Donald W. Moorman

The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery.

Objective:We sought to examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on 30-day morbidity and mortality in a large cohort of patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery. Summary Background Data:Obesity has long been considered a risk factor for poor outcomes from a variety of surgical procedures, yet recent studies of critically and chronically ill patients suggest that overweight and obese patients may paradoxically have better outcomes than “normal” weight patients. Methods:A prospective, multi-institutional, risk-adjusted cohort study of 118,707 patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery who were included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use database in 2005 and 2006 was performed. Outcomes and risk variables were compared across NIH-defined BMI class using analysis of variance, Bonferroni multiple comparisons of means tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Results:After adjusting for all significant perioperative risk factors, the risk of death according to BMI exhibited a reverse J-shaped relationship, with the highest rates in the underweight and morbidly obese extremes and the lowest rates in the overweight and moderately obese. Overweight (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75–0.99) and moderately obese (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.94) patients had a significantly lower risk of death than normal weight patients. There was a progressive increase in the likelihood of a complication with increasing BMI class, almost entirely due to increasing rates of wound infection. Conclusions:Overweight and moderately obese patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery have paradoxically “lower” crude and adjusted risks of mortality compared with patients at a “normal” weight. This finding is in contrast to observations from the general population, confirming the existence of an “obesity paradox” in this patient population.

Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance

ObjectiveDiminishing human error and improving patient outcomes is the goal of task training and simulation experience. The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) is a validated tool to assess technical laparoscopic skills. We hypothesize that performance in a crisis depends on technical skills and team performance. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a high-fidelity simulation model of a laparoscopic crisis scenario in a mock endosuite environment.MethodsTo establish the feasibility of the model as well as its face and construct validity, the scenario evaluated the performances of FLS-certified surgeon experts (n = 5) and non-FLS certified novices (n = 5) during a laparoscopic crisis scenario, in a mock endosuite, on a simulated abdomen. Likert scale questionnaires were used for validity assessments. Groups were compared using previously validated rating scales on technical and nontechnical performance. Objective outcome measures assessed were: time to diagnose bleeding (TD), time to inform the team to convert (TT), and time to conversion to open (TC). SAS software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsMedian scores for face validity were 4.29, 4.43, 4.71 (maximum 5) for the FLS, non-FLS, and nursing groups, respectively, with an inter-rater reliability of 93%. Although no difference was observed in Veress needle safety and laparoscopic equipment set up, there was a significant difference between the two groups in their overall technical and nontechnical abilities (p < 0.05), specifically in identifying bleeding, controlling bleeding, team communication, and team skills. There was a trend towards a difference between the two groups for TD, TT, and TC. While experts controlled bleeding in a shorter time, they persisted longer laparoscopically.ConclusionsOur evidence suggests that face and construct validity are established for a laparoscopic crisis simulation in a mock endosuite. Technical and nontechnical performance discrimination is observed between novices and experts. This innovative multidisciplinary simulation aims at improving error/problem recognition and timely initiation of appropriate and safe responses by surgical teams.

Health care and socioeconomic impact of falls in the elderly

BACKGROUND Elderly falls are associated with long hospital stays, major morbidity, and mortality. We sought to examine the fate of patients ≥75 years of age admitted after falls. METHODS We reviewed all fall admissions in 2008. Causes, comorbidities, injuries, procedures, mortality, readmission, and costs were analyzed. RESULTS Seven hundred eight patients ≥75 years old were admitted after a fall, with 89% being simple falls. Short-term mortality was 6%. Male sex, atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF), intracranial hemorrhage, hospital-acquired pneumonia, trigger events, Clostridium difficile, and intubation were predictors of death (P < .05). Thirty-day readmission occurred in 14%; CHF, craniotomy, and acute renal failure were predictive. The median cost of hospitalization was

A policy-based intervention for the reduction of communication breakdowns in inpatient surgical care: results from a Harvard surgical safety collaborative.

11,000 with cardiac disease, anemia, major orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, pneumonia, and intubation as predictive. CONCLUSIONS Simple falls in the elderly have high morbidity, mortality, and costs. Methodologies for prevention are warranted and should be studied intensively.

Communication practices on 4 harvard surgical services: A surgical safety collaborative

Objective: To develop and evaluate an intervention to reduce breakdowns in communication during inpatient surgical care. Background: Communication breakdowns are the second most common cause of avoidable surgical adverse events after technical errors. Methods: In a pre- and postintervention study, a random selection of patients on the surgical services of 4 teaching hospitals were observed according to 3 measures: (1) resident-attending communication of critical patient events (eg, transfer into the intensive care unit, unplanned intubation, cardiac arrest); (2) resident-attending notification regarding routine weekend patient status; and (3) frequency of weekend patient visits by an attending. All departments then developed and adopted a set of policy and education initiatives designed to increase prompt and consistent resident-attending communication (especially in critical events) and to improve regular attending visits with surgical patients. Specific reinforcement of the policies included a pocket information card for residents, as well as periodic reminders. Repeat audits of the surgical services were then conducted. Results: We reviewed information for 211 critical events and 1360 patients for the nature of resident and attending communication practices. After the intervention, the proportion of critical events not conveyed to an attending decreased from 33% (26/80) to 2% (1/47), and gaps in the frequency of attending notification of patient status on weekends were virtually eliminated (P < 0.0001); the proportion of weekend patients not visited by an attending for greater than 24 hours decreased by half (from 61% to 33%; P = 0.0002). Contact resulted in attending-led changes in patient management in one-third of cases. Conclusions: An intervention to improve surgical communication practices at 4 teaching hospitals led to significant reductions in potentially harmful communication breakdowns during inpatient care; significant alterations in patient management were noted in one-third of cases in which there was an adherence to recommended communication practices.

Design and Impact of an Intraoperative Pathway: A New Operating Room Model for Team-Based Practice

Background:Communication breakdowns between surgical residents and attending physicians in the pre- and postoperative setting are common contributors to patient injury. These communication transactions might offer an opportunity for safety improvement, but it remains unknown how often resident-attending communication fails, what the current level of attending involvement is, and how often attending input changes the plan for patient care. We conducted a prospective study at 4 Harvard teaching hospitals to address these issues. Methods:Three prospective data collection strategies were employed: (1) we randomly selected surgical services and queried residents for the occurrence of predefined critical patient events and the characteristics of attending communications that ensued, (2) on weekends, randomly selected patients were interviewed and their charts reviewed to identify the frequency of attending visitation and how such visits affected processes of care, and (3) on weekends, senior residents on randomly selected surgical services were queried regarding the occurrence of attending-resident discussion of patients in their care. Results:Of 80 critical patient events identified, 26 (33%) were not communicated to attending surgeons. Residents reported that, when contacted, all attending physicians were receptive to communication, whether they were the primary surgeon or providing cross-coverage. Although residents felt that attending contact was unnecessary for safe patient care in 61 (76%) of these events, discussions with attending physicians changed management in 33% (18/54) of cases in which they occurred. Attending surgeons were found to visit their patients on randomly selected weekend days 42% (n = 37) of the time, while 21% (n = 19) had not visited for 2 or greater days. When attending physicians visited patients, however, resident management was modified 46% (n = 36) of the time. Though residents frequently discussed patient management with attending physicians on randomly selected weekends, they failed to do so 16% (n = 58) of the time, which appeared to be related to service-specific variation (χ2 = 269, P < 0.0001). Conclusions:In the context of both critical patient events and routine patient care, residents often fail to obtain attending surgeons’ input for management decisions. These failures seem to derive more from residents’ perception of necessity than from attending physicians’ receptiveness or interest in being contacted. Once involved, attending physicians frequently modify residents management decisions. It seems, therefore, that there is significant potential for communication failure and information loss among our 4 institutions.

Diagnostic, surgical judgment, and systems issues leading to reoperation: mining administrative databases.

BACKGROUND The concept of a team-based model for delivery of care has been critical at our institution for improving efficiency and safety. Despite these measures, difficulties continue to occur during lengthy operating room procedures. Using a novel team-based practice model, a multidisciplinary team was organized to improve efficiency in microsurgical breast reconstruction. We describe development of an intraoperative pathway for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction and its impact on various outcomes. STUDY DESIGN We evaluated 150 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2005 to 2008. Patient groups were subdivided into 50 unilateral and 50 bilateral procedures before the intraoperative pathway and 25 unilateral and 25 bilateral procedures after. Outcomes measured included operative time, complications, operating room and hospital costs, proper administration of prophylactic antibiotics and heparin, and staff satisfaction surveys. RESULTS Mean operative times decreased after pathway implementation in both unilateral (8.2 hours to 6.9 hours; p < 0.001) and bilateral groups (12.8 hours to 10.6 hours; p < 0.001) and complication rates were unchanged. Mean operating room costs decreased in the unilateral group by 10.2% (p = 0.018). Prophylactic heparin administration showed substantial improvements, although antibiotic administration and redosing of antibiotics trended upward. Staff surveys showed improved interdisciplinary communication, transition guidelines, and enhanced efficiency through standardization. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an intraoperative pathway led to improvements in operative time, cost, quality measures, and staff satisfaction. Refinement of the pathway with team resolution of variances might continue to improve outcomes. Complex, multi-team procedures can derive benefits from standardization and intraoperative pathway development.

Building Better Teams in Surgery

BACKGROUND Underreporting of surgical adverse events limits the ability to identify quality and safety issues. Automated screening of the clinical information system (CIS) can improve case capture and reduce dependency on self-reporting. We compared screening of a CIS to self-reporting for identifying unplanned reoperation and also examined the relationship between causality and probability of reporting. METHODS Between 2005 and 2009, all unplanned reoperations identified by automated screening of databases were reviewed and classified according to causality. Comparison was made to cases self-reported to departmental morbidity and mortality; conditional probability analysis assessed the likelihood of reporting as a function of causality. RESULTS Of 104,938 operations performed, automated CIS screening identified 1,010 cases requiring unplanned reoperation; 23.6% were self-reported to morbidity and mortality; the probability of reporting varied widely depending on causality. CONCLUSIONS Screening of a CIS for adverse events requiring reoperation revealed significant underreporting, with additional bias in reporting based on underlying causality.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Intra-abdominal Cancer Surgery

This manuscript represents an overview of a presentation at the SSAT 49th annual meeting which describes the evolution of the author’s work within surgery to build and advance teamwork into processes of care.