Dov Leshchinsky

Post-earthquake investigation on several geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls and slopes during the Ji-Ji earthquake of Taiwan

Abstract This paper gives an overview on the application of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures in Taiwan. Taiwan has an unique topography and geotechnical conditions that rendered a less conservative and more challenging design compared to that of North America, Europe and Japan. The Ji-Ji (Chi-Chi) earthquake of 1999 gave an opportunity to examine the behavior of reinforced soil structures. The performance of several modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls and reinforced slopes at the vicinity of the fault was evaluated. Reinforced structures performed better than unreinforced soil retaining walls. The failure cases were highlighted and the cause of failure was identified. The lack of seismic design consideration could be a major cause of failure. The compound failure mode, the inertia force of the blocks, and the connection stiffness and strength relative to the large dynamic earth pressure, were among major items that would warrant further design consideration.

Soil slopes under combined horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations

Conventional methods of designing earth structures are based on pseudo-static stability analysis employing a horizontal seismic coefficient. This paper discusses the stability and permanent displacement of a slope subject to combined horizontal and vertical accelerations. A log-spiral failure mechanism is used. It is shown that seismic force has a significant effect on stability and permanent displacement of slopes. The parametric study reveals that vertical acceleration may play an important role on stability and permanent displacement if the corresponding horizontal acceleration is large.

Performance of Geocell-Reinforced RAP Bases over Weak Subgrade under Full-Scale Moving Wheel Loads

Recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) has been increasingly used as an energy efficient and environmentally friendly paving material and is currently the most reused and recycled material in the United States. RAP has been used in new hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures and in base courses for pavement construction. When RAP is used as a base course material, the presence of asphalt in RAP may cause excessive deformation under traffic loading. Geocell, three-dimensional (3D) polymeric geosynthetic cells, was proposed in this study to minimize the deformation by confining the RAP material. Full-scale accelerated pavement tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of geocell reinforcement on RAP base courses over weak subgrade. Two types of RAP were used and a total of seven geocell-reinforced and unreinforced RAP sections were tested under full-scale traffic loads. The road sections were excavated and examined after each moving wheel test. The benefits of geocell reinforcement were evaluated in rut depths for a specific number of passes of the wheel load and the angle of stress distribution from the surface to the base course-subgrade interface. The test results demonstrated that the novel polymeric alloy geocell reinforcement improved the performance of unpaved RAP sections by widening the stress distribution angle and reducing the rut depth if the base courses were equally compacted in unreinforced and reinforced sections.

Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Sand under a Vertical Load:

Geocells have a three-dimensional cellular structure, which can be used to stabilize foundations by increasing bearing capacity and reducing settlements. However, a considerable gap exists between the applications and the theories for the mechanisms of geocell-reinforced foundations. An experimental and numerical study on the behavior of geocell-reinforced sand under a vertical load is presented. A single geocell was filled with sand and subjected to a vertical load to failure. This test process was modeled by using the FLAC3D numerical software to investigate the mechanisms of geocell and sand interactions. Experimental and numerical results both demonstrated that the geocell increased the ultimate bearing capacity and the modulus of the sand. The numerical results include the distributions of displacements in the sand and geocell walls and the distributions of tensile stresses and shear stresses acting on the geocell walls. The numerical results for geocell-reinforced sand are compared to those for sand without geocell.

Impact of Toe Resistance in Reinforced Masonry Block Walls: Design Dilemma

Reinforced masonry block retaining walls are comprised of a narrow column of stacked blocks at their exposed end. This column is placed on a nonstructural leveling pad to facilitate the placement of facing units. Theoretically, this column can generate very large toe resistance to sliding. A recent publication indicates that an accepted design methodology implicitly counts on this resistance in assessing the reinforcement load. Although not calculated in this design, it unconditionally considers that over 60% of the resultant horizontal force in a 12-m-high wall is carried by the toe, which is made up of 0.3-m-deep blocks. This paper elucidates this issue by explicitly identifying the magnitude of toe resistance and critically reviews whether such high resistance is universally suitable for design. It shows that high toe resistance may not be feasible for most foundation soils. The high impact of toe resistance on the reinforcement force poses a design dilemma as to the reliability of this resistance, eve...

Finite-Element Simulations of Full-Scale Modular-Block Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls under Earthquake Loading

A finite-element procedure was used to simulate the dynamic behavior of four full-scale reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to earthquake loading. The experiments were conducted at a maximum horizontal acceleration of over 0.8 g, with two walls subjected to only horizontal accelerations and two other walls under simultaneous horizontal and vertical accelerations. The analyzes were conducted using advanced soil and geosynthetic models that were capable of simulating behavior under both monotonic and cyclic loadings. The soil behavior was modeled using a unified general plasticity model, which was developed based on the critical state concept and that considered the stress level effects over a wide range of densities using a single set of parameters. The geosynthetic model was based on the bounding surface concept and it considered the S-shape load-strain behavior of polymeric geogrids. In this paper, the calibrations of the models and details of finite-element analysis are presented. The time response of horizontal and vertical accelerations obtained from the analyses, as well as wall deformations and tensile force in geogrids, were compared with the experimental results. The comparisons showed that the finite-element results rendered satisfactory agreement with the shake table test results.

Design Dilemma: Use peak or residual strength of soil

Abstract Most design methods for geosynthetic reinforced soil structures are based on limit equilibrium analysis. The required strength and length of the reinforcement is calculated based on the shear strength of the soils through which potential slip surfaces are likely to pass. Many design guidelines require a free-draining compacted backfill. Such soil exhibits strain softening behavior and thus there is a question of whether peak or residual shear strength should be used in the limit equilibrium analysis. The end result of this selection may have significant economic consequences especially when the foundation soil is competent. This paper recognizes the potential for the development of progressive failure. To produce safe and economical structures, a hybrid approach is proposed for design analysis. The location of the critical slip surfaces is determined based on peak strength as observed in laboratory soil element testing as well as centrifugal models of reinforced slopes. Accounting for the possibility that soil strength along these surfaces will degrade to its residual plastic value, the limit equilibrium analysis is repeated to determine the required long-term reinforcement strength. A simplified analytical design methodology is presented. Parametric studies show that the hybrid approach allows for marginal reduction in strength of reinforcement as compared to the `pure’ residual strength approach. However, the required length using the hybrid approach may decrease significantly depending on the slope and soil properties. Since the economics of geosynthetics are more sensitive to its area or length than to its strength in many instances, the presented approach may have significant design implications.

Required Unfactored Strength of Geosynthetic in Reinforced Earth Structures

Current reinforced earth structure designs arbitrarily distinguish between reinforced walls and slopes, that is, the batter of walls is 20° or less while in slopes it is larger than 20°. This has led to disjointed design methodologies where walls employ a lateral earth pressure approach and slopes utilize limit equilibrium analyses. The earth pressure approach used is either simplified (e.g., ignoring facing effects), approximated (e.g., considering facing effects only partially), or purely empirical. It results in selection of a geosynthetic with a long-term strength that is potentially overly conservative or, by virtue of ignoring statics, potentially unconservative. The limit equilibrium approach used in slopes deals explicitly with global equilibrium only; it is ambiguous about the load in individual layers. Presented is a simple limit equilibrium methodology to determine the unfactored global geosynthetic strength required to ensure sufficient internal stability in reinforced earth structures. This approach allows for seamless integration of the design methodologies for reinforced earth walls and slopes. The methodology that is developed accounts for the sliding resistance of the facing. The results are displayed in the form of dimensionless stability charts. Given the slope angle, the design frictional strength of the soil, and the toe resistance, the required global unfactored strength of the reinforcement can be determined using these charts. The global strength is then distributed among individual layers using three different assumed distribution functions. It is observed that, generally, the assumed distribution functions have secondary effects on the trace of the critical slip surface. The impact of the distribution function on the required global strength of reinforcement is minor and exists only when there is no toe resistance, when the slope tends to be vertical, or when the soil has low strength. Conversely, the impact of the distribution function on the maximum unfactored load in individual layers, a value which is typically used to select the geosynthetics, can result in doubling its required long-term strength.

Centrifuge Modeling of Slope Instability

This paper demonstrates the use of a centrifuge modeling technique in studying slope instability. The slope models were prepared from sand, and sand mixed with 15 and 30% fines by weight, compacted at optimum water content. The validity of the modeling technique was confirmed using slope models of different heights, inclinations, and soil types. The soil behavior was studied under triaxial and plane strain conditions, and the extended Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion was found relevant for expressing the strength of unsaturated compacted soil based on the angle of internal friction and apparent cohesion. The Bishops circular mechanism, together with the extended Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, was able to simulate the slope failure reasonably well. The rainfall of different intensities was then induced on the 60° stable slopes of sand with 15% fines. It was found that the failure of slope under rainfall may be interpreted as a reduction in apparent cohesion. The centrifuge tests also allowed the rainfall intensity-duration threshold curve (local curve) to be generated for the test slopes, and the accumulated rainfall corresponded well to some of the reported field observations.

Accelerated Pavement Testing of Geocell-Reinforced Unpaved Roads over Weak Subgrade

Full-scale trafficking tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of novel polymeric-alloy geocell reinforcement on base courses for low-volume unpaved roads over weak subgrade. Three types of in-fill materials—crushed limestone (AB-3) aggregate, quarry waste (QW), and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP)—were used for the base courses over a weak subgrade layer consisting of A-7-6 clay. Four unpaved sections that included one unreinforced control section of AB-3 aggregate 30 cm thick and three 17-cm novel polymeric-alloy geocell-reinforced sections were tested under a single-axle dual-tire wheel loading. The road sections were exhumed and examined after the moving-wheel test. The benefits of novel polymeric-alloy geocell reinforcement were evaluated in relation to rut depths for a specific number of passes of the wheel load and the angle of stress distribution from the surface to the base course–subgrade interface. The test results demonstrated that the novel polymeric-alloy geocell reinforcement improved the performance of unpaved AB-3 and RAP sections. The QW section also showed better performance in relation to stress distribution angle.