Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Donna J. Graville is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Donna J. Graville.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2012

Factors associated with supracricoid laryngectomy functional outcomes

Daniel Clayburgh; Donna J. Graville; Andrew D. Palmer; Joshua S. Schindler

Supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) is an option for laryngeal cancer resection that preserves laryngeal function; however, little information exists regarding factors that are associated with functional outcomes.


Laryngoscope | 2011

Determining the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the activalve: Results of a long-term prospective trial

Donna J. Graville; Andrew D. Palmer; Peter E. Andersen; James I. Cohen

To investigate 1) whether the Provox ActiValve results in increased device‐life in individuals with below average device‐life, 2) whether it is cost‐effective, and 3) whether it has any impact on voice‐related quality of life.


Laryngoscope | 2017

A randomized controlled trial of corticosteroids for pain after transoral robotic surgery

Daniel Clayburgh; Will Stott; Rachel K. Bolognone; Andrew D. Palmer; Virginie Achim; Scott H. Troob; Ryan Li; Daniel Brickman; Donna J. Graville; Peter E. Andersen; Neil D. Gross

To determine if an extended perioperative course of corticosteroids will improve pain control following transoral robotic surgery (TORS).


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2017

Long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes after transoral robotic surgery in patients with oropharyngeal cancer

Virginie Achim; Rachel K. Bolognone; Andrew D. Palmer; Donna J. Graville; Tyler Light; Ryan Li; Neil D. Gross; Peter E. Andersen; Daniel Clayburgh

Importance In recent years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a useful treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). In appropriately selected patients, the use of TORS may allow avoidance of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, thereby avoiding the long-term adverse effects of these therapies. Objective To compare functional speech, swallowing, and quality-of-life outcomes longitudinally between those undergoing TORS only and those undergoing TORS and adjuvant radiotherapy (TORS+RT) or TORS and chemoradiotherapy (TORS+CRT). Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, longitudinal cohort study performed from June 1, 2013, through November 31, 2015, included 74 patients undergoing TORS for initial treatment of OPSCC at a single tertiary academic hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures Data were collected at baseline, postoperatively (7-21 days), at short-term follow-up (6-12 months), and at long-term follow-up (>12 months). The quality-of-life metrics included the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool and the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life instrument. Data were also collected on tumor staging, surgical and adjuvant therapy details, patient comorbidities, tracheostomy and feeding tube use, and functional speech and swallowing status using the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Results Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 61.39 [7.99] years; 68 [92%] male). Median long-term follow-up was 21 months (range, 12-36 months). The response rates were 86% (n = 64) postoperatively, 88% (n = 65) at short-term follow-up, and 86% (n = 64) at long-term follow-up. In all 3 groups, there was a significant worsening in pain and all swallowing-related measures postoperatively. There was subsequent improvement over time, with different trajectories observed across the 3 intervention groups. Postoperative dysphagia improved significantly more quickly in the TORS-only group. At long-term follow-up, weight loss differed between the TORS-only and TORS+RT groups (mean difference, −16.1; 97.5% CI, −29.8 to −2.4) and the TORS-only and TORS+CRT groups (mean difference, −14.6; 97.5% CI, −29.2 to 0) in a clinically meaningful way. In addition, the TORS-only group had significantly better scores than the TORS+CRT group on the Performance Status Scale–Eating in Public scale (mean difference, 21.8; 97.5% CI, 4.3-39.2) and Head and Neck Quality of Life–Eating scale (mean difference, 21.2; 97.5% CI, 4.0-38.3). Conclusions and Relevance Patients who underwent TORS+CRT demonstrated poorer long-term outcomes, with continued dysphagia more than 1 year after surgery. These findings support the investigation of adjuvant de-escalation therapies to reduce the long-term adverse effects of treatment.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2017

Functional outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy with noncircumferential radial forearm free tissue transfer

Donna J. Graville; Andrew D. Palmer; Christine M. Chambers; Lauren Ottenstein; Breanne Whalen; Peter E. Andersen; Mark K. Wax; James I. Cohen

The purpose of this study was to compare long‐term functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after total laryngectomy with primary closure and those who underwent reconstruction with noncircumferential radial free forearm tissue transfer (RFFTT).


American Journal of Speech-language Pathology | 2017

The Use of Technology for Phone and Face-to-Face Communication After Total Laryngectomy

Jana M. Childes; Andrew D. Palmer; Melanie Fried-Oken; Donna J. Graville

Purpose The purpose of this article is to describe the characteristics and experiences of individuals who use technology to support telephone or face-to-face communication after total laryngectomy. Method An online questionnaire was used to identify potential participants. Seventeen individuals met inclusion criteria and participated in an in-depth survey. They were compared with a reference group matched for age, gender, and time postsurgery who did not use these technologies. Open-ended responses were summarized. Results Compared with the matched reference group, individuals who used technology to support verbal communication had undergone more aggressive cancer treatment and used more communication methods. They were less likely to use an alaryngeal speech method, had greater difficulty over the telephone, and used more repair strategies in face-to-face communication. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in the frequency or success of their communication, however. Open-ended responses revealed great variety with regard to their reasons, purposes, and timing of technology use. Conclusions There is a subset of individuals using technology to support verbal communication very successfully after laryngectomy. Usage was not limited to those who were unable to communicate verbally and often continued long after the initial postoperative period in many settings, for various purposes, and in combination with other methods of communication.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 1999

The Long-term Indwelling Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis for Alaryngeal Voice Rehabilitation

Donna J. Graville; Neil D. Gross; Peter E. Andersen; Edwin C. Everts; James I. Cohen


Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders | 2009

Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration After Salvage Total Laryngectomy

Donna J. Graville; Andrew D. Palmer; Mark K. Wax; Peter E. Andersen


Journal of Medical Speech-language Pathology | 2004

Acoustic parameters that identify listeners' perceptions of good near-total laryngectomy voice

Donna J. Graville; James I. Cohen; Marie T. Rau


Oral, Head and Neck Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery | 2018

17 – Speech Pathology and Rehabilitation

Donna J. Graville; Andrew D. Palmer

Collaboration


Dive into the Donna J. Graville's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marie T. Rau

Portland VA Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil D. Gross

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge