Dominique Delbeke

FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out, interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations, but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information.

Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology

The rationale was to develop recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in breast, colorectal, esophageal, head and neck, lung, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer; lymphoma, melanoma, and sarcoma; and unknown primary tumor. Outcomes of interest included the use of 18F-FDG PET for diagnosing, staging, and detecting the recurrence or progression of cancer. Methods: A search was performed to identify all published randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in the literature. An additional search was performed to identify relevant unpublished systematic reviews. These publications comprised both retrospective and prospective studies of varied methodologic quality. The anticipated consequences of false-positive and false-negative tests when evaluating clinical usefulness, and the impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of cancer patients, were also reviewed. Results and Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET should be used as an imaging tool additional to conventional radiologic methods such as CT or MRI; any positive finding that could lead to a clinically significant change in patient management should be confirmed by subsequent histopathologic examination because of the risk of false-positive results. 18F-FDG PET should be used in the appropriate clinical setting for the diagnosis of head and neck, lung, or pancreatic cancer and for unknown primary tumor. PET is also indicated for staging of breast, colon, esophageal, head and neck, and lung cancer and of lymphoma and melanoma. In addition, 18F-FDG PET should be used to detect recurrence of breast, colorectal, head and neck, or thyroid cancer and of lymphoma.

FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Our goal was to evaluate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in staging patients with biliary tract cancers. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent FDG-PET for suspected cholangiocarcinoma (n = 36) or gallbladder carcinoma (n = 14) were reviewed. Patients with cholangiocarcinoma were divided into two groups: group 1 had nodular type (mass > 1 cm) (n = 22) and group 2 had inflltrating type (n = 14) cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty-one of 36 patients evaluated for cholangiocarcinoma had cholangiocarcinoma and five did not. Sensitivity was 85% for nodular morphology but only 18% for inflltrating morphology. Sensitivity for metastases was 65% but false negative for carcinomatosis in three of three patients. One false positive result occurred in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis who had acute cholangitis. Seven (58%) of 12 patients had FDG uptake along the tract of a biliary stent. FDG-PET led to a change in surgical management in 30% (11 of 36) of patients evaluated for cholangiocarcinoma because of detection of unsuspected metastases. Eleven of 14 patients with gallbladder carcinoma were newly diagnosed by cholecystectomy or another type of exploratory procedure, whereas three patients were undergoing follow-up. Nine had residual gallbladder carcinoma at the time of PET. Sensitivity for gallbladder carcinoma was 78%. Sensitivity for extrahepatic metastases was 50% in eight patients; six of them had carcinomatosis. These data suggest that PET is accurate in predicting the presence of nodular cholangiocarcinoma (mass > 1cm) but was not helpful for the inflltrating type. PET was also helpful for detecting residual gallbladder carcinoma following cholecystectomy, but was not helpful in patients with carcinomatosis. Although FDG-PET led to a change in management in 30% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, it must be interpreted with caution in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and with stents in place, as well as in those with known granulomatous disease.

Positron Emission Tomography to Stage Suspected Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to the Liver

BACKGROUND Accurate detection of recurrent colorectal carcinoma remains a clinical challenge. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) is an imaging technique that allows direct evaluation of cellular metabolism. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET was compared to computed tomography (CT) and CT portography for staging metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-four patients previously treated for colorectal carcinoma who had suspected recurrence to the liver underwent an 18FDG PET scan of the entire body. All patients had either a CT scan of the abdomen (n = 17), a CT portogram (n = 18), or both (n = 11). The final diagnosis was obtained by tissue pathology in 19 patients and clinical follow-up in 5 patients. RESULTS A total of 60 suspicious lesions were identified. Of the 55 intrahepatic lesions, 39 were malignant and 16 were benign. Of the 5 extra-hepatic lesions, 4 were malignant. The 18FDG PET imaging had a higher accuracy (93%) than CT and CT portography (both 76%) in detecting metastatic disease to the liver, and detected unsuspected extrahepatic recurrence in 4 patients. Although the sensitivity of 18FDG PET (90%) was slightly lower than that of CT portography (97%), the specificity was much higher (100% versus 9%), including postsurgical sites. 18FDG PET altered surgical plans in 6 (25%) of 24 patients. CONCLUSIONS 18FDG PET is extremely useful in staging patients with suspected metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver.

SNM Practice Guideline for Sodium 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans 1.0

PREAMBLE The Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. Its 16,000 members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine. In addition to publishing journals, newsletters, and books, the SNM also sponsors international meetings and workshops designed to increase the competencies of nuclear medicine practitioners and to promote new advances in the science of nuclear medicine. The SNM will periodically define new Practice Guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing Practice Guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each Practice Guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, requiring the approval of the Committee on SNM Guidelines, Health Policy and Practice Commission, and SNM Board of Directors. The Practice Guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published Practice Guidelines by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. These Practice Guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNM cautions against the use of these Practice Guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, an approach that differs from the Practice Guidelines, standing alone, does not necessarily imply that the approach was below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the Practice Guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the Practice Guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art, of preventing, diagnosing, alleviating, and treating disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these Practice Guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these Practice Guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Impact of 131I-SPECT/CT images obtained with an integrated system in the follow-up of patients with thyroid carcinoma

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to determine the diagnostic impact of 131I-SPECT/CT imaging compared with conventional scintigraphic evaluation in the follow-up of patients with thyroid carcinoma.MethodsSeventy-one patients with thyroid carcinoma underwent concurrent 131I-SPECT/CT, using an integrated imaging system, at various stages of their disease in order to evaluate foci of uptake detected on planar whole-body images.ResultsSPECT/CT imaging had an incremental diagnostic value in 57% (41/71) of patients. Uptake in the neck was evaluated in 61 patients, and SPECT/CT imaging in this region had an incremental diagnostic value in 27% of the whole patient population (19/71). Low-resolution integrated CT images allowed for the precise characterization of equivocal neck lesions on planar imaging in 14/17 patients and changed the assessment of the lesion location in five patients as compared with planar studies. Thirty-six patients underwent SPECT/CT for evaluation of foci of uptake distant from the neck. SPECT/CT imaging improved characterization of equivocal foci of uptake as definitely benign in 13% (9/71) of patients. Precise localization of malignant lesions to the skeleton was possible in 17% (12/71) and to the lungs versus the mediastinum in 6% (5/71) of patients.ConclusionIntegrated 131I-SPECT/CT was found to have an additional value over planar imaging in patients with thyroid cancer for correct characterization of equivocal tracer uptake seen on planar imaging as well as for precise localization of malignant lesions in the neck, chest, and skeleton. SPECT/CT optimized the localization of 131I uptake to lymph node metastases versus remnant thyroid tissue, to lung versus mediastinal metastases, and to the skeleton. It also had a further clinical impact on patient management by influencing referral for 131I treatment, tailoring of the administered radioiodine dose, and/or the addition of surgery or external radiation therapy when indicated.

Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging: Results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease)

OBJECTIVES This study examined short-term cardiac catheterization rates and medication changes after cardiac imaging. BACKGROUND Noninvasive cardiac imaging is widely used in coronary artery disease, but its effects on subsequent patient management are unclear. METHODS We assessed the 90-day post-test rates of catheterization and medication changes in a prospective registry of 1,703 patients without a documented history of coronary artery disease and an intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography. RESULTS Baseline medication use was relatively infrequent. At 90 days, 9.6% of patients underwent catheterization. The rates of catheterization and medication changes increased in proportion to test abnormality findings. Among patients with the most severe test result findings, 38% to 61% were not referred to catheterization, 20% to 30% were not receiving aspirin, 35% to 44% were not receiving a beta-blocker, and 20% to 25% were not receiving a lipid-lowering agent at 90 days after the index test. Risk-adjusted analyses revealed that compared with stress single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, changes in aspirin and lipid-lowering agent use was greater after computed tomography angiography, as was the 90-day catheterization referral rate in the setting of normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal test results. CONCLUSIONS Overall, noninvasive testing had only a modest impact on clinical management of patients referred for clinical testing. Although post-imaging use of cardiac catheterization and medical therapy increased in proportion to the degree of abnormality findings, the frequency of catheterization and medication change suggests possible undertreatment of higher risk patients. Patients were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization after computed tomography angiography than after single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography after normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal study findings. (Study of Perfusion and Anatomys Role in Coronary Artery [CAD] [SPARC]; NCT00321399).

EANM/SNMMI Guideline for 18F-FDG Use in Inflammation and Infection

1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 3Nuclear Medicine, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy; 4Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; 5Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; 7Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; 8Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; and 9Nuclear Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University “Sapienza,” Rome, Italy

POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IN ONCOLOGY

The applications for FDG-PET imaging are rapidly growing and accepted in the field of oncology. FDG-PET imaging does not replace other imaging modalities, such as CT, but seems to be very helpful in specific situations where CT has known limitations, such as differentiation of benign from malignant indeterminate lesions on CT, differentiation of post-treatment changes versus recurrent tumor, differentiation of benign from malignant lymph nodes, and monitoring therapy. The biggest use of FDG-PET presently is in N and M staging of various body tumors. The addition of FDG-PET in the evaluation of oncologic patients in well-defined algorithms including a combination of imaging studies seems to be cost effective by accurately identifying patients who benefit from invasive procedures and saving unnecessary costly invasive procedures on patients who do not benefit from them. Although PET imaging may decrease the cost of health care by reducing the number of invasive procedures, implementation of clinical PET has been hindered by the high cost of the purchase, operation expenses, and maintenance of PET systems; the need for immediate access to a source of 18F (owing to the 110-minute half-life); and the limited reimbursement for clinical procedures by third-party payers. These combined factors have resulted in the development by manufacturers of hybrid gamma camera systems capable of performing positron imaging. These systems can be used to image conventional radiopharmaceuticals used in general nuclear medicine and positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals. The performance of these camera-based PET systems has improved markedly over the past few years with the introduction of thicker NaI (T1) crystals, iterative reconstruction algorithms, and attenuation correction. These new developments in medical imaging instrumentation have contributed to the expansion of the number of cyclotrons, and have driven the concept of commercial FDG distribution centers.