Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Douglas S. Reintgen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Douglas S. Reintgen.


Annals of Surgery | 1994

The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases

Douglas S. Reintgen; Cruse Cw; Wells Ke; Claudia Berman; Neil A. Fenske; Frank Glass; K. Schroer; Richard Heller; Merrick I. Ross; Gary H. Lyman; Charles E. Cox; D. Rappaport; Hilliard F. Seigler; Charles M. Balch

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the order of melanoma nodal metastases. Summary Background DataMost solid tumors are thought to demonstrate a random nodal metastatic pattern. The incidence of skip nodal metastases precluded the use of sampling procedures of first station nodal basins to achieve adequate pathological staging. Malignant melanoma may be different from other malignancies in that the cutaneous lymphatic flow is better defined and can be mapped accurately. The concept of an orderly progression of nodal metastases is radically different than what is thought to occur in the natural history of metastases from most other solid malignancies. MethodsThe investigators performed preoperative and intraoperative mapping of the cutaneous lymphatics from the primary melanoma in an attempt to identify the “sentinel” lymph node in the regional basin. All patients had primary melanomas with tumor thicknesses > 0.76 mm and were considered candidates for elective lymph node dissection. The sentinel lymph node was defined as the first node in the basin from which the primary site drained. The sentinel lymph node was harvested and submitted separately to pathology, followed by a complete node dissection. The null hypothesis tested was whether nodal metastases from malignant melanoma occurred in equal proportions among sentinel and nonsentinel nodes. ResultsForty-two patients met the criteria of the protocol based on prognostic factors of their primary melanoma. Thirty-four patients had histologically negative sentinel nodes, with the rest of the nodes in the basin also being negative. Thus, there were no skip metastases documented. Eight patients had positive sentinel nodes, with seven of the eight having the sentinel node as the only site of disease. In these seven patients, the frequency of sentinel nodal metastases was 92%, whereas none of the higher nodes had documented metastatic disease. Nodal involvement was compared between the sentinel and nonsentinel nodal groups, based on the binomial distribution. Under the null hypothesis of equality in distribution of nodal metastases, the probability that all seven unpaired observations would demonstrate that involvement of the sentinel node is 0.008.


Annals of Surgery | 1999

Validation of the Accuracy of Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Melanoma: A Multicenter Trial

Donald L. Morton; John F. Thompson; Richard Essner; Robert M. Elashoff; Stacey L. Stern; Omgo E. Nieweg; Daniel F. Roses; Constantine P. Karakousis; Nicola Mozzillo; Douglas S. Reintgen; He-Jing Wang; Mph Edwin; C. Glass; Alistair J. Cochran

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the multicenter application of intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection (LM/SL/SCLND) for the management of early-stage melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The multidisciplinary technique of LM/SL/SCLND has been widely adopted, but not validated in a multicenter trial. The authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT) 5 years ago to evaluate the survival of patients with early-stage primary melanoma after wide excision alone versus wide excision plus LM/SL/SCLND. This study examined the accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND in the MSLT, using the experience of the organizing center (John Wayne Cancer Institute [JWCI]) as a standard for comparison. METHODS Before entering patients into the randomization phase, each center in the MSLT was required to finish a 30-case learning phase with complete nuclear medicine, pathology, and surgical review. Selection of MSLT patients in the LM/SL/SCLND treatment arm was based on complete pathologic and surgical data. The comparison group of JWCI patients was selected using these criteria: primary cutaneous melanoma having a thickness > or =1 mm with a Clark level > or =III, or a thickness <1 mm with a Clark level > or =IV (MSLT criterion); LM/SL performed between June 1, 1985, and December 30, 1998; and patient not entered in the MSLT. The accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND was determined by comparing the rates of sentinel node (SN) identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the MSLT and JWCI groups. RESULTS There were 551 patients in the MSLT group and 584 patients in the JWCI group. In both groups, LM performed with blue dye plus a radiocolloid was more successful (99.1 %) than LM performed with blue dye alone (95.2%) (p = 0.014). After a center had completed the 30-case learning phase, the success of SN identification in the MSLT group was independent of the centers case volume or experience in the MSLT. CONCLUSIONS Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy can be successfully learned and applied in a standardized fashion with high accuracy by centers worldwide. Successful SN identification rates of 97% can be achieved, and the incidence of nodal metastases approaches that of the organizing center. A multidisciplinary approach (surgery, nuclear medicine, and pathology) and a learning phase of > or =30 consecutive cases per center are sufficient for mastery of LM/SL in cutaneous melanoma. Lymphatic mapping performed using blue dye plus radiocolloid is superior to LM using blue dye alone.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2011

gp100 Peptide Vaccine and Interleukin-2 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Douglas J. Schwartzentruber; David H. Lawson; Jon Richards; Robert M. Conry; Donald M. Miller; Jonathan Treisman; Fawaz Gailani; Lee B. Riley; Kevin C. Conlon; Barbara A. Pockaj; Kari Kendra; Richard L. White; Rene Gonzalez; Timothy M. Kuzel; Brendan D. Curti; Phillip D. Leming; Eric D. Whitman; Jai Balkissoon; Douglas S. Reintgen; Howard L. Kaufman; Francesco M. Marincola; Maria J. Merino; Steven A. Rosenberg; Peter L. Choyke; Don Vena; Patrick Hwu

BACKGROUND Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone. METHODS We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freunds adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival. RESULTS The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).


Annals of Surgery | 1998

Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.

Charles E. Cox; Solange Pendas; John M. Cox; Emmanuella Joseph; Alan R. Shons; Timothy J. Yeatman; Ni Ni Ku; Gary H. Lyman; Claudia Berman; Fadi Haddad; Douglas S. Reintgen

OBJECTIVE To define preliminary guidelines for the use of lymphatic mapping techniques in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of patients with breast cancer. METHODS Four hundred sixty-six consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent a prospective trial of intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or a hot node with a 10:1 ex vivo gamma probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLNs were bivalved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. A cytokeratin-positive SLN was defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive-staining cells that could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections. RESULTS Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or stereotactic core biopsy was used to diagnose 195 of the 422 patients (46.2%) with breast cancer; 227 of 422 patients (53.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy. The SLN was successfully identified in 440 of 466 patients (94.4%). Failure to identify an SLN to the axilla intraoperatively occurred in 26 of 466 patients (5.6%). In all patients who failed lymphatic mappings, a complete axillary dissection was performed, and metastatic disease was documented in 4 of 26 (15.4%) of these patients. Of the 26 patients who failed lymphatic mapping, 11 of 227 (4.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy and 15 of 195 (7.7%) were diagnosed by FNA or stereotactic core biopsy. Of interest, there was only one skip metastasis (defined as a negative SLN with higher nodes in the chain being positive) in a patient with prior excisional biopsy. A mean of 1.92 SLNs were harvested per patient. Twenty percent of the SLNs removed were positive for metastatic disease in 105 of 440 (23.8%) of the patients. Descriptive information on 844 SLNs was evaluated: 339 of 844 (40.2%) were hot, 272 of 844 (32.2%) were blue, and 233 of 844 (27.6%) were both hot and blue. At least one positive SLN was found in 4 of 87 patients (4.6%) with noninvasive (ductal carcinoma in situ) tumors. A greater incidence of positive SLNs was found in patients who had invasive tumors of increasing size: 18 of 112 patients (16%) with tumor size between 0.1 mm and 1 cm had positive SLNs. However, a significantly greater percentage of patients (43 of 131 [32.8%] with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm and 31 of 76 [40.8%] with tumor size between 2 and 5 cm) had positive SLNs. The highest incidence of positive SLNs was seen with patients of tumor size greater than 5 cm; in this group, 9 of 12 (75%) had a positive SLN (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that accurate SLN identification was obtained when all blue and hot lymph nodes were harvested as SLNs. Therefore, lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is most effective when a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabeled sulfur colloid is used. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or small tumors exhibit a low but significant incidence of metastatic disease to the axillary lymph nodes and may benefit most from selective lymphadenectomy, avoiding the unnecessary complications of a complete axillary lymph node dissection.


Annals of Surgery | 2005

Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma - Accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial

Donald L. Morton; Alistair J. Cochran; John F. Thompson; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Edwin C. Glass; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E. Nieweg; Daniel F. Roses; Harald J. Hoekstra; Constantine P. Karakousis; Douglas S. Reintgen; Brendon J. Coventry; He-Jing Wang

Objective:The objective of this study was to evaluate, in an international multicenter phase III trial, the accuracy, use, and morbidity of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (LM/SNB) for staging the regional nodal basin of patients with early-stage melanoma. Summary Background Data:Since our introduction of LM/SNB in 1990, this technique has been widely adopted and has become part of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Eleven years ago, the authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) to compare 2 treatment approaches: wide excision (WE) plus LM/SNB with immediate complete lymphadenectomy (CLND) for sentinel node (SN) metastases, and WE plus postoperative observation with CLND delayed until the subsequent development of clinically evident nodal metastases. Methods:After each center achieved 85% accuracy of SN identification during a 30-case learning phase, patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (≥1 mm with Clark level ≥III, or any thickness with Clark level ≥IV) were randomly assigned in a 4:6 ratio to WE plus observation (WEO) with delayed CLND for nodal recurrence, or to WE plus LM/SNB with immediate CLND for SN metastasis. The accuracy of LM/SNB was determined by comparing the rates of SN identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the LM/SNB group versus the subsequent development of nodal metastases in the regional nodal basin of those patients with tumor-negative SNs. Early morbidity of LM/SNB was evaluated by comparing complication rates between the 2 treatment groups. Trial accrual was completed on March 31, 2002, after enrollment of 2001 patients. Results:Initial SN identification rate was 95.3% overall: 99.3% for the groin, 95.3% for the axilla, and 84.5% for the neck basins. The rate of false-negative LM/SNB during the trial phase, as measured by nodal recurrence in a tumor-negative dissected SN basin, decreased with increasing case volume at each center: 10.3% for the first 25 cases versus 5.2% after 25 cases. There were no operative mortalities. The low (10.1%) complication rate after LM/SNB increased to 37.2% with the addition of CLND; CLND also increased the severity of complications. Conclusions:LM/SNB is a safe, low-morbidity procedure for staging the regional nodal basin in early melanoma. Even after a 30-case learning phase and 25 additional LM/SNB cases, the accuracy of LM/SNB continues to increase with a centers experience. LM/SNB should become standard care for staging the regional lymph nodes of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.


Annals of Surgery | 1996

Intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma

John J. Albertini; C. Wayne Cruse; Rapaport D; Wells Ke; Merrick I. Ross; Ronald C. DeConti; Claudia Berman; Karen Jared; Jane L. Messina; Gary H. Lyman; Frank Glass; Neil A. Fenske; Douglas S. Reintgen

BACKGROUND The sentinel lymph node (SLN), the first node draining the primary tumor site, has been shown to reflect the histologic features of the remainder of the lymphatic basin in patients with melanoma. Intraoperative localization of the SLN, first proposed by Morton and colleagues, has been accomplished with the use of a vital blue dye mapping technique. Technical difficulties resulting in unsuccessful explorations have occurred in up to 20% of the dissections. OBJECTIVES The authors aimed to define the SLN using gamma detection probe mapping and to determine whether intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy using technetium sulfur colloid and a hand-held gamma-detecting probe could be used to improve detection of all SLNs for patients with melanoma. METHODS To ensure that all initial nodes draining the primary site were removed at the time of selective lymphadenectomy, the authors used intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy to confirm the location of the SLN, which was determined initially with the preoperative lymphoscintigram and the intraoperative vital blue dye injection. PATIENT POPULATION The patient population consisted of 106 consecutive patients who presented with cutaneous melanomas larger than 0.75 mm in all primary site locations. RESULTS The preoperative lymphoscintigram revealed that 22 patients had more than one lymphatic basin sampled. Two hundred SLNs and 142 neighboring non-SLNs were harvested from 129 basins in 106 patients. After the skin incision was made, the mean ratio of hot spot to background activity was 8.5:1. The mean ratio of ex vivo SLN-to-non-SLN activity for 72 patients who had SLNs harvested was 135.6:1. When correlated with the vital blue dye mapping, 139 of 200 (69.5%) SLNs demonstrated blue dye staining, whereas 167 of 200 (83.5%) SLNs were hot according to radioisotope localization. With the use of both intraoperative mapping techniques, identification of the SLN was possible for 124 of the 129 (96%) basins sampled. Micrometastases were identified in SLNs of 16 of the 106 (15%) patients by routine histologic analysis. CONCLUSION The use of intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy can improve the identification of all SLNs during selective lymphadenectomy.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2006

Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Results From a Prospective International Cooperative Group Trial

Lee Gravatt Wilke; Linda M. McCall; Katherine E. Posther; Pat W. Whitworth; Douglas S. Reintgen; A. Marilyn Leitch; Sheryl Gabram; Anthony Lucci; Charles E. Cox; Kelly K. Hunt; James E. Herndon; Armando E. Giuliano

BackgroundAmerican College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0010 is a prospective multicenter trial designed to evaluate the prognostic significance of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow aspirates of women with early-stage breast cancer. Surgical complications associated with the sentinel lymph node biopsy surgical procedure are reported.MethodsEligible patients included women with clinical T1/2N0M0 breast cancer. Surgical outcomes were available at 30 days and 6 months after surgery for 5327 patients. Patients who had a failed sentinel node mapping (n = 71, 1.4%) or a completion lymph node dissection (n = 814, 15%) were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors for the measured surgical complications.ResultsIn patients who received isosulfan blue dye alone (n = 783) or a combination of blue dye and radiocolloid (n = 4192), anaphylaxis was reported in .1% of subjects (5 of 4975). Other complications included axillary wound infection in 1.0%, axillary seroma in 7.1%, and axillary hematoma in 1.4% of subjects. Only increasing age and an increasing number of sentinel lymph nodes removed were significantly associated with an increasing incidence of axillary seroma. At 6 months, 8.6% of patients reported axillary paresthesias, 3.8% had a decreased upper extremity range of motion, and 6.9% demonstrated proximal upper extremity lymphedema (change from baseline arm circumference of >2 cm). Significant predictors for surgical complications at 6 months were a decreasing age for axillary paresthesias and increasing body mass index and increasing age for upper extremity lymphedema.ConclusionsThis study provides a prospective assessment of the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure, as performed by a wide range of surgeons, demonstrating a low complication rate.


British Journal of Cancer | 1998

Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy.

Lluis M. Mir; Glass Lf; Gregor Sersa; Justin Teissié; Domenge C; Damijan Miklavčič; Mark J. Jaroszeski; S. Orlowski; Douglas S. Reintgen; Zvonimir Rudolf; Belehradek M; Richard Gilbert; Marie-Pierre Rols; Jean Belehradek; Bachaud Jm; Ronald C. DeConti; Stabuc B; Maja Cemazar; Coninx P; Richard Heller

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) enhances the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents by administering the drug in combination with short intense electric pulses. ECT is effective because electric pulses permeabilize tumour cell membranes and allow non-permeant drugs, such as bleomycin, to enter the cells. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the anti-tumour effectiveness of ECT with bleomycin on cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours. This article summarizes results obtained in independent clinical trials performed by five cancer centres. A total of 291 cutaneous or subcutaneous tumours of basal cell carcinoma (32), malignant melanoma (142), adenocarcinoma (30) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (87) were treated in 50 patients. Short and intense electric pulses were applied to tumours percutaneously after intravenous or intratumour administration of bleomycin. The tumours were measured and the response to the treatment evaluated 30 days after the treatment. Objective responses were obtained in 233 (85.3%) of the 273 evaluable tumours that were treated with ECT. Clinical complete responses were achieved in 154 (56.4%) tumours, and partial responses were observed in 79 (28.9%) tumours. The application of electric pulses to the patients was safe and well tolerated. An instantaneous contraction of the underlying muscles was noticed. Minimal adverse side-effects were observed. ECT was shown to be an effective local treatment. ECT was effective regardless of the histological type of the tumour. Therefore, ECT offers an approach to the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours in patients with minimal adverse side-effects and with a high response rate.


Cancer | 2000

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Charles M. Balch; Antonio C. Buzaid; Michael B. Atkins; Natale Cascinelli; Daniel G. Coit; Irvin D. Fleming; Alan N. Houghton; John M. Kirkwood; Martin F. Mihm; Donald L. Morton; Douglas S. Reintgen; Merrick I. Ross; Arthur J. Sober; Seng-jaw Soong; John A. Thompson; John F. Thompson; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; Kelly M. McMasters

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2004

An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Charles M. Balch; Seng Jaw Soong; Michael B. Atkins; Antonio C. Buzaid; Natale Cascinelli; Daniel G. Coit; Irvin D. Fleming; Jeffrey E. Gershenwald; Alan N. Houghton; John M. Kirkwood; Kelly M. McMasters; Martin F. Mihm; Donald L. Morton; Douglas S. Reintgen; Merrick I. Ross; Arthur J. Sober; John A. Thompson; John F. Thompson

A completely revised staging system for cutaneous melanoma was implemented in 2003. The changes were validated with a prognostic factors analysis involving 17,600 melanoma patients from prospective databases. This major collaborative study of predicting melanoma outcome was conducted specifically for this project, and the results were used to finalize the criteria for this evidence‐based staging system. In fact, this was the largest prognostic factors analysis of prospectively followed melanoma patients ever conducted. Important results that shaped the staging criteria involved both the tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) criteria and stage grouping for all four stages of melanoma. Major changes in the staging include: (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration are the dominant predictors of survival in patients with localized melanoma (Stages I and II); deeper level of invasion (ie, IV and V) was independently associated with reduced survival only in patients with thin or T1 melanomas. (2) The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the tumor burden were the most dominant predictors of survival in patients with Stage III melanoma; patients with metastatic nodes detected by palpation had a shorter survival compared with patients whose nodal metastases were first detected by sentinel node excision of clinically occult or “microscopic” metastases. (3) The site of distant metastases (nonvisceral versus lung versus all other visceral metastatic sites) and the presence of elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were the dominant predictors of outcome in patients with Stage IV or distant metastases. (4) An upstaging was implemented for all patients with Stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated by histopathological criteria. (5) Satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in‐transit metastases were merged into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease. (6) A new convention was implemented for defining clinical and pathological staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Douglas S. Reintgen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles E. Cox

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claudia Berman

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Merrick I. Ross

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wells Ke

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cruse Cw

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil A. Fenske

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane L. Messina

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary H. Lyman

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge