Donna Mackinnon-Cameron

Interim estimates of 2014/15 influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalisation from the Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network of the Canadian Immunization Research Network, January 2015.

The 2014/15 influenza season in Canada has been characterised to date by early and intense activity dominated by influenza A(H3N2). A total of 99.0% (593/599) hospitalisations for laboratory-confirmed influenza with a known influenza virus type enrolled in sentinel hospitals of the Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network of the Canadian Immunization Research Network were due to influenza A. Of the 216 with a known subtype, influenza A(H3N2) accounted for 99.1% (n=214). Interim unmatched vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates adjusted for age and presence of one or more medical comorbidities were determined by test-negative case-control design to be ?16.8% (90% confidence interval (CI): ?48.9 to 8.3) overall and ?22.0% (90% CI: ?66.5 to 10.7) for laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H3N2). Among adults?aged under?65 years, the overall VE was 10.8% (90% CI: ?50.2 to 47.0) while in adults?aged 65 years or older, the overall VE was ?25.4% (90% CI: ?65.0 to 4.6). .

Interim estimates of 2013/14 influenza clinical severity and vaccine effectiveness in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalisation, Canada, February 2014

During the 2013/14 influenza season in Canada, 631 of 654 hospitalisations for laboratory-confirmed influenza enrolled in sentinel hospitals were due to Influenza A. Of the 375 with known subtype, influenza A(H1N1) accounted for 357. Interim unmatched vaccine effectiveness adjusted for age and presence of one or more medical comorbidities was determined by test-negative case-control design to be 58.5% (90% confidence interval (CI): 43.9-69.3%) overall and 57.9% (90% CI: 37.7-71.5) for confirmed influenza A(H1N1).

Safety and immunogenicity of different two-dose regimens of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (hepatitis B surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide) in healthy young adults.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that two doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine consisting of hepatitis B surface antigen combined with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide adjuvant (HBV-ISS) given 8 weeks apart provides seroprotection sooner than 3 doses of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine over 24 weeks. A more rapid schedule with a 4-week interval could provide earlier protection and potentially greater compliance. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind study, healthy adults received two doses of HBV-ISS at 0 and 4 or 0 and 8 weeks; saline placebo was given at week 8 for the 0-4 schedule and at week 4 for the 0-8 schedule). Adverse events were collected after each dose. Antibodies were measured at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 32 weeks. RESULTS Participants were randomized to the 0-4 (n=18) or 0-8 (n=23) weeks schedule. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups after the HBV-ISS injections regardless of the schedule, but more frequent than after the placebo injections. By 4 weeks post-dose-2, 94.1% of 0-4 and 100% of 0-8 recipients had protective antibody levels; geometric mean concentrations were 244 mIU/mL and 3217 mIU/mL respectively. By 32 weeks, the difference in antibody concentration had decreased (GMC 439 mIU/mL vs. 863 mIU/mL, respectively; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS A 0-4 weeks, two-dose regimen of HBV-ISS was well-tolerated and induced an antibody response that was similar to a 0-8 weeks schedule.

High-Level Immunogenicity Is Achieved Vaccine With Adjuvanted Pandemic H1N12009 and Improved With Booster Dosing in a Randomized Trial of HIV-Infected Adults

Abstract Background: More severe influenza disease and poor vaccine immunogenicity in HIV-infected patients necessitate improved immunization strategies to maximize vaccine efficacy. Methods: A phase III, randomized trial was conducted at 4 Cana-dian sites. Two dosing strategies (standard dose vs standard dose plus booster on day 21) were assessed in HIV patients aged 20 to 59 years during the H1N12009 pandemic. A single antigen, inactivated split adjuvanted (AS03A) influenza vaccine (Arepanrix) was utilized. Serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titres were assessed at days 21 and 42 and at month 6. Results: 150 participants received at least one injection. Baseline parameters were similar between groups: 83% male, 85% on HAART, median CD4 = 519 cells/mm3, 84% with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL. At day 21, seroprotection (HAI ≥1:40) was achieved in 80% (95% CI, 70-89) of participants. Seroconversion occurred in 74% (63–85). Seroprotection and seroconversion were further improved in those randomized to booster dosing: day 42, 94% (85–98) versus 73% (60-83) (P < .01) and 86% (75–93) versus 66% (5–77) (P = .01). Seroprotec-tion was retained in 40% (28–54) of recipients at month 6 with trends toward greater retention of immunity in booster recipients. Conclusion: High-level immunogenicity was achieved with a single dose of this adjuvanted vaccine. Immunogenicity was further improved with booster dosing. Use of this adjuvanted vaccine and booster represent an important approach to increasing immunogenicity in this vaccine hypo-responsive population.

Safety and immunogenicity of 2010-2011 H1N12009-containing trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 12-59 months of age previously given AS03-adjuvanted H1N12009 pandemic vaccine: a PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) study.

BACKGROUND Concern arose in 2010 that reactogenicity, particularly febrile seizures, to influenza A/H1N1-containing 2010-2011 trivalent seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) could occur in young children who had been previously immunized and/or infected with the pandemic strain. We conducted a pre-season study of 2010-2011 TIV safety and immunogenicity in children 12-59 months of age to inform public health decision making. METHODS Children immunized with 1 or 2 doses of the pandemic vaccine, with or without the 2009-10 TIV, received 1 or 2 doses of 2010-11 TIV in an observational, multicentre Canadian study. Standard safety monitoring was enhanced by a telephone call at ~24 h post-TIV when adverse events were expected to peak. Summary safety reports were rapidly reported to public health before the launch of public programs. TIV immunogenicity was assessed day 0, and 21 days after final vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01180621. RESULTS Among 207 children, a general adverse event was reported by 60.9% of children post-dose one and by 58.3% post-dose two. Only severe fever (>38.5°C) was more common in two-dose compared to one dose recipients (16.7%, n=4 v. 1.0%, n=2). At baseline 99.0% of participants had A/H1N1 hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers ≥10, and 85.5% had a protective titer of ≥40 (95% CI 80.0, 90.0). Baseline geometric mean titers (GMT) were higher in recipients of a 2-dose schedule of pandemic vaccine compared to one-dose recipients: 153.1 (95% CI 126.2, 185.7) v. 78.8 ((58.1, 106.8, p<0.001). At 21 days, all regulatory criteria for influenza vaccine immunogenicity were exceeded for A/H1N1 and H3N2, but responses to the B antigen were poor. No correlations between reactogenicity and either baseline high influenza titers or serologic response to revaccination were evident. CONCLUSIONS Infants and toddlers who received AS03-adjuvanted A/H1N1 2009 vaccine up to 11 months earlier retained high titers in the subsequent season but re-exposure to A/H1N1 2009 antigen in TIV resulted in no unusual adverse effects and 100% were sero-protected for A/H1N1 after receipt of the 2010-11 TIV.

Assessing the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus Ebola vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The 2013–2016 Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa was the most widespread in history. In response, alive attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) vaccine expressing Zaire Ebolavirus glycoprotein (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) was evaluated in humans. METHODS: In a phase 1, randomized, dose-ranging, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial, healthy adults aged 18–65 years were randomized into 4 groups of 10 to receive one of 3 vaccine doses or placebo. Follow-up visits spanned 180 days postvaccination for safety monitoring, immunogenicity testing and any rVSV virus shedding. RESULTS: Forty participants were injected with rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine (n = 30) or saline placebo (n = 10). No serious adverse events related to the vaccine or participant withdrawals were reported. Solicited adverse events during the 14-day follow-up period were mild to moderate and self-limited, with the exception of injection-site pain and headache. Viremia following vaccination was transient and no longer detectable after study day 3, with no virus shedding in saliva or urine. All vaccinated participants developed serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), as measured by Ebola virus envelope glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunogenicity was comparable across all dose groups, and sustained IgG titers were detectable through to the last visit, at study day 180. INTERPRETATION: In this phase 1 study, there were no safety concerns after a single dose of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine. IgG ELISA showed persistent high titers at 180 days postimmunization. There was a period of reactogenicity, but in general, the vaccine was well tolerated. This study provides evidence of the safety and immunogenicity of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine and importance of its further investigation. Trial registration: Clinical-Trials.gov no., NCT02374385

Immunogenicity of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (hepatitis B surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide) in nonresponders to licensed hepatitis B vaccine

An additional one to three doses of hepatitis B vaccine are recommended for nonresponders to an initial standard three-dose series. We compared the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine (HBsAg-1018) with a phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide adjuvant that targets toll-like receptor-9 to a commercially available, alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-Eng) in nonresponders to three previous doses (primary study) or to four to six previous doses (substudy) of HBsAg-Eng. Both vaccines were well tolerated, although HBsAg-1018 was associated with more injection-site tenderness (63.2% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.016 in the primary study and 81.8% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.003 in the substudy). No statistically significant differences in rates of seroprotection (anti-HBs concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL) or geometric mean antibody concentrations were found in the primary study. In the substudy, a greater proportion of HBsAg-1018 recipients achieved an anti-HBs concentration ≥ 100 mIU/mL (54.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.027), and those responders had higher geometric mean antibody concentrations at 4 weeks (264 vs. 46.5 mIU/mL, p = 0.021) and 52 weeks (7.0 vs. 1.2 mIU/mL, p = 0.030) than HBsAg-Eng recipients. Although this study suggests that HBsAg-1018 may have improved immunogenicity in nonresponders to hepatitis B vaccine vaccination when compared with HBsAg-Eng, larger studies are required.

Maintaining the momentum: Key factors influencing acceptance of influenza vaccination among pregnant women following the H1N1 pandemic

This survey study compared pre- and post-pandemic knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intended behaviors of pregnant women regarding influenza vaccination (seasonal and/or pandemic) during pregnancy in order to determine key factors influencing their decision to adhere to influenza vaccine recommendations. Only 36% of 662 pre-pandemic respondents knew that influenza was more severe in pregnant women, compared to 62% of the 159 post-pandemic respondents. Of the pre-pandemic respondents, 41% agreed or strongly agreed that that it was safer to wait until after the first 3 months to receive the seasonal influenza vaccine, whereas 23% of the post-pandemic cohort agreed or strongly agreed; 32% of pre-pandemic participants compared to 11% of post-pandemic respondents felt it was best to avoid all vaccines while pregnant. Despite 61% of the pre-pandemic cohort stating that they would have the vaccine while pregnant if their doctor recommended it and 54% citing their doctor/nurse as their primary source of vaccine information, only 20% said their doctor discussed influenza vaccination during their pregnancy, compared to 77% of the post-pandemic respondents who reported having this conversation. Women whose doctors discussed influenza vaccine during pregnancy had higher overall knowledge scores (P < 0.0001; P = 0.005) and were more likely to believe the vaccine is safe in all stages of pregnancy (P < 0.0001; P = 0.001) than those whose doctors did not discuss influenza vaccination. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic experience appeared to change attitudes and behaviours of health care providers and their pregnant patients toward influenza vaccination.

Safety and immunogenicity of 2 mixed primary infant immunization schedules of pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae Type B vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months of age: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Two pentavalent infant vaccines that contain either 5 or 3 component acellular pertussis antigens are authorized in Canada. Because of changes in vaccine use by provinces over time and movement of families across jurisdictions, it is possible that children are exposed to different combination vaccines during the primary infant immunization schedule. The safety and immunogenicity of mixed primary infant schedules is unknown. Methods: In a double-blind multicenter trial, 2-month-old healthy infants were randomized to 1 of 2 schedules at 2, 4, and 6 months of age (either Pediacel, Pediacel, Infanrix [PPI] or Infanrix, Pediacel, Pediacel [IPP]). Solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected by parent diary on days 0 through 7; unsolicited AEs were collected for 31 days after each dose. Immune responses to polypolyribosylribitol phosphate capsular polysaccharide (PRP) (Haemophilus influenzae type b) and pertussis antigens were assessed before the first dose and 28 days after the 6 month (third) dose. Results: In all, 127 infants were randomized to IPP and 126 to PPI. The percentage of children with anti-PRP responses ≥0.15 &mgr;g/mL after dose 3 was higher in the IPP than in the PPI group (98.3, 95% CI: 94.1, 99.8 vs. 86.1%, 95% CI: 78.6, 91.7, P < 0.001). Antipertussis toxin and anti-fimbriae 2 and 3 responses were statistically significantly higher in the IPP than in the PPI group. Higher filamentous hemagglutinin responses occurred in PPI than in IPP. No difference between groups was observed in pertactin responses. Systemic AEs were similar between the 2 vaccine schedules. Irritability (67.2 vs. 51.6, P = 0.014) and mild crying (35.2% vs. 23.0%, P = 0.037) were more common after the 6-month dose in the PPI compared with the IPP group, as were overall systemic reactions (any intensity) for the PPI group after this dose (80.0 vs. 68.0, P = 0.042). Conclusion: Mixed 2-, 4-, 6-month pentavalent infant vaccine schedules had different immunogenicity and reactogenicity, with a PPI schedule being more reactogenic, and less immunogenic for PRP and fimbriae 2 and 3 antigens at 7 months. It is preferable to complete the primary infant 3-dose vaccine series with the same vaccine, rather than considering infant vaccines as interchangeable.

Hepatitis A and travel amongst Nova Scotia postsecondary students: evidence for a targeted vs. universal immunization strategy.

BACKGROUND Canadian guidelines recommend hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination for high-risk persons, such as travelers to HAV-endemic areas. The US CDC advocates universal immunization. OBJECTIVES To explore whether a universal strategy for HAV immunization rather than the Canadian targeted approach for travelers is justified by measuring compliance of postsecondary students with Canadian guidelines. METHODS A cross-sectional study using an electronic survey method elicited HAV risk factors, immunization history, disease status, and factors affecting immunization status from postsecondary students. Seropositivity was determined by measuring HAV antibodies in saliva from a convenience sample of survey participants within each study group. Statistical analysis used Fishers exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS We received 2279 completed surveys (10.6% response) and 235 saliva samples (58.7% response). A total of 1380 (60.6%) participants had traveled to HAV-endemic regions and 1851 (81.2%) were planning to do so within the next 5 years. Less than half who traveled to HAV-endemic areas reported a history of HAV vaccination (48.0%). HAV seropositivity rates were higher amongst those who traveled to (63.6%) or were planning to travel to (55.0%) HAV-endemic areas than those who had never traveled or had no plans to travel to such areas (17.4%). Only 8.9% of unvaccinated students were seropositive (5.3% of Canadian-born students). Amongst unvaccinated, seropositive students, there was a nonsignificant trend for higher seropositivity in those who had previously traveled to HAV-endemic areas (14.7%) than those who had not traveled abroad (4.4%), suggesting an exposure to HAV during travel. Nearly all (96.5%) unvaccinated students, who were willing to be vaccinated based on current knowledge or if their doctor recommended it, indicated a willingness to receive vaccine if it were provided free of charge. CONCLUSIONS Current Canadian guidelines for HAV vaccination are not being followed within the postsecondary student population. Given high rates of travel to HAV-endemic areas in this population, a universal approach to HAV vaccination may be warranted.