Donna-Michelle Smith

The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis

The androgen receptor (AR) is a key regulator of prostate growth and the principal drug target for the treatment of prostate cancer. Previous studies have mapped AR targets and identified some candidates which may contribute to cancer progression, but did not characterize AR biology in an integrated manner. In this study, we took an interdisciplinary approach, integrating detailed genomic studies with metabolomic profiling and identify an anabolic transcriptional network involving AR as the core regulator. Restricting flux through anabolic pathways is an attractive approach to deprive tumours of the building blocks needed to sustain tumour growth. Therefore, we searched for targets of the AR that may contribute to these anabolic processes and could be amenable to therapeutic intervention by virtue of differential expression in prostate tumours. This highlighted calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase kinase 2, which we show is overexpressed in prostate cancer and regulates cancer cell growth via its unexpected role as a hormone‐dependent modulator of anabolic metabolism. In conclusion, it is possible to progress from transcriptional studies to a promising therapeutic target by taking an unbiased interdisciplinary approach.

Variability of Proliferation and Diffusion in Different Lung Cancer Models as Measured by 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Molecular imaging allows the noninvasive assessment of cancer progression and response to therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate molecular and cellular determinants of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging in lung carcinoma xenografts. Methods: Four lung cancer cell lines (A549, HTB56, EBC1, and H1975) were subcutaneously implanted in nude mice, and growth was followed by caliper measurements. Glucose uptake and tumor proliferation were determined by 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET, respectively. T2-weighted MR imaging was performed, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was determined by DW MR imaging as an indicator of cell death. Imaging findings were correlated to histology with markers for tumor proliferation (Ki67, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine [BrdU]) and cell death (caspase-3, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling). The expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), thymidylate synthase, and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) were analyzed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Thymidine levels were determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Results: Xenografts varied with respect to in vivo growth rates. MR imaging and PET revealed intratumoral heterogeneities, which were confirmed by histology. 18F-FLT uptake differed significantly between tumor lines, with A549 and H1975 demonstrating the highest radiotracer accumulation (A549, 8.5 ± 3.2; HTB56, 4.4 ± 0.7; EBC1, 4.4 ± 1.2; and H1975, 12.1 ± 3.5 maximal percentage injected dose per milliliter). In contrast, differences in 18F-FDG uptake were only marginal. No clear relationship between 18F-FLT accumulation and immunohistochemical markers for tumor proliferation (Ki67, BrdU) as well as hENT1, TK1, or TS expression was detected. However, TP was highly expressed in A549 and H1975 xenografts, which was accompanied by low tumor thymidine concentrations, suggesting that tumor thymidine levels influence 18F-FLT uptake in the tumor models investigated. MR imaging revealed higher ADC values within proliferative regions of H1975 and A549 tumors than in HTB56 and EBC1. These ADC values were negatively correlated with cell density but not directly related to cell death. Conclusion: A direct relationship of 18F-FLT with proliferation or ADC with cell death might be complicated by the interplay of multiple processes at the cellular and physiologic levels in untreated tumors. This issue must be considered when using these imaging modalities in preclinical or clinical settings.

A phase I trial of the γ-secretase inhibitor MK-0752 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Background:The Notch pathway is frequently activated in cancer. Pathway inhibition by γ-secretase inhibitors has been shown to be effective in pre-clinical models of pancreatic cancer, in combination with gemcitabine.Methods:A multi-centre, non-randomised Bayesian adaptive design study of MK-0752, administered per os weekly, in combination with gemcitabine administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 (28 day cycle) at 800 or 1000 mg m-2, was performed to determine the safety of combination treatment and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary and tertiary objectives included tumour response, plasma and tumour MK-0752 concentration, and inhibition of the Notch pathway in hair follicles and tumour.Results:Overall, 44 eligible patients (performance status 0 or 1 with adequate organ function) received gemcitabine and MK-0752 as first or second line treatment for pancreatic cancer. RP2Ds of MK-0752 and gemcitabine as single agents could be combined safely. The Bayesian algorithm allowed further dose escalation, but pharmacokinetic analysis showed no increase in MK-0752 AUC (area under the curve) beyond 1800 mg once weekly. Tumour response evaluation was available in 19 patients; 13 achieved stable disease and 1 patient achieved a confirmed partial response.Conclusions:Gemcitabine and a γ-secretase inhibitor (MK-0752) can be combined at their full, single-agent RP2Ds.

Thymidine Metabolism as Confounding Factor of 3’-Deoxy-3’-[18F]Fluorothymidine Uptake after Therapy in a Colorectal Cancer Model

Noninvasive monitoring of tumor therapy response helps in developing personalized treatment strategies. Here, we performed sequential PET and diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate changes induced by a FOLFOX-like combination chemotherapy in colorectal cancer xenografts, to identify the cellular and molecular determinants of these imaging biomarkers. Methods: Tumor-bearing CD1 nude mice, engrafted with FOLFOX-sensitive Colo205 colorectal cancer xenografts, were treated with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) weekly. On days 1, 2, 6, 9, and 13 of therapy, tumors were assessed by in vivo imaging and ex vivo analyses. In addition, HCT116 xenografts, which did not respond to the FOLFOX treatment, were imaged on day 1 of therapy. Results: In Colo205 xenografts, FOLFOX induced a profound increase in uptake of the proliferation PET tracer 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) accompanied by increases in markers for proliferation (Ki-67, thymidine kinase 1) and for activated DNA damage response (γH2AX), whereas the effect on cell death was minimal. Because tracer uptake was unaltered in the HCT116 model, these changes appear to be specific for tumor response. Conclusion: We demonstrated that 18F-FLT PET can noninvasively monitor cancer treatment–induced molecular alterations, including thymidine metabolism and DNA damage response. The cellular or imaging changes may not, however, be directly related to therapy response as assessed by volumetric measurements.

Depicting changes in tumor biology in response to cetuximab mono- or combination therapy by apoptosis and proliferation imaging using 18F-ICMT-11 and 3′-Deoxy-3′-[18F]Fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET

Imaging biomarkers must demonstrate their value in monitoring treatment. Two PET tracers, the caspase-3/7–specific isatin-5-sulfonamide 18F-ICMT-11 (18F-(S)-1-((1-(2-fluoroethyl)-1H-[1,2,3]-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-5-(2(2,4-difluoro-phenoxymethyl)-pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl)isatin) and 18F-FLT (3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine), were used to detect early treatment-induced changes in tumor biology and determine whether any of these changes indicate a response to cetuximab, administered as monotherapy or combination therapy with gemcitabine. Methods: In mice bearing cetuximab-sensitive H1975 tumors (non–small lung cancer), the effects of single or repeated doses of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab (10 mg/kg on day 1 only or on days 1 and 2) or a single dose of gemcitabine (125 mg/kg on day 2) were investigated by 18F-ICMT-11 or 18F-FLT on day 3. Imaging was also performed after 2 doses of cetuximab (days 1 and 2) in mice bearing cetuximab-insensitive HCT116 tumors (colorectal cancer). For imaging–histology comparison, tumors were evaluated for proliferation (Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 [TK1]), cell death (cleaved caspase-3 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling [TUNEL]), and target engagement (epidermal growth factor receptor expression) by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and immunoblotting, respectively. Tumor and plasma were analyzed for thymidine and gemcitabine metabolites by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Results: Retention of both tracers was sensitive to cetuximab in H1975 tumors. 18F-ICMT-11 uptake and ex vivo cleaved caspase-3 staining notably increased in tumors treated with repeated doses of cetuximab (75%) and combination treatment (46%). Although a single dose of cetuximab was insufficient to induce apoptosis, it did affect proliferation. Significant reductions in tumor 18F-FLT uptake (44%–50%; P < 0.001) induced by cetuximab monotherapy and combination therapy were paralleled by a clear decrease in proliferation (Ki-67 decrease, 72%–95%; P < 0.0001), followed by a marked tumor growth delay. TK1 expression and tumor thymidine concentrations were profoundly reduced. Neither imaging tracer depicted the gemcitabine-induced tumor changes. However, cleaved caspase-3 and Ki-67 staining did not significantly differ after gemcitabine treatment whereas TK1 expression and thymidine concentrations increased. No cetuximab-induced modulation of the imaging tracers or other response markers was detected in the insensitive model of HCT116. Conclusion: 18F-ICMT-11 and 18F-FLT are valuable tools to assess cetuximab sensitivity depicting distinct and time-variant aspects of treatment response.

Abstract 3771: Capecitabine pharmacokinetics and efficacy in spontaneous tumors occurring in a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of pancreatic cancer

Capecitabine (CAP) is an oral fluoropyrimidine, converted sequentially and selectively to 5-FU at the tumour site. It is used in the treatment of a number of cancers as a single agent and in patients with pancreatic cancer, in combination with gemcitabine. However, pre-clinical data in pancreatic cancer models are limited. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of CAP in a GEMM of spontaneous pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) occurring in KrasG12D; p53R172H; Pdx1-Cre (KPC) mice, compared to an allograft model of a cell line isolated from a PDA arising in the KPC mice. In the PK study, tumour was collected 2 hours after CAP treatment (755 mg/kg by oral gavage), homogenates were analysed using an LC-MS/MS assay developed to simultaneously detect capecitabine and its 3 metabolites DFCR, DFUR and 5-FU (modified from S.M.Guichard, et al., J. Chrom. B. 2005). Data were compared to our previously reported studies in an allograft model (Proc. AACR 2011 a 5446). After a QDx7 treatment, 5-FU concentrations of 27 ± 13 μM were achieved (compared to 23.0 ± 8.1 μM and 22.7 ± 7.7 μM in allograft tumours after 1 and 5 consecutive doses respectively), confirming adequate drug delivery to the in situ tumour following oral administration of CAP. Therefore we proceeded to efficacy studies in this model. In the allograft model we had identified a significant reduction of the tumour doubling time with 755 mg/kg CAP (5 days/week, 3 weeks), compared to control (7.5 ± 3.0 vs 3.5 ± 0.5 days; P Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3771. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3771