Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dominik Selleslag is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dominik Selleslag.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2004

Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Conventional Antifungal Therapy

J Maertens; Issam Raad; George Petrikkos; Marc Boogaerts; Dominik Selleslag; Finn Bo Petersen; Carole A. Sable; Nicholas A. Kartsonis; Angela Ngai; Arlene Taylor; Thomas F. Patterson; David W. Denning; Thomas J. Walsh

BACKGROUND Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Echinocandins are novel antifungal molecules with in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus species. METHODS We investigated the efficacy and safety of caspofungin in the treatment of IA. Ninety patients with IA who were refractory to or intolerant of amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, or triazoles were enrolled to receive caspofungin. RESULTS Efficacy was assessed for 83 patients who had infection consistent with definitions of IA and who received >or=1 dose of study drug. Common underlying conditions included hematologic malignancy (48% of patients), allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (25% of patients), and solid-organ transplantation (11% of patients). Seventy-one patients (86%) were refractory to and 12 patients (14%) were intolerant of previous therapy. A favorable response to caspofungin therapy was observed in 37 (45%) of 83 patients, including 32 (50%) of 64 with pulmonary aspergillosis and 3 (23%) of 13 with disseminated aspergillosis. Two patients discontinued caspofungin therapy because of drug-related adverse events. Drug-related nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity occurred infrequently. CONCLUSION Caspofungin demonstrated usefulness in the salvage treatment of IA.


Blood | 2011

A randomized phase 3 study of lenalidomide versus placebo in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with Low-/Intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del5q

Pierre Fenaux; A. Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Ghulam J. Mufti; Moshe Mittelman; P. Muus; P. A. W. te Boekhorst; Guillermo Sanz; C. Del Canizo; Agnès Guerci-Bresler; Lars J Nilsson; Uwe Platzbecker; Michael Lübbert; Bruno Quesnel; Mario Cazzola; Arnold Ganser; David G. Bowen; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Carlo Aul; Robert Knight; J. Francis; Tommy Fu; Eva Hellström-Lindberg

This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in 205 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients with International Prognostic Scoring System Low-/Intermediate-1-risk del5q31 myelodysplastic syndromes. Patients received lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21 (n = 69) or 5 mg/day on days 1-28 (n = 69) of 28-day cycles; or placebo (n = 67). Crossover to lenalidomide or higher dose was allowed after 16 weeks. More patients in the lenalidomide 10- and 5-mg groups achieved RBC-transfusion independence (TI) for ≥ 26 weeks (primary endpoint) versus placebo (56.1% and 42.6% vs 5.9%; both P < .001). Median duration of RBC-TI was not reached (median follow-up, 1.55 years), with 60% to 67% of responses ongoing in patients without progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytogenetic response rates were 50.0% (10 mg) versus 25.0% (5 mg; P = .066). For the lenalidomide groups combined, 3-year overall survival and AML risk were 56.5% and 25.1%, respectively. RBC-TI for ≥ 8 weeks was associated with 47% and 42% reductions in the relative risks of death and AML progression or death, respectively (P = .021 and .048). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Lenalidomide is beneficial and has an acceptable safety profile in transfusion-dependent patients with Low-/Intermediate-1-risk del5q myelodysplastic syndrome. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00179621.


Blood | 2013

Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet

Luca Malcovati; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; David G. Bowen; Lionel Ades; Jaroslav Cermak; Consuelo del Cañizo; Matteo G. Della Porta; Pierre Fenaux; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing; Joop H. Jansen; Moshe Mittelman; Ghulam J. Mufti; Uwe Platzbecker; Guillermo Sanz; Dominik Selleslag; Mette Skov-Holm; Reinhard Stauder; Argiris Symeonidis; Theo de Witte; Mario Cazzola

Within the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) work package of the European LeukemiaNet, an Expert Panel was selected according to the framework elements of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program. A systematic review of the literature was performed that included indexed original papers, indexed reviews and educational papers, and abstracts of conference proceedings. Guidelines were developed on the basis of a list of patient- and therapy-oriented questions, and recommendations were formulated and ranked according to the supporting level of evidence. MDSs should be classified according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria. An accurate risk assessment requires the evaluation of not only disease-related factors but also of those related to extrahematologic comorbidity. The assessment of individual risk enables the identification of fit patients with a poor prognosis who are candidates for up-front intensive treatments, primarily allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A high proportion of MDS patients are not eligible for potentially curative treatment because of advanced age and/or clinically relevant comorbidities and poor performance status. In these patients, the therapeutic intervention is aimed at preventing cytopenia-related morbidity and preserving quality of life. A number of new agents are being developed for which the available evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine use. The inclusion of patients into prospective clinical trials is strongly recommended.


Blood | 2015

International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts

Hervé Dombret; John F. Seymour; Aleksandra Butrym; Agnieszka Wierzbowska; Dominik Selleslag; Jun Ho Jang; Rajat Kumar; J Cavenagh; Andre C. Schuh; Anna Candoni; Christian Recher; Irwindeep Sandhu; Teresa Bernal del Castillo; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Giovanni Martinelli; Jose Falantes; Richard Noppeney; Richard Stone; Mark D. Minden; Heidi McIntyre; S. Songer; Lela M. Lucy; C.L. Beach; Hartmut Döhner

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated azacitidine efficacy and safety vs conventional care regimens (CCRs) in 488 patients age ≥65 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with >30% bone marrow blasts. Before randomization, a CCR (standard induction chemotherapy, low-dose ara-c, or supportive care only) was preselected for each patient. Patients then were assigned 1:1 to azacitidine (n = 241) or CCR (n = 247). Patients assigned to CCR received their preselected treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was increased with azacitidine vs CCR: 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-12.7 months) vs 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.0-8.6 months), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] was 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69-1.03; stratified log-rank P = .1009). One-year survival rates with azacitidine and CCR were 46.5% and 34.2%, respectively (difference, 12.3%; 95% CI, 3.5%-21.0%). A prespecified analysis censoring patients who received AML treatment after discontinuing study drug showed median OS with azacitidine vs CCR was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.2-14.2 months) vs 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.6 months; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; stratified log-rank P = .0190). Univariate analysis showed favorable trends for azacitidine compared with CCR across all subgroups defined by baseline demographic and disease features. Adverse events were consistent with the well-established safety profile of azacitidine. Azacitidine may be an important treatment option for this difficult-to-treat AML population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01074047.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010

Romiplostim or Standard of Care in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia

David J. Kuter; Mathias Rummel; Ralph V. Boccia; B. Gail Macik; Ingrid Pabinger; Dominik Selleslag; Francesco Rodeghiero; Beng H. Chong; Xuena Wang; Dietmar Berger

BACKGROUND Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin mimetic, increases platelet counts in patients with immune thrombocytopenia, with few adverse effects. METHODS In this open-label, 52-week study, we randomly assigned 234 adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia, who had not undergone splenectomy, to receive the standard of care (77 patients) or weekly subcutaneous injections of romiplostim (157 patients). Primary end points were incidences of treatment failure and splenectomy. Secondary end points included the rate of a platelet response (a platelet count >50×10(9) per liter at any scheduled visit), safety outcomes, and the quality of life. RESULTS The rate of a platelet response in the romiplostim group was 2.3 times that in the standard-of-care group (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 2.6; P<0.001). Patients receiving romiplostim had a significantly lower incidence of treatment failure (18 of 157 patients [11%]) than those receiving the standard of care (23 of 77 patients [30%], P<0.001) (odds ratio with romiplostim, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.61). Splenectomy also was performed less frequently in patients receiving romiplostim (14 of 157 patients [9%]) than in those receiving the standard of care (28 of 77 patients [36%], P<0.001) (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.35). The romiplostim group had a lower rate of bleeding events, fewer blood transfusions, and greater improvements in the quality of life than the standard-of-care group. Serious adverse events occurred in 23% of patients (35 of 154) receiving romiplostim and 37% of patients (28 of 75) receiving the standard of care. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with romiplostim had a higher rate of a platelet response, lower incidence of treatment failure and splenectomy, less bleeding and fewer blood transfusions, and a higher quality of life than patients treated with the standard of care. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00415532.).


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 1998

An EORTC International Multicenter Randomized Trial (EORTC Number 19923) Comparing Two Dosages of Liposomal Amphotericin B for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis

Michael E. Ellis; D. Spence; B.E. de Pauw; Françoise Meunier; A. Marinus; L. Collette; Richard Sylvester; Jacques F. Meis; Marc Boogaerts; Dominik Selleslag; V. Krcmery; W. von Sinner; P. MacDonald; Chantal Doyen; B. Vandercam

This is the first completed prospective randomized clinical efficacy trial of antifungals in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the first to compare the clinical efficacy of two dosages of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) for IA in neutropenic patients with cancer or those undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Eighty-seven of 120 patients were eligible and evaluable. Clinical responses were documented for 26 (64%) of 41 patients receiving 1 mg/(kg.d) (L-AmB-1) and 22 (48%) of 46 receiving 4 mg/(kg.d) (L-AmB-4). Radiologic response rates were similar: 24 (58%) of the L-AmB-1 recipients and 24(52%) of the L-AmB-4 recipients. The six-month survival rates were 43% (L-AmB-1) and 37% (L-AmB-4). These differences were not significant. The numbers of deaths directly due to IA at 6 months were similar: 9 (22%) of 41 L-AmB-1 recipients and 9 (20%) of 46 L-AmB-4 recipients. No other variable independently influenced survival, apart from central nervous system IA. L-AmB is effective in treating approximately 50%-60% of patients who have IA. A 1-mg/(kg.d) dosage is as effective as a 4-mg/(kg.d) dosage, and no advantages to use of the higher, more expensive, dosage has been observed.


The Lancet | 2016

Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): A phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial

Johan Maertens; Issam Raad; Kieren A. Marr; Thomas F. Patterson; Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis; Oliver A. Cornely; Eric J. Bow; Galia Rahav; Dionysios Neofytos; Mickael Aoun; John W. Baddley; Michael Giladi; Werner J. Heinz; Raoul Herbrecht; William W. Hope; Meinolf Karthaus; Dong-Gun Lee; Olivier Lortholary; Vicki A. Morrison; Ilana Oren; Dominik Selleslag; Shmuel Shoham; George R. Thompson; Misun Lee; Rochelle Maher; Anne Hortense Schmitt-Hoffmann; Bernhardt Zeiher; Andrew J. Ullmann

BACKGROUND Isavuconazole is a novel triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. The SECURE trial assessed efficacy and safety of isavuconazole versus voriconazole in patients with invasive mould disease. METHODS This was a phase 3, double-blind, global multicentre, comparative-group study. Patients with suspected invasive mould disease were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using an interactive voice-web response system, stratified by geographical region, allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, and active malignant disease at baseline, to receive isavuconazonium sulfate 372 mg (prodrug; equivalent to 200 mg isavuconazole; intravenously three times a day on days 1 and 2, then either intravenously or orally once daily) or voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 1, 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 2, then intravenously 4 mg/kg twice daily or orally 200 mg twice daily from day 3 onwards). We tested non-inferiority of the primary efficacy endpoint of all-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) using a 10% non-inferiority margin. Safety was assessed in patients who received the first dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00412893. FINDINGS 527 adult patients were randomly assigned (258 received study medication per group) between March 7, 2007, and March 28, 2013. All-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 for the ITT population was 19% with isavuconazole (48 patients) and 20% with voriconazole (52 patients), with an adjusted treatment difference of -1·0% (95% CI -7·8 to 5·7). Because the upper bound of the 95% CI (5·7%) did not exceed 10%, non-inferiority was shown. Most patients (247 [96%] receiving isavuconazole and 255 [98%] receiving voriconazole) had treatment-emergent adverse events (p=0·122); the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (174 [68%] vs 180 [69%]) and infections and infestations (152 [59%] vs 158 [61%]). Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events by system organ class were similar overall. However, isavuconazole-treated patients had a lower frequency of hepatobiliary disorders (23 [9%] vs 42 [16%]; p=0·016), eye disorders (39 [15%] vs 69 [27%]; p=0·002), and skin or subcutaneous tissue disorders (86 [33%] vs 110 [42%]; p=0·037). Drug-related adverse events were reported in 109 (42%) patients receiving isavuconazole and 155 (60%) receiving voriconazole (p<0·001). INTERPRETATION Isavuconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for the primary treatment of suspected invasive mould disease. Isavuconazole was well tolerated compared with voriconazole, with fewer study-drug-related adverse events. Our results support the use of isavuconazole for the primary treatment of patients with invasive mould disease. FUNDING Astellas Pharma Global Development, Basilea Pharmaceutica International.


Haematologica | 2013

Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome

Barbara Deschler; Gabriele Ihorst; Uwe Platzbecker; Ulrich Germing; Eva März; Marcelo de Figuerido; Kurt Fritzsche; Peter Haas; Helmut R. Salih; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; Boris Labar; Theo de Witte; Pierre W. Wijermans; Michael Lübbert

Myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia exemplify the complexity of treatment allocation in older patients as options range from best supportive care, non-intensive treatment (e.g. hypomethylating agents) to intensive chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation. Novel metrics for non-disease variables are urgently needed to help define the best treatment for each older patient. We investigated the feasibility and prognostic value of geriatric/quality of life assessments aside from established disease-specific variables in 195 patients aged 60 years or over with myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia. These patients were grouped according to treatment intensity and assessed. Assessment consisted of eight instruments evaluating activities of daily living, depression, mental functioning, mobility, comorbidities, Karnofsky Index and quality of life. Patients with a median age of 71 years (range 60-87 years) with myelodysplastic syndromes (n=63) or acute myeloid leukemia (n=132) were treated either with best supportive care (n=47), hypomethylating agents (n=73) or intensive chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=75). After selection of variables, pathological activities of daily living and quality of life/fatigue remained highly predictive for overall survival in the entire patient group beyond disease-related risk factors adverse cytogenetics and blast count of 20% or over. In 107 patients treated non-intensively activities of daily living of less than 100 (hazard ratio, HR 2.94), Karnofsky Index below 80 (HR 2.34) and quality of life/’fatigue’ of 50 or over (HR 1.77) were significant prognosticators. Summation of adverse features revealed a high risk of death (HR 9.36). In-depth evaluation of older patients prior to individual treatment allocation is feasible and provides additional information to standard assessment. Patients aged 60 years or over with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia and impairments in activities of daily living, Karnofsky Index below 80%, quality of life/’fatigue’ of 50 or over, are likely to have poor outcomes.


Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | 2000

MLL amplification in myeloid leukemias: A study of 14 cases with multiple copies of 11q23

Lucienne Michaux; Iwona Wlodarska; Michel Stul; Judith Dierlamm; Francine Mugneret; Christian Herens; Berna Beverloo; Alain Verhest; Christine Verellen-Dumoulin; Gregor Verhoef; Dominik Selleslag; Vincent Madoe; Marianne Lecomte; Bernard Deprijck; Augustin Ferrant; Sabine Marichal; Caroline Duhem; Mario Dicato; Anne Hagemeijer

We here report the clinical, cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and Southern blot data on 14 patients with a myeloid malignancy and structural aberration of chromosome band 11q23 associated with overrepresentation or amplification of the MLL gene. The number of copies of MLL varied from three (two cases) to a cluster consisting of multiple hybridization spots. Together with previous reports, available data indicate that amplification of 11q23/MLL is a recurrent genetic change in myeloid malignancy. It affects mainly elderly patients and is often associated with dysplastic bone marrow changes or with complex karyotypic aberrations, suggestive of genotoxic exposure. It is associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, FISH analysis of nine cases with additional 11q probes showed that the overrepresented chromosomal region is generally not restricted to MLL, and Southern blot analysis indicated that amplification does not involve a rearranged copy of this gene. The significance of MLL amplification and the mechanisms by which it could play a role in leukemogenesis and/or disease progression remain to be elucidated. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 29:40–47, 2000.


Haematologica | 2014

p53 protein expression independently predicts outcome in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q)

Leonie Saft; Mohsen Karimi; Mehran Ghaderi; András Matolcsy; Ghulam J. Mufti; Austin Kulasekararaj; Gudrun Göhring; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; P. Muus; Guillermo Sanz; Moshe Mittelman; David G. Bowen; Anna Porwit; Tommy Fu; Jay Backstrom; Pierre Fenaux; Kyle J. MacBeth; Eva Hellström-Lindberg

Del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System as low- or intermediate-1-risk (lower-risk) are considered to have an indolent course; however, recent data have identified a subgroup of these patients with more aggressive disease and poorer outcomes. Using deep sequencing technology, we previously demonstrated that 18% of patients with lower-risk del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes carry TP53 mutated subclones rendering them at higher risk of progression. In this study, bone marrow biopsies from 85 patients treated with lenalidomide in the MDS-004 clinical trial were retrospectively assessed for p53 expression by immunohistochemistry in association with outcome. Strong p53 expression in ≥1% of bone marrow progenitor cells, observed in 35% (30 of 85) of patients, was significantly associated with higher acute myeloid leukemia risk (P=0.0006), shorter overall survival (P=0.0175), and a lower cytogenetic response rate (P=0.009), but not with achievement or duration of 26-week transfusion independence response. In a multivariate analysis, p53-positive immunohistochemistry was the strongest independent predictor of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (P=0.0035). Pyrosequencing analysis of laser-microdissected cells with strong p53 expression confirmed the TP53 mutation, whereas cells with moderate expression predominantly had wild-type p53. This study validates p53 immunohistochemistry as a strong and clinically useful predictive tool in patients with lower-risk del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. This study was based on data from the MDS 004 trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00179621).

Collaboration


Dive into the Dominik Selleslag's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Theo de Witte

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Suciu

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan Maertens

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Uwe Platzbecker

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Petra Muus

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sergio Amadori

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Muus

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge