Dorota A. Zieba

Divergent effects of leptin on luteinizing hormone and insulin secretion are dose dependent.

We have shown recently that fasting permits leptin to modulate both luteinizing hormone (LH) and insulin secretion in cows. In rodents, leptin causes divergent effects on LH and insulin release that are dose dependent. To test the hypothesis that leptin effects on LH and insulin secretion in fasted cows are dose related, we examined the effects of various doses of recombinant ovine leptin (oleptin) in mature cows. Twenty ovariectomized beef cows, each bearing an estradiol implant to maintain basal estradiol concentrations, were used. All cows were fasted for 60 hr with free access to water and were assigned randomly to one of four groups (n = 5/group): 1) saline control; 2) leptin, 0.2 μg/kg; 3) leptin, 2.0 μg/kg; and 4) leptin, 20 μg/kg body wt. Blood samples were collected at 10-min intervals for 6 hr on Days 0 and 2, with saline or oleptin injected intravenously immediately after the first intensive sample on Day 2 (54 hr). Leptin caused a dose-related increase (P < 0.001) in mean concentrations of circulating LH. Stimulation of LH release by leptin was significant at the lowest (141% of control) and middle (122% of control) doses used, but no increase was observed for the highest dose. Increased mean concentrations of LH appeared to result from an augmentation of basal secretion, as pulse characteristics were not affected. After 54 hr of fasting, plasma insulin concentrations were lowered (P < 0.01) in all treatment groups compared to Day 0. After leptin injections, plasma insulin concentrations increased (P < 0.01) and reached highest concentrations during the first hour of sampling. However, this increase was sustained for several hours only in the intermediate (2.0 μg/kg) dose group. Collectively, our results show that leptin has potent positive effects on both LH and insulin secretion in fasted cows, but the anterior pituitary and endocrine pancreas appear to become downregulated in the presence of excess ligand.

Seasonal effects of central leptin infusion on secretion of melatonin and prolactin and on SOCS-3 gene expression in ewes

Recent studies have demonstrated photoperiodic changes in leptin sensitivity of seasonal mammals. Herein, we examined the interaction of season (long days (LD) versus short days (SD)) and recombinant ovine leptin (roleptin) on secretion of melatonin and prolactin (PRL) and on mRNA expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) in sheep. Twenty-four Polish Longwool ewes, surgically fitted with third ventricle (IIIV) cannulas, were utilized in a replicated switchback design involving 12 ewes per season. Within-season and replicate ewes were assigned randomly to one of three treatments (four ewes/treatment) and infused centrally three times at 0, 1 and 2 h beginning at sunset. Treatments were 1) control, Ringer-Locke buffer; 2) L1, roleptin, 0.5 microg/kg BW; and 3) L2, roleptin, 1.0 microg/kg BW. Jugular blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals beginning immediately before the start of infusions and continued for 6 h. At the end of blood sampling, a washout period of at least 3 days elapsed before ewes were re-randomized and treated with one of the treatments described above (four ewes/treatment). Ewes were then killed and brains were collected for MBH processing. Leptin treatments increased (P<0.001) circulating leptin concentrations compared with controls during both seasons in a dose-dependent manner. Overall, mean plasma concentrations of melatonin were greater (P<0.001) during LD than SD. However, leptin treatments increased melatonin concentrations during SD in a dose-dependent manner and decreased it during LD. Similarly, plasma concentrations of PRL were greater (P<0.001) during LD than SD. However, unlike changes in melatonin, circulating PRL decreased (P<0.001) in response to leptin during LD. Semi-quantitative PCR revealed that leptin increased (P<0.001) SOCS-3 expression in the MBH region during LD in a dose-dependent manner. Data provide evidence that secretion of photoperiodic hormones such as melatonin and PRL are inversely regulated by leptin during SD and LD. However, the increase in expression of SOCS-3 in the MBH during LD compared with SD fails to fully explain these effects.

Ghrelin-mediated appetite regulation in the central nervous system

The gut hormone and neuropeptide ghrelin was initially identified in the periphery as a compound released in the bloodstream in response to a negative energetic status. In the central nervous system (CNS), ghrelin mainly acts on the hypothalamus and the limbic system, with its best-known biological role being the regulation of appetitive functions. Recent research has shown that ghrelin is not an indispensable factor in the regulation of food intake. However, it plays a key role in the metabolic changes of lipids, mainly those involving hypothalamic NOS, AMPK, CaMKK2, CPT1 and UCP2 proteins. Ghrelin participates in the regulation of memory processes and the feeling of pleasure resulting from eating, both of which are metabolism-dependent and may be essential for the successful achievement of adaptive appetitive behavior. Ghrelin exerts its biological effect through a complicated network of neuroendocrine links, including the melanocortin and endocannabinoid systems. The activity of ghrelin is connected with circadian and annual fluctuations, which depend on seasons and food availability.

Effects of orexigenic peptides and leptin on melatonin secretion during different photoperiods in seasonal breeding ewes: An in vitro study

The pineal gland (PG) acts as a neuroendocrine transducer of daily and seasonal time through the nocturnal release of melatonin. Here, we examined the interaction of season, orexin, ghrelin, and leptin on melatonin secretion by pineal explants in short-term culture. Glands were collected after sunset from 12 ewes during long days (LD; April and May) and from an additional 12 ewes during short days (SD; October and November). Glands were transected sagittally into strips, with each equilibrated in 2.5 mL of Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium for 60 min, followed by a 2-h incubation in control medium or medium containing orexin B (10 and 100 ng/mL), ghrelin (10 and 100 ng/mL), or 50 ng/mL of leptin. After a 3-h incubation, some PG explants treated previously with lower doses of orexin or ghrelin were challenged with 50 ng/mL of leptin and those treated with both doses of orexin were challenged with 300 nM of the β-agonist isoproterenol. One milliliter of medium was harvested and replaced from each well every 30 min. Treatment with the low dose of orexin during LD increased melatonin secretion about 110% (P<0.01); treatment with a high dose increased melatonin secretion about 47% (P<0.001). During the SD period, leptin stimulated (P < 0.05) melatonin secretion slightly compared with mean melatonin concentration in controls. However, together, orexin and leptin depressed (P<0.01) melatonin secretion. Both doses of ghrelin reduced (P < 0.01) melatonin concentration during the SD season compared with control culture. Addition of ghrelin and leptin to culture medium increased (P<0.01) melatonin concentration compared with ghrelin-treated culture and decreased melatonin concentration (P<0.01) compared with leptin-treated culture during SD. Isoproterenol stimulated (P<0.01) melatonin secretion compared with values observed during the pretreatment period. We conclude that orexigenic peptides (orexin B and ghrelin) and an anorectic peptide (leptin) affect PG directly. The responses of PG to those hormones depend on day length. Moreover, secretion of melatonin from the ovine PG is under an adrenergic regulation.

A review on the effect of the photoperiod and melatonin on interactions between ghrelin and serotonin

Ghrelin and serotonin, which exhibit rhythmic secretion profiles under feeding/fasting conditions, are sensitive to increases and decreases in the day length and form a close web of interrelationships in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Ghrelin and serotonin are biochemically and functionally linked to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which is a circadian pacemaker, and melatonin, which is an internal transducer of photic environmental changes. Ghrelin and serotonin might be candidates for integrating photic and nonphotic signals, such as light and food availability in the central nervous system. The mechanisms that convert a light signal into a variety of physiological and behavioral rhythms remain unknown. However, we know that the conversion of light signals is necessary to maximize an animals chances of survival and reproduction.

Seasonal effects of central leptin infusion and prolactin treatment on pituitary SOCS-3 gene expression in ewes

Suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS) negatively regulate cytokine-induced signalling pathways and may be involved in leptin and prolactin (PRL) interactions. Herein, we examined the effect of PRL on SOCS-3 mRNA expression in pituitary explants and investigated whether leptin could modify the expression of SOCS-3 mRNA in pituitary explants. In the first experiment, we used pituitaries isolated from 16 ewes decapitated in March, May, July and October (four per month). Tissues were cut into 50 mg explants, which were treated with control or medium containing PRL (100 or 300 ng/ml). Incubation was maintained for different time intervals: 0, 60, 120, 180, 240 or 300 min. Real-time PCR was used to measure SOCS-3 mRNA levels. In the second study, we used 24 ewes surgically fitted with third ventricle cannulas (12 were used during the long-day period, and 12 were used during the short-day (SD) period). Each ewe was administered an i.c.v. injection of Ringer-Locke buffer or leptin (0.5 or 1.0 μg/kg body weight). Explants of anterior pituitaries were collected and snap frozen 1 h after injection. Semi-quantitative expression of SOCS-3 mRNA was performed using reverse transcription-PCR. PRL stimulated SOCS-3 expression in the pituitaries collected in March (P<0.05) and May (P<0.01 and P<0.05 for lower and higher doses respectively), inhibited SOCS-3 expression in pituitaries collected in July (P<0.01) and had no effect in pituitaries collected in October. Treatment with leptin increased SOCS-3 expression during the SDs in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.01). The results demonstrated that photoperiod may be involved in leptin and PRL effects on SOCS-3 expression in sheep.

Comparison of the effects of pretreatment with Veramix sponge (medroxyprogesterone acetate) or CIDR (natural progesterone) in combination with an injection of estradiol-17β on ovarian activity, endocrine profiles, and embryo yields in cyclic ewes superovulated in the multiple-dose Folltropin-V (porcine FSH) regimen

Follicular wave status at the beginning of exogenous FSH administration is an important contributor to variability in superovulatory responses in ruminants. Studies in ewes have shown a decrease in the number of ovulations when superovulation is initiated in the presence of ostensibly ovulatory-sized ovarian follicles. Hormonal ablation of large antral follicles with the progestin-estradiol (E2-17β) treatment significantly reduces this variability in superovulated anestrous ewes, but the effects of the treatment in cycling ewes have not yet been assessed. Sixteen Rideau Arcott × Polled Dorset ewes (November-December) received either medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP)-releasing intravaginal sponges (60 mg) or controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices (containing 300 mg of natural progesterone) for 14 days (Days 0-14), with a single intramuscular injection of 350 μg of E2-17β on Day 6. The superovulatory treatment consisted of six injections of porcine FSH (Folltropin-V) given twice daily, followed by a bolus GnRH injection (50 μg intramuscular) on Day 15. There were no differences (P < 0.05) in the ovulatory responses and embryo yields between the two groups of ewes. In both subsets of animals, the next follicular wave emerged ∼2.5 days after an E2-17β injection (P > 0.05). A decline in maximum follicle size after an E2-17β injection was more abrupt in CIDR- compared with MAP-treated animals, and the ewes pretreated with exogenous progesterone had significantly more 3-mm follicles at the start of the superovulatory treatment. The metabolic clearance rate of exogenous E2-17β appeared to be greater in MAP-treated ewes, but circulating concentrations of porcine FSH failed to increase significantly after each Folltropin-V injection in CIDR-treated animals. The CIDR-treated ewes exceeded (P < 0.05) their MAP-treated counterparts in serum E2-17β concentrations during superovulation. In spite of differences in antral follicle numbers and endocrine profiles between MAP- and CIDR-treated cyclic ewes receiving E2-17β before ovarian superstimulation, there were no differences in superovulatory responses.

Suitability of antral follicle counts and computer-assisted analysis of ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images for estimating follicular reserve in porcine, ovine and bovine ovaries ex situ

This study was conducted to determine if correlations exist between the numbers of microscopic follicles comprising ovarian follicular reserve (OFR) and antral follicle counts (AFCs), and to assess the usefulness of computerized analyses of ovarian ultrasonograms and magnetic resonance (MR) images for estimating OFR in excised porcine, ovine and bovine ovaries. As a pre-requisite to these analyses, we characterized and compared ovarian cortical histomorhpology and follicle populations in the three species varying in prolificacy and overall reproductive longevity, and hence the total number of microscopic and antral follicles. Ultrasonographic and MR images were obtained at the scanner settings optimized to provide opposing contrasts between antral follicles and the ovarian stroma. Commercially available ImageProPlus® analytical software was used to calculate numerical pixel values (NPVs) and pixel heterogeneity (standard deviation of the pixel values) along the computer-generated lines (4–6) placed in the area corresponding to the ovarian cortex. The numbers of primordial (r = 0.38, P < 0.01) and intermediate follicles (r = 0.37, P < 0.01) were correlated with the numbers of antral follicles in bovine ovarian sections. The numbers of primordial (r = 0.28, P < 0.05), intermediate (r = 0.31, P < 0.01) and primary follicles (r = 0.27, P < 0.05) correlated directly with mean NPVs of the ultrasonographic ovarian images in cattle. There was a negative correlation between primary follicle numbers and NPVs of MR images (3D FAST-SPOILED GRADIENT ECHO) of the porcine ovarian cortex (r = −0.31, P < 0.05). To summarize, the numbers of primordial and intermediate follicles could only be estimated from AFCs in cows. Using ultrasound NPVs, the numbers of primordial, intermediate and primary follicles could be directly estimated in bovine ovaries and the quantitative image attributes of MR images were useful for quantifying porcine primary follicles. The bovine ovarian model is compatible with human situation and hence future studies should be undertaken to ascertain the usefulness of AFCs and ultrasonographic image analyses for estimating OFR in women.

Cross-talk between leptin, ghrelin and orexins in the central nervous system of seasonal animals – a review

Abstract The maintenance of energy homeostasis is achieved with ‘detectors’ that receive signals from the external and internal environment and with multidirectional ‘communication routes’ including neuronal networks and body fluids, such as blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Changes in the energy demands of organisms are caused by current physiological status and environmental conditions, including season and food availability. Little is known about the interactions between the metabolic indicators involved in the maintenance of energy homeostasis, e.g., leptin, orexins and ghrelin. Sheep and other seasonal animals are highly adaptable to their environments because of the plasticity of their neural and endocrine systems. Sheep exhibit leptin resistance and are thus an extremely interesting model for research on the relationship between hormonal indicators of energy metabolism. The paper is focused mainly on the anatomical and functional communication between leptin, ghrelin and orexins, which play principal roles in the adaptation of energetic demands to environmental fluctuations.

Photoperiod Influences the Effects of Ghrelin and Serotonin Receptor Agonist onGrowth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion in Sheep

Objective: Recent studies have identified a novel heterodimer involving the ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) and the 5-HT2C receptor, a subtype of serotonin receptors. Whether or not interactions between GHS-R1A and the 5-HT2C receptor exist and how they are modulated by photoperiod and nutritional status in seasonally animals remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of ghrelin and a 5-HT2B/2C serotonin receptor agonist, 1-(3-chlorophenyl) piperazine hydrochloride (m-CPP), on GH and PRL secretion under the influence of nutritional status and photoperiod. Methods: Normally fed (n=12) or fasted (n=12) ewes were assigned to one of 4 groups and treatments: 1) control (saline); 2) ghrelin (2.5 μg/kg); 3) m-CPP (2.5 mg/kg); 4) ghrelin followed by m-CPP were infused once at the beginning of the study for groups 1, 2 and 3; in group 4, ghrelin was administered at 15 min, and m-CPP at 30 min. Blood samples were collected at 15 min intervals for 3 h during the short day (SD) and long day (LD) season. Results: Ghrelin and m-CPP enhanced (p<0.05) GH secretion in fasted ewes during LD. The m-CPP significantly decreased GH concentrations in fasted ewes during SD. Prolactin concentrations were lower (p<0.01) in normally fed ewes after the ghrelin+m-CPP treatment compared to treatment with m-CPP alone. Conclusion: There were interactions among ghrelin, serotonin, photoperiod and metabolic status that influenced GH and PRL secretion in ewes. Using an ovine model, our work provides a basis for future studies of the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders associated with alterations in nutritional status and day length.