group 1 as compared with 8.2% in group 2 (NS). New neurologic symptoms appeared in 4.7% of patients in group 1 and 6% in group 2 (NS) whereas the late stroke rates were 0% and 3.1%, respectively (NS). Restenosis was observed in two and three patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (NS). In conclusion, CEA for ulcerated or stenotic lesions of the internal carotid artery in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion is associated with very low early and long-term neurologic morbidity and mortality, similar to findings in patients who undergo CEA with a patent contralateral carotid artery.

Surgical treatment for pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery

OBJECTIVES Carotid artery pseudo-occlusion is a rare condition and its natural history and clinicopathological characteristics are not well defined. We reported our 7-year experience in the surgical treatment of carotid artery pseudo-occlusion to determine the real benefit of the surgical option. METHODS From January 2006 to December 2013, 1414 patients were treated for high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery, 33 (2.3%) presented with a carotid pseudo-occlusion (26 males and 7 females, mean age: 70 ± 10). Nineteen patients were symptomatic, and 14 asymptomatic. Carotid artery pseudo-occlusion was identified by duplex scan (segmental occlusion at the origin of internal carotid artery with very thin distal flow) and the diagnostic confirmation was obtained by angio-computed-tomography (CT) scan. The operation was performed under general anaesthesia and constant Electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. The follow-up was performed by duplex scan at discharge, 30 days, 6 months and yearly. RESULTS Politetrafluoroetilene (PTFE) patch endarterectomy, eversion endarterectomy and carotid bypass were performed in 20 (61%), 10 (30%) and 3 patients (9%), respectively. No mortality or stroke was observed in postoperative period. Four patients presented with an asymptomatic postoperative thrombosis of the internal carotid artery. No restenosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS Surgical treatment for carotid artery pseudo-occlusion is safe and effective.

Surgery for Acute Lower Limb Ischemia in the Elderly Population: Results of a Comparative Study

BACKGROUND To evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment of acute lower limb ischemia in elderly patients. The primary endpoints were early and midterm rates of survival and limb salvage. METHODS A retrospective analysis involving 76 consecutive patients observed for acute lower limb ischemia between March 2005 and December 2008 who underwent revascularization was conducted. A total of 44 patients (group A) of age >80 years (average age: 86.9 ± 4.5 years; 13 men and 31 women) had a site of obstruction at the level of abdominal aorta in one case (2.3%), common-external iliac artery/common femoral artery in 15 (34.1%), superficial femoral artery/popliteal artery in 26 (59.1%), and infrapopliteal arteries in two (4.5%), and embolectomy, thrombectomy, bypass, and angioplasty was performed in 24 (54.5%), 11 (25.0%), eight (18.2%), and one (2.3%) case(s), respectively. A total of 32 patients (group B) of age <80 years (average age: 67.2 ± 12.2 years; 19 men and 13 women) with an analogous site of obstruction at the level of abdominal aorta in one case (3.1%), common/external iliac artery/common femoral artery in 12 (37.5%), superficial femoral artery/popliteal artery in three (9.4%), and infrapopliteal arteries in 16 (50.0%) underwent the same aforementioned procedures in 10 (31.3%), 12 (37.5%), nine (28.1%), and one (3.1%) case(s), respectively. RESULTS At 30 days after surgery, survival and limb salvage were both 93.2% in group A versus 96.9% and 87.5%, respectively, in group B, whereas they were 93.2% and 65.8%, respectively, in group A versus 85.7% and 96.9%, respectively, in group B (p = 0.22 and p = 0.19, respectively) at the midterm control. The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that category 2b of acute ischemia (immediately-threatening) has a negative statistically significant influence on the survival rate (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Limb salvage rates after surgical intervention for acute lower limb ischemia in the elderly population are comparable with those of the younger population, whereas survival rates are lower, but without statistical significance. The only factor that negatively influences the survival rate is the 2b clinical category of acute ischemia, regardless of the age of the patient.

Aortic Epithelioid Angiosarcoma after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

We report a case of epithelioid angiosarcoma of the abdominal aortic wall after endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). A 60-year-old male, treated 7 years before with EVAR, presented with abdominal back pain, general fatigue, and fever. It was assumed to be a graft infection with periaortic tissue compatible with an inflammatory reaction. The endograft was therefore completely removed and a Dacron silver aorto-bisiliac graft was implanted. After a few days the patient worsened, the angio-computed tomography scan showed a progressive increase of the periaortic mass and numerous small nodules in the abdomen were also detected. The patient was again brought to surgery, an axillo-bifemoral bypass was performed, and the aorto-bisiliac graft was removed but the patient died after surgery. The histological examination showed an aortic epithelioid angiosarcoma with peritoneal metastasis.

PREVENTION OF AORTIC STUMP DEHISCENCE AFTER COMPLETE AORTIC PROSTHESIS REMOVAL

Dehiscence of the aortic stump is one of the most common causes of death following aortic prosthetic removal. The reason is easy to understand: the aortoprosthesis anastomosis performed during the original infrarenal aneurysm repair is usually performed only a few centimetres below the renal artery origins. An end-to-side prosthetic graft for obliterative disease requires an arteriotomy which must not include the inferior mesenteric artery origin and therefore usually starts just below the infrarenal clamp. Cases with an end-to-end anastomosis may permit a longer infrarenal aortic tract. As a consequence, when the original operation has been done properly, a disruption of the aortic wall suture line, destroying at least 0.5 cm of the remaining infrarenal aortic wall, often does not result in sufficient tissue below the renal arteries to allow a technically sound suture of the aortic stump. In most cases it is this mechanical defect more than subsequent infection of the suture line which causes the dehiscence of the aortic stump. Manoeuvres like the use of a flap of the anterior spinous ligament, proposed by Fry and Lindenauer, 1 or mobilisation of a segment of omentum 2 can protect the area from infection but do not ensure the mechanical integrity of the stump. In other words, only those cases in which the original revascularisation procedure has left a long segment of aortic wall will permit a mechanically sound stump closure capable of resisting disruption. A stump closure technique which may avoid dehiscence when there is insufficient infrarenal aorta tissue is here described.