Douglas S. Robinson

IGIF Does Not Drive Th1 Development but Synergizes with IL-12 for Interferon-γ Production and Activates IRAK and NFκB

Abstract In these studies, IFNγ-inducing factor (IGIF), unlike IL-12, did not drive Th1 development in BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice, but like IL-1α, potentiated IL-12–driven Th1 development in BALB/c mice. IGIF and IL-12 synergized for IFNγ production from Th1 cells. Unlike IL-1α, IGIF had no effect on Th2 cells. IGIF signaled through IRAK, IL-1 receptor–associated kinase, to induce nuclear translocation of p65/p50 NFκB in Th1 cells. IL-1α had no effect on proliferation, cytokine production, or NFκB activation in Th1 cells but activated NFκB and proliferation in Th2 cells. Thus, Th1 and Th2 cells may differ in responsiveness and receptor expression for IL-1 family molecules. IGIF and IL-1α may differentially amplify Th1 and Th2 effector responses, respectively.

Relation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell suppression of allergen-driven T-cell activation to atopic status and expression of allergic disease

BACKGROUND Allergic diseases are frequent and rising in prevalence, and result from activation of T-helper (Th) 2 cells by allergens. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress T-cell activation in vitro and prevent pathological findings in animal models of disease. We aimed to investigate whether the amount of inhibition of allergic responses by CD4+CD25+ T cells was related to atopy and allergic disease. METHODS Blood CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells were isolated from three groups of donors: non-atopic individuals; those atopic with no present symptoms; and patients with hayfever studied during and out of the grass-pollen season. We investigated the ability of CD25+ T cells from these donors to suppress allergen-stimulated T-cell proliferation and cytokine production in vitro. FINDINGS CD4+CD25+ T cells from non-atopic donors suppressed proliferation and interleukin 5 production by their own allergen-stimulated CD4+CD25- T cells. Inhibition of proliferation by CD4+CD25+ T cells from atopic donors was significantly reduced (p=0.0012), and was even more diminished by CD4+CD25+ T cells isolated from patients with hayfever during the pollen season (p=0.0003). In patients with hayfever, out-of-season suppression remained less than that seen by regulatory cells from non-atopic donors. INTERPRETATION Allergic disease can result from an inappropriate balance between allergen activation of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells and effector Th2 cells. This imbalance could result from a deficiency in suppression by regulatory T cells or strong activation signals could overcome such regulation. Treatment to enhance regulatory T-cell responses, in concert with reduction of Th2 cell activation, might be useful in prevention and treatment of allergic disease.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin Expression Is Increased in Asthmatic Airways and Correlates with Expression of Th2-Attracting Chemokines and Disease Severity

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is said to increase expression of chemokines attracting Th2 T cells. We hypothesized that asthma is characterized by elevated bronchial mucosal expression of TSLP and Th2-attracting, but not Th1-attracting, chemokines as compared with controls, with selective accumulation of cells bearing receptors for these chemokines. We used in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to examine the expression and cellular provenance of TSLP, Th2-attracting (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CCL17, macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC)/CCL22, I-309/CCL1) and Th1-attracting (IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10)/CXCL10, IFN-inducible T cell α-chemoattractant (I-TAC)/CXCL11) chemokines and expression of their receptors CCR4, CCR8, and CXCR3 in bronchial biopsies from 20 asthmatics and 15 normal controls. The numbers of cells within the bronchial epithelium and submucosa expressing mRNA for TSLP, TARC/CCL17, MDC/CCL22, and IP-10/CXCL10, but not I-TAC/CXCL11 and I-309/CCL1, were significantly increased in asthmatics as compared with controls (p ≤ 0.018). TSLP and TARC/CCL17 expression correlated with airway obstruction. Although the total numbers of cells expressing CCR4, CCR8, and CXCR3 did not significantly differ in the asthmatics and controls, there was evidence of selective infiltration of CD4+/CCR4+ T cells in the asthmatic biopsies which correlated with TARC and MDC expression and airway obstruction. Epithelial cells, endothelial cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and mast cells were significant sources of TSLP and chemokines. Our data implicate TSLP, TARC/CCL17, MDC/CCL22, and IP-10/CXCL10 in asthma pathogenesis. These may act partly through selective development and retention, or recruitment of Th2 cells bearing their receptors.

Anti-IL-5 treatment reduces deposition of ECM proteins in the bronchial subepithelial basement membrane of mild atopic asthmatics

Eosinophil-derived TGF-beta has been implicated in remodeling events in asthma. We hypothesized that reduction of bronchial mucosal eosinophils with anti-IL-5 would reduce markers of airway remodeling. Bronchial biopsies were obtained before and after three infusions of a humanized, anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody (mepolizumab) in 24 atopic asthmatics in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The thickness and density of tenascin, lumican, and procollagen III in the reticular basement membrane (RBM) were quantified immunohistochemically by confocal microscopy. Expression of TGF-beta1 mRNA by airway eosinophils was assessed by in situ hybridization, and TGF-beta1 protein was measured in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid by ELISA. At baseline, airway eosinophil infiltration and ECM protein deposition was increased in the RBM of asthmatics compared with nonasthmatic controls. Treating asthmatics with anti-IL-5 antibody, which specifically decreased airway eosinophil numbers, significantly reduced the expression of tenascin, lumican, and procollagen III in the bronchial mucosal RBM when compared with placebo. In addition, anti-IL-5 treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the numbers and percentage of airway eosinophils expressing mRNA for TGF-beta1 and the concentration of TGF-beta1 in BAL fluid. Therefore eosinophils may contribute to tissue remodeling processes in asthma by regulating the deposition of ECM proteins.

Activation of CD4+ T cells, increased TH2-type cytokine mRNA expression, and eosinophil recruitment in bronchoalveolar lavage after allergen inhalation challenge in patients with atopic asthma

BACKGROUND We have examined whether the local eosinophilia provoked by inhalational allergen challenge of patients with atopic asthma is associated with the appearance, in vivo, of activated TH2-type T helper lymphocytes. METHODS Fifteen patients with atopic asthma had bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) 24 hours after allergen or diluent challenge separated by at least 21 days. RESULTS There was an increase in eosinophils in both bronchial wash (p = 0.01) and BAL (p = 0.02) after allergen challenge but not after diluent challenge. Activation of CD4+ BAL T cells was suggested by an increase in the expression of CD25 shown by flow cytometry after allergen challenge, when compared with diluent (p = 0.02). There was no evidence of activation of CD8 T cells. By in situ hybridization after allergen challenge as compared with diluent, increases were shown in the numbers of cells expressing mRNA for interleukin-4 (IL-4) (p = 0.005), IL-5 (p = 0.01), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (p = 0.03) but not IL-3, IL-2, or interferon-gamma. In situ hybridization of BAL cells after immunomagnetic separation of CD2-positive and CD2-negative cell populations showed that IL-4 and IL-5 mRNAs were associated with T lymphocytes after allergen challenge. BAL and bronchial wash eosinophilia closely correlated with maximal late fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second after allergen challenge. CONCLUSION Cytokines produced by activated TH2-type CD4+ T cells in the airway may contribute to late asthmatic responses by mechanisms that include eosinophil accumulation.

Resolution of airway inflammation and hyperreactivity after in vivo transfer of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is interleukin 10 dependent

Deficient suppression of T cell responses to allergen by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells has been observed in patients with allergic disease. Our current experiments used a mouse model of airway inflammation to examine the suppressive activity of allergen-specific CD4+CD25+ T cells in vivo. Transfer of ovalbumin (OVA) peptide–specific CD4+CD25+ T cells to OVA-sensitized mice reduced airway hyperreactivity (AHR), recruitment of eosinophils, and T helper type 2 (Th2) cytokine expression in the lung after allergen challenge. This suppression was dependent on interleukin (IL) 10 because increased lung expression of IL-10 was detected after transfer of CD4+CD25+ T cells, and regulation was reversed by anti–IL-10R antibody. However, suppression of AHR, airway inflammation, and increased expression of IL-10 were still observed when CD4+CD25+ T cells from IL-10 gene–deficient mice were transferred. Intracellular cytokine staining confirmed that transfer of CD4+CD25+ T cells induced IL-10 expression in recipient CD4+ T cells, but no increase in IL-10 expression was detected in airway macrophages, dendritic cells, or B cells. These data suggest that CD4+CD25+ T cells can suppress the Th2 cell–driven response to allergen in vivo by an IL-10–dependent mechanism but that IL-10 production by the regulatory T cells themselves is not required for such suppression.

The immunopathology of extrinsic (atopic) and intrinsic (non-atopic) asthma: more similarities than differences

Abstract Intrinsic asthma shows no clinical or serological evidence of IgE-mediated allergy to common environmental agents. Similar to extrinsic asthma, bronchial biopsies from such patients show enhanced expression of Th2-type cytokines, CC chemokines and Iϵ/Cϵ compared with controls. These findings suggest there might be local IgE production directed against unknown antigens, possibly of viral origin or even autoantigens, in this important clinically distinct variant of the disease.

Tregs and allergic disease

Allergic diseases such as asthma, rhinitis, and eczema are increasing in prevalence and affect up to 15% of populations in Westernized countries. The description of Tregs as T cells that prevent development of autoimmune disease led to considerable interest in whether these Tregs were also normally involved in prevention of sensitization to allergens and whether it might be possible to manipulate Tregs for the therapy of allergic disease. Current data suggest that Th2 responses to allergens are normally suppressed by both CD4+CD25+ Tregs and IL-10 Tregs. Furthermore, suppression by these subsets is decreased in allergic individuals. In animal models, Tregs could be induced by high- or low-dose inhaled antigen, and prior induction of such Tregs prevented subsequent development of allergen sensitization and airway inflammation in inhaled challenge models. For many years, allergen-injection immunotherapy has been used for the therapy of allergic disease, and this treatment may induce IL-10 Tregs, leading to both suppression of Th2 responses and a switch from IgE to IgG4 antibody production. Improvements in allergen immunotherapy, such as peptide therapy, and greater understanding of the biology of Tregs hold great promise for the treatment and prevention of allergic disease.

Further Checkpoints in Th1 Development

Tight control of Th1 immunity is essential to prevent immunopathology. Central to control of the IFN-gamma gene is the transcription factor T-bet, whose induction is Stat-1 dependent. IL-12 is dominant in directing Th1 development, while synergizing with IL-18 for IFNgamma production from differentiated Th1 cells. In this issue of Immunity, IL-27 is described, which acts in synergy with IL-12 early in Th1 development from naive T cells via the receptor TCCR/WSX-1. We review the coordination of these checkpoints in Th1 development and function.

Systematic assessment of difficult-to-treat asthma

Five per cent of asthmatics remain symptomatic despite high-dose treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate how often such difficult-to-treat asthma is due to intractable asthma, misdiagnosis, non-adherence with therapy, or psychiatric problems. Difficult asthma was defined as persistence of symptoms despite treatment at step 4 of British guidelines or requirement for long-term oral glucocorticoids (step 5). One-hundred patients with a respiratory physician diagnosis of asthma were investigated in a single tertiary respiratory unit in an open and descriptive study. Twelve of the patients studied did not have asthma and a further seven had additional diagnoses. Of the remainder, 55 had an asthma diagnosis confirmed by demonstration of reversible airflow narrowing or peak flow variability, whilst 20 did not. Noncompliance with prednisolone therapy was more frequent in the 55 with confirmed asthma (nine of 18 prescribed oral prednisolone at a dose of ≥15 mg·day−1) and was not detected in the “unconfirmed asthma” group. There were no other significant differences between these groups. A major psychiatric component was detected in 10 patients. Systematic evaluation of difficult asthma is useful as it can identify alternative or additional diagnoses, psychiatric illness or nonconcordance with therapy in a substantial proportion of cases (32% in the present series).