Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Donna S. Leonard is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Donna S. Leonard.


Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata | 2005

Optimization of pheromone dosage for gypsy moth mating disruption

Ksenia Tcheslavskaia; Kevin W. Thorpe; Carlyle C. Brewster; Alexei A. Sharov; Donna S. Leonard; Richard C. Reardon; Vic Mastro; Patricia Sellers; E. Anderson Roberts

The effect of aerial applications of the pheromone disparlure at varying dosages on mating disruption in low‐density gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), populations was determined in field plots in Virginia, USA during 2000 and 2002. Six dosages [0.15, 0.75, 3, 15, 37.5, and 75 g active ingredient (AI)/ha] of disparlure were tested during the 2‐year study. A strongly positive dose–response relationship was observed between pheromone dosages and mating disruption, as measured by the reduction in male moth capture in pheromone‐baited traps and mating successes of females. Dosages of pheromone 15 g AI/ha (15, 37.5, and 75 g AI/ha) reduced the mating success of females by >99% and significantly reduced male moth catches in pheromone‐baited traps compared to untreated plots. Pheromone dosages <15 g AI/ha also reduced trap catch, but to a lesser extent than dosages 15 g AI/ha. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the lower dosage treatments (0.15, 0.75, and 3 g AI/ha) declined over time, so that by the end of the study, male moth catches in traps were significantly lower in plots treated with pheromone dosages 15 g AI/ha. The dosage of 75 g AI/ha was initially replaced by a dosage of 37.5 g AI/ha in the USDA Forest Service Slow‐the‐Spread (STS) of the Gypsy Moth management program, but the program is currently making the transition to a dosage of 15 g AI/ha. These changes in applied dosages have resulted in a reduction in the cost of gypsy moth mating disruption treatments.


Journal of Chemical Ecology | 1996

Control of low-density gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations by mating disruption with pheromone

B. A. Leonhardt; Victor C. Mastro; Donna S. Leonard; W. McLane; Richard C. Reardon; Kevin W. Thorpe

This four-year study demonstrated that low-density populations of the gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar (L.), were effectively suppressed by annual aerial application of 75 g of racemic disparlure per hectare formulated in plastic laminate flakes. These tests also showed that, when plots were treated with 150 g of pheromone per hectare in 1990 only and left untreated for the following three years, populations continued to be suppressed in 1991–1993 as compared with the controls. Although none of the plots were treated in 1994, population assessment continued and showed that the gypsy moth population density remained low in the plots that had been treated annually for the preceding four years. The laminate flakes released an average of 0.48 g disparlure per day per hectare from each of the two applications in 1990, and 0.72 g per day per hectare from the single application in each of the following three years (1991–1993). Only 27–40% of the applied pheromone dose was emitted during male moth flight.


Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata | 1999

Comparative efficacy of two controlled-release gypsy moth mating disruption formulations

Kevin W. Thorpe; Victor C. Mastro; Donna S. Leonard; B. A. Leonhardt; W. McLane; Richard C. Reardon; S.E. Talley

The effects of aerial applications of the gypsy moth sex pheromone, disparlure, on mating disruption and suppression of growth of populations of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), were investigated. Two formulations of disparlure, plastic laminate flakes applied in a single application and polymethacrylate beads applied in two applications, were compared in two separate tests conducted in 1993 and 1994. The beads were applied in two applications spaced 2 weeks apart because preliminary tests had indicated that they released pheromone too rapidly to maintain adequate emission rates throughout the period of male flight. In 1993, the flakes were applied at a rate of 50 g a.i./ha, and the beads were applied at a rate of 15 g a.i./ha for each application. In 1994, the flakes were applied at a rate of 75 g a.i./ha and the beads were applied at rates of 32.5 and 42.5 g a.i./ha for the two applications. Beads with larger average particle size were used in 1994 to prolong disparlure release. The treatments applied in 1993 resulted in >97% reduction in mating and >82% suppression of population growth in the following year. Because of a 1995 collapse of gypsy moth populations in the vicinity of the tests, reliable population growth data were not available for the treatments applied in 1994, but significant mating disruption did occur under both treatments. Based on measurements of residual disparlure after field aging, the flakes released 32 and 48% of their disparlure content during the 6 weeks of male moth flight in 1993 and 1994, respectively. The smaller beads used in 1993 released 75% of their disparlure content, and the larger beads used in 1994 released 52% of their disparlure content, during the 6 weeks of male flight. The biological efficacy data suggest that the bead and flake formulations, as applied in these tests, have similar effects on gypsy moth mating disruption and subsequent population growth. Based on the observed release rates from both 1993 and 1994, a single application of the beads would provide emission rates equal to or greater than those provided by the flakes when applied at an equal dose.


Environmental Entomology | 2009

Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Flight Behavior and Phenology Based on Field-Deployed Automated Pheromone-Baited Traps

Patrick C. Tobin; Kenneth T. Klein; Donna S. Leonard

ABSTRACT Populations of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), are extensively monitored in the United States through the use of pheromone-baited traps. We report on use of automated pheromone-baited traps that use a recording sensor and data logger to record the unique date-time stamp of males as they enter the trap. We deployed a total of 352 automated traps under field conditions across several U.S. states over a 5-yr period. In many cases, there was general congruence between male moth capture and the number of recorded events. Although it was difficult to decipher an individual recording event because of the tendency for over-recording, the overall distribution of recorded events was useful in assessing male gypsy moth flight behavior and phenology. The time stamp for recorded events corroborated a previous report of crepuscular gypsy moth male flight behavior, because, although most moths were trapped between 12 and 16 h, there was a consistent period of flight activity between 20 and 22 h. The median male flight duration was 24 d (228 DD, base threshold = 10°C), but there were several traps that recorded flight periods >42 d that could not be explained by overcounting given the congruence between moth capture and the number of recorded events. Unusually long flight periods could indicate the introduction of male moths or other life stages that developed under different climatic conditions.


Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata | 2007

Persistent effects of aerial applications of disparlure on gypsy moth: trap catch and mating success

Kevin W. Thorpe; Ksenia Tcheslavskaia; Patrick C. Tobin; Laura M. Blackburn; Donna S. Leonard; E. Anderson Roberts

In forest plots treated aerially with a plastic laminated flake formulation (Disrupt® II) of the gypsy moth sex pheromone disparlure to disrupt gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), mating was monitored the year of treatment and 1–2 years after treatment to determine the effects of the treatment on suppression of trap catch and mating success. In the year of treatment, there was a greater than 95% reduction in trap catch and a greater than 98% reduction in mating success compared to controls. One year after treatment at a dosage of 37.5 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1, trap catch was reduced by 46–56% and mating success was reduced by 60–79%. Both trap catch and mating success were significantly reduced compared to controls in plots treated 1 year previously at 15 g a.i. ha−1. Trap catch, but not mating success, was significantly reduced 2 years after treatment at 37.5 g a.i. ha−1. The efficacy of mating disruption (MD) treatments in the Slow‐the‐Spread of the Gypsy Moth program was significantly reduced 2 years compared to 1 year after treatment. No such reduction was observed in plots treated with aerial applications of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki. The higher apparent efficacy of MD treatments 1 year after application may result to some extent from the suppression of moth capture in pheromone traps from the persistent effects of the previous years treatment.


Journal of Applied Entomology | 2005

Effects of intentional gaps in spray coverage on the efficacy of gypsy moth mating disruption

Ksenia Tcheslavskaia; Carlyle C. Brewster; Kevin W. Thorpe; A. Sharov; Donna S. Leonard; A. Roberts

Abstract:  The study was conducted during 2001 and 2002 in forested areas in Virginia, US to examine the effects of gaps in coverage of pheromone on gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lep., Lymantriidae), mating disruption. Gypsy moth male moth catches in pheromone‐baited traps were significantly reduced in plots treated with the gypsy moth sex pheromone, disparlure, at an overall application rate of 37.5 g of active ingredient (AI)/ha but with untreated gaps of 30 or 90 m between 30‐m wide treated swaths. In one of the two plots with 90 m gaps, significantly more males were captured in traps in the untreated areas compared with the treated areas within the plot. However, in another plot, significant differences in trap catches between treated and untreated areas were not observed. No difference in male moth catches in the pheromone‐baited traps was observed between treated and untreated areas within the plots treated with 30 m gaps. Female mating success did not differ significantly between treated and untreated areas within the one plot in which it was measured. These results suggest that it may be possible to lower costs associated with gypsy moth mating disruption applications by alternating treated and untreated swaths, which would reduce flight time and fuel costs, without a reduction in efficacy.


Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata | 2010

Effects of SPLAT ® GM sprayable pheromone formulation on gypsy moth mating success

Ksenia S. Onufrieva; Kevin W. Thorpe; Andrea D. Hickman; Patrick C. Tobin; Donna S. Leonard; E. Anderson Roberts

Several integrated pest management programs rely on the use of mating disruption tactics to control insect pests. Some programs specifically target non‐native species, such as the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). We evaluated SPLAT® GM, a new sprayable formulation of the gypsy moth sex pheromone disparlure, for its ability to disrupt gypsy moth mating. The study was conducted in 2006, 2007, and 2008 in forested areas in Virginia, USA. Mating success of gypsy moth females was reduced by >99% and male moth catches in pheromone‐baited traps by >90%, in plots treated with SPLAT® GM at dosages ranging from 15 to 75 g of active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1. Dosage‐response tests conducted in 2008 indicated that SPLAT® GM applied at a dosage of 7.5 g a.i. ha−1 was as effective as a 15 g a.i. ha−1 dosage.


Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2016

Mating Disruption as a Suppression Tactic in Programs Targeting Regulated Lepidopteran Pests in US

David R. Lance; Donna S. Leonard; Victor C. Mastro; Michelle Walters

Mating disruption, the broadcast application of sex-attractant pheromone to reduce the ability of insects to locate mates, has proven to be an effective method for suppressing populations of numerous moth pests. Since the conception of mating disruption, the species-specificity and low toxicity of pheromone applications has led to their consideration for use in area-wide programs to manage invasive moths. Case histories are presented for four such programs where the tactic was used in the United States: Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm), Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth), Epiphyas postvittana (light brown apple moth), and Lobesia botrana (European grapevine moth). Use of mating disruption against P. gossypiella and L. botrana was restricted primarily to agricultural areas and relied in part (P. gossypiella) or wholly (L. botrana) on hand-applied dispensers. In those programs, mating disruption was integrated with other suppression tactics and considered an important component of overall efforts that are leading toward eradication of the invasive pests from North America. By contrast, L. dispar and E. postvittana are polyphagous pests, where pheromone formulations have been applied aerially as stand-alone treatments across broad areas, including residential neighborhoods. For L. dispar, mating disruption has been a key component in the program to slow the spread of the infestation of this pest, and the applications generally have been well tolerated by the public. For E. postvittana, public outcry halted the use of aerially applied mating disruption after an initial series of treatments, effectively thwarting an attempt to eradicate this pest from California. Reasons for the discrepancies between these two programs are not entirely clear.


Agricultural and Forest Entomology | 2000

Effectiveness of gypsy moth mating disruption from aerial applications of plastic laminate flakes with and without a sticking agent

Kevin W. Thorpe; Donna S. Leonard; Victor C. Mastro; W. McLane; Richard C. Reardon; Patricia Sellers; R. E. Webb; S. E. Talley

1 The plastic laminate flake formulation, Disparlure II, is currently the only gypsy moth mating disruption product available for aerial application. The elimination of a sticking agent from the formulation would reduce costs, simplify application, and make it possible to apply the product without specialized equipment.


Journal of Applied Entomology | 2008

Effects of the 3M™ MEC Sprayable Pheromone® formulation on gypsy moth mating success

K. S. Onufrieva; Carlyle C. Brewster; Kevin W. Thorpe; A. A. Sharov; Donna S. Leonard; Richard C. Reardon; Victor C. Mastro; Patricia Sellers; E. A. Roberts

The study was conducted during 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2004 in forested areas in Virginia, USA to evaluate the 3M™ MEC‐GM Sprayable Pheromone® formulation of the gypsy moth sex pheromone, disparlure, for its ability to disrupt mating in gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lep.: Lymantriidae). Both mating success of gypsy moth females and male moth catches in pheromone‐baited traps were significantly reduced in plots treated with the 3M™ MEC‐GM formulation at dosages ranging from 15 to 75 g of active ingredient/ha. However, the 3M™ MEC‐GM formulation reduced trap catch to a lesser extent than did the currently registered Hercon Disrupt® II plastic flakes used as a positive control and applied at similar or lower dosages. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the 3M™ sprayable formulation declined through time, so that by the end of the male flight season, male moth catches in traps were significantly higher than in plots treated with Hercon plastic flakes. Based on the reported results, 3M™ MEC‐GM Sprayable Pheromone® formulation was never integrated into the operational treatment projects of USDA Forest Service Cooperative Slow‐the‐Spread of the Gypsy Moth management programme.

Collaboration


Dive into the Donna S. Leonard's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin W. Thorpe

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victor C. Mastro

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard C. Reardon

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patricia Sellers

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. McLane

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge