Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Donald R. Franklin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Donald R. Franklin.


Neurology | 2010

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study.

Robert K. Heaton; David B. Clifford; Donald R. Franklin; Steven Paul Woods; Christopher F. Ake; Florin Vaida; Ronald J. Ellis; S. Letendre; Thomas D. Marcotte; Atkinson Jh; M. Rivera-Mindt; Ofilio Vigil; Michael J. Taylor; Ann C. Collier; C. M. Marra; Benjamin B. Gelman; Justin C. McArthur; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; McCutchan Ja; Ian Abramson; Anthony Gamst; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Terry L. Jernigan; Joseph K. Wong; Igor Grant

Objectives: This is a cross-sectional, observational study to determine the frequency and associated features of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in a large, diverse sample of infected individuals in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART). Methods: A total of 1,555 HIV-infected adults were recruited from 6 university clinics across the United States, with minimal exclusions. We used standardized neuromedical, psychiatric, and neuropsychological (NP) examinations, and recently published criteria for diagnosing HAND and classifying 3 levels of comorbidity (minimal to severe non-HIV risks for NP impairment). Results: Fifty-two percent of the total sample had NP impairment, with higher rates in groups with greater comorbidity burden (40%, 59%, and 83%). Prevalence estimates for specific HAND diagnoses (excluding severely confounded cases) were 33% for asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, 12% for mild neurocognitive disorder, and only 2% for HIV-associated dementia (HAD). Among participants with minimal comorbidities (n = 843), history of low nadir CD4 was a strong predictor of impairment, and the lowest impairment rate on CART occurred in the subset with suppressed plasma viral loads and nadir CD4 ≥200 cells/mm3 (30% vs 47% in remaining subgroups). Conclusions: The most severe HAND diagnosis (HAD) was rare, but milder forms of impairment remained common, even among those receiving CART who had minimal comorbidities. Future studies should clarify whether early disease events (e.g., profound CD4 decline) may trigger chronic CNS changes, and whether early CART prevents or reverses these changes.


Journal of NeuroVirology | 2011

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors.

Robert K. Heaton; Donald R. Franklin; Ronald J. Ellis; J. Allen McCutchan; Scott Letendre; Shannon LeBlanc; Stephanie H. Corkran; Nichole A. Duarte; David B. Clifford; Steven Paul Woods; Ann C. Collier; Christina M. Marra; Susan Morgello; Monica Rivera Mindt; Michael J. Taylor; Thomas D. Marcotte; J. Hampton Atkinson; Tanya Wolfson; Benjamin B. Gelman; Justin C. McArthur; David M. Simpson; Ian Abramson; Anthony Gamst; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Terry L. Jernigan; Joseph K. Wong; Igor Grant

Combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) has greatly reduced medical morbidity and mortality with HIV infection, but high rates of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) continue to be reported. Because large HIV-infected (HIV+) and uninfected (HIV−) groups have not been studied with similar methods in the pre-CART and CART eras, it is unclear whether CART has changed the prevalence, nature, and clinical correlates of HAND. We used comparable methods of subject screening and assessments to classify neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in large groups of HIV + and HIV − participants from the pre-CART era (1988–1995; N = 857) and CART era (2000–2007; N = 937). Impairment rate increased with successive disease stages (CDC stages A, B, and C) in both eras: 25%, 42%, and 52% in pre-CART era and 36%, 40%, and 45% in CART era. In the medically asymptomatic stage (CDC-A), NCI was significantly more common in the CART era. Low nadir CD4 predicted NCI in both eras, whereas degree of current immunosuppression, estimated duration of infection, and viral suppression in CSF (on treatment) were related to impairment only pre-CART. Pattern of NCI also differed: pre-CART had more impairment in motor skills, cognitive speed, and verbal fluency, whereas CART era involved more memory (learning) and executive function impairment. High rates of mild NCI persist at all stages of HIV infection, despite improved viral suppression and immune reconstitution with CART. The consistent association of NCI with nadir CD4 across eras suggests that earlier treatment to prevent severe immunosuppression may also help prevent HAND. Clinical trials targeting HAND prevention should specifically examine timing of ART initiation.


Neurology | 2014

Asymptomatic HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment increases risk for symptomatic decline

Igor Grant; Donald R. Franklin; Reena Deutsch; Steven Paul Woods; Florin Vaida; Ronald J. Ellis; Scott Letendre; Thomas D. Marcotte; Atkinson Jh; Ann C. Collier; Christina M. Marra; David B. Clifford; Benjamin B. Gelman; Justin C. McArthur; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; McCutchan Ja; Ian Abramson; Anthony Gamst; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Davey M. Smith; Robert K. Heaton

Objective: While HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain prevalent despite combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), the clinical relevance of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), the most common HAND diagnosis, remains unclear. We investigated whether HIV-infected persons with ANI were more likely than those who were neurocognitively normal (NCN) to experience a decline in everyday functioning (symptomatic decline). Methods: A total of 347 human participants from the CNS HIV Anti-Retroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) cohort were NCN (n = 226) or had ANI (n = 121) at baseline. Neurocognitive assessments occurred approximately every 6 months, with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 45.2 (28.7–63.7) months. Symptomatic decline was based on self-report (SR) or objective, performance-based (PB) problems in everyday functioning. Proportional hazards modeling was used to generate risk ratios for progression to symptomatic HAND after adjusting for baseline and time-dependent covariates, including CD4+ T-lymphocyte count (CD4), virologic suppression, CART, and mood. Results: The ANI group had a shorter time to symptomatic HAND than the NCN after adjusting for baseline predictors: adjusted risk ratios for symptomatic HAND were 2.0 (confidence interval [CI] 1.1–3.6; p = 0.02) for SR, 5.8 (CI 3.2–10.7; p < 0.0001) for PB, and 3.2 (CI 2.0–5.0; p < 0.0001) for either SR or PB. Current CD4 and depression were significant time-dependent covariates, but antiretroviral regimen, virologic suppression, and substance abuse or dependence were not. Conclusions: This longitudinal study demonstrates that ANI conveys a 2-fold to 6-fold increase in risk for earlier development of symptomatic HAND, supporting the prognostic value of the ANI diagnosis in clinical settings. Identifying those at highest risk for symptomatic decline may offer an opportunity to modify treatment to delay progression.


Journal of NeuroVirology | 2011

Clinical factors related to brain structure in HIV: The CHARTER study

Terry L. Jernigan; Sarah L. Archibald; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Michael J. Taylor; Rebecca J. Theilmann; Michelle D. Julaton; Randy Notestine; Tanya Wolfson; Scott Letendre; Ronald J. Ellis; Robert K. Heaton; Anthony Gamst; Donald R. Franklin; David B. Clifford; Ann C. Collier; Benjamin B. Gelman; Christina M. Marra; Justin C. McArthur; J. Allen McCutchan; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; Igor Grant

Despite the widening use of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), neurocognitive impairment remains common among HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Associations between HIV-related neuromedical variables and magnetic resonance imaging indices of brain structural integrity may provide insight into the neural bases for these symptoms. A diverse HIV+ sample (n = 251) was studied through the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research initiative. Multi-channel image analysis produced volumes of ventricular and sulcal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cortical and subcortical gray matter, total cerebral white matter, and abnormal white matter. Cross-sectional analyses employed a series of multiple linear regressions to model each structural volume as a function of severity of prior immunosuppression (CD4 nadir), current CD4 count, presence of detectable CSF HIV RNA, and presence of HCV antibodies; secondary analyses examined plasma HIV RNA, estimated duration of HIV infection, and cumulative exposure to ART. Lower CD4 nadir was related to most measures of the structural brain damage. Higher current CD4, unexpectedly, correlated with lower white and subcortical gray and increased CSF. Detectable CSF HIV RNA was related to less total white matter. HCV coinfection was associated with more abnormal white matter. Longer exposure to ART was associated with lower white matter and higher sulcal CSF. HIV neuromedical factors, including lower nadir, higher current CD4 levels, and detectable HIV RNA, were associated with white matter damage and variability in subcortical volumes. Brain structural integrity in HIV likely reflects dynamic effects of current immune status and HIV replication, superimposed on residual effects associated with severe prior immunosuppression.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2015

Neurocognitive Change in the Era of HIV Combination Antiretroviral Therapy: The Longitudinal CHARTER Study

Robert K. Heaton; Donald R. Franklin; Reena Deutsch; Scott Letendre; Ronald J. Ellis; Kaitlin B. Casaletto; María J. Marquine; Steven Paul Woods; Florin Vaida; J. Hampton Atkinson; Thomas D. Marcotte; J. Allen McCutchan; Ann C. Collier; Christina M. Marra; David B. Clifford; Benjamin B. Gelman; Ned Sacktor; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; Ian Abramson; Anthony Gamst; Christine Fennema-Notestine; David M. Smith; Igor Grant

BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) can show variable clinical trajectories. Previous longitudinal studies of HAND typically have been brief, did not use adequate normative standards, or were conducted in the context of a clinical trial, thereby limiting our understanding of incident neurocognitive (NC) decline and recovery. METHODS We investigated the incidence and predictors of NC change over 16-72 (mean, 35) months in 436 HIV-infected participants in the CNS HIV Anti-Retroviral Therapy Effects Research cohort. Comprehensive laboratory, neuromedical, and NC assessments were obtained every 6 months. Published, regression-based norms for NC change were used to generate overall change status (decline vs stable vs improved) at each study visit. Survival analysis was used to examine the predictors of time to NC change. RESULTS Ninety-nine participants (22.7%) declined, 265 (60.8%) remained stable, and 72 (16.5%) improved. In multivariable analyses, predictors of NC improvements or declines included time-dependent treatment status and indicators of disease severity (current hematocrit, albumin, total protein, aspartate aminotransferase), and baseline demographics and estimated premorbid intelligence quotient, non-HIV-related comorbidities, current depressive symptoms, and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses (overall model P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS NC change is common in HIV infection and appears to be driven by a complex set of risk factors involving HIV disease, its treatment, and comorbid conditions.


Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | 2011

Demographically corrected norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised, Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Version

Marc A. Norman; David Moore; Michael D. Taylor; Donald R. Franklin; Lucette A. Cysique; Chris Ake; Deborah Lazarretto; Florin Vaida; Robert K. Heaton

Memory and executive functioning are two important components of clinical neuropsychological (NP) practice and research. Multiple demographic factors are known to affect performance differentially on most NP tests, but adequate normative corrections, inclusive of race/ethnicity, are not available for many widely used instruments. This study compared demographic contributions for widely used tests of verbal and visual learning and memory (Brief Visual Memory Test–Revised, Hopkins Verbal Memory Test–Revised) and executive functioning (Stroop Color and Word Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test–64) in groups of healthy Caucasians (n = 143) and African Americans (n = 103). Demographic factors of age, education, gender, and race/ethnicity were found to be significant factors on some indices of all four tests. The magnitude of demographic contributions (especially age) was greater for African Americans than for Caucasians on most measures. New, demographically corrected T-score formulas were calculated for each race/ethnicity. The rates of NP impairment using previously published normative standards significantly overestimated NP impairment in African Americans. Utilizing the new demographic corrections developed and presented herein, NP impairment rates were comparable between the two race/ethnicities and were unrelated to the other demographic characteristics (age, education, gender) in either race/ethnicity group. Findings support the need to consider extended demographic contributions to neuropsychological test performance in clinical and research settings.


Clinical Neuropsychologist | 2012

Defining Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV: Deficit Scores Versus Clinical Ratings

Kaitlin Blackstone; David Moore; Donald R. Franklin; David B. Clifford; Ann C. Collier; C. M. Marra; Benjamin B. Gelman; J. C. McArthur; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; Ronald J. Ellis; Atkinson Jh; Igor Grant; Robert K. Heaton

Because HIV-related neurocognitive impairment is usually mild and variable, clinical ratings (CR) and global deficit scores (GDS) are recommended for detecting HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). The CR approach requires impairment in at least two ability domains while the GDS considers number and severity of impairments across all measures. We examined classification agreement and clinical correlates of the two methods. Neurocognitive functioning of 1574 HIV-infected participants was assessed via a comprehensive, seven-domain neuropsychological battery. Global neurocognitive impairment was defined for each participant independently by CR and GDS. Participants were classified into four categories (Dually-normal, [impaired by] CR-only, [impaired by] GDS-only, or Dually-impaired). There was 83% concordance between CR and GDS classifications; in total, 56% of participants were deemed impaired by CR and 41% were classified as impaired by GDS. Impairment by GDS virtually guaranteed CR impairment, but 16% of participants were additionally classified as impaired only by CR. As compared to Dually-normal participants, those classified as Dually and CR-only impaired were more likely to have AIDS, have more severe co-occurring conditions, have more severe depressive symptoms, be unemployed, and have more everyday functioning complaints (ps < .05). Impairment classifications of the two methods were in high agreement; however, more people were classified as impaired using the CR approach compared to the GDS approach. Those impaired according to CR-only showed fewer neurocognitive and functional deficits than the Dually-impaired participants, but more of these deficits than Dually-normal participants. The CR approach may be most appropriate for detecting more subtle forms of neurocognitive impairment. Clinicians and researchers should recognize the strengths and weaknesses of each method when evaluating neurocognitive complications in HIV.


Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | 2011

Normative data and validation of a regression based summary score for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change.

Lucette A. Cysique; Donald R. Franklin; Ian Abramson; Ronald J. Ellis; Scott Letendre; Ann C. Collier; David B. Clifford; Benjamin B. Gelman; Justin C. McArthur; Susan Morgello; David M. Simpson; J. Allen McCutchan; Igor Grant; Robert K. Heaton

Reliable detection and quantification of longitudinal cognitive change are of considerable importance in many neurological disorders, particularly to monitor central nervous system effects of disease progression and treatment. In the current study, we developed normative data for repeated neuropsychological (NP) assessments (6 testings) using a modified standard regression-based (SRB) approach in a sample that includes both HIV-uninfected (HIV–, N = 172) and neuromedically stable HIV-infected (HIV+, N = 124) individuals. Prior analyses indicated no differences in NP change between the infected and uninfected participants. The norms for change included correction for factors found to significantly affect follow-up performance, using hierarchical regression. The most robust and consistent predictors of follow-up performance were the prior performance on the same test (which contributed in all models) and a measure of prior overall NP competence (predictor in 97% of all models). Demographic variables were predictors in 10–46% of all models and in small amounts; while test–retest interval contributed in only 6% of all models. Based on the regression equations, standardized change scores (z scores) were computed for each test measure at each interval; these z scores were then averaged to create a total battery change score. An independent sample of HIV– participants who had completed 8 of the 15 tests was used to validate an abridged summary change score. The normative data are available in an electronic format by e-mail request to the first author. Correction for practice effects based on normative data improved the consistency of NP impairment classification in a clinically stable longitudinal cohort after baseline.


Journal of The International Neuropsychological Society | 2012

Diagnosing symptomatic HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: Self-report versus performance-based assessment of everyday functioning

Kaitlin Blackstone; David Moore; Robert K. Heaton; Donald R. Franklin; Steven Paul Woods; David B. Clifford; A. C. Collier; C. M. Marra; Benjamin B. Gelman; J. C. McArthur; S. Morgello; D. M. Simpson; M. Rivera-Mindt; Reena Deutsch; Ronald J. Ellis; J. Hampton Atkinson; Igor Grant

Three types of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) exist that are distinguished by presence and severity of impairment in cognitive and everyday functioning. Although well-validated neurocognitive measures exist, determining impairment in everyday functioning remains a challenge. We aim to determine whether Self-Report measures of everyday functioning are as effective in characterizing HAND as Performance-Based measures. We assessed 674 HIV-infected participants with a comprehensive neurocognitive battery; 233 met criteria for a HAND diagnosis by having at least mild neurocognitive impairment. Functional decline was measured via Self-Report and Performance-Based measures. HAND diagnoses were determined according to published criteria using three approaches to assess functional decline: (1) Self-Report measures only, (2) Performance-Based measures only, and (3) Dual-method combining Self-Report and Performance-Based measures. The Dual-method classified the most symptomatic HAND, compared to either singular method. Singular method classifications were 76% concordant with each other. Participants classified as Performance-Based functionally impaired were more likely to be unemployed and more immunosuppressed, whereas those classified as Self-Report functionally impaired had more depressive symptoms. Multimodal methods of assessing everyday functioning facilitate detection of symptomatic HAND. Singular Performance-Based classifications were associated with objective functional and disease-related factors; reliance on Self-Report classifications may be biased by depressive symptoms.


Journal of NeuroVirology | 2008

Neurobehavioral effects of human immunodeficiency virus infection among former plasma donors in rural China.

Robert K. Heaton; Lucette A. Cysique; Hua Jin; Chuan Shi; Xin Yu; Scott Letendre; Donald R. Franklin; Christopher F. Ake; Ofilio Vigil; J. Hampton Atkinson; Thomas D. Marcotte; Igor Grant; Zunyou Wu

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in China has expanded rapidly in recent years, but little is known about the prevalence and features of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs) in this part of the world. We administered a comprehensive Western neuropsychological (NP) test battery to 203 HIV+ and 198 HIV − former plasma donors in the rural area of Anhui province. They found that 26% of the HIV − samples, and 46% of the HIV+ samples, were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), which can also have central nervous system (CNS) effects. To classify NP impairment, we developed demographically corrected test norms based upon individuals free of both infections (N=141). Using a global summary score, NP impairment was found in 34.2% of the HIV-monoinfected group and 39.7% of the coinfected group, as compared to 12.7% of the uninfected controls (P <.001). HIV+ participants with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were more likely to be impaired (43%) than non-AIDS individuals (29%; P <.05). Lastly, when all infection groups were combined, participants with NP impairment reported more cognitive complaints (P <.01) and increased dependence in everyday functioning (P=.01). In sum, NP impairment in this large rural Chinese sample was associated with both HIV and HCV infections, and the impairment’s prevalence, severity, and pattern were similar to those reported by Western studies. Clinical significance of NP impairment in this population is suggested by the participants’ reports of reduced everyday functioning. These findings indicate that HAND is likely to be an important feature of HIV infection in developing countries, underscoring the need for international efforts to develop CNS-relevant treatments.

Collaboration


Dive into the Donald R. Franklin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Igor Grant

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott Letendre

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin B. Gelman

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann C. Collier

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Morgello

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Simpson

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge