Donna DiPrima Bickel
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Donna DiPrima Bickel.
American Educational Research Journal | 2001
Samuel J. Meisels; Donna DiPrima Bickel; Julie Nicholson; Yange Xue; Sally Atkins-Burnett
Teacher judgments of student learning are a key element in performance assessment. This study examines aspects of the validity of teacher judgments that are based on the Work Sampling System (WSS), a curriculum-embedded, performance assessment for preschool (age 3) to Grade 5. The purpose of the study is to determine if teacher judgments about student learning in kindergarten to third grade are trustworthy if they are informed by a curriculum-embedded performance assessment. A cross-sectional sample composed of 345 K-3 students enrolled in 17 classrooms in an urban school system was studied. Analyses included correlations between WSS and an individually administered psychoeducational battery, four-step hierarchical regressions to examine the variance in students’ spring outcome scores, and receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves to compare the accuracy of WSS in categorizing students in terms of the outcome. Results demonstrate that WSS correlates well with a standardized, individually administered psychoeducational battery; that it is a reliable predictor of achievement ratings in K-3; and that the data obtained from WSS have significant utility for discriminating accurately between children who are at risk (e.g., Title I) and those who are not at risk. Further discussion concerns the role of teacher judgment in assessing student learning and achievement.
Educational Administration Quarterly | 2009
Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Mary L. Sartoris; Donna DiPrima Bickel; Helen Garnier
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between principal leadership and variation in teachers’ participation in a new literacy coaching program: Content-Focused Coaching® (CFC). Research design: Twenty-nine schools were randomly assigned to participate in the CFC program or to serve as a comparison. Interviews were conducted with elementary school principals and coaches, and teachers completed surveys describing their experiences with their new coach. Correlation analyses investigated the relationship between the categories of principal support and the frequency of teachers’ participation in individual coaching activities. Principals’ actions and beliefs were also compared across schools, with teachers’ relatively high and low participation in coaching, to identify patterns in principal leadership. Findings: Principal leadership was significantly associated with the frequency with which teachers conferred with their new CFC coach and were observed by their new coach as teaching reading comprehension lessons. Principal behaviors associated with teachers’ increased engagement with coaches included actively participating in the CFC program and publicly endorsing the coach as a source of literacy expertise to teachers. Principal beliefs regarding a literacy coach’s role and responsibilities were associated with the frequency with which teachers opened their classrooms to the new coaches. Implications: This study provides insight into the features of principal leadership that may support coaches in engaging with teachers and gaining access to their classrooms. Observing teachers’ lessons is a critical dimension of effective coaching and a difficult task for coaches to accomplish. Learning how principals can positively contribute to this process could help schools and districts make more effective use of their literacy coaching resources.
Early Childhood Research Quarterly | 1991
Donna DiPrima Bickel; Naomi Zigmond; Joseph M. Strayhorn
The effects of childrens ages at entrance to first grade upon success in elementary school was examined in a cohort of urban children who entered first grade in 1983. A set of demographic, social, and early experience variables was used as covariates in the analysis. Older children did slightly, but significantly better academically in first grade, primarily because of better performance in mathematics. There was no relationship between age of entrance and a measure of conduct in the first grade. Four years later, no effect of age at entrance to first grade upon academic performance or upon placement inside or outside the mainstream of regular education was found. Age at entrance was a far less powerful predictor than the socioeconomic variables in our covariate set.
Psychological Reports | 2003
Joseph M. Strayhorn; Donna DiPrima Bickel
Children in Grades K-5, selected for reading and behavior problems, received individual tutoring in a program which aimed to detail a hierarchy of reading skills, locate the point on the hierarchy at which each child should work, and provide enthusiastic social reinforcement for successes. Children were randomly assigned to higher or lower frequency tutoring (one 45-min. session every 1.6 days vs every 8.3 days). The higher frequency group progressed significantly faster in reading than the lower frequency group. Both groups progressed much faster during the time of the intervention than they had before tutoring. Before tutoring, both groups had progressed at about 0.5 grade per year; during tutoring, the higher frequency group progressed at 1.5 grade per year and the lower frequency group at 1.1 grade per year. The subsets of children with verbal ability scores one or two standard deviations below the population mean, as assessed on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, still progressed at average rates of 1.2 grade per year during tutoring. The amount of work students accomplished on a sounding and blending drill predicted reading progress. The intervention cost an average of
Education Policy Analysis Archives | 2003
Samuel J. Meisels; Sally Atkins-Burnett; Yange Xue; Donna DiPrima Bickel; S. Son; Julie Nicholson
1,156 per student per year.
Elementary School Journal | 2010
Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Helen Garnier; Richard Correnti; Brian W. Junker; Donna DiPrima Bickel
Educational Assessment | 2001
Samuel J. Meisels; Yange Xue; Donna DiPrima Bickel; Julie Nicholson; Sally Atkins-Burnett
Psychological Reports | 2002
Joseph M. Strayhorn; Donna DiPrima Bickel
Journal of Staff Development | 2014
Donna DiPrima Bickel; Tabetha Bernstein-Danis; Lindsay Clare Matsumura
Archive | 2000
Yange Xue; Samuel J. Meisels; Donna DiPrima Bickel; Julie Nicholson; Sally Atkins-Burnett