Douglass A. Morrison

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sidney C. Smith, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Ted E. Feldman, MD, FACC, FSCAI[‡][1] John W. Hirshfeld, JR, MD, FACC, FAHA,FSCAI[‡][1] Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI Morton J. Kern, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI[‡][1] Spencer B. King III, MD, MACC, FSCAI Douglass A. Morrison, MD, PhD, FACC

ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 200

WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair; Ted E. Feldman, MD, FACC, FSCAI*; John W. Hirshfeld, Jr, MD, FACC, FSCAI*; Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI; Morton J. Kern, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI*; Spencer B. King, III, MD, MACC, FSCAI; Douglass A. Morrison, MD, PhD, FACC, FSCAI*; William W. O’Neill, MD, FACC, FSCAI; Hartzell V. Schaff, MD, FACC, FAHA; Patrick L. Whitlow, MD, FACC, FAHA; David O. Williams, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Patients With Medically Refractory Myocardial Ischemia and Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes With Bypass: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Abstract BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are being applied to high-risk populations, but previous randomized trials comparing revascularization methods have excluded a number of important high-risk groups. OBJECTIVES This five-year, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare long-term survival among patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and a high risk of adverse outcomes assigned to either a CABG or a PCI strategy, which could include stents. METHODS Patients from 16 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers were screened to identify myocardial ischemia refractory to medical management and the presence of one or more risk factors for adverse outcome with CABG, including prior open-heart surgery, age >70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction RESULTS A total of 232 patients was randomized to CABG and 222 to PCI. The 30-day survivals for CABG and PCI were 95% and 97%, respectively. Survival rates for CABG and PCI were 90% versus 94% at six months and 79% versus 80% at 36 months (log-rank test, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous coronary intervention is an alternative to CABG for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and a high risk of adverse outcomes with CABG.

Radial Artery Grafts vs Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Trial

CONTEXT Arterial grafts are thought to be better conduits than saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on experience with using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending coronary artery. The efficacy of the radial artery graft is less clear. OBJECTIVE To compare 1-year angiographic patency of radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in patients undergoing elective CABG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted from February 2003 to February 2009 at 11 Veterans Affairs medical centers among 757 participants (99% men) undergoing first-time elective CABG. INTERVENTIONS The left internal mammary artery was used to preferentially graft the left anterior descending coronary artery whenever possible; the best remaining recipient vessel was randomized to radial artery vs saphenous vein graft. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was angiographic graft patency at 1 year after CABG. Secondary end points included angiographic graft patency at 1 week after CABG, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and death. RESULTS Analysis included 733 patients (366 in the radial artery group, 367 in the saphenous vein group). There was no significant difference in study graft patency at 1 year after CABG (radial artery, 238/266; 89%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-93%; saphenous vein, 239/269; 89%; 95% CI, 85%-93%; adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.56-1.74; P = .98). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points. CONCLUSION Among Veterans Affairs patients undergoing first-time elective CABG, the use of a radial artery graft compared with saphenous vein graft did not result in greater 1-year patency. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00054847.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients

OBJECTIVES This report compares long-term percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) survival among post-CABG patients included in the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME) randomized trial and prospective registry. BACKGROUND Repeat CABG surgery is associated with a higher risk of mortality than first-time CABG. The AWESOME is the first randomized trial comparing CABG with PCI to include post-CABG patients. METHODS Over a five-year period (1995 to 2000), patients at 16 hospitals were screened to identify a cohort of 2,431 individuals who had medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five high-risk factors. There were 454 patients in the randomized trial, of whom 142 had prior CABG. In the physician-directed registry of 1,650 patients, 719 had prior CABG. Of the 327 patient-choice registry patients, 119 had at least one prior CABG. The CABG and PCI survivals for the three groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS The CABG and PCI three-year survival rates were 73% and 76% respectively for the 142 randomized patients (75 and 67 patients) (log-rank = NS). In the physician-directed registry, 155 patients were assigned to reoperation and 357 to PCI (207 received medical therapy); 36-month survivals were 71% and 77% respectively (log-rank = NS). In the patient-choice registry, 32 patients chose reoperation and 74 chose PCI (13 received medical therapy); 36-month survivals were 65% and 86% respectively (log-rank test p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous coronary intervention is preferable to CABG for many post-CABG patients.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: Outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry

OBJECTIVES This study compared survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) among diabetics in the Veterans Affairs AWESOME (Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation) study randomized trial and registry of high-risk patients. BACKGROUND Previous studies indicate that CABG may be superior to PCI for diabetics, but no comparisons have been made for diabetics at high risk for surgery. METHODS Over five years (1995 to 2000), 2,431 patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five risk factors (prior CABG, myocardial infarction within seven days, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35, age >70 years, or an intra-aortic balloon being required to stabilize) were identified. A total of 781 were acceptable for CABG and PCI, and 454 consented to be randomized. The 1,650 patients not acceptable for both CABG and PCI constitute the physician-directed registry, and the 327 who were acceptable but refused to be randomized constitute the patient-choice registry. Diabetes prevalence was 32% (144) among randomized patients, 27% (89) in the patient-choice registry, and 32% (525) in the physician-directed registry. The CABG and PCI survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS The respective CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates for diabetic patients were 72% and 81% for randomized patients, 85% and 89% for patient-choice registry patients, and 73% and 71% for the physician-directed registry patients. None of the differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that PCI is a relatively safe alternative to CABG for diabetic patients with medically refractory unstable angina who are at high risk for CABG.

Right ventricular dysfunction and the exercise limitation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This study examined right ventricular function during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to answer the following questions: Is there a significant correlation between oxygen consumption at maximal exercise and exercise right ventricular ejection fraction? Does the right ventricular ejection fraction response to exercise correlate with exercise changes in pulmonary artery pressure, total pulmonary resistance or pulmonary vascular resistance? Which combinations of cardiac, ventilatory and blood gas variables are the best predictors of oxygen consumption at maximal exercise? Twenty-six patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise with simultaneous hemodynamic and radionuclide ventriculographic measurements. The oxygen consumption at maximal exercise correlated with the exercise right ventricular ejection fraction (n = 21, r = 0.66; p less than 0.005), exercise stroke volume (r = 0.68; p less than 0.001), exercise cardiac output (r = 0.77; p less than 0.00005) and exercise ventilation (r = 0.85; p less than 0.00001). The change in right ventricular ejection fraction from rest to exercise correlated inversely with the change from rest to exercise in total pulmonary resistance (r = -0.51; p less than 0.05) but not with the change in mean pulmonary pressure (r = -0.37) or in pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.09). Multivariate analysis showed that the variables giving the highest combined correlation with oxygen consumption were ventilation and right ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.95, adjusted r2 = 0.88). These results suggest that exercise oxygen consumption of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is related to right ventricular systolic function, exercise right ventricular dysfunction is related, in part, to abnormal exercise total pulmonary resistance, and exercise limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurs as a result of the dynamic interaction between disordered right heart function and ventilation.

Health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass surgery in high-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia.

OBJECTIVES We compared six-month health-related quality of life (HRQL) for high-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. BACKGROUND Mortality rates after PCI and CABG surgery are similar. Therefore, differences in HRQL outcomes may help in the selection of a revascularization procedure. METHODS Patients were enrolled in a Veterans Affairs multicenter randomized trial comparing PCI versus CABG for patients with medically refractory ischemia and one or more risk factors for adverse outcome; 389 of 423 patients (92%) alive six months after randomization completed an Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status survey. Primary outcomes were the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate whether PCI or CABG surgery was associated with better PCS or MCS scores after adjusting for over 20 baseline variables. RESULTS There were no significant differences in either PCS scores (38.7 vs. 37.3 for PCI and CABG, respectively; p = 0.23) or MCS scores (45.5 vs. 46.1, p = 0.58) between the treatment arms. In multivariable models, there remained no difference in HRQL for post-PCI versus post-CABG patients (for PCS, absolute difference = 0.56 +/- standard error of 1.14, p = 0.63; for MCS, absolute difference = -1.23 +/- 1.12, p = 0.27). We had 97% power to detect a four-point difference in scores, where four to seven points is a clinically important difference. CONCLUSIONS High-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia randomized to PCI versus CABG surgery have equivalent six-month HRQL. Therefore, HRQL concerns should not drive decision-making regarding selection of a revascularization procedure for these patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Revascularization of High-Risk Patients

Background— A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study randomized high-risk patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia, a group largely excluded from previous trials, to urgent revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The present study examined the cost-effectiveness of PCI versus CABG for these high-risk patients. Methods and Results— Of 454 patients at 16 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers, 445 were available for the economic analysis (218 PCI and 227 CABG patients). Total costs were assessed at 3 and 5 years from the third-party payer’s perspective, and effectiveness was measured by survival. After 3 years, average total costs were

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: the VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial

63 896 for PCI versus