Donald D. Harrison

Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial

BACKGROUNDnCervical lordosis has been shown to be an important outcome of care; however, few conservative methods of rehabilitating sagittal cervical alignment have been reported.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo study whether a seated, retracted, extended, and compressed position would cause tension in the anterior cervical ligament, anterior disk, and muscle structures, and thereby restore cervical lordosis or increase the curvature in patients with loss of the cervical lordosis.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnNonrandomized, prospective, clinical control trial.nnnMETHODSnThirty preselected patients, after diagnostic screening for tolerance to cervical extension with compression, were treated for the first 3 weeks of care using cervical manipulation and a new type of cervical extension-compression traction (vertical weight applied to the subjects forehead in the sitting position with a transverse load at the area of kyphosis). Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain ratings were compared along with pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cervical radiographs analyzed with the posterior tangent method for changes in alignment. Results are compared to a control group of 33 subjects receiving no treatment and matched for age, sex, weight, height, and pain.nnnRESULTSnControl subjects reported no change in VAS pain ratings and had no statistical significant change in segmental or global cervical alignment on comparative lateral cervical radiographs (difference in all angle mean values < 1.3 degrees ) repeated an average of 8.5 months later. For the traction group, VAS ratings were 4.1 pretreatment and 1.1 posttreatment. On comparative lateral cervical radiographs repeated after an average of 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, 10 angles and 2 distances showed statistically significant improvements, including anterior head weight bearing (mean improvement of 11 mm), Cobb angle at C2-C7 (mean improvement of -13.6 degrees ), and the angle of intersection of the posterior tangents at C2-C7 (mean improvement of 17.9 degrees ). Twenty-one (70%) of the treatment group subjects were followed for an additional 14 months; improvements in cervical lordosis and anterior weight bearing were maintained.nnnCONCLUSIONSnChiropractic biophysics (CBP) techniques extension-compression 2-way cervical traction combined with spinal manipulation decreased chronic neck pain intensity and improved cervical lordosis in 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, as indicated by increases in segmental and global cervical alignment. Anterior head weight-bearing was reduced by 11 mm; Cobb angles averaged an increase of 13 degrees to 14 degrees; and the angle of intersection of posterior tangents on C2 and C7 averaged 17.9 degrees of improvement.

Comparison of axial and flexural stresses in lordosis and three buckled configurations of the cervical spine

OBJECTIVEnTo calculate and compare combined axial and flexural stresses in lordosis versus buckled configurations of the sagittal cervical curve.nnnDESIGNnDigitized measurements from lateral cervical radiographs of four different shapes were used to calculate axial loads and bending moments on the vertebral bodies of C2-C7.Background. Osteoarthritis and spinal degeneration are factors in neck and back pain. Calculations of stress in clinically occurring configurations of the sagittal cervical spine are rare.nnnMETHODSnCenter of gravity of the head (inferior-posterior sella turcica) and vertebral body margins were digitized on four different lateral cervical radiographs: lordosis, kyphosis, and two S-shapes. Polynomials (seventh degree) and stress concentrations on the concave and convex margins were derived for the shape of the sagittal cervical curvatures from C1 to T1. Moments of inertia were determined from digitizing and the use of an elliptical shell model of cross-section. Moment arms from a vertical line through the center of gravity of the head to the atlas and scaled neck extensor moment arms from the literature were used to compute the vertical component of extensor muscle effort. Segmental lever arms were calculated from a vertical line through C1 to each vertebra.nnnRESULTSnIn lordosis, anterior and posterior stresses in the vertebral body are nearly uniform and minimal. In kyphotic areas, combined stresses changed from tension to compression at the anterior vertebral margins and were very large (6-10 times as large in magnitude) compared to lordosis. In kyphotic areas at the posterior vertebral body, the combined stresses changed from compression (in lordosis) to tension.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe stresses in kyphotic areas are very large and opposite in direction compared to a normal lordosis. This analysis provides the basis for the formation of osteophytes (Wolffs Law) on the anterior margins of vertebrae in kyphotic regions of the sagittal cervical curve. This indicates that any kyphosis is an undesirable configuration in the cervical spine. Relevance. Osteophytes and osteoarthritis are found at areas of altered stress and strain. Axial and flexural stresses at kyphotic areas in the sagittal cervical spine are abnormally high.

How do anterior/posterior translations of the thoracic cage affect the sagittal lumbar spine, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis?

Abstract. Anterior and posterior thoracic cage translations in the sagittal plane have not been reported for their range of motion and effects on the lumbar spine and pelvis. Twenty subjects volunteered for full-spine radiography in neutral, anterior, and posterior thoracic cage translation postures in a standing position. While grasping an anterior vertical pole, with hands at elbow level, subjects were instructed on how to translate their thoracic cage without any flexion/extension, utilizing a full-length mirror. On the radiographs, all four vertebral body corners of T1 through S1 and the superior margin of the acetabulum were digitized. Segmental and global angles of thoracic kyphosis, sagittal lumbar curvature, and pelvic flexion/extension in translation postures were compared to alignment in the neutral posture. Using the femur heads as an origin, the mean range of thoracic cage translation, measured as horizontal movement of T12 from neutral posture, was found to be 85.1xa0mm anterior and 73xa0mm posterior. In anterior translation, the thoracic kyphosis is hypokyphotic (Cobb T1–T12 reduced by 16°). In posterior translation, the segmental angles at T12–L1 and L1–L2 flexed, creating an S shape in the sagittal lumbar spine, while the thoracic kyphosis increased by 10°. Using posterior tangents from L1 to L5 and T12 to S1, and Cobb angles at T12–S1, the lumbar curve reduced slightly (by less than 3.3° for all global angle measurements) in anterior translation and reduced by 7.4°, 5.7°, and 8.1° respectively in posterior thoracic translation. The angle of pelvic tilt (measured as the angle of intersection of a line through posterior-inferior S1 to the superior acetabulum and the horizontal) reduced by a mean of 15.9°, and Fergusons sacral base angle to horizontal reduced by a mean of 13.1° in posterior translation. In anterior translation, pelvic tilt and Fergusons sacral base angle increased by 15.1° and 12.8°, respectively. The findings of this study show that thoracic cage anterior/posterior translations cause significant changes in thoracic kyphosis (26°), lumbar curve, and pelvic tilt. An understanding of this main motion and consequent coupled movements might aid the understanding of spinal injury kinematics and spinal displacement analysis on full spine lateral radiographs of low back pain and spinal disorder populations.

Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study

BackgroundFew digitizers can measure the complexity of upright human postural displacements in six degrees of freedom of the head, rib cage, and pelvis.MethodsIn a University laboratory, three examiners performed delayed repeated postural measurements on forty subjects over two days. Three digital photographs (left lateral, AP, right lateral) of each of 40 volunteer participants were obtained, twice, by three examiners. Examiners placed 13 markers on the subjects before photography and chose 16 points on the photographic images. Using the PosturePrint® internet computer system, head, rib cage, and pelvic postures were calculated as rotations (Rx, Ry, Rz) in degrees and translations (Tx, Tz) in millimeters. For reliability, two different types (liberal = ICC3,1 & conservative = ICC2,1) of inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Standard error of measurements (SEM) and mean absolute differences within and between observers measurements were also determined.ResultsAll of the liberal ICCs were in the excellent range (> 0.84). For the more conservative type ICCs, four Inter-examiner ICCs were in the interval (0.5–0.6), 10 ICCs were in the interval (0.61–0.74), and the remainder were greater than 0.75. SEMs were 2.7° or less for all rotations and 5.9 mm or less for all translations. Mean absolute differences within examiners and between examiners were 3.5° or less for all rotations and 8.4 mm or less for all translations.ConclusionFor the PosturePrint® system, the combined inter-examiner and intra-examiner correlation coefficients were in the good (14/44) and excellent (30/44) ranges. SEMs and mean absolute differences within and between examiners measurements were small. Thus, this posture digitizer is reliable for clinical use.

Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading

In the absence of external forces, the largest contributor to intervertebral disc (IVD) loads and stresses is trunk muscular activity. The relationship between trunk posture, spine geometry, extensor muscle activity, and the loads and stresses acting on the IVD is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in thoracolumbar disc loads and extensor muscle forces following anterior translation of the thoracic spine in the upright posture. Vertebral body geometries (C2 to S1) and the location of the femoral head and acetabulum centroids were obtained by digitizing lateral, full-spine radiographs of 13 men and five women volunteers without previous history of back pain. Two standing, lateral, full-spine radiographic views were obtained for each subject: a neutral-posture lateral radiograph and a radiograph during anterior translation of the thorax relative to the pelvis (while keeping T1 aligned over T12). Extensor muscle loads, and compression and shear stresses acting on the IVDs, were calculated for each posture using a previously validated biomechanical model. Comparing vertebral centroids for the neutral posture to the anterior posture, subjects were able to anterior translate +101.5xa0mm±33.0xa0mm (C7–hip axis), +81.5xa0mm±39.2xa0mm (C7–S1) (vertebral centroid of C7 compared with a vertical line through the vertebral centroid of S1), and +58.9xa0mm±19.1xa0mm (T12–S1). In the anterior translated posture, disc loads and stresses were significantly increased for all levels below T9. Increases in IVD compressive loads and shear loads, and the corresponding stresses, were most marked at the L5–S1 level and L3–L4 level, respectively. The extensor muscle loads required to maintain static equilibrium in the upright posture increased from 147.2xa0N (mean, neutral posture) to 667.1xa0N (mean, translated posture) at L5–S1. Compressive loads on the anterior and posterior L5–S1 disc nearly doubled in the anterior translated posture. Anterior translation of the thorax resulted in significantly increased loads and stresses acting on the thoracolumbar spine. This posture is common in lumbar spinal disorders and could contribute to lumbar disc pathologies, progression of L5–S1 spondylolisthesis deformities, and poor outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. In conclusion, anterior trunk translation in the standing subject increases extensor muscle activity and loads and stresses acting on the intervertebral disc in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions.

A non-randomized clinical control trial of Harrison mirror image methods for correcting trunk list (lateral translations of the thoracic cage) in patients with chronic low back pain

Spinal trunk list is a common occurrence in clinical practice, but few conservative methods of spinal rehabilitation have been reported. This study is a non-randomized clinical control trial of 63 consecutive retrospective subjects undergoing spinal rehabilitation and 23 prospective volunteer controls. All subjects presented with lateral thoracic-cage-translation posture (trunk list) and chronic low back pain. Initial and follow-up numerical pain rating scales (NRS) and AP lumbar radiographs were obtained after a mean of 11.5xa0weeks of care (average of 36 visits) for the treatment group and after a mean of 37.5xa0weeks for the control group. The radiographs were digitized and analyzed for a horizontal displacement of T12 from the second sacral tubercle, verticality of the lumbar spine at the sacral base, and any dextro/levo angle at mid-lumbar spine. Treatment subjects received the Harrison mirror image postural correction methods, which included an opposite trunk-list exercise and a new method of opposite trunk-list traction. Control subjects did not receive spinal rehabilitation therapy, but rather self-managed their back pain. For the treatment group, there were statistically significant improvements (approximately 50%) in all radiographic measurements and a decrease in pain intensity (NRS: 3.0 to 0.8). For the control group, no significant radiographic and NRS differences were found, except in trunk-list displacement of T12 to S1, worsened by 2.4xa0mm. Mirror image (opposite posture) postural corrective exercises and a new method of trunk-list traction resulted in 50% reduction in trunk list and were associated with nearly resolved pain intensity in this patient population. The findings warrant further study in the conservative treatment of chronic low back pain and spinal disorders.

UPRIGHT STATIC PELVIC POSTURE AS ROTATIONS AND TRANSLATIONS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL FROM THREE 2-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL IMAGES : VALIDATION OF A COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS

PURPOSEnThe aim of this study was to determine the accuracy in measuring the pelvic orientations of a phantom model using the PosturePrint method.nnnMETHODSnIn the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières biomechanics laboratory, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, a mannequin was fixed on a rotating platform. For a set of 3 photographs (left lateral, anterior to posterior, right lateral) of each position, the mannequin pelvis was placed in 68 different postures on a stand, 61 cm from a wall, in front of a digital camera. The camera was at 83.8 cm in height and at 3.35 m from a calibrated wall grid. Mannequin postures were in 5 degrees of freedom: lateral translation (Tx), lateral flexion (Rz), axial rotation (Ry), flexion-extension (Rx), and anterior-posterior translation (Tz). Average errors were the differences of the positioned postures to the PosturePrint computed values.nnnRESULTSnMean and SD of computational errors for rotation displacements were Rx = 0.5 degrees +/- 0.8 degrees , Ry = 1.3 degrees +/- 0.8 degrees , and Rz = 0.5 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees , and for translation, Tz = 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm and Tx = 0.9 +/- 0.5 mm.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe PosturePrint system allowed for accurate postural measurement of rotations and translations of a mannequin pelvis. The next step in evaluation of this product would be a reliability study on human subjects.

Reliability of lateral bending and axial rotation with validity of a new method to determine axial rotation on anteroposterior cervical radiographs.

OBJECTIVEnTo investigate the reliability of a new radiographic measurement of axial rotation and lateral bending on anterior-posterior cervical views by using a computer and sonic digitizer.nnnDESIGNnA blind, repeated-measure design was used. Anteroposterior cervicothoracic radiographs were presented to each of 3 examiners in random order. Each film was digitized, and 1 week later the films were randomized for a second run.nnnSETTINGnPrivate, primary-care chiropractic clinic.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURESnThe interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability were calculated from measurements on radiographs for determining axial rotations (Ry) and lateral bending (Rz) of C3 to T3.nnnRESULTSnWhen the new axial rotation method was applied to small rotations of a C3 plastic model, the average error was less than 1 degrees. For the calculations of axial rotation (Ry), the ICC values were in the good to excellent range. For axial rotation, the intraclass correlation coefficients were ICCs > or =0.78, and the interclass correlation coefficients were ICCs > or =0.67. For lateral flexions (Rz) of C3 to T3, all intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients were in the excellent range (ICCs > 0.87).nnnCONCLUSIONSnMethods of calculating axial rotations in the spine have been reported for large angles (5 degrees to 30 degrees ) but not for smaller angles. A new method for determining axial rotations of the cervical segments on AP views, based on the chord across the arc displaced by the spinous-lamina junction, had reliability (ICC values) in the good to excellent range. Compared with measured rotations of a C3 model (-5 degrees to +5 degrees ), the new method had an average error of less than 1 degrees and approximately 11.5%. The reliability for the axial rotation measurements was in the good to excellent range, and the lateral bending measurements were all in the excellent range.