Donald Banerji

Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis function in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUNDnDespite their proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of asthma exacerbations, current inhaled corticosteroids carry safety concerns, especially adrenal suppression. Ciclesonide (hydrofluoroalkane propellant) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with few, if any, clinical adverse events.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the potential effects of ciclesonide therapy on the dynamic cortisol response to sequential low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.nnnMETHODSnThis was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized and treated; 148 patients completed the study. Fluticasone propionate (chlorofluorocarbon propellant) was used as an active comparator. The doses administered were 320 microg of ciclesonide once daily, 320 microg of ciclesonide twice daily, and 440 microg of fluticasone propionate twice daily, all doses ex-actuator.nnnRESULTSnFor both ciclesonide groups, changes in mean low- and high-dose peak serum cortisol levels and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels corrected for creatinine were small vs baseline and comparable with placebo. For the fluticasone propionate group, significant reductions vs placebo in serum cortisol levels in response to high-dose cosyntropin stimulation and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were observed. Oral candidiasis rates were 2.5% for 320-microg/d ciclesonide, 2.4% for 640-microg/d ciclesonide, and 22.0% for 880-microg/d fluticasone propionate.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese findings confirm the safety of ciclesonide therapy, demonstrating that at doses up to 640 microg/d, the drug does not affect sensitive markers of adrenal function.

FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and Safety of QVA149 (Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate) versus Its Monocomponents and Placebo in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

RATIONALEnCurrent Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy recommends the combination of two long-acting bronchodilators of different pharmacologic classes for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) if symptoms are not adequately controlled by a single bronchodilator.nnnOBJECTIVESnThe FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2 studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of QVA149 (indacaterol/glycopyrrolate), a fixed-dose combination of a long-acting β2-agonist (indacaterol) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (glycopyrrolate), compared with its monocomponents and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.nnnMETHODSnFLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2 were 12-week, identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled studies. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to indacaterol/glycopyrrolate (27.5/15.6 μg twice daily), indacaterol (27.5 μg twice daily), glycopyrrolate (15.6 μg twice daily), or placebo, all delivered via the Neohaler device. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of indacaterol/glycopyrrolate versus its monocomponents for standardized area under the curve from 0-12 hours for FEV1 at Week 12. Secondary objectives included St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score and transition dyspnea index total score and reduction in daily rescue medication use with indacaterol/glycopyrrolate versus placebo.nnnMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTSnIn total, 2,038 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Indacaterol/glycopyrrolate was statistically superior in terms of FEV1 area under the curve from 0-12 hours compared with its monocomponents (P < 0.001). Statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score, transition dyspnea index total score, and reduction in rescue medication use were observed with indacaterol/glycopyrrolate compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The safety profile was comparable across the treatment groups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIndacaterol/glycopyrrolate twice daily can be an alternative treatment option for the management of symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01727141 and NCT 0171251).

Placebo-controlled, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol with the non-CFC propellant HFA-134a in patients with asthma

BACKGROUNDnTriamcinolone acetonide (TAA) inhalation aerosol (Azmacort Inhalation Aerosol), a well-established corticosteroid treatment for bronchial asthma, utilizes the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant P-12, which will be phased out because of environmental concerns. Two TAA aerosol formulations have been developed using a non-chlorofluorocarbon propellant, HFA-134a (Azmacort HFA Inhalation Aerosol delivering TAA 75 microg/puff or 225 microg/puff).nnnOBJECTIVEnThis study compared the efficacy and safety of the new 225 microg/puff formulation (TAA-HFA 225) to the marketed TAA inhalation aerosol (TAA-CFC) and to placebo in adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.nnnMETHODSnAfter a 5-day to 21-day baseline period during which all patients received TAA-CFC 150 microg/day, 538 patients were randomized to one of the following treatment schedules: TAA-HFA 450, 900, or 1800 microg/day; TAA-CFC 450 or 900 microg/day; or placebo for 12 weeks.nnnRESULTSnAll active treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement compared with placebo in pulmonary function (FEV1, FEF25-75%, morning and evening PEF), use of rescue albuterol, and asthma symptom scores. Improvements in all variables occurred within 1 week of treatment.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe TAA-HFA 225 exhibited similar safety and efficacy profiles to the two equivalent doses of TAA-CFC studied. Our findings indicate that TAA-HFA is a safe and effective replacement for the currently marketed CFC-containing product. The higher strength 225 microg/puff formulation provides effective control of asthma with fewer inhalations.

Long-Term Safety of a Non-Chlorofluorocarbon- Containing Triamcinolone Acetonide Inhalation Aerosol in Patients with Asthma

In response to environmental concerns regarding chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), two new triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) inhalation aerosol (Azmacort Inhalation Aerosol) formulations have been developed using a more environmentally favorable propellant, HFA-134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). This multicenter, open-label study evaluated the safety of switching asthma patients from TAA-CFC to one of two TAA-HFA formulations. After a 2- or 4-week baseline period during which patients received only CFC-containing TAA Inhaler, 552 patients were randomized to receive TAA-HFA 75 or 225 μg for 6 or 12 months. A total of 493 patients completed treatment. Seven patients discontinued because of adverse events and two because of ineffective asthma control. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, and most events were mild to moderate in severity and were not considered related to study medication. No clinically relevant suppression of the hypophyseal-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was observed. Pulmonary function tests were not adversely affected by use of either study medication, and improvements were noted in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25%-75%) throughout the course of treatment. This study confirms that TAA-HFA provides effective, long-term asthma control and can safely be substituted for the currently marketed CFC-containing TAA product.

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

BACKGROUNDnNational and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients.nnnMETHODSnA multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF.nnnRESULTSnTriamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTriamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in Asian patients with COPD at a high risk of exacerbations: results from the FLAME study

Background The FLAME study demonstrated that indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY), the fixed-dose combination of a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA, IND) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA, GLY), was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in preventing exacerbations in COPD patients with a high risk of exacerbations. In this study, we report a prespecified analysis of the efficacy and safety of IND/GLY versus SFC in Asian patients from the FLAME study. Patients and methods Patients from Asian centers with moderate-to-very severe COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the previous year from the 52-week, randomized FLAME study were included. IND/GLY was compared versus SFC for effects on exacerbations, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and forced vital capacity [FVC]), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]), rescue medication use, and safety. Results A total of 510 Asian patients (IND/GLY, n=250 or SFC, n=260) were included. Compared to the overall FLAME population, the Asian cohort had more males, a shorter duration of COPD, fewer patients using inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) at screening, fewer current smokers, and more patients with very severe COPD. IND/GLY significantly reduced the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations (rate ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.97; P=0.027) and prolonged time to first moderate/severe exacerbation versus SFC (hazard ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.01; P=0.055). Predose trough FEV1 and FVC significantly improved in Asian patients (P<0.001). IND/GLY improved SGRQ for COPD (SGRQ-C score; P=0.006) and reduced rescue medication use (P=0.058) at week 52. Pneumonia incidence was 3.6% with IND/GLY and 7.7% with SFC (P=0.046). Conclusion In exacerbating Asian COPD patients, IND/GLY was more effective than SFC.

Indacaterol/glycopyrronium in symptomatic patients with COPD (GOLD B and GOLD D) versus salmeterol/fluticasone: ILLUMINATE/LANTERN pooled analysis.

Background Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) is approved for maintenance treatment of adult patients with COPD. This post hoc analysis explored the efficacy and safety of IND/GLY versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in symptomatic (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] B and GOLD D) patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Patients and methods Data from LANTERN and ILLUMINATE studies were pooled and analyzed. In both studies, symptomatic COPD patients were randomized to once-daily IND/GLY 110 μg/50 μg or twice-daily SFC 50 μg/500 μg. End points were pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), standardized area under the curve for FEV1 from 0 to 12 hours (FEV1 AUC0–12 hours), peak FEV1, peak forced vital capacity (FVC), pre-dose trough FVC, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) total score, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, rescue medication use and safety. Results A total of 1,263 patients were classified as either GOLD B (n=809) or GOLD D (n=454). At week 26, IND/GLY demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all lung function parameters versus SFC in patients in both the GOLD B and GOLD D subgroups. TDI total score and rescue medication use were significantly improved with IND/GLY versus SFC in the overall population and in the GOLD B (TDI total score only) and GOLD D (rescue medication only) subgroups. IND/GLY also reduced the rate of exacerbations in the pooled population. Overall safety profile was comparable with a higher incidence of pneumonia in the SFC-treated group. Conclusion In this pooled analysis, IND/GLY demonstrated superior efficacy compared with SFC in patients in the GOLD B and GOLD D subgroups and supported its use in symptomatic COPD patients.

In vitro and in vivo techniques used in drug development for evaluation of dose delivery of inhaled corticosteroids.

Oral inhaled corticosteroids are important in the treatment of asthma since their delivery is targeted directly to the lung, which is the site of action. Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) is an effective and safe corticosteroid that is marketed as a metered‐dose inhaler (MDI) with an integrated spacer (Azmacort®) for the treatment of asthma. Due to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, Azmacort® has been reformulated with a non‐CFC propellant. Due to the complexities of oral inhaled formulations and the topical nature of drug delivery to the lung for efficacy, the reformulation of oral inhaled MDIs requires careful consideration and support throughout their development, using a combination of in vitro and in vivo studies to ensure clinical comparability for both efficacy and safety. This paper describes a chronological series of studies designed to support the reformulation of Azmacort®. These included in vitro studies to estimate respirable fraction, in vivo pulmonary deposition studies, in vivo pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic studies to estimate the systemic effects of each formulation, and final clinical studies in adult and pediatric patients to confirm the clinical comparability of the new formulation of Azmacort®. The results of these studies, performed at various stages during the development of new formulations, were critical in guiding the reformulation efforts for Azmacort®.

Comparative dose-ranging study of triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol using propellants hydrofluoroalkane 134a or P-12 in children with chronic asthma*

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide hydrofluoroalkane 134a (HFA) (chlorofluorocarbon [CFC] free) with those of triamcinolone acetonide P-12 (CFC containing) in children with chronic asthma. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comprised 473 children (6 to 13 years of age) with asthma. Patients received 12 weeks of treatment with 150, 300 or 600 μg of triamcinolone acetonide HFA daily given as 1, 2, or 4 puffs (75 μg/puff) or the same doses of triamcinolone acetonide P-12 after a 3- to 28-day baseline period. Mean percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 12.17% to 22.02% with HFA and 13.53% to 22.62% with P-12. Albuterol use decreased by 2, 2.7, and 3.6 puffs/d with the HFA 150-, 300-, and 600-μg groups, respectively, and by 2.2, 2.4, and 3 puffs/d for the respective P-12 groups. Significant improvement ( P

Long-Term Maintenance Bronchodilation With Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate Versus Indacaterol in Moderate-to-Severe COPD Patients: The FLIGHT 3 Study

Background: The objective of the FLIGHT3 study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrrolate* (IND/GLY) versus an active comparator, IND, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) over 52 weeks. Method: FLIGHT3 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 52-week study. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to IND/GLY (27.5/15.6 or 27.5/31.2 µg twice daily [b.i.d.]) or IND (75 µg once daily [o.d.]), delivered via the Neohaler® device. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of IND/GLY versus IND in terms of adverse event (AE)-reporting rates in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD over 52 weeks. The secondary objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of IND/GLY versus IND in terms of pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and post-dose 1-h FEV1 over 52 weeks. Results: A total of 85.2% patients completed the study treatment. The overall incidence of AEs (and SAEs) was similar between treatments. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and/or cardiovascular (CV) events were comparable between treatment groups. The rate of discontinuation of the study treatment due to AEs was lower for IND/GLY than IND. Improvements in pre-dose trough FEV1 and post-dose 1-h FEV1 were consistently superior with IND/GLY than with IND over 52 weeks, demonstrating long-term maintenance of lung function. Conclusions: IND/GLY demonstrated a favorable long-term safety and tolerability profile and provided effective bronchodilation, with maintenance of lung function over 52 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. These data support the safety and efficacy of IND/GLY as a treatment option for COPD. Trial registration: ClinTrials.gov identifier NCT01682863 *Glycopyrrolate 15.6 µg (excluding the bromide salt) is equivalent to 12.5 µg glycopyrronium.