Douglas J. DeBoer

Treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: 2010 clinical practice guidelines from the International Task Force on Canine Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic relapsing pruritic skin disease of dogs for which treatment has varied over time and geographical location. Recent high quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have established which drugs are likely to offer consistent benefit. The International Task Force for Canine AD currently recommends a multi-faceted approach to treat dogs with AD. Acute flares should be treated with a combination of nonirritating baths and topical glucocorticoids, once an attempt has been made to identify and remove the suspected causes of the flare. Oral glucocorticoids and antimicrobial therapy must be added when needed. In dogs with chronic AD, a combination of interventions should be considered. Again, factors that trigger flares of AD must be identified and, if possible, avoided. Currently recognized flare factors include food, flea and environmental allergens, Staphylococcus bacteria and Malassezia yeast. Skin and coat hygiene and care must be improved by bathing with nonirritating shampoos and dietary supplementation with essential fatty acids. The severity of pruritus and skin lesions can be reduced with a combination of anti-inflammatory drugs. Currently, medications with good evidence of high efficacy include topical and oral glucocorticoids, and calcineurin inhibitors such as oral ciclosporin and topical tacrolimus. The dose and frequency of administration of these drugs should be tailored to each patient considering each drugs efficacy, adverse effects and cost. Allergen-specific immunotherapy should be offered, whenever feasible, in an attempt to prevent recurrence of clinical signs upon further exposure to environmental allergens to which the patient is hypersensitive.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XIV): clinical manifestations of canine atopic dermatitis

Canine atopic diseases, including those with skin lesions, have been described for many years. Unfortunately, early descriptions often failed to establish definitive guidelines for considering a patient atopic, and criteria for diagnosing atopic dermatitis (AD) have varied from author to author. Larger case-series published from the 1960s to the 1980s suggested that the most common clinical manifestation of AD was pruritus, particularly of the face, ears, paws, extremities, and/or ventrum. It is not always clear that testing to eliminate other differential diagnoses was always carefully performed on patients in early reports; therefore, some descriptions could include patients affected with diseases other than or in addition to AD. Points of consensus regarding clinical manifestations of AD in case-series include the presence of pruritus beginning at a young age, possibly seasonally; and a prominent lesional involvement of the face, extremities, axillae or ventrum. Conflicting information on breed and sex predispositions is present, perhaps representing regional or temporal variability. Clinical reports vary, in regard to the description of lesions seen in dogs with AD. This reflects a possible confusion with lesions of secondary complications, and highlights the fact that the existence and nature of primary lesions of canine AD are not truly known.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XVII): intradermal testing.

Intradermal testing has been practiced for decades in human and veterinary medicine. The primary utility of intradermal testing is in the demonstration of IgE-mediated allergen hypersensitivity. The presence of a positive reaction on an intradermal test is not always indicative of allergy, as it may sometimes be an indication of sub-clinical hypersensitivity. Despite its widespread use by veterinary dermatologists, the usefulness of the intradermal test would be greatly enhanced by the use of standardized allergen extracts and homogeneous criteria for the interpretation of results. Irrespective of these shortcomings, intradermal testing is regarded as a valuable tool in the demonstration of allergen-specific hypersensitivity when performed according to accepted guidelines.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (IV): environmental allergens

Numerous environmental allergens have been incriminated in the pathogenesis of canine atopic dermatitis (AD). These include dust and storage mite antigens, house dust, pollens from grasses, trees and weeds, mould spores, epidermal antigens, insect antigens, and miscellaneous antigens such as kapok. In this paper, we review the literature concerning the allergens that have been reported to contribute to canine AD. We conclude that attempts to identify the relevant canine antigens in the past have been plagued by a lack of standardisation of extracts and techniques, and the presence of false-positive and -negative reactions in allergy tests. Until these problems are rectified, it is unlikely that we will be able to provide a list of major and minor antigens for dogs. Hence, we recommend that future studies should be aimed at determining the major patterns of reactivity and cross-reactivity to specific protein allergens within antigenic extracts using electrophoresis and immunoblotting techniques. Once this information becomes available, it may be possible to use a selection of genetically engineered, highly pure antigens for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in canine allergy investigations. The use of such antigens will allow standardisation of canine allergy testing and immunotherapy so that the reliability and efficacy of these procedures can be objectively assessed.

Concentrations of total serum IgE, IgA, and IgG in atopic and parasitized dogs.

Concentrations of total serum IgE, IgA, and IgG were measured in 36 atopic and 16 parasitized dogs, and compared them with 30 healthy control dogs. IgE was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IgA and IgG were measured using radial immunodiffusion assays. Mean total serum immunoglobulin (Ig) E concentrations in healthy, atopic and parasitized dogs were 7.1 units (U) ml-1, 5.8 U ml-1 and 14.3 U ml-1, respectively. Mean total serum IgA concentrations in the same groups were 103.3 mg dl-1, 63.2 mg dl-1 and 67.3 mg dl-1, respectively. Mean total serum IgG concentrations were 1066 mg dl-1, 1621 mg dl-1 and 1480 mg dl-1 in the three groups. There was no significant difference in IgE concentrations between these groups of dogs. IgA levels were significantly lower in atopic and parasitized dogs compared with healthy dogs (P < or = 0.05), whereas IgG levels were significantly higher in the atopic and parasitized dogs (P < or = 0.005). These results suggest that measurement of total serum IgE would be of no benefit in the preliminary clinical investigation of a suspected atopic dog. The lower IgA and higher IgG concentrations in both atopic and parasitized dogs suggest that similar regulatory mechanisms governing immunoglobulin synthesis occur in canine allergic and parasitic disease, promoting IgG synthesis but down-regulating IgA production.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XII): the relationship of cutaneous infections to the pathogenesis and clinical course of canine atopic dermatitis

Dogs and human beings with atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently exhibit concurrent skin infections with Staphylococcus sp. bacteria or Malassezia yeast, and treatment of such infections is an important facet of managing these patients. Staphylococci appear to colonize atopic skin readily, and bacterial products on the skin could augment cutaneous inflammation via immediate hypersensitivity responses to the bacteria, by superantigen-mediated lymphocyte activation, or other non-specific mechanisms. Similarly, skin colonization by Malassezia yeast could contribute to clinical signs of AD; yeast components could induce inflammation via non-specific mechanisms, such as alteration in mediator release, or via antigen-specific hypersensitivity reactions. Clinical and experimental evidence exists that secondary microbial infections can both initiate and perpetuate episodes of AD in dogs and humans, and could even participate in promotion of pro-allergic immunologic responses. Mechanistic details of these complex interactions are under extensive investigation in human beings; only a few observations have been extended to include dog with AD.

Production and characterization of mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against canine IgE and IgG

Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions have been studied infrequently in dogs, in part because of limited availability of antisera specific for canine IgE. A series of murine hybridoma cell lines were prepared, that produced monoclonal antibodies (MAb) with specificity for canine immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG. The MAb were tested for their ability to induce a reverse cutaneous anaphylaxis reaction in dog skin, to neutralize the Prausnitz-Küstner reactivity of atopic dog serum, to serve as a ligand in immunoaffinity chromatography, and to bind to IgE and other Ig subclasses in several ELISA systems. Some of the MAb produced were found to be specific for canine IgE. Other MAb recognized common or similar determinants on IgE and IgG, or on IgG and IgM, though with apparently differing affinities. Heat or acid treatment of canine IgE abolished most, but not all, of the reactivity with the anti-IgE MAb. These MAb will be useful for further study of IgE-mediated phenomena in the dog.

Treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: 2015 updated guidelines from the International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals (ICADA)

BackgroundIn 2010, the International Task Force on Canine Atopic Dermatitis (now International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals, ICADA) published the first consensus guidelines for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in dogs. This is the first 5-year minor update of this document.ResultsThe treatment of acute flares of AD should involve the search for, and then elimination of, the cause of the flares, bathing with mild shampoos, and controlling pruritus and skin lesions with interventions that include topical and/or oral glucocorticoids or oclacitinib. For chronic canine AD, the first steps in management are the identification and avoidance of flare factors, as well as ensuring that there is adequate skin and coat hygiene and care; this might include more frequent bathing and possibly increasing essential fatty acid intake. The medications currently most effective in reducing chronic pruritus and skin lesions are topical and oral glucocorticoids, oral ciclosporin, oral oclacitinib, and, where available, injectable recombinant interferons. Allergen-specific immunotherapy and proactive intermittent topical glucocorticoid applications are the only interventions likely to prevent or delay the recurrence of flares of AD.ConclusionsThis first 5-year minor update of the international consensus guidelines for treatment of AD in dogs further establishes that the treatment of this disease is multifaceted, and that interventions should be combined for a proven (or likely) optimal benefit. Importantly, treatment plans are likely to vary between dogs and, for the same dog, between times when the disease is at different stages.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XXI): antihistamine pharmacotherapy.

Antihistamines frequently are recommended by veterinary dermatologists for symptomatic treatment of pruritus associated with canine atopic dermatitis (AD), perhaps because of their moderate success in some human patients with AD. A critical review of the literature describing antihistamine use in canine AD reveals that the majority of published, peer-reviewed studies are open, uncontrolled or partially-controlled trials. Such studies vary widely in reported efficacy, from perhaps 0 to 75% of patients, even using the same drug. The few blinded placebo-controlled trials available have failed to confirm efficacy of these drugs to relieve the pruritus of canine AD. Some studies indicate that synergistic effects could occur with concurrent use of essential fatty acid supplements. Consequently, at the time of this writing, there is insufficient evidence to conclude for or against the efficacy of antihistamines for treatment of canine AD. Additional blinded, randomized and controlled trials with larger numbers of patients are necessary to establish which of the antihistamine drugs currently available, if any, are truly efficacious for canine AD. Nevertheless, present clinician consensus suggests that several different antihistamine drugs should be evaluated in sequence, for 7-14 days each, in canine patients with AD.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (III): the role of antibodies in canine atopic dermatitis

Although an important pathogenic role for IgE is established in the case of allergic asthma and rhinitis in man, its role in atopic dermatitis is less clear. There are many studies where allergists and immunologists have provided evidence in favour of such a role, whereas dermatologists are less than convinced. In dogs, however, there is an abundance of clinical evidence implying that atopic dermatitis is antigen driven, and recent studies suggest that there may be a role for IgE, not only in the effector pathway, but also in antigen capture. Although an IgG response often accompanies an IgE response in dogs with atopic dermatitis, there is little evidence in support of a pathogenic role in respect of the former isotype.