Donald E. Tsai

Reduction in immunosuppression as initial therapy for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: analysis of prognostic variables and long-term follow-up of 42 adult patients.

Background. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an Epstein-Barr virus–associated malignancy that occurs in the setting of pharmacologic immunosuppression after organ transplantation. With the increased use of organ transplantation and intensive immunosuppression, this disease is becoming more common. We explore reduction in immunosuppression as an initial therapy for PTLD. Methods. We analyzed our organ transplant patient database to identify patients with biopsy-proven PTLD who were initially treated with reduction of their immunosuppressive medications with or without surgical resection of all known disease. Results. Forty-two adult patients were included in this study. Thirty patients were treated with reduction in immunosuppression alone. Twelve patients were treated with both reduction in immunosuppression and surgical resection of all known disease. Thirty-one of 42 patients (73.8%) achieved a complete remission. Of those patients who were treated with reduction in immunosuppression alone, 19 of 30 (63%) responded with a median time to documentation of response of 3.6 weeks. Multivariable analysis showed that elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio, organ dysfunction, and multi-organ involvement by PTLD were independent prognostic factors for lack of response to reduction in immunosuppression. In patients with none of these poor prognostic factors, 16 of 18 (89%) responded to reduction in immunosuppression in contrast to three of five (60%) with one risk factor and zero of seven (0%) with two to three factors present. The analysis also showed that increased age, elevated LDH ratio, severe organ dysfunction, presence of B symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight loss), and multi-organ involvement by PTLD at the time of diagnosis are independent prognostic indicators for poor survival. With median follow-up of 147 weeks, 55% of patients are alive with 50% in complete remission. Conclusions. Reduction in immunosuppression is an effective initial therapy for PTLD. Clinical prognostic factors may allow clinicians to identify which patients are likely to respond to reduction in immuno- suppression.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a review

Summary:Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a spectrum of Epstein–Barr virus-related (EBV) clinical diseases, from a benign mononucleosis-like illness to a fulminant non-Hodgkins lymphoma. In the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PTLD is an often-fatal complication occurring relatively early after transplant. Risk factors for the development of PTLD are well established, and include HLA-mismatching, T-cell depletion, and the use of antilymphocyte antibodies as conditioning or treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Early recognition of PTLD is particularly important in the SCT setting, because PTLD in these patients tends to be rapidly progressive. Familiarity with the clinical features of PTLD and a heightened level of suspicion are critical for making the diagnosis. Surveillance techniques with EBV antibody titers and/or polymerase chain raction (PCR) may have a role in some high-risk settings. Immune-based therapies such as monoclonal anti-B-cell antibodies, interferon-α, and EBV-specific donor T cells, either as treatment for PTLD or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients, represent promising new directions in the treatment of this disease.

Treatment of PTLD with Rituximab or Chemotherapy

Information regarding treatment of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) beyond reduction in immunosuppression (RI) is limited. We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy for PTLD for response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Thirty‐five patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty‐two underwent rituximab treatment, with overall response rate (ORR) 68%. Median TTF was not reached at 19 months and estimated OS was 31 months. In univariable analysis, Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) positivity predicted response and TTF. LDH elevation predicted shorter OS. No patient died of rituximab toxicity and all patients who progressed underwent further treatment with chemotherapy. Twenty‐three patients received chemotherapy. ORR was 74%, median TTF was 10.5 months and estimated OS was 42 months. Prognostic factors for response included stage, LDH and allograft involvement by tumor. These factors and lack of complete response (CR) predicted poor survival. Twenty‐six percent of the patients receiving chemotherapy died of toxicity. Rituximab and chemotherapy are effective in patients with PTLD who fail or do not tolerate RI. While rituximab is well tolerated, toxicity of chemotherapy is marked. PTLD patients requiring therapy beyond RI should be considered for rituximab, especially with EBV‐positive disease. Chemotherapy should be reserved for patients who fail rituximab, have EBV‐negative tumors or need a rapid response.

Variability in the biological response to anti-CD20 B cell depletion in systemic lupus erythaematosus

Objective: To study the effects in systemic lupus erythaematosus (SLE) of B cell directed therapy with rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed at CD20+ B cells, without concomitant immunosuppressive therapy in mild to moderate SLE. Methods: Patients (n = 24) with active SLE and failure of ⩾1 immunosuppressive were recruited from three university centres into this phase I/II prospective open-label study. Patients were followed for 1 year to assess safety, efficacy and biological effects. Results: In total, 18 of the patients scheduled to receive the full lymphoma dose of rituximab were evaluable for B cell levels in peripheral blood. Of these, 17 had effective CD19+ B cell depletion (<5 cells/μl). However, six of the depleted patients showed B cell return before 24 weeks. A total of 70% of patients improved by week 55, as defined by an SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score improvement of ⩾2 units from baseline. The degree of CD19+ B cell depletion was correlated with SLEDAI improvement at week 15 (r = 0.84). In general, rituximab infusions were well tolerated. Approximately a third of the patients developed human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) titres, which correlated with poor B cell depletion. Most patients (9 of 14) did not respond to immunisations with Pneumovax and tetanus toxoid. Conclusions: Rituximab is a promising new therapy for SLE. The variability of responses in patients with SLE may be related to HACA formation. The failure to respond to immunisations is surprising, in view of the apparently low risk of infections. Better biological markers are necessary to follow these patients during treatment.

Phase I Trial of Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist PF-3512676 with and Following Rituximab in Patients with Recurrent Indolent and Aggressive Non–Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Purpose: PF-3512676 (formerly CpG 7909) is a novel Toll-like receptor 9–activating oligonucleotide with single-agent antitumor activity that augments preclinical rituximab efficacy. This Phase I trial was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab. Experimental Design: Patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ B cell non–Hodgkins lymphoma received i.v. rituximab (375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) and PF-3512676 weekly for 4 weeks either i.v. (0.04, 0.16, 0.32, or 0.48 mg/kg) or s.c. (0.01, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.16 mg/kg). An additional extended-treatment cohort received 4 weeks of 0.24 mg/kg s.c. PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab followed by s.c. PF-3512676 alone weekly for 20 weeks. Results: Patients (N = 50) had received a median of three prior therapies (range, 1-11) including rituximab in 80% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 of 19 (58%) i.v. patients, 15 of 19 (79%) s.c. patients, and all 12 patients in the extended-treatment cohort. Most common adverse events were mild to moderate systemic flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions (s.c. cohorts only). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients. Objective responses occurred in 12 of 50 (24%) patients overall and in 6 of 12 (50%) patients in the extended-treatment cohort, including 2 patients with rituximab-refractory disease. Conclusion: Brief or extended-duration PF-3512676 can be safely administered in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory non–Hodgkins lymphoma.

Reduction of Immunosuppression as Initial Therapy for Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Reduction of immunosuppression (RI) is commonly used to treat posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplant recipients. We investigated the efficacy, safety and predictors of response to RI in adult patients with PTLD. Sixty‐seven patients were managed with RI alone and 30 patients were treated with surgical excision followed by adjuvant RI. The response rate to RI alone was 45% (complete response—37%, partial response—8%). The relapse rate in complete responders was 17%. Adjuvant RI resulted in a 27% relapse rate. The acute rejection rate following RI‐containing strategies was 32% and a second transplant was feasible without relapse of PTLD. The median survival was 44 months in patients treated with RI alone and 9.5 months in patients who remained on full immunosuppression (p = 0.07). Bulky disease, advanced stage and older age predicted lack of response to RI. Survival analysis demonstrated predictors of poor outcome—age, dyspnea, B symptoms, LDH level, hepatitis C, bone marrow and liver involvement. Patients with none or one of these factors had a 3‐year overall survival of 100% and 79%, respectively. These findings support the use of RI alone in low‐risk PTLD and suggest factors that predict response and survival.

A Phase I Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Sirolimus and MEC Chemotherapy in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Purpose: Inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem cells may enhance their sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. We sought to determine the safety and describe the toxicity of this approach by adding the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus (rapamycin), to intensive AML induction chemotherapy. Experimental Design: We performed a phase I dose escalation study of sirolimus with the chemotherapy regimen MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) in patients with relapsed, refractory, or untreated secondary AML. Results: Twenty-nine subjects received sirolimus and MEC across five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were irreversible marrow aplasia and multiorgan failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sirolimus was determined to be a 12 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 4 mg/d on days 2 to 7, concurrent with MEC chemotherapy. Complete or partial remissions occurred in 6 (22%) of the 27 subjects who completed chemotherapy, including 3 (25%) of the 12 subjects treated at the MTD. At the MTD, measured rapamycin trough levels were within the therapeutic range for solid organ transplantation. However, direct measurement of the mTOR target p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in marrow blasts from these subjects only showed definite target inhibition in one of five evaluable samples. Conclusions: Sirolimus and MEC is an active and feasible regimen. However, as administered in this study, the synergy between MEC and sirolimus was not confirmed. Future studies are planned with different schedules to clarify the clinical and biochemical effects of sirolimus in AML and to determine whether target inhibition predicts chemotherapy response. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(21):6732–9)

Second auto-SCT is safe and effective salvage therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Therapeutic options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has relapsed after a prior auto-SCT include novel biologic therapies, traditional chemotherapy or a second transplant, with no clear standard of care. Few published studies address the safety and efficacy of a second auto-SCT for relapsed disease. We reviewed the Abramson Cancer Center experience with salvage auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Forty-one patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at our institution; the median time between transplants was 37 months (range 3–91). The overall response rate in assessable patients was 55%, and treatment-related mortality was 7%. With a median follow-up time of 15 months, the median PFS was 8.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months. In a multivariate analysis of OS, independent prognostic factors were ⩾5 prior lines of therapy and time to progression after initial auto-SCT of ⩽12 months. We conclude that in well-selected patients, salvage auto-SCT is safe and effective for relapsed myeloma.

Management of patients with post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: the role of rituximab

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ and bone marrow transplantations. Rituximab (Rituxan, Mabthera), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to the CD20 antigen on the surface of B‐cell lymphocytes, has been used increasingly in the treatment of PTLD. Rituximab was initially approved for the treatment of low‐grade non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, but multiple case studies, retrospective analyses, and phase II trials demonstrate the benefit of rituximab in PTLD. This paper reviews the current data on rituximab and its promising role in the management of PTLD.

Prognostic value of FDG-PET scan imaging in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 50 lymphoma patients (Hodgkins disease and non-Hodgkins lymphoma) who had an 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan after at least two cycles of salvage chemotherapy and before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at our institution. The patients were categorized into FDG-PET negative (N=32) and positive (N=18) groups. The median follow-up after ASCT was 19 months (range: 3–59). In the FDG-PET-negative group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months (range: 2–59) with 15 (54%) patients without progression at 12 months after ASCT. The median overall survival (OS) for this group was not reached. In the FDG-PET-positive group, the median PFS was 5 months (range: 1–19) with only one (7%) patient without progression at 12 months after ASCT. The median OS was 19 months (range: 1–34). In the FDG-PET-negative group, chemotherapy-resistant patients by CT-based criteria had a comparable outcome to those with chemotherapy-sensitive disease. A positive FDG-PET scan after salvage chemotherapy and prior ASCT indicates an extremely poor chance of durable response after ASCT.