Doug Munoz
Queen's University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Doug Munoz.
Experimental Brain Research | 2007
Joan M. Dafoe; Irene T. Armstrong; Doug Munoz
We examined the sensory and motor influences of stimulus eccentricity and direction on saccadic reaction times (SRTs), direction-of-movement errors, and saccade amplitude for stimulus-driven (prosaccade) and volitional (antisaccade) oculomotor responses in humans. Stimuli were presented at five eccentricities, ranging from 0.5° to 8°, and in eight radial directions around a central fixation point. At 0.5° eccentricity, participants showed delayed SRT and increased direction-of-movement errors consistent with misidentification of the target and fixation points. For the remaining eccentricities, horizontal saccades had shorter mean SRT than vertical saccades. Stimuli in the upper visual field trigger overt shifts in gaze more easily and faster than in the lower visual field: prosaccades to the upper hemifield had shorter SRT than to the lower hemifield, and more anti-saccade direction-of-movement errors were made into the upper hemifield. With the exception of the 0.5° stimuli, SRT was independent of eccentricity. Saccade amplitude was dependent on target eccentricity for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades within the range we tested. Performance matched behavioral measures described previously for monkeys performing the same tasks, confirming that the monkey is a good model for the human oculomotor function. We conclude that an upper hemifield bias lead to a decrease in SRT and an increase in direction errors.
Journal of Vision | 2010
Susan E. Boehnke; David J. Berg; Pierre Baldi; Laurent Itti; Doug Munoz
References 1. Dorris MC, Klein RM, Everling S, Munoz DP 2002. Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. J Cogn Neurosci. 14, 1256-63. 2. Sokolov, EN. (1963) Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Physiol., 25, 545-80. 3. Baars, BJ. (1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness NY: Cambridge University Press. 4. Drager, UC and Hubel, DH. (1975) Responses to visual stimulation and relationship between visual, auditory, and somatosensory inputs in mouse superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 38(3), 690-713. 5. Woods, E.J. and Frost, B.J. (1977) Adaptation and habituation characteristics of tectal neurons in the pigeon. Experimental Brain Research, 27, 347 – 354. 6. Itti, L & Baldi, PF (in press) Bayesian Surprise attracts human attention. Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems. Dissociating Adaptation from Habituation
Journal of Vision | 2012
Aarlenne Z. Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Doug Munoz
Journal of Vision | 2010
Po-He Tseng; Ian G. M. Cameron; Doug Munoz; Laurent Itti
Journal of Vision | 2010
Po-He Tseng; Ran Carmi; Ian G. M. Cameron; Doug Munoz; Laurent Itti
Journal of Vision | 2010
David J. Berg; Susan E. Boehnke; Robert A. Marino; Pierre Baldi; Doug Munoz; Laurent Itti
Journal of Vision | 2010
David J. Berg; Susan E. Boehnke; Robert A. Marino; Pierre Baldi; Doug Munoz; Laurent Itti
Journal of Vision | 2010
Po-He Tseng; Ian G. M. Cameron; Doug Munoz; Laurent Itti
Journal of Vision | 2010
Robert A. Marino; Ron Levy; Doug Munoz
Journal of Vision | 2010
Ran Carmi; Po-He Tseng; Ian G. M. Cameron; Laurent Itti; Doug Munoz