Doreen Su-Yin Tan

Identifying potentially avoidable readmissions: A medication-based 15-day readmission risk stratification algorithm.

Stratifying patients according to 15‐day readmission risk would be useful in identifying those who may benefit from targeted interventions during and/or following hospital discharge that are designed to reduce the likelihood of readmission.

Cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Background: Sacubitril/valsartan reduces cardiovascular death and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF). However, decision-makers need to determine whether its benefits are worth the additional costs, given the low-cost generic status of traditional standard of care. Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction, from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was developed to project clinical and economic outcomes of sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril for 66-year-old patients with HF over 10 years. Key health states included New York Heart Association classes I–IV and deaths; patients in each state incurred a monthly risk of hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death. Sacubitril/valsartan benefits were modeled by applying the hazard ratios (HRs) in PARADIGM-HF trial to baseline probabilities. Primary model outcomes were total and incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for sacubitril/valsartan relative to enalapril Results: Compared to enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an ICER of SGD 74,592 (USD 55,198) per QALY gained. A major driver of cost-effectiveness was the cardiovascular mortality benefit of sacubitril/valsartan. The uncertainty of this treatment benefit in the Asian sub-group was tested in sensitivity analyses using a HR of 1 as an upper limit, where the ICERs ranged from SGD 41,019 (USD 30,354) to SGD 1,447,103 (USD 1,070,856) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the probability of sacubitril/valsartan being cost-effective was below 1%, 12%, and 71% at SGD 20,000, SGD 50,000, and SGD 100,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Conclusions: At the current daily price sacubitril/valsartan may not represent good value for limited healthcare dollars compared to enalapril in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in HF in the Singapore healthcare setting. This study highlights the cost-benefit trade-off that healthcare professionals and patients face when considering therapy.

Prevalence of dysglycaemic events among inpatients with diabetes mellitus: a Singaporean perspective.

INTRODUCTION As the effectiveness of intensive glycaemic control is unclear and recommended glycaemic targets are inconsistent, this study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of dysglycaemia among hospitalised patients with diabetes mellitus in an Asian population and evaluate the current standards of inpatient glycaemic control. METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted at a secondary hospital. Point-of-care blood glucose (BG) values, demographic data, medical history, glycaemic therapy and clinical characteristics were recorded. Dysglycaemia prevalence was calculated as proportions of BG-monitored days with at least one reading exceeding the cut points of 8, 10 and 15 mmol/L for hyperglycaemia, and below the cut point of 4 mmol/L for hypoglycaemia. RESULTS Among the 288 patients recruited, hyperglycaemia was highly prevalent (90.3%, 81.3% and 47.6% for the respective cut points), while hypoglycaemia was the least prevalent (18.8%). Dysglycaemic patients were more likely than normoglycaemic patients to have poorer glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (8.4% ± 2.6% vs. 7.3% ± 1.9%; p = 0.002 for BG > 10 mmol/L) and longer lengths of stay (10.1 ± 8.2 days vs. 6.8 ± 4.7 days; p = 0.007 for BG < 4 mmol/L). Hyperglycaemia was more prevalent in patients on more intensive treatment regimens, such as basal-bolus combination therapy and the use of both insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents (100.0% and 96.0%, respectively; p < 0.001 for BG > 10 mmol/L). CONCLUSION Inpatient glycaemic control is suboptimal. Factors (e.g. type of treatment regimen, discipline and baseline HbA1c) associated with greater prevalence of dysglycaemia should be given due consideration in patient management.

Reply: Cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Reply to: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13696998.2018.1503597 Original Article: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13696998.2017.1387119 Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) ...

Letter by Aw et al Regarding Article, “Clinical Outcomes and Sustainability of Using CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention”

We read the recent studies by Lee et al1 and the IGNITE network (Implementing Genomics in Practice) with much interest and wish to share findings from our cohort of 247 Asians in Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore. To our knowledge, we are the first Asian group to demonstrate similar interventional cohort findings as those of Lee et al1 and Cavallari et al from the IGNITE network.2 We conducted a single-center, prospective, open label study in 247 Asian patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel. At the time of design, we intended to switch subjects with high-on-treatment response from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Additional blood samples were collected for genotyping. High-on-treatment …

Drug Class, Renal Elimination, and Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a better risk benefit profile in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether treatment effects could be modified by drug class and dependency on renal elimination of studied agents has not yet been explored. METHODS We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases through November 2016 for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with AF. Efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled according to drug class and dependency on renal elimination of DOACs and were compared with the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Effect differences were assessed with Buchers indirect comparisons using common estimates, once heterogeneity was low, and with the Bayesian method. RESULTS Among 6496 Asian patients from 6 trials, both direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, compared with warfarin, were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.51 [0.33-0.78], 0.74 ([0.58-0.96], 0.60 [0.41-0.86], and 0.59 [0.47-0.76], respectively). There was no between-group difference in direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors or in DOACs with renal elimination less than 50% and 50% or greater (all I2 < 25% and interaction P > .05). Indirect comparisons within strata of drug class and dependency on renal elimination showed no preferential effect of any given regimen over another. There was no difference in effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality between DOACs stratified by pharmacologic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS DOACs, as a therapeutic class, outperform warfarin in efficacy and safety in Asian patients with AF.

Incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: An Asian multicenter retrospective cohort study in Singapore

Real‐world effectiveness and safety of antithrombotics in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in Singapore has not been thoroughly studied.

The Role of a Pharmacist in a Transdisciplinary Geriatric Surgery Team

Polypharmacy can refer to the prescribing of many medicines (five or more medicines are often quoted) or to the addition of inappropriate medicines to an existing regime. It appeared in medical literature more than 150 years ago and thus is not an unfamiliar term. Why is there a need to talk about polypharmacy in a general surgery population? The number of chronic medicine that patients receive has increased over the years. The following paragraphs will sought to explain why.

REAL-WORLD INCIDENCE RATES OF BLEEDING IN ASIAN PATIENTS ON PRASUGREL AND TICAGRELOR

Apart from the two landmark studies which led to the approval of prasugrel and ticagrelor, bleeding incidences have not been reported to date. We aim to determine the incidence of clinically-significant bleeding in local Asians and to identify the possible risk factors for bleeding. Post-PCI

Erythema Multiforme Secondary to Dimenhydrinate in a Patient With Previous Similar Reactions to Pamabrom

Objective: To report a case of erythema multiforme secondary to dimenhydrinate and pamabrom cross-sensitivity. Case Summary: A 22-year-old Chinese female presented with a complaint of lip mucosal ulceration with necrosis and stomatitis, worsening over the past 24 hours and associated with reduced oral intake and incomplete opening of the mouth. Presentation was accompanied by a generalized rash and genital mucosal involvement. The only new systemically ingested agent was dimenhydrinate approximately 4 days prior to admission. She had no significant medical history, but was labeled to be allergic to acetaminophen. She had a positive history of 2 similar presentations secondary to Panadol Menstrual (acetaminophen and pamabrom), once 3 years ago and again 5 months prior to the current admission. An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse drug event was “probable” to dimenhydrinate. A detailed history revealed a negative drug challenge to acetaminophen. She had previously taken plain acetaminophen and Beserol (acetaminophen and chlormezanone) with no reaction. Discussion: A comprehensive history taking facilitated the diagnosis of erythema multiforme secondary to dimenhydrinate without the need to perform invasive testing, and the removal of erroneous allergy labeling to acetaminophen. Dimenhydrinate and pamabron both contain theophylline-related structures in their chemical composition. Similar reactions to pamabrom strongly suggested cross-sensitivity to theophylline-related structures. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of erythema multiforme due to dimenhydrinate with pamabron cross-sensitivity. We recommend that comprehensive medication-history taking be carried out for all drug-allergy patients to ensure greater informed decision making when choosing medications to use for that patient in the future.