Douglas W. Blayney

Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases

BACKGROUND Bisphosphonates such as pamidronate disodium inhibit osteoclast-induced bone resorption associated with cancer that has metastasized to bone. METHODS Women with stage IV breast cancer who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and had at least one lytic bone lesion were given either placebo or pamidronate (90 mg) as a two-hour intravenous infusion monthly for 12 cycles. Skeletal complications, including pathologic fractures, the need for radiation to bone or bone surgery, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia (a serum calcium concentration above 12 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter] or elevated to any degree and requiring treatment), were assessed monthly. Bone pain, use of analgesic drugs, performance status, and quality of life were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS The efficacy of treatment was evaluated in 380 of 382 randomized patients, 185 receiving pamidronate and 195 receiving placebo. The median time to the occurrence of the first skeletal complication was greater in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group (13.1 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.005), and the proportion of patients in whom any skeletal complication occurred was lower (43 percent vs. 56 percent, P = 0.008). There was significantly less increase in bone pain (P=0.046) and deterioration of performance status (P=0.027) in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group. Pamidronate was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Monthly infusions of pamidronate as a supplement to chemotherapy can protect against skeletal complications in women with stage IV breast cancer who have osteolytic bone metastases.

Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE Pamidronate, an aminobisphosphonate, has been shown to lower the risk of skeletal complications associated with lytic bone lesions for up to 1 year in women with stage IV breast cancer who received chemotherapy. We studied the long-term effectiveness and safety of continued treatment with intravenous pamidronate infusions for up to 2 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred eighty-two women with metastatic breast cancer and lytic bone lesions who received chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either 90 mg of pamidronate or placebo intravenously every 3 to 4 weeks in this double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group trial. Patients were evaluated monthly for 2 years for skeletal complications, which included pathologic fractures, need for radiation or surgery to treat bone complications, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia. Bone pain, analgesic use, bone biochemical markers, performance status, quality of life, radiologic response in bone, and survival were also evaluated. RESULTS As in the first year of treatment, the proportion of patients with any skeletal complication was significantly less for the pamidronate than the placebo group at 15, 18, 21, and 24 months (P < .001). The proportions of patients with any pathologic fracture (i.e., vertebral and nonvertebral fractures), need for radiation or surgery to treat bone complications, and hypercalcemia were also statistically less for the pamidronate than the placebo group. The median time to the first skeletal complication was 13.9 months in the pamidronate-treated women and 7.0 months in the placebo group (P < .001). Long-term treatment did not result in any unexpected adverse events. Survival did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION The risk for osteolytic bone lesion complications in metastatic breast cancer was significantly decreased with monthly infusions of 90 mg of pamidronate, and this effect was maintained for at least 2 years. Pamidronate is a useful adjunct to standard chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: a call to action

Substantial inequalities exist in cancer survival rates across countries. In addition to prevention of new cancers by reduction of risk factors, strategies are needed to close the gap between developed and developing countries in cancer survival and the effects of the disease on human suffering. We challenge the public health communitys assumption that cancers will remain untreated in poor countries, and note the analogy to similarly unfounded arguments from more than a decade ago against provision of HIV treatment. In resource-constrained countries without specialised services, experience has shown that much can be done to prevent and treat cancer by deployment of primary and secondary caregivers, use of off-patent drugs, and application of regional and global mechanisms for financing and procurement. Furthermore, several middle-income countries have included cancer treatment in national health insurance coverage with a focus on people living in poverty. These strategies can reduce costs, increase access to health services, and strengthen health systems to meet the challenge of cancer and other diseases. In 2009, we formed the Global Task Force on Expanded Access to Cancer Care and Control in Developing Countries, which is composed of leaders from the global health and cancer care communities, and is dedicated to proposal, implementation, and evaluation of strategies to advance this agenda.

Clinical course of retrovirus-associated adult T-cell lymphoma in the United States.

We studied the clinical features of 11 patients with adult T-cell lymphoma associated with the human T-cell lymphoma virus. The patients were predominantly young, black, and born in the southeastern United States. They had an aggressive course, with the rapid onset of disseminated skin lesions or symptoms related to hypercalcemia and other metabolic disturbances, or both. Common findings included rapid enlargement of peripheral, hilar, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes, with sparing of the mediastinum; invasion of the central nervous system, lungs, or gastrointestinal tract; and opportunistic infections. A paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by increased bone turnover, abnormal bone scintigraphy, and hypercalcemia was present in all patients. Intensive combination chemotherapy produced prompt complete clinical remissions, which were generally of short duration. Similar features have been described in patients in Japan and the West Indies who had adult T-cell lymphoma, which is also associated with the human T-cell lymphoma virus. This syndrome should be suspected in patients presenting with the acute onset of widespread T-cell lymphoma in association with metabolic bone disease and hypercalcemia. The presence of the syndrome can be confirmed by appropriate serologic and virologic studies.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options

Health care costs in the United States present a major challenge to the national economic well being. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has projected that US health care spending will reach

American Society of Clinical Oncology Identifies Five Key Opportunities to Improve Care and Reduce Costs: The Top Five List for Oncology

4.3 trillion and account for 19.3% of the national gross domestic product by 2019.1 This growth in spending—both in absolute terms and as a proportion of our gross domestic product—has not been accompanied by commensurate improvements in health outcomes, despite expenditures far exceeding those of other countries.2–4 One of the fastest growing components of US health care costs is cancer care, the cost of which is now estimated to increase from

Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

125 billion in 2010 to

Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received

158 billion in 2020.1 Although cancer care represents a small fraction of overall health care costs, its contribution to health care cost escalation is increasing faster than those of most other areas because of several factors: the increasing prevalence of cancer due to the overall aging of the population and better control of some causes of competing mortality; the introduction of costly new drugs and techniques in radiation therapy and surgery; and the adoption of more expensive diagnostic tests. In some cases, the adoption of newer, more expensive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions may not be well supported by medical evidence, thereby raising costs without improving outcomes.5 Coupled with, or even driving, some of these rising costs are sometimes unrealistic patient and family expectations that lead clinicians to offer or recommend some of these services, despite the lack of supporting evidence of utility or benefit.6 Historically, most individuals in the United States were shielded from the acute economic impact of expensive care because they had health insurance. However, current trends suggest that patients will find themselves increasingly responsible for a greater proportion of the cost of their health care. Cost shifting or sharing can occur through the increased use of high-deductible policies and larger copayments. These increased costs are already commonplace and may not be affordable for many families. Indeed, health care expenditures are cited as a major cause of personal bankruptcy,7 and the term financial toxicity has entered the vernacular as a means of describing the financial distress that now often accompanies cancer treatment.8 Like other toxicities of cancer treatment, financial toxicity resulting from out-of-pocket treatment expenses can reduce quality of life and impede delivery of high-quality care.9,10 Patients experiencing high out-of-pocket costs have reported reducing their spending on food and clothing, reducing the frequency with which they take prescribed medications, avoiding recommended procedures, and skipping physician appointments to save money.10,11 These unintended consequences risk an increase in health disparities, which runs counter to some of the key goals of health care reform. In many communities, the high costs associated with cancer care have created a difficult situation for patients and the oncologists who care for them. Addressing this situation will require greater understanding of all the risks and benefits of various treatment options as well as the consequences of specific choices. In this regard, studies have shown that patients specifically want financial information about treatment alternatives along with information about medical effectiveness and treatment toxicity. However, they often do not receive it. Closing this knowledge gap will require educated providers who are able to sensitively initiate a dialogue about the cost of care with their patients when appropriate.12,13 Patients with cancer are often surprised by and unprepared for the high out-of-pocket costs of treatments. They also overestimate the benefits of treatments that sometimes extend life by only weeks or months or not at all. Oncologists are generally aware of this conundrum but uncertain about whether and how the cost of care should affect their recommendations.14 Although raising awareness of costs and providing tools to assess value may help to manage costs while maintaining high-quality care, some oncologists see this as being in conflict with their duty to individual patients.15 Recent American Society of Clinical Oncology Efforts Motivated by our responsibility to help oncologists deliver the highest-quality care to patients everywhere, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) formed the Task Force on the Cost of Cancer Care in 2007. Its mission includes educating oncologists about the importance of discussing costs associated with recommended treatments, empowering patients to ask questions pertaining to the anticipated costs of their treatment options, identifying the drivers of the rising costs of cancer care, and ultimately developing policy positions that will help Americans move toward more equal access to the highest-quality care at the lowest cost.16 In 2012, through the work of the Task Force, ASCO responded to the Choosing Wisely Campaign of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation and identified specific instances of overuse in the delivery of cancer care. ASCO used a deliberative consensus process to identify five common clinical practices that are not supported by high-level evidence. A second list of five was developed using the same process and submitted to the Choosing Wisely Campaign in 2013. ASCO amplified the evidence basis for both top-five lists in two publications17,18 and is now developing measures to evaluate the use of these practices as part of its Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. These exercises have provided opportunities to develop a rigorous but flexible approach to assessing efficacy across diagnostic and treatment domains.

The pathologic spectrum of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in the United States: Human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus-associated lymphoid malignancies

Lowell E. Schnipper, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thomas J. Smith, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Derek Raghavan, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC; Douglas W. Blayney, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Patricia A. Ganz, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Therese Marie Mulvey, Southcoast Center for Cancer Care, Southcoast Health System, New Bedford, MA; Dana S. Wollins, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.

Sclerosing cholangitis after continuous hepatic artery infusion of FUDR.

The objective of this study was to describe clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival according to breast cancer subtype with a focus on triple‐negative tumors.