Dominik Wojtczak
University of Liverpool
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dominik Wojtczak.
automated technology for verification and analysis | 2010
Ashutosh Trivedi; Dominik Wojtczak
We study recursive timed automata that extend timed automata with recursion. Timed automata, as introduced by Alur and Dill, are finite automata accompanied by a finite set of real-valued variables called clocks. Recursive timed automata are finite collections of timed automata extended with special states that correspond to (potentially recursive) invocations of other timed automata from their collection. During an invocation of a timed automaton, our model permits passing the values of clocks using both pass-byvalue and pass-by-reference mechanisms. We study the natural reachability and termination (reachability with empty invocation stack) problems for recursive timed automata. We show that these problems are decidable (in many cases with the same complexity as the reachability problem on timed automata) for recursive timed automata satisfying the following condition: during each invocation either all clocks are passed by reference or none is passed by reference. Furthermore, we show that for recursive timed automata that violate this condition reachability/termination problems are undecidable for automata with as few as three clocks. We also establish similar results for two-player game extension of our model against reachability/termination objective.
Logical Methods in Computer Science | 2011
Michael Ummels; Dominik Wojtczak
textabstractWe analyse the computational complexity of finding Nash equilibria in stochastic multiplayer games with
tools and algorithms for construction and analysis of systems | 2007
Dominik Wojtczak; Kousha Etessami
\omega
international conference on concurrency theory | 2011
Michael Ummels; Dominik Wojtczak
-regular objectives. We show that restricting the search space to equilibria whose payoffs fall into a certain interval may lead to undecidability. In particular, we prove that the following problem is undecidable: Given a game~
international colloquium on automata, languages and programming | 2009
Michael Ummels; Dominik Wojtczak
\mathcal{G}
international conference on logic programming | 2013
Krishnendu Chatterjee; Vojtěch Forejt; Dominik Wojtczak
, does there exist a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of~
arXiv: Logic in Computer Science | 2017
John Fearnley; Sanjay Jain; Sven Schewe; Frank Stephan; Dominik Wojtczak
\mathcal{G}
acm international conference hybrid systems computation and control | 2012
Rajeev Alur; Ashutosh Trivedi; Dominik Wojtczak
where player 0 wins with probability~
computer science logic | 2009
Michael Ummels; Dominik Wojtczak
1
theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge | 2015
Krzysztof R. Apt; Sunil Simon; Dominik Wojtczak
. Moreover, this problem remains undecidable if it is restricted to strategies with (unbounded) finite memory. However, if randomised strategies are allowed, decidability remains an open problem; we can only prove NP-hardness in this case. One way to obtain a provably decidable variant of the problem is to restrict the strategies to be positional or stationary. For the complexity of these two problems, we obtain a common lower bound of NP and upper bounds of NP and PSPACE respectively. Finally, we single out a special case of the general problem that, in many cases, admits an efficient solution. In particular, we prove that deciding the existence of an equilibrium in which each player either wins or loses with probability~