Dori Seccareccia

Phase II Study of an Outpatient Palliative Care Intervention in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

PURPOSE Although there is increasing advocacy for timely symptom control in patients with cancer, few studies have assessed outpatient palliative care clinics. This study assessed prospectively the efficacy of an Oncology Palliative Care Clinic (OPCC) in improving patient symptom distress and satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were new referrals to an OPCC, had metastatic cancer, were at least 18 years old, and were well enough and able to speak and read English sufficiently to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires. Patients received a consultation by a palliative care team. The primary end points of symptom control and patient satisfaction were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and patient-adapted Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE) scale at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month. Initial and follow-up scores were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS Of 150 patients enrolled, 123 completed 1-week assessments, and 88 completed 4-week assessments. At baseline, the mean ESAS Distress Score (EDS) was 39.5. The mean improvement in EDS was 8.8 points (P < .0001) at 1 week and 7.0 points (P < .0001) at 1 month. Statistically significant improvements were observed for pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, dyspnea, insomnia, and constipation at 1 week (all P < or = .005) and 1 month (all P < or = .05). The mean improvement in FAMCARE score was 6.1 points (P < .0001) at 1 week and 5.0 points (P < .0001) at 1 month. CONCLUSION This phase II study demonstrates efficacy of an OPCC for improvement of symptom control and patient satisfaction with care. Randomized controlled trials are indicated to further evaluate the effectiveness of specialized outpatient palliative care.

Bringing palliative care to a Canadian cancer center: the palliative care program at Princess Margaret Hospital.

It is increasingly recognized that complete care of the patient with cancer includes palliative care, which is applicable early in the course of illness, in conjunction with life-prolonging treatment. Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) is Canada’s largest center for cancer care and research, and it is an international referral center for patients with cancer. The Palliative Care Program at PMH has developed into a comprehensive clinical, educational, and research program, with an acute palliative care unit, daily palliative care clinics, a cancer pain clinic, and a consultation service that sees urgent consultations on a same-day basis in inpatient and outpatient areas. We will describe the components, successes, and challenges of our program, which may be useful for others, who are developing palliative care programs in an academic setting.

Rotation to methadone after opioid dose escalation: How should individualization of dosing occur?

Methadone is a synthetic opioid agonist and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that is being increasingly used in pain management, particularly for pain that is resistant to conventional opioids. We describe two patients with neurotoxic side effects on escalating doses of parenteral hydromorphone with uncontrolled cancer pain who were successfully converted to oral methadone at a dose much smaller than predicted. The phenomenon of increasing pain despite opioid dose escalation is discussed and the rationale for the use of methadone in this situation is described. While methadone is useful for patients with unremitting pain on another opioid, existing conversion regimens do not specifically take into account the setting of dose escalation. Clinical guidelines for rotation to methadone after dose escalation of the previous opioid are needed to avoid toxicity including respiratory depression. A possible conversion method for rotation to methadone for patients with escalating pain and opioid use is suggested.

Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients

IntroductionPerformance status (PS) scales are used widely in oncology practice and research. We compared inter-rater agreement, between nurses and physicians, for three commonly used PS scales.Materials and methodsPatients attending an oncology palliative care clinic were assessed by a physician and nurse who blindly completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Karnofsky PS (KPS), and palliative PS (PPS) scales. Patients completed the Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS).ResultsInter-rater agreement (weighted kappa) for the 457 patients was 0.67 for the ECOG, 0.74 for the KPS, and 0.72 for the PPS. There was no difference between proportions of physicians’ vs. nurses’ ratings of KPS, >60 vs. ≤60 (McNemar’s test, p = 0.33); however, physicians were more likely to rate patients as having better PS for the ECOG (77% in the 0–2 range vs. 70% for nurses, p = 0.0003) and PPS (63% in the 70–100 range vs. 54% for nurses, p = 0.0001). Physician and nurse scores of ECOG, KPS, and PPS were all correlated with ESAS distress score (Pearson correlation, r = 0.4–0.5).ConclusionsAlthough inter-rater agreement was good for all three scales, physicians tended to rate patients as healthier for the PPS and ECOG. The KPS may provide greater consistency of PS ratings by different oncology professionals in clinical and research settings.

Predictors of Symptom Severity and Response in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

We examined determinants of symptom severity and response to treatment among 150 patients with cancer participating in a phase II trial of a palliative care team intervention. Patients completed a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at baseline and 1 week. Women had a worse baseline ESAS Distress Score (EDS; P = .003) and Total Distress Score (TDS; P = .005); differences were particularly marked for anxiety and appetite. Performance status was inversely associated with EDS, TDS, well-being, appetite, and fatigue (Kruskal-Wallis, all P < .005). Multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that symptom improvement was independently predicted by worse baseline EDS score and female gender. Performance status, gender, and baseline symptom severity should be accounted for in trials of palliative care interventions; inclusion criteria based on symptom severity should also be considered.

Administrative Outcomes Five Years after Opening an Acute Palliative Care Unit at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

PURPOSE We examined administrative outcomes after opening an oncology acute palliative care unit (APCU), to determine attainment of administrative targets related to the units function of acute palliation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the administrative database for our APCU for the 5 years following its opening in 2003. Data were abstracted on demographic information, as well as source of admission, primary reason for admission, discharge destination, inpatient death rate, and length of stay. Linear regression and the Cochran-Armitage trend test were used for analysis. In keeping with targets set at the units opening, our primary hypotheses were that outpatient admissions, admissions for symptom control, and discharges home would increase over the study period; secondary hypotheses were that length of stay and inpatient death rate would decrease. RESULTS There were 1748 admissions during the study period: the median age was 64, 54% were women, and the most common cancer sites were gastrointestinal (24%), lung (20%), and gynecologic (13%). There were significant changes for all primary endpoints: outpatient admissions increased from 47% to 70% (p < 0.0001), admissions for symptom control increased from 42% to 75% (p < 0.0001), and discharges home increased from 18% to 39% (p < 0.0001). The secondary end points of death rate and length of stay decreased from 65% to 40% (p < 0.0001) and 12 to 11 days (p = 0.54), respectively. CONCLUSION Setting and adhering to administrative targets for an APCU is possible with appropriate admission criteria, adequate community resources, and education of patients, families and health professionals regarding the model of care.

Availability of Services in Ontario Hospices and Hospitals Providing Inpatient Palliative Care

PURPOSE Most Canadians die in inpatient settings. Our aim was to determine the availability of medical services, programs, and care for common palliative procedures, in hospices, palliative care units (PCUs), and hospital medical wards (MWs) providing inpatient palliative care in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We identified facilities providing inpatient palliative care using the Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) and Hospice Association of Ontario (HAO) websites. An electronic survey was sent to the person responsible for palliative care at each facility. We compared services available among the three types of units, using Fishers exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS Of 128 surveys sent, 102 (80%) were completed and returned, from 58 MWs, 31 PCUs, and 13 hospices. MWs were the most common location of palliative care overall, particularly in rural areas. PCUs were most likely to provide care for common procedures (e.g., tracheostomy, nephrostomy; p<0.01); methadone for pain management (p<0.0001); and palliative radiation (p<0.01). MWs were most likely to offer intravenous chemotherapy and antibiotics (p<0.01). Transfusions were available in most PCUs and MWs, but only in one hospice (p<0.0001). Hospices were most likely to provide complementary therapies. Lack of financial support and human resources were the most frequent perceived barriers to providing quality palliative care. CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variability of available services depending on the setting where inpatient palliative care is provided. Further financial support and resources are required to ensure consistent high quality of care in both urban and rural areas.

Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care on Palliative Care Units

CONTEXT There is little research on quality of care specific to palliative care units (PCUs). OBJECTIVES To delineate important aspects of satisfaction with care and quality of care on a PCU, as described by inpatients, family caregivers, and health care professionals. METHODS Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted across four Toronto PCUs, with a total of 46 patient/caregiver interviews and eight staff focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were semistructured to elicit comments about satisfaction with care and quality of care for inpatients and families on a PCU. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory method, with an inductive, constant comparison approach to identify themes, and were coded to saturation. RESULTS Key elements of quality care and patient satisfaction on a PCU were grouped into six domains: 1) interprofessional team: a team of experts comprising multiple disciplines functioning as a unit; 2) communication: developing rapport, addressing expectations, providing information, listening actively, and facilitating end-of-life discussions; 3) attentive, personalized care: anticipatory and responsive compassionate care with tailored management of physical and nonphysical symptoms; 4) family-centered: support of patients and caregivers within a family; 5) accessible and consistent: appropriate resources and adequate staff to provide consistent care; and 6) supportive setting: a bright noninstitutionalized setting allowing both privacy and socialization. CONCLUSION The elements identified support the delivery of quality care. They may act as a guide for those planning to develop PCUs and form the basis for measures of satisfaction with care.

Standardized patient simulation versus didactic teaching alone for improving residents’ communication skills when discussing goals of care and resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial

Background: Communication skills are important when discussing goals of care and resuscitation. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of standardized patients for teaching medical trainees to communicate about goals of care. Objective: To determine whether standardized patient simulation offers benefit over didactic sessions alone for improving skill and comfort discussing goals of care. Design and intervention: Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of didactic teaching plus standardized patient simulation versus didactic teaching alone. Participants: First-year internal medicine residents. Main measures: Changes in communication comfort and skill between baseline and 2 months post-training assessed using the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure. Key results: We enrolled 94 residents over a 2-year period. Both groups reported a significant improvement in comfort when discussing goals of care with patients. There was no difference in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores following the workshop (p = 0.79). The intervention group showed a significant increase in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores post-workshop compared with pre-workshop (35.0 vs 31.7, respectively; p = 0.048), whereas there was no improvement in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores in the control group (35.6 vs 36.0; p = 0.4). However, when the results were adjusted for baseline differences in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores in a multivariable regression analysis, group assignment was not associated with an improvement in Consultation and Relational Empathy score. Improvement in comfort scores and perception of benefit were not associated with improvements in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores. Conclusion: Simulation training may improve communication skill and comfort more than didactic training alone, but there were important confounders in this study and further studies are needed to determine whether simulation is better than didactic training for this purpose.

Palliating a Pandemic: All Patients Must Be Cared For

Abstract In the event of an overwhelming influenza pandemic, many health care systems will implement a triage system that would potentially deny critical care treatment to some seriously ill patients. Although all triage systems have guaranteed palliative care for those who are denied critical care, no jurisdiction has yet developed a plan to accommodate the anticipated “surge” in demand for palliative care. The authors present a mathematical and ethical justification for a palliative care surge plan and outline some of the key elements that should be included in such a plan.