Dominique Joyal

Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalizations remain extremely challenging procedures. With improvements in technology and techniques, success rates for recanalization of CTO continue to improve. However, the clinical benefits of this practice remain unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of CTO recanalization on clinical outcomes. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing CTO recanalization to medical management. Data were extracted in duplicate and analyzed by a random effects model. RESULTS We did not identify any randomized controlled trials or observational studies comparing CTO recanalization to a planned medical management. We did identify 13 observational studies comparing outcomes after successful vs failed CTO recanalization attempt. These studies encompassed 7,288 patients observed over a weighted average follow-up of 6 years. There were 721 (14.3%) deaths of 5,056 patients after successful CTO recanalization compared to 390 deaths (17.5%) of 2,232 patients after failed CTO recanalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.72). Successful recanalization was associated with a significant reduction in subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.17-0.27) but not in myocardial infarction (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.25) or major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.21). In the 6 studies that reported angina status, successful recanalization was associated with a significant reduction in residual/recurrent angina (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.67). CONCLUSIONS In highly selected patients considered for CTO recanalization, successful attempts appear to be associated with an improvement in mortality and with a reduction for the need for CABG as compared to failed recanalization. However, given the observational nature of the reviewed evidence, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Despite lower risks of access site-related complications with transradial approach (TRA), its clinical benefit for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing TRA and transfemoral approach (TFA) for PCI. METHODS Randomized trials and observational studies (1993-2011) comparing TRA with TFA for PCI with reports of ischemic and bleeding outcomes were included. Crude and adjusted (for age and sex) odds ratios (OR) were estimated by a hierarchical Bayesian random-effects model with prespecified stratification for observational and randomized designs. The primary outcomes were rates of death, combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction, bleeding, and transfusions, early (≤ 30 days) and late after PCI. RESULTS We collected data from 76 studies (15 randomized, 61 observational) involving a total of 761,919 patients. Compared with TFA, TRA was associated with a 78% reduction in bleeding (OR 0.22, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.16-0.29) and 80% in transfusions (OR 0.20, 95% CrI 0.11-0.32). These findings were consistent in both randomized and observational studies. Early after PCI, there was a 44% reduction of mortality with TRA (OR 0.56, 95% CrI 0.45-0.67), although the effect was mainly due to observational studies (OR 0.52, 95% CrI 0.40-0.63, adjusted OR 0.49 [95% CrI 0.37-0.60]), with an OR of 0.80 (95% CrI 0.49-1.23) in randomized trials. CONCLUSION Our results combining observational and randomized studies show that PCI performed by TRA is associated with substantially less risks of bleeding and transfusions compared with TFA. Benefit on the incidence of death or combined death or myocardial infarction is found in observational studies but remains inconclusive in randomized trials.

Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the current effectiveness and safety of sympathetic renal denervation (RDN) for resistant hypertension. BACKGROUND RDN is a novel approach that has been evaluated in multiple small studies. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies evaluating the effect of RDN in patients with resistant hypertension. Studies were stratified according to controlled versus uncontrolled design and analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis models. RESULTS We identified 2 randomized controlled trials, 1 observational study with a control group, and 9 observational studies without a control group. In controlled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) at 6 months of -28.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -37.2 to -20.6 mm Hg) and -11.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -16.4 to -5.7 mm Hg), respectively, compared with medically treated patients (for both, p < 0.0001). In uncontrolled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP at 6 months of -25.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -29.9 to -20.1 mm Hg) and -10.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -12.5 to -7.5 mm Hg), respectively, compared with pre-RDN values (for both, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the effect of RDN according to the 5 catheters employed. Reported procedural complications included 1 renal artery dissection and 4 femoral pseudoaneurysms. CONCLUSIONS RDN resulted in a substantial reduction in mean BP at 6 months in patients with resistant hypertension. The decrease in BP was similar irrespective of study design and type of catheter employed. Large randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the sustained efficacy and safety of RDN.

Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

The radial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recently assessed in both randomized and observational studies. However, observational studies have several biases that favor the radial approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the clinical outcomes of radial and femoral approach in primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The outcomes of interest included death, major bleeding, vascular complications/hematoma, and procedure time. The data were pooled using random-effects models. Ten randomized controlled trials involving 3,347 patients met our inclusion criteria. The radial approach was associated with improved survival (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.84) and reduced vascular complications/hematoma (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.53). A nonsignificant trend was found toward reduced major bleeding with the radial approach (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.35-1.12). The procedural time with the radial approach was longer by < 2 minutes (mean difference 1.76 minutes, 95% confidence interval 0.59-2.92). In conclusion, in patients undergoing primary PCI, the radial approach is associated with lower short-term mortality. When feasible, the radial approach should be the favored route in primary PCI.

The retrograde technique for recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a step-by-step approach.

Chronic total occlusion recanalization still represents the final frontier in percutaneous coronary intervention. Retrograde chronic total occlusion recanalization has recently become an essential complement to the classical antegrade approach. In experienced hands, the retrograde technique currently has a high success rate with a low complication profile, despite frequent utilization in the most anatomically and clinically complex patients. Since its initial description, important changes have occurred that make the technique faster and more successful. We propose a step-by-step approach of the technique as practiced at experienced centers in North America. Because the technique can vary substantially, we describe the different alternatives to each step and offer what we perceived to be the most efficient techniques.

Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention case selection and techniques for the antegrade-only operator.

Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) remain a difficult lesion subset to treat. Although CTOs are present at coronary angiography in 15–20% of patients, only a small fraction of eligible patients will be offered percutaneous treatment. Recent publications from centers with dedicated CTO programs using the full range of antegrade and retrograde techniques suggest success rates in the range of 90% even when little anatomic exclusion are used. However, many patients with clinically appropriate CTO targets have simpler anatomy that can predictably be managed without the selected skills and equipment. The purpose of this review is to provide skilled percutaneous coronary intervention operators who have not specialized in complex retrograde CTO techniques, an algorithm for the selection and antegrade management of appropriate CTO cases. Core equipment and techniques are discussed.

Prevalence and impact of coronary artery disease in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

The occurrence and impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence, clinical correlates, and effect of CAD in patients with PAH. We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with PAH at a university-based referral center for pulmonary vascular disease from January 1990 to May 2010. The patients systematically underwent right heart catheterization and coronary angiography as a part of their evaluation. The patients with PAH with CAD (defined as ≥50% stenosis in ≥1 major epicardial coronary artery) were compared to patients without CAD. Among the 162 patients with PAH, the prevalence of CAD was 28.4%. The presence of CAD was associated with older age (66.6 ± 11.5 vs 49.2 ± 14.0 years, p <0.001), systemic hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The patients with PAH and CAD had a lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure (44.6 ± 11.1 vs 49.2 ± 14.0 mm Hg; p = 0.02) than patients without CAD. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 73 patients died. The presence of CAD was a predictor of all-cause mortality on univariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 3.20) but not on multivariate analysis, which identified older age (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.05) and right atrial pressure (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.14) as the only independent predictors. In conclusion, our study has demonstrated that CAD is common among patients with PAH. CAD prevalence increases with age, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, but we did not detect an independent prognostic effect of CAD on mortality.

Hemodynamic Stability After Transitioning Between Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND Maintenance of a favourable hemodynamic profile is central to therapeutic success in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). There is little information about the safety of transitioning patients between oral therapies for PAH. Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been a therapeutic mainstay in PAH, providing benefit to many patients. Three ERAs, bosentan, sitaxsentan, and ambrisentan have been approved for clinical use. Sitaxsentan was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in late 2010 resulting in the need to quickly transition a large number of stable patients. METHODS We transitioned 30 clinically stable patients to either ambrisentan or bosentan. Patients underwent a right heart catheterization, measurement of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and assessment of functional class before changing ERA and again 4 months later. We present a retrospective analysis of those data. RESULTS Of the 30 patients transitioned (15 to ambrisentan, 15 to bosentan), 23 had complete hemodynamic data. No significant change was observed in the groups in right atrial, mean pulmonary artery, and pulmonary artery wedge pressures, or in cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance, or NT-proBNP levels. There was no change in World Health Organization functional class. Four ambrisentan and 2 bosentan-treated patients reported fluid retention, and 3 bosentan-treated patients had elevation of hepatic transaminases. Two of the patients had a right atrial pressure increase of ≥5 mm Hg, and 4 had pulmonary artery wedge pressure increase of ≥5 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS Transitioning between ERAs in stable PAH patients does not result in hemodynamic or clinical deterioration during the first 4 months posttransition. A minority of patients have developed increased cardiac filling pressures.

Percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiovascular outcomes for patients with chronic total occlusions

In this issue of Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Jolicoeur et al. [1] have attempted to add clarity to a major controversy in interventional cardiology by addressing the question, ‘‘are there benefits of chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI)?’’ The primary comparison was the combined endpoint of death and self-reported cardiac rehospitalization over a mean 5 years of follow-up among those who underwent successful as compared to failed CTO-PCI. This has been performed repeatedly by others whom they cite. They criticized the varying definitions of CTO and the statistical methodologies of prior studies summarized in a recent metaanalysis [2] to justify their study. In the end, they used the same definition for CTO of the most recent studies and to adjust for case mix and account for referral bias, they developed a logistic regression model to identify clinical predictors of CTO-PCI attempt. A second model was developed to identify angiographic features associated with failed CTO-PCI so that adjustment could be made in the final regression model. They argue that accounting for these potential biases strengthens the discriminatory capacity of their study and adds clarity to the controversy. They go so far as to suggest that CTO-PCI should not be ‘‘allowed to expand’’ until randomized trials are performed which will not conclude for at least 5 years. We are concerned that weaknesses in the methodology and over reaching conclusions could potentially mislead the reader.

Second reading of coronary angiograms by radiologists

BACKGROUND In many hospitals in the provinces of Quebec and Nova Scotia, as well as in some hospitals in the rest of Canada, coronary angiograms are performed and interpreted by invasive cardiologists, and are later reinterpreted and reported by radiologists. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the value of second readings of coronary angiograms by radiologists. METHODS Cardiology and radiology reports of a total of 160 consecutive coronary angiograms were compared from patients at three hospitals. Ten segments of the coronary tree were considered and 1582 segments were included. Agreement between cardiology and radiology interpretations was evaluated using per cent agreement, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Agreement was calculated for each arterial segment and for each hospital. RESULTS Excellent agreement was found between cardiology and radiology interpretations of coronary angiograms. Per cent agreement ranged from 94.9% to 100%, Pearson correlation ranged from 0.83 to 0.97 and Bland-Altman limits of agreement ranged from -18.1 to 19.4. Agreement was similar for each segment and for each hospital. Agreement remained excellent after exclusion of normal angiograms (n=348 segments), with a per cent agreement of 96.3%. Secondary analyses demonstrated a mean time delay of 13 days between angiograms and the subsequent radiology reports. CONCLUSIONS There are minimal differences between the cardiology and radiology interpretations of coronary angiograms. Routine second reading by a radiologist may be redundant.