Doreen M. Agnese
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Doreen M. Agnese.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2017
B. Faries; John F. Thompson; Alistair J. Cochran; Robert Hans Ingemar Andtbacka; Nicola Mozzillo; Jonathan S. Zager; T. Jahkola; Tawnya L. Bowles; Alessandro Testori; P. D. Beitsch; Harald J. Hoekstra; Marc Moncrieff; Christian Ingvar; M. W.J.M. Wouters; Michael S. Sabel; E. A. Levine; Doreen M. Agnese; Michael A. Henderson; Reinhard Dummer; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Rogerio I. Neves; S. D. Trocha; F. Wright; David R. Byrd; M. Matter; E. Hsueh; A. MacKenzie-Ross; Douglas B. Johnson; P. Terheyden; Adam C. Berger
BACKGROUND Sentinel‐lymph‐node biopsy is associated with increased melanoma‐specific survival (i.e., survival until death from melanoma) among patients with node‐positive intermediate‐thickness melanomas (1.2 to 3.5 mm). The value of completion lymph‐node dissection for patients with sentinel‐node metastases is not clear. METHODS In an international trial, we randomly assigned patients with sentinel‐node metastases detected by means of standard pathological assessment or a multimarker molecular assay to immediate completion lymph‐node dissection (dissection group) or nodal observation with ultrasonography (observation group). The primary end point was melanoma‐specific survival. Secondary end points included disease‐free survival and the cumulative rate of nonsentinel‐node metastasis. RESULTS Immediate completion lymph‐node dissection was not associated with increased melanoma‐specific survival among 1934 patients with data that could be evaluated in an intention‐to‐treat analysis or among 1755 patients in the per‐protocol analysis. In the per‐protocol analysis, the mean (±SE) 3‐year rate of melanoma‐specific survival was similar in the dissection group and the observation group (86±1.3% and 86±1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log‐rank test) at a median follow‐up of 43 months. The rate of disease‐free survival was slightly higher in the dissection group than in the observation group (68±1.7% and 63±1.7%, respectively; P=0.05 by the log‐rank test) at 3 years, based on an increased rate of disease control in the regional nodes at 3 years (92±1.0% vs. 77±1.5%; P<0.001 by the log‐rank test); these results must be interpreted with caution. Nonsentinel‐node metastases, identified in 11.5% of the patients in the dissection group, were a strong, independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; P=0.005). Lymphedema was observed in 24.1% of the patients in the dissection group and in 6.3% of those in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS Immediate completion lymph‐node dissection increased the rate of regional disease control and provided prognostic information but did not increase melanoma‐specific survival among patients with melanoma and sentinel‐node metastases. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; MSLT‐II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297895.)
Surgery | 2003
Doreen M. Agnese; Shahab Abdessalam; William E. Burak; Cynthia M. Magro; Rodney V. Pozderac; Michael J. Walker
BACKGROUND Consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for thin melanomas with poor prognostic features; however, few metastases are identified. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of SLNB in this population. METHODS The prospective melanoma database was reviewed to identify patients with melanomas <1.2 mm thick who had undergone SLNB. Physician and hospital charges were collected from the appropriate billing department. RESULTS A total of 138 patients were identified over an 8-year period (1994-2002). Two patients with positive SLNs were identified (1.4%), one with a melanoma <1 mm thick. Patient charges for SLNB ranged from
Health Psychology | 2014
Lisa M. Jaremka; Rebecca Andridge; Christopher P. Fagundes; Catherine M. Alfano; Stephen P. Povoski; Adele M. Lipari; Doreen M. Agnese; Mark W. Arnold; William B. Farrar; Lisa D. Yee; William E. Carson; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Edward W. Martin; Carl Schmidt; Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser
10,096 to
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2006
Stephen P. Povoski; Johannes O. Olsen; Donn C. Young; Johannah Clarke; William E. Burak; Michael J. Walker; William E. Carson; Lisa D. Yee; Doreen M. Agnese; Rodney V. Pozderac; Nathan Hall; William B. Farrar
15,223 US dollars, compared with
Brain Behavior and Immunity | 2012
Christopher P. Fagundes; Ronald Glaser; Catherine M. Alfano; Jeanette M. Bennett; Stephen P. Povoski; Adele M. Lipari; Doreen M. Agnese; Lisa D. Yee; William E. Carson; William B. Farrar; William B. Malarkey; Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser
1000 to
Health Psychology | 2012
Christopher P. Fagundes; Jeanette M. Bennett; Catherine M. Alfano; Ronald Glaser; Stephen P. Povoski; Adele M. Lipari; Doreen M. Agnese; Lisa D. Yee; William E. Carson; William B. Farrar; William B. Malarkey; Min Chen; Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser
1740 US dollars for wide excision as an outpatient. Using these charges, the cost to identify a single positive SLN would be between
Cancer Journal | 2005
Doreen M. Agnese; William E. Burak
696,600 and
Brain Behavior and Immunity | 2014
Christopher P. Fagundes; Lisa M. Jaremka; Ronald Glaser; Catherine M. Alfano; Stephen P. Povoski; Adele M. Lipari; Doreen M. Agnese; Lisa D. Yee; William E. Carson; William B. Farrar; William B. Malarkey; Min Chen; Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser
1,051,100 US dollars. The cost for wide excision would be between
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2004
Doreen M. Agnese; Shahab Abdessalam; William E. Burak; Mark W. Arnold; Denise Soble; George H. Hinkle; Donn C. Young; M. B. Khazaeli; Edward W. Martin
69,000 and
Psycho-oncology | 2013
Monica E. Lindgren; Christopher P. Fagundes; Catherine M. Alfano; Stephen P. Povoski; Doreen M. Agnese; Mark W. Arnold; William B. Farrar; Lisa D. Yee; William E. Carson; Carl Schmidt; Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser
120,100 US dollars. Assuming that all patients with a positive SLN would die of melanoma, the cost per life saved would be