Drahuse Novotna

A girl with neurofibromatosis type 1, atypical autism and mosaic ring chromosome 17

We describe a girl with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), mild dysmorphic features, growth and mental retardation, autism, and mosaicism of ring chromosome 17 and chromosome 17 monosomy. The extent of genetic material deleted from the ring chromosome was determined using a combination of classical cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to be 0.6–2.5 Mb on 17p, and up to about 10 Mb on 17q. Based on our observations and on a review of the literature we argue that in addition to a universal “ring syndrome” which is based on ring instability and is less specific for the chromosome involved, various ring chromosomes underlie their own characteristic phenotypes. We propose that the symptoms leading to the diagnosis of NF1 in our patient could be attributed to mosaic hemizygosity for the NF1 gene in some of her somatic cells. A similar mechanism or a direct involvement of respective disease genes in the aberration could possibly influence also the development of autism and other symptoms. We raise a question if the loss of one copy of chromosome 17 from a substantial fraction of somatic cells can have specific consequences also for future risks of the patient, for example, due to the mosaic hemizygosity for the BRCA1 and TP53 genes.

Long term follow-up in a patient with a de novo microdeletion of 14q11.2 involving CHD8

We identified a de novo deletion of 14q11.2 in a Czech patient with developmental delay, mild autistic features, macrosomy, macrocephaly, orthognathic deformities, and dysmorphic facial features. The clinical follow‐up of the patient lasting 14 years documented changes in the facial dysmorphism from infancy to adolescence. The deletion affects approximately 200 kb of DNA with five protein‐coding genes and two snoRNA genes. Two of the protein‐coding genes, SUPT16H and CHD8, have been proposed as candidate genes for a new microdeletion syndrome. Our patient further supports the existence of this syndrome and extends its phenotypic spectrum, especially points to the possibility that orthognathic deformities may be associated with microdeletions of 14q11.2. CHD8 mutations have been found in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders and macrocephaly. The HNRNPC gene, repeatedly deleted in patients with developmental delay, is another candidate as its 5́ end is adjacent to the deletion, and the expression of this gene may be affected by position effect.

Mechanism and genotype-phenotype correlation of two proximal 6q deletions characterized using mBAND, FISH, array CGH, and DNA sequencing.

Proximal 6q deletions have a milder phenotype than middle and distal 6q deletions. We describe 2 patients with non-overlapping deletions of about 15 and 19 Mb, respectively, which subdivide the proximal 6q region into 2 parts. The aberrations were identified using karyotyping and analysed using mBAND and array CGH. The unaffected mother of the first patient carried a mosaic karyotype with the deletion in all metaphases analysed and a small supernumerary marker formed by the deleted material in about 77% of cells. Her chromosome 6 centromeric signal was split between the deleted chromosome and the marker, suggesting that this deletion arose through the centromere fission mechanism. In this family the location of the proximal breakpoint in the centromere prevented cloning of the deletion junction, but the junction of the more distal deletion in the second patient was cloned and sequenced. This analysis showed that the latter aberration was most likely caused by non-homologous end joining. The second patient also had a remarkably more severe phenotype which could indicate a partial overlap of his deletion with the middle 6q interval. The phenotypes of both patients could be partly correlated with the gene content of their deletions and with phenotypes of other published patients.

Fanconi anemia with biallelic FANCD1/BRCA2 mutations – Case report of a family with three affected children

Fanconi anemia, complementation group D1 with bi-allelic FANCD1 (BRCA2) mutations, is a very rare genetic disorder characterized by early onset of childhood malignancies, including acute leukemia, brain cancer and nephroblastoma. Here, we present a case report of a family with 3 affected children in terms of treatment outcome, toxicity and characterization of the malignancies using comprehensive cytogenetic analysis. The first child was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia when he was 11 months old. During chemotherapy, he suffered from repeated pancytopenia, sepsis and severe vincristine polyneuropathy, and 18 months after primary diagnosis, he succumbed to secondary acute monocytic leukemia. The second child was diagnosed with stage 2 triphasic nephroblastoma (Wilms tumor), when he was 3 years and 11 months old. During chemotherapy, he suffered from vincristine polyneuropathy. Currently, he is in complete remission, 29 months following the initial diagnosis. The third child was diagnosed with medulloblastoma with classical histology, when she was 4 years and 5 months old. After the first cycle of chemotherapy, she suffered from prolonged pancytopenia, sepsis and severe skin and mucosal toxicity. Six weeks after primary diagnosis, a first relapse in the posterior fossa was diagnosed, and at 7 and half months after primary diagnosis, a second relapse was diagnosed that led to the patients death. Our case report underscores tumor heterogeneity, treatment toxicity and poor outcome in Fanconi anemia patients of complementation group D1.

A boy with developmental delay and mosaic supernumerary inv dup(5)(p15.33p15.1) leading to distal 5p tetrasomy – case report and review of the literature

BackgroundWith only 11 patients reported, 5p tetrasomy belongs to rare postnatal findings. Most cases are due to small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) or isochromosomes. The patients share common but unspecific symptoms such as developmental delay, seizures, ventriculomegaly, hypotonia, and fifth finger clinodactyly. Simple interstitial duplications leading to trisomies of parts of 5p are much more frequent and better described. Duplications encompassing 5p13.2 cause a defined syndrome with macrocephaly, distinct facial phenotype, heart defects, talipes equinovarus, feeding difficulties, respiratory distress and anomalies of the central nervous system, developmental delay and hypotonia.Case presentationWe present a boy with dysmorphic features, developmental delay, intellectual disability and congenital anomalies, and a mosaic sSMC inv dup(5)(p15.33p15.1). He is the fourth and the oldest reported patient with distal 5p tetrasomy. His level of mosaicism was significantly different in lymphocytes (13.2%) and buccal cells (64.7%). The amplification in our patient is smaller than that in the three previously published patients but the only phenotype difference is the absence of seizures in our patient.ConclusionsOur observations indicate that for the assessment of prognosis, especially with respect to intellectual functioning, the level of mosaicism could be more important than the extent of amplification and the number of extra copies. Evaluation of the phenotypical effect of rare chromosomal aberrations is challenging and each additional case is valuable for refinement of the genotype-phenotype correlation. Moreover, our patient demonstrates that if the phenotype is severe and if the level of sSMC mosaicism is low in lymphocytes, other tissues should be tested.

Very short DNA segments can be detected and handled by the repair machinery during germline chromothriptic chromosome reassembly

Analyses at nucleotide resolution reveal unexpected complexity of seemingly simple and balanced chromosomal rearrangements. Chromothripsis is a rare complex aberration involving local shattering of one or more chromosomes and reassembly of the resulting DNA segments. This can influence gene expression and cause abnormal phenotypes. We studied the structure and mechanism of a seemingly balanced de novo complex rearrangement of four chromosomes in a boy with developmental and growth delay. Microarray analysis revealed two paternal de novo deletions of 0.7 and 2.5 Mb at two of the breakpoints in 1q24.3 and 6q24.1‐q24.2, respectively, which could explain most symptoms of the patient. Subsequent whole‐genome mate‐pair sequencing confirmed the chromothriptic nature of the rearrangement. The four participating chromosomes were broken into 29 segments longer than 1 kb. Sanger sequencing of all breakpoint junctions revealed additional complexity compatible with the involvement of different repair pathways. We observed translocation of a 33 bp long DNA fragment, which may have implications for the definition of the lower size limit of structural variants. Our observations and literature review indicate that even very small fragments from shattered chromosomes can be detected and handled by the repair machinery during germline chromothriptic chromosome reassembly.

Array comparative genome hybridization in patients with developmental delay: two example cases

Developmental delay is often a predictor of mental retardation (MR) or autism, two relatively frequent developmental disorders severely affecting intellectual and social functioning. The causes of these conditions remain unknown in most patients. They have a strong genetic component, but the specific genetic defects can only be identified in a fraction of patients. Recent developments in genomics supported the establishment of the causal link between copy number variants in the genomes of some patients and their affection. One of the techniques suitable for this analysis is array comparative genome hybridization, which can be used both for detailed mapping of chromosome rearrangements identified by classical cytogenetics and for the identification of novel submicroscopic gains or losses of genetic material. We illustrate the power of this approach in two patients. Patient 1 had a cytogenetically visible deletion of chromosome X and the molecular analysis was used to specify the gene content of the deletion and the prognosis of the child. Patient 2 had a seemingly normal karyotype and the analysis revealed a small recurrent deletion of chromosome 1 likely to be responsible for his phenotype. However, the genetic dissection of MR and autism is complicated by high heterogeneity of the genetic aberrations among patients and by broad variability of phenotypic effects of individual genetic defects.