Dorothy F. Edwards

Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage.

ObjectiveTo determine whether mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is lower in patients admitted to a neurologic or neurosurgical (neuro) intensive care unit (ICU) compared to those admitted to general ICUs. BackgroundThe utility of specialty ICUs is debated. From a cost perspective, having fewer larger ICUs is preferred. Alternatively, the impact of specialty ICUs on patient outcome is unknown. Patients with ICH are admitted routinely to both general and neuro ICUs and provide an opportunity to address this question. SettingForty-two neuro, medical, surgical, and medical-surgical ICUs. Measurements and Main Results The study was an analysis of data prospectively collected by Project Impact over 3 yrs from 42 participating ICUs (including one neuro ICU) across the country. The records of 36,986 patients were merged with records of 3,298 patients from a second neuro ICU that collected the same data over the same period. The impact of clinical (age, race, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale score, reason for admission, insurance), ICU (size, number of ICH patients, full-time intensivist, clinical service, American College for Graduate Medical Education or Critical Care Medicine fellowship), and institutional (size, location, medical school affiliation) characteristics on hospital mortality rate of ICH patients was assessed by using a forward-enter multivariate analysis. Data from 1,038 patients were included. The 13 ICUs that admitted >20 patients accounted for 83% of the admissions with a mortality rate that ranged from 25% to 64%. Multivariate analysis adjusted for patient demographics, severity of ICH, and ICU and institutional characteristics indicated that not being in a neuro ICU was associated with an increase in hospital mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65–7.6). Other factors associated with higher mortality rate were greater age (OR, 1.03/year; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR, 0.6/point; 95% CI, 0.58–0.65), fewer ICH patients (OR, 1.01/patient; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01), and smaller ICU (OR, 1.1/bed; 95% CI, 1.02–1.13). Having a full time intensivist was associated with lower mortality rate (OR, 0.388; 95% CI, 0.22–0.67). ConclusionsFor patients with acute ICH, admission to a neuro vs. general ICU is associated with reduced mortality rate.

Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke?

Background and Purpose Motor dysfunction after unilateral deafferentation in primates can be overcome by restraining the unaffected limb. We asked whether a constraint-induced movement (CIM) program could be implemented within 2 weeks after stroke and whether CIM is more effective than traditional upper-extremity (UE) therapies during this period. Methods Twenty-three persons were enrolled in a pilot randomized, controlled trial that compared CIM with traditional therapies. A blinded observer rated the primary end point, the Action Research Arm Test (ARA). Inclusion criteria were the following: ischemic stroke within 14 days, persistent hemiparesis, evidence of preserved cognitive function, and presence of a protective motor response. Differences between the groups were compared by using Student’s t tests, ANCOVA, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Twenty subjects completed the 14-day treatment. Two adverse outcomes, a recurrent stroke and a death, occurred in the traditional group; 1 CIM subject met rehabilitation goals and was discharged before completing 14 inpatient days. The CIM treatment group had significantly higher scores on total ARA and pinch subscale scores (P <0.05). Differences in the mean ARA grip, grasp, and gross movement subscale scores did not reach statistical significance. UE activities of daily living performance was not significantly different between groups, and no subject withdrew because of pain or frustration. Conclusions A clinical trial of CIM therapy during acute rehabilitation is feasible. CIM was associated with less arm impairment at the end of treatment. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether CIM early after stroke is superior to traditional therapies.

Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT

Background: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is among the most developed training approaches for motor restoration of the upper extremity (UE). Methods: Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS) was a single-blind phase II trial of CIMT during acute inpatient rehabilitation comparing traditional UE therapy with dose-matched and high-intensity CIMT protocols. Participants were adaptively randomized on rehabilitation admission, and received 2 weeks of study-related treatments. The primary endpoint was the total Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score on the more affected side at 90 days after stroke onset. A mixed model analysis was performed. Results: A total of 52 participants (mean age 63.9 ± 14 years) were randomized 9.65 ± 4.5 days after onset. Mean NIHSS was 5.3 ± 1.8; mean total ARAT score was 22.5 ± 15.6; 77% had ischemic stroke. Groups were equivalent at baseline on all randomization variables. As expected, all groups improved with time on the total ARAT score. There was a significant time x group interaction (F = 3.1, p < 0.01), such that the high intensity CIT group had significantly less improvement at day 90. No significant differences were found between the dose-matched CIMT and control groups at day 90. MRI of a subsample showed no evidence of activity-dependent lesion enlargement. Conclusion: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) was equally as effective but not superior to an equal dose of traditional therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Higher intensity CIMT resulted in less motor improvement at 90 days, indicating an inverse dose-response relationship. Motor intervention trials should control for dose, and higher doses of motor training cannot be assumed to be more beneficial, particularly early after stroke.

Hydrocephalus: A Previously Unrecognized Predictor of Poor Outcome From Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although several factors have been identified that predict outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), no previous study has investigated the impact of hydrocephalus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of hydrocephalus after ICH would predict mortality and functional outcome. METHODS Patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH were identified in our prospectively collected database to determine the following: age, sex, race, past medical history; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and blood pressure on admission; use of mechanical ventilation, mannitol, and ventriculostomy; and medical complications. CT scans performed within 24 hours of hemorrhage were retrospectively analyzed to determine lesion size and location, pineal shift, cisternal effacement, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and hydrocephalus. Outcome was determined with use of hospital disposition (dead, nursing home, rehabilitation, home) and functional outcome (Functional Independence Measure [FIM]) at 3 months. Patients with and without hydrocephalus were compared and univariate and multivariate analyses performed to determine whether hydrocephalus was an independent predictor of mortality. Data are presented as mean+/-SD. RESULTS Of the 81 patients studied, 40 had hydrocephalus. Those with hydrocephalus were younger (57+/-15 versus 67+/-15 years), had lower GCS scores (8.2+/-4.2 versus 11+/-2.9), were more likely to have ganglionic or thalamic hemorrhages, and were intubated more frequently (70% versus 27%). Hospital mortality was higher in patients with hydrocephalus (51% versus 2%), and fewer patients went home (21% versus 35%). Those who died had higher hydrocephalus scores (9.67+/-7.1 versus 5.75+/-4.5). Outcome was no different if a ventriculostomy was placed. The final logistic regression model included hydrocephalus score, gender, GCS, and pineal shift, and it correctly predicted 85% of patients as dead or alive. Multivariate analyses indicated that hydrocephalus is an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that hydrocephalus is an independent predictor of mortality after ICH.

Driving Performance in Persons with Mild Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

Objective: To assess the effect of mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) on driving ability.

Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Upper-Extremity Measures Early After Stroke

OBJECTIVE To estimate minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values of several upper-extremity measures early after stroke. DESIGN Data in this report were collected during the Very Early Constraint-induced Therapy for Recovery of Stroke trial, an acute, single-blind randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy. Subjects were tested at the prerandomization baseline assessment (average days poststroke, 9.5d) and the first posttreatment assessment (average days poststroke, 25.9d). At each time point, the affected upper extremity was evaluated with a battery of 6 tests. At the second assessment, subjects were also asked to provide a global rating of perceived changes in their affected upper extremity. Anchor-based MCID values were calculated separately for the affected dominant upper extremities and the affected nondominant upper extremities for each of the 6 tests. SETTING Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-two people with hemiparesis poststroke. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Estimated MCID values for grip strength, composite upper-extremity strength, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and duration of upper-extremity use as measured with accelerometry. RESULTS MCID values for grip strength were 5.0 and 6.2 kg for the affected dominant and nondominant sides, respectively. MCID values for the ARAT were 12 and 17 points, for the WMFT function score were 1.0 and 1.2 points, and for the MAL quality of movement score were 1.0 and 1.1 points for the 2 sides, respectively. MCID values were indeterminate for the dominant (composite strength), the nondominant (WMFT time score), and both affected sides (duration of use) for the other measures. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide some of the first estimates of MCID values for upper-extremity standardized measures early after stroke. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to refine these estimates and to determine whether MCID values are modified by time poststroke.

Predictors of Acute Hospital Costs for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in an Academic Center

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We sought to determine predictors of acute hospital costs in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke to an academic center using a stroke management team to coordinate care. METHODS Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected on 191 patients consecutively admitted with acute ischemic stroke. Patients were classified by insurance status, premorbid modified Rankin scale, stroke location, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), and presence of comorbidities. Detailed hospital charge data were converted to cost by application of department-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Physicians fees were not included. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was computed to determine the predictors of total hospital cost. RESULTS Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 1 to 63 days), and mortality was 3%. Median hospital cost per discharge was

Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials.

4408 (range,

Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the 31-Item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM-31):

1199 to

More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.

59 799). Fifty percent of costs were for room charges, 19% for stroke evaluation, 21% for medical management, and 7% for acute rehabilitation therapies. Sixteen percent were admitted to an intensive care unit. Length of stay accounted for 43% of the variance in total cost. Other independent predictors of cost included stroke severity, heparin treatment, atrial fibrillation, male sex, ischemic cardiac disease, and premorbid functional status. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the major predictors of acute hospital costs of stroke in this environment are length of stay, stroke severity, cardiac disease, male sex, and use of heparin. Room charges accounted for the majority of costs, and attempts to reduce the cost of stroke evaluation would be of marginal value. Efforts to reduce acute costs should be monitored for potential cost shifting or a negative impact on quality of care.