Donald J. Bord

On the possible presence of promethium in the spectra of HD 101065 (Przybylski's star) and HD 965

Traditional and statistical line-identification methods indicate the presence of Pm I and II, Tc I, and perhaps Tc II in the spectrum of the roAp star HD 101065. These methods also lead to the presence of Pm II and probably also Pm I in a related cool Ap star, HD 965. The spectroscopic evidence is strong enough that we would declare promethium to be present without hesitation, if any of its isotopes were stable. The longest-lived promethium isotope has a half-life of only 17.7 years. The presence of this element would mean that unrecognized processes - perhaps flare activities - are taking place in the atmospheres of these stars. The significance of such processes for galactic chemical evolution cannot be ruled out. We discuss the possibility that the highly improbable wavelength coincidences are due to chance, or due to contamination of the laboratory sources.

A Re-Evaluation of the Abundance of Lutetium in the Sun

AbstractLutetium is one of the few nonvolatile elements whose solar photospheric abundance departs significantly from that derived from CI chondrites. We have applied the Cowan code to compute new oscillator strengths for Luii, and have included a correction for core polarization. The results have been used in a synthesis of the solar spectrum in the vicinity of features at

AN ANALYSIS OF HD 43819 BY WAVELENGTH-COINCIDENCE STATISTICS.

\lambda _ \odot

Abundances in Przybylski's star

3397.062 and

On the Abundance of Holmium in the sun

\lambda _ \odot

The CP Stars, an overview: Then and now

6221.72. We find that the majority of the absorption in the ultraviolet feature is due to NH, making it unsuitable for extracting a reliable lutetium abundance. Our best fit to the low-noise Jungfraujoch spectrum for the weak, nine-component hyperfine Luii line at λ 6221.87 yields an abundance of +0.06 on a scale where log(H) = 12.00. This value is within 0.07 dex of the meteoritic result (+0.13). (These figures reflect the note added in proof below.)