Donald J. Green

Impact of plasma transfusion in massively transfused trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the optimal use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) in trauma. Our hypothesis was that a higher FFP: packed red blood cells (PRBC) ratio is associated with improved survival. METHODS This is a 6-year retrospective trauma registry and blood bank database study in a level I trauma center. All massively transfused patients (> or =10 PRBC during 24 hours) were analyzed. Patients with severe head trauma (head Abbreviated Injury Severity score > or =3) were excluded from the analysis. Patients were classified into four groups according to the FFP:PRBC ratio received: low ratio (< or =1:8), medium ratio (>1:8 and < or =1:3), high ratio (>1:3 and < or =1:2), and highest ratio (>1:2). RESULTS Of 25,599 trauma patients, 4,241 (16.6%) received blood transfusion. Massive transfusion occurred in 484 (11.4%) of the transfused. After exclusion of 101 patients with severe head injury 383 patients were available for analysis. The mortality rate decreased significantly with increased FFP transfusion. However, there does not seem to be a survival advantage after a 1:3 FFP:PRBC ratio has been reached. Using the highest ratio group as a reference, the relative risk of death was 0.97 (p = 0.97) for the high ratio group, 1.90 (p < 0.01) for the medium ratio group, and 3.46 (p < 0.01) for the low ratio group. There was an increasing trend toward more FFP use during time with the mean units per patient increasing 83% from 6.3 +/- 4.6 in 2000 to 11.5 +/- 9.7 in 2005. CONCLUSION Higher FFP:PRBC ratio is an independent predictor of survival in massively transfused patients. Aggressive early use of FFP may improve outcome in massively transfused trauma patients.

Quikclot use in trauma for hemorrhage control: Case series of 103 documented uses

BACKGROUND Local hemostatics have recently been introduced for field use to control external hemorrhage. The objective of this report is to describe the initial clinical experience with QuikClot, a zeolite that works by absorbing water and concentrating coagulation factors to stop bleeding in a series of patients. METHODS Documented cases using a self-reporting survey sheet submitted by the users and first-hand detailed interviews with the users when possible. RESULTS There were 103 documented cases of QuikClot use: 69 by the US military in Iraq, 20 by civilian trauma surgeons and 14 by civilian first responders. There were 83 cases involving application to external wounds and 20 cases of intracorporeal use by military and civilian surgeons. All field applications by first responders were successful in controlling hemorrhage. The overall efficacy rate was 92% with eight cases of ineffectiveness noted by physicians in morbid patients with massive injuries when the QuikClot was used as a last resort. These reported failures were thought to be a result of the coagulopathic state of the patient from massive resuscitation or the inability to get the product directly to the source of hemorrhage. When the QuikClot was applied on responsive patients, the heat generated by the exothermic reaction caused mild to severe pain and discomfort. There were three cases of burns caused by the heat generated by the QuikClot application with one case requiring skin grafting. There was one major complication from intracorporeal use caused by scar formation from a foreign body reaction. CONCLUSIONS QuikClot has been effectively used by a wide range of providers in the field and hospital to control hemorrhage.

Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients: A prospective analysis

IMPORTANCE The Frailty Index (FI) is a known predictor of adverse outcomes in geriatric patients. The usefulness of the FI as an outcome measure in geriatric trauma patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the usefulness of the FI as an effective assessment tool in predicting adverse outcomes in geriatric trauma patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A 2-year (June 2011 to February 2013) prospective cohort study at a level I trauma center at the University of Arizona. We prospectively measured frailty in all geriatric trauma patients. Geriatric patients were defined as those 65 years or older. The FI was calculated using 50 preadmission frailty variables. Frailty in patients was defined by an FI of 0.25 or higher. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was in-hospital complications. The secondary outcome measure was adverse discharge disposition. In-hospital complications were defined as cardiac, pulmonary, infectious, hematologic, renal, and reoperation. Adverse discharge disposition was defined as discharge to a skilled nursing facility or in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the FI and outcomes. RESULTS In total, 250 patients were enrolled, with a mean (SD) age of 77.9 (8.1) years, median Injury Severity Score of 15 (range, 9-18), median Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 (range, 12-15), and mean (SD) FI of 0.21 (0.10). Forty-four percent (n = 110) of patients had frailty. Patients with frailty were more likely to have in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0; P = .001) and adverse discharge disposition (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4; P = .001). The mortality rate was 2.0% (n = 5), and all patients who died had frailty. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The FI is an independent predictor of in-hospital complications and adverse discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients. This index should be used as a clinical tool for risk stratification in this patient group.

Pediatric vs adult vascular trauma: a National Trauma Databank review

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to examine nationwide data on vascular injuries in children and to compare pediatric and adult patients with respect to the incidence, injury mechanisms, and outcomes. METHODS This is a National Trauma Databank analysis based on dataset version 7.0 (spanning a 5-year period ending December 2006). Pediatric patients under the age of 16 with at least one reported diagnosis of a vascular injury were compared to the adult cohort aged 16 and greater with a vascular injury. RESULTS During the study period, of 251,787 injured patients younger than 16 years, 1138 (0.6%) had a vascular injury. The incidence in patients 16 years or older was significantly higher, at 1.6% (P < .01). Compared to the adult vascular patients, pediatric patients had a significantly lower Injury Severity Score (16.8 +/- 14.9 vs 26.3 +/- 16.7, P < .001) and encountered less frequently penetrating injuries (41.8% vs 51.2%, P < .001). The most commonly injured vessels in the pediatric population were vessels of the upper extremity (424 patients or 37.9%). The overall incidence of thoracic aortic injuries in children was seven-fold lower compared to the incidence in adults (0.03% vs 0.21%). After adjusting for confounding factors, pediatric patients demonstrated improved survival following vascular injuries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.79; P < .001). No significant difference was identified in the rate of amputation between pediatric and adult patients who had sustained upper or lower extremity vascular injuries. CONCLUSION Vascular trauma in the pediatric population is uncommon, occurring in only 0.6% of all pediatric trauma patients. Although less frequent than adults, a significant proportion was due to penetrating injury. Vessels of the upper extremity were the most commonly injured and were associated with low mortality. Injuries of the thoracic aorta are rare. Overall, pediatric patients had an improved adjusted mortality when compared to adults.

Incidence and clinical predictors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury: a National Trauma Databank review.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and identify clinical predictors for the need for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). METHODS The National Trauma Databank version 7.0 (2002-2006) was used to identify all patients who sustained a CSCI. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) were excluded. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were abstracted. Patients requiring tracheostomy were compared with those who did not require tracheostomy. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for the need of tracheostomy. RESULTS There were 5,265 eligible patients. Of these, 1,082 (20.6%) required tracheostomy and 4,174 (79.4%) did not. The majority patients were men and blunt trauma predominated. Patients requiring tracheostomy had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (33.5±17.7 vs. 24.4±16.2, p<0.001) and required intubation more frequently on scene and Emergency Department (ED) (4.2 vs. 1.4%, p<0.001 and 31.1 vs. 7.9%, p<0.001, respectively). Patients requiring tracheostomy had higher rates of complete CSCI at C1-C4 (18.2 vs. 8.4%, p<0.001) and C5-C7 levels (37.8 vs. 16.9%, p<0.001). Patients requiring tracheostomy had more ventilation days, longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, but lower mortality. Intubation on scene or ED, complete CSCI at C1-C4 or C5-C7 levels, ISS≥16, facial fracture, and thoracic trauma were identified as independent predictors for the need of tracheostomy. CONCLUSION After CSCI, a fifth of patients will require tracheostomy. Intubation on scene or ED, complete CSCI at C1-C4 or C5-C7 levels, ISS≥16, facial fracture, and thoracic trauma were independently associated with the need for tracheostomy.

Early vasopressor use in critical injury is associated with mortality independent from volume status.

BACKGROUND Complications of excessive crystalloid after critical injury have increased interest in vasopressor support. However, it is hypothesized that vasopressor use in patients who are under-resuscitated is associated with death. We performed this study to determine whether volume status is associated with increased mortality in the critically injured exposed to early vasopressors. METHODS The intensive care unit database at a Level I center was queried for all adult admissions surviving for >24 hours from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2008. Patients with spinal cord injury and severe traumatic brain injury were excluded. The vasopressor group [Vaso (+)] was exposed to dopamine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or arginine vasopressin within 24 hours of admission. Demographic and injury data were studied including intensive care unit admission central venous pressure. Hypovolemia [Hypov (+)] was considered an admission central venous pressure ≤8 mm Hg. The Vaso (+) group was analyzed to determine whether Hypov (+) was independently associated with death. RESULTS Of 1,349 eligible patients, 26% (351) were Vaso (+). Mortality was 43.6% (153) in the Vaso (+) versus 4.2% (42) in the Vaso (-) group (17.60 [12.10-25.60], <0.01). Vasopressor exposure was associated with death independent of injury severity. In Vaso (+) patients, Hypov (+) was not associated with mortality, whereas Emergency Department admission Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 and multiple vasopressor use were. CONCLUSIONS Vasopressor exposure early after critical injury is independently associated with death and mortality is increased regardless of fluid status. Although it is not advisable to withhold support with impending cardiovascular collapse, use of any vasopressor during ongoing resuscitation should be approached with extreme caution regardless of volume status.

A Diagnostic Delay of 5 Hours Increases the Risk of Death After Blunt Hollow Viscus Injury

BACKGROUND Hollow viscus injuries (HVI) are uncommon after blunt trauma, and accomplishing a timely diagnosis can be difficult. Time to operative intervention has been implicated as a risk factor for mortality, but reports are conflicting. METHODS All blunt trauma admissions to an academic level 1 trauma center from January 1992 to September 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of blunt HVI were included. Patients who died within 24 hours were excluded. Data regarding patient demographics, injuries, time from admission until laparotomy, length of stay, and mortality were recorded, and a multivariate analysis to determine independent risk factors for mortality was carried out. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Of 35,033 blunt trauma admissions, there were 195 (0.6%) HVI patients with the following characteristics (data expressed as mean +/- 1 SD): mean age of 35 years +/- 16 years, Injury Severity Score of 17 +/- 11, time from admission to laparotomy of 5.9 hours +/- 5.8 hours, operative blood loss of 1500 mL +/- 1800 mL, and length of stay of 19 days +/- 23 days. Twelve percent presented with a systolic pressure <90 mm Hg and 9% died. Independent risk factors for mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, p = 0.005), Abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score (OR = 2.5, p = 0.011), the presence of a significant extra-abdominal injury (OR = 3.4, p = 0.043), and a delay of more than 5 hours between admission and laparotomy (OR = 3.2, p = 0.0499). Eighty-six percent of the deaths in patients who had a delay of >5 hours were because of abdominal-related sepsis. CONCLUSION HVI occurred in less than 1% of all blunt trauma admissions. Delays in operative intervention are associated with an increased mortality. A high index of suspicion is needed to make a timely diagnosis and minimize risk.

Optimal positioning for emergent needle thoracostomy: a cadaver-based study.

BACKGROUND Needle thoracostomy is an emergent procedure designed to relieve tension pneumothorax. High failure rates because of the needle not penetrating into the thoracic cavity have been reported. Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines recommend placement in the second intercostal space, midclavicular line using a 5-cm needle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate placement in the fifth intercostal space, midaxillary line, where tube thoracostomy is routinely performed. We hypothesized that this would result in a higher successful placement rate. METHODS Twenty randomly selected unpreserved adult cadavers were evaluated. A standard 14-gauge 5-cm needle was placed in both the fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line and the traditional second intercostal space at the midclavicular line in both the right and left chest walls. The needles were secured and thoracotomy was then performed to assess penetration into the pleural cavity. The right and left sides were analyzed separately acting as their own controls for a total of 80 needles inserted into 20 cadavers. The thickness of the chest wall at the site of penetration was then measured for each entry position. RESULTS A total of 14 male and 6 female cadavers were studied. Overall, 100% (40 of 40) of needles placed in the fifth intercostal space and 57.5% (23 of 40) of the needles placed in the second intercostal space entered the chest cavity (p < 0.001); right chest: 100% versus 60.0% (p = 0.003) and left chest: 100% versus 55.0% (p = 0.001). Overall, the thickness of the chest wall was 3.5 cm ± 0.9 cm at the fifth intercostal space and 4.5 cm ± 1.1 cm at the second intercostal space (p < 0.001). Both right and left chest wall thicknesses were similar (right, 3.6 cm ± 1.0 cm vs. 4.5 cm ± 1.1 cm, p = 0.007; left, 3.5 ± 0.9 cm vs. 4.4 cm ± 1.1 cm, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS In a cadaveric model, needle thoracostomy was successfully placed in 100% of attempts at the fifth intercostal space but in only 58% at the traditional second intercostal position. On average, the chest wall was 1 cm thinner at this position and may improve successful needle placement. Live patient validation of these results is warranted.

Prospective Evaluation of Multidetector Computed Tomography for Extremity Vascular Trauma

BACKGROUND Multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) is increasingly being used for the assessment of extremity vascular injury. However, to date, there are only retrospective series and a single small prospective study evaluating its efficacy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the ability of MDCTA to detect arterial injury in the injured upper and lower extremities. METHODS After institutional review board approval, all trauma patients aged 16 years or older admitted to a Level I trauma center who sustained extremity trauma and underwent initial evaluation with a 64-channel MDCTA from March 2009 to June 2010 were prospectively enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA were tested against an aggregate gold standard of operative intervention, conventional angiography, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS During the 20-month study period, 635 patients with extremity trauma underwent a structured clinical examination. Hard signs of vascular injury was observed in 5.5% of patients with a 97.1% incidence of clinically significant injury requiring operative intervention. Eighty-three percent of patients had no signs of vascular injury with no missed injuries detected during follow-up. Eighty-nine MDCTAs were performed in the remaining 73 patients (11.5%) with soft signs. The mechanism of injury was penetrating in 69.9% (42 gunshot wound, 5 stab wound, and 4 shotgun). There were 24 positive studies, 23 of which were confirmed at operation (5 brachial artery injuries, 2 radial, 1 ulnar, 1 external iliac, 2 common femoral, 5 proximal superficial femoral, 2 distal superficial femoral, 4 popliteal, and 1 posterior tibial artery injury). A left posterior tibial artery occlusion was managed nonoperatively. There were 58 negative studies with clinical follow-up available in 100%, for a mean of 10.6 days ± 11.7 days (median, 6 days; range, 1-41 days). MDCTA was nondiagnostic in seven patients (9.6%), five secondary to artifact from retained missile fragments (3 shotgun and 2 gunshot wound), and two secondary to technical errors in reformatting. In the absence of artifact, MDCTA achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting all clinically significant arterial injuries. CONCLUSIONS Physical examination is critical in the decision-making process for the injured extremity and can accurately reduce unnecessary imaging. If imaging is required, MDCTA is a sensitive and a specific noninvasive modality for arterial evaluation and may replace conventional angiography as the diagnostic modality of choice for the evaluation of the acutely injured extremity.

Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

BACKGROUND Heart rate and systolic blood pressure are unreliable in geriatric trauma patients. Shock index (SI) (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) is a simple marker of worse outcomes after injury. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of SI in predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that SI predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients. METHODS We performed a 4-year (2007–2010) retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients 65 years or older were included. Transferred patients, patients dead on arrival, missing vitals on presentation, and patients with burns and traumatic brain injury were excluded. A cutoff value of SI greater than or equal to 1 (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 79%) was used to define hemodynamic instability. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcome measures were need for blood transfusion, need for exploratory laparotomy, and development of in-hospital complications. Multiple logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS A total of 485,595 geriatric patients were reviewed, of whom 217,190 were included. The mean (SD) age was 77.7 (7.1) years, 60% were males, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 14 (range, 3–15), median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9 (range, 4–18), and mean (SD) SI was 0.58 (0.18). Three percent (n = 6,585) had an SI greater than or equal to 1. Patients with SI greater than or equal to 1 were more likely to require blood product requirement (p = 0.001), require an exploratory laparotomy (p = 0.01), and have in-hospital complications (p = 0.02). The overall mortality rate was 4.1% (n = 8,952). SI greater than or equal to 1 was the strongest predictor for mortality (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6–3.3; p = 0.001) in geriatric trauma patients. Systolic blood pressure (p = 0.09) and heart rate (p = 0.2) were not predictive of mortality. CONCLUSION SI is an accurate and specific predictor of morbidity and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. SI is superior to heart rate and systolic blood pressure for predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Geriatric trauma patients with SI greater than or equal to 1 should be transferred to a Level 1 trauma center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.