Dror Rosengarten

Histological diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases by cryo-transbronchial biopsy.

The gold standard for the histological diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is an open lung biopsy (OLB). Tissue samples obtained by forceps transbronchial lung biopsies (TBB) are usually too small. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryo‐TBB for the diagnosis of ILD and to explore its role as substitute for OLB.

Bilateral Endoscopic Sealant Lung Volume Reduction Therapy for Advanced Emphysema

BACKGROUND A clinical study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of bilateral AeriSeal Emphysematous Lung Sealant System (ELS) treatment in patients with advanced emphysema out to 1 year. METHODS Twenty patients received treatment at four subsegments, two in each upper lobe. Tenhad upper lobe disease, and 10 had homogeneous disease. Treatments were administered under moderate sedation. Efficacy was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS Procedure times were short (15.2 ± 9.6 min), and hospital length of stay averaged 1.1 days. The study was successful in reaching its primary end point of a reduction at 3 months in upper lobe lung volume assessed by quantitative CT scan analysis ( - 895 ± 484 mL, P < .001). Treatment was associated with improvements in spirometry ( Δ FEV 1 at 6 months = 31.2% ± 36.6%, 12 months = 25.0% ± 33.4%), gas trapping ( Δ residual volume/total lung capacity at 6 months = 2 7.2% 12.7%, 12 months = - 10.9% 14.0%), diffusing capacity of lung for carbonmonoxide (6 months = 12.7% ± 16.4%, 12 months = 12.3% ± 21.1%), symptom scores ( Δ Medical Research Council dyspnea score at 6 months = median 0, range - 2 to 1, 12 months = median - 1, range - 3 to 0), and health-related quality of life ( Δ St. George Respiratory Questionnaire at 6 months = 8.0 ± 17.2 U, 12 months = 7.0 ± 15.8 U). There was one serious procedural complication and seven all-cause significant respiratory adverse events over 17 patient-years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral ELS treatment administered under conscious sedation in patients with advanced emphysema is associated with short procedure time and length of hospital stay and produces physiologic and functional improvement out to 1 year.

Transbronchial cryo-biopsy in lung transplantation patients: first report.

Transbronchial lung biopsies remain the gold standard to establish the presence of allograft rejection or infection after lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryo‐transbronchial biopsies (cryo‐TBB) in lung transplantation patients.

Safety of Cryo-Transbronchial Biopsy in Diffuse Lung Diseases: Analysis of Three Hundred Cases

Background: Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) which is performed with metal forceps (forceps TBB) has been accepted as a useful technique in establishing diagnoses of diffuse lung diseases (DLDs). The use of cryoprobes to obtain alveolar tissue (cryo-TBB) is a new method which is currently used by our institute as well as others with excellent results. Objectives: To assess the safety of cryo-TBB compared with conventional forceps TBB. Methods: We performed a retrospective data evaluation of 300 consecutive patients who underwent cryo-TBB between January 2012 and April 2014 and compared them with historical cases treated with forceps TBB between 2010 and 2012. The results of both diagnostic modalities were compared based on pathological reports. The major complications (significant bleeding and pneumothorax) were compared, along with postprocedural hospitalization. Results: Pneumothorax was observed in 15 cases (4.95%) treated with cryo-TBB versus 9 cases (3.15%) treated with forceps TBB, with no significant difference (p = 0.303). The insertion of a chest tube was necessary in 6 (2%) and 4 (1.3%) of the cases having undergone cryo-TBB or forceps TBB, respectively (p = 0.8). In the cryo-TBB group, bleeding was encountered in 16 cases (5.2%), and it occurred in 13 cases (4.5%) of the forceps TBB group, with no significant difference in rates (p = 0.706). Also, there was no significant difference in hospital admission rates between the groups [cryo-TBB: 10 (3.3%); forceps TBB: 4 (1.44%); p = 0.181]. The safety profile of cryo- and forceps TBB remained the same even when stratified according to indications for TBB, i.e. immunocompromised hosts, patients after lung transplantation and those with DLDs. Conclusion: In patients with DLDs, cryo-TBB is as safe as forceps TBB.

Lung cancer in lung transplant recipients: Experience of a tertiary hospital and literature review

BACKGROUND Lung transplantation is a viable therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease and is being increasingly performed worldwide. The incidence of lung cancer after lung transplantation has increased concomitantly, although data are still sparse. METHODS The computerized medical records of the Pulmonary Institute of a tertiary care medical center were searched for patients who underwent lung transplantation from 1997 to 2009 and acquired lung cancer postoperatively. The prevalence, potential contributing factors, and outcome of bronchogenic cancer were determined, and the medical literature was reviewed. RESULTS Bronchogenic cancer developed in 7 of the 290 lung transplant recipients (2.4%). All had received a single lung transplant and in most cases, the cancer developed in the native lung. These findings were similar to reports in the literature. The indication for transplantation was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/interstitial lung disease. All had a history of smoking. The average interval from transplantation to development of lung cancer was 5 years (range 1-9). Five patients had stage 4 cancer at diagnosis and 2 had stage 1. Six patients died from 10 days to 1 year after diagnosis. CONCLUSION Lung transplantation is associated with a relatively high prevalence of bronchogenic cancer, particularly in the native lung, in patients with primary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and a history of smoking. The cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor outcome. Efforts to improve screening are recommended, as aggressive management and treatment may be beneficial for earlier stage disease.

Propofol safety in bronchoscopy: prospective randomized trial using transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension monitoring.

Background: Midazolam is commonly used for sedation during flexible bronchoscopy because of its relatively wide therapeutic window. Recently, sedation with propofol for bronchoscopy has gained popularity, although concern has been raised regarding its potential ability to induce severe respiratory depression. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation under midazolam + alfentanil compared to propofol. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial using continuous transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension monitoring. The study group included 115 patients undergoing bronchoscopy, prospectively randomized to receive sedation with either midazolam + alfentanil (n = 59) or propofol (n = 56). Results: Intra-procedural carbon dioxide tension values were higher in the midazolam + alfentanil group than in the propofol group (maximum 53.72 vs. 49.49 mm Hg, mean 46.78 vs. 43.78 mm Hg), but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.149 and 0.193, respectively). Carbon dioxide tension values were significantly higher in the midazolam + alfentanil group than in the propofol group at 5 and 10 min following procedure (51.7 vs. 49.3 mm Hg, p = 0.026, and 50.8 vs. 42.7 mm Hg, p < 0.01, respectively), and significantly more patients in the midazolam + alfentanil group needed oxygen supplementation or airway support (24 vs. 8 patients, respectively). Conclusion: Midazolam + alfentanil and propofol are equally safe for sedation during bronchoscopy. Sedation with propofol, using small boluses at short intervals, does not cause excessive respiratory drive depression and represents an excellent alternative to traditional sedation agents.

Endobronchial closure of bronchopleural fistulas with Amplatzer vascular plug

OBJECTIVE Bronchopulmonary fistula (BPF) is a severe complication following lobectomy or pneumonectomy and is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. We have developed a novel minimally invasive method of central BPF closure using Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) device that was originally designed for the transcatheter closure of vascular structures in patients with small BPF. METHODS Patients with BPFs were treated under conscious sedation by bronchoscopic closure of BPFs using AVP. After locating the fistula using bronchography, the self-expanding nitinol made AVP occluder to be delivered under direct bronchoscopic guidance over a loader wire into the fistula followed by bronchography to assure correct device positioning and sealing of the BPF. RESULTS Six AVPs were placed in five patients, four males and one female, with a mean age of 62.3 years (range: 51-82 years). The underlying disorders and etiologies for BPF development were lobectomy (two patients), pneumonectomy for lung cancer (one patient), lobectomy due to necrotizing pneumonia (one patient), and post-tracheostomy tracheo-pleural fistula (one patient). In all the patients, the bronchoscopic procedure was successful and symptoms related to BPF disappeared following closure by the AVP. The results were maintained over a median follow-up of 9 months (range: 5-34 months). CONCLUSIONS Endobronchial closure using the AVP is a safe and effective method for treatment of small postoperative BPF. The ease of their implantation by bronchoscopy under conscious sedation adds this novel technique to the armatorium of minimally invasive modalities for the treatment of small BPF.

Two-Year Follow-up in Patients Treated With Emphysematous Lung Sealant for Advanced Emphysema

Endoscopic lung volume-reduction therapy for emphysema has been associated with therapeutic responses smaller in magnitude and less durable than surgical volume reduction (LVRS). Bronchoscopic emphysematous lung sealant (ELS) therapy has been shown to produce improvements in pulmonary function similar to surgery at 1 year. This case series summarizes safety and efficacy data of all patients from the initial ELS study out to 2 years. Between 1 and 2 years, there were three all-cause adverse events requiring hospitalization. One patient went on to successful lung transplant. Improvements relative to baseline in spirometry (change in FEV1: + 14.3 ± 33.1%; change in FVC: + 5.8 ± 23.2%) and diffusing capacity (change in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide: + 10.6 ± 20.6%) were observed at 2 years. An exponential model fit to FEV₁ data at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months predicted improvements from a baseline of > 5% out to 4.1 years, similar to what has been reported following surgery. This report confirms long-term safety and efficacy following ELS therapy in advanced emphysema. Studies in a larger cohort are needed to define the role of ELS therapy in the treatment algorithm of patients with this condition.

Pregnancy outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era

To the Editors: We read with interest the important article by Jais et al . [1] in a recent issue of the European Respiratory Journal discussing management and outcome of pregnancy in pulmonary hypertension patients in the light of recent advanced therapy. We certainly agree that this issue should be revisited in the current era when many new potent medications are available. Yet, even in the current era with optimal management, this condition carries substantial risks and demands careful examination of the data …

Renal function preservation with the mTOR inhibitor, Everolimus, after lung transplant.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in solid organ transplantation. Previous data suggest that the use of everolimus as an immunosuppressant drug leads to improvement in renal function. The aim of our study was to establish the effect of everolimus in combination with lower doses of CNIs on renal function among lung transplant recipients. Data regarding renal function and pulmonary function were collected from 41 lung transplanted patients in whom treatment was converted to a combination of everolimus with lower doses of CNIs. Patients transferred to everolimus and low dose CNIs showed an improvement in renal function. Patients who continued treatment with everolimus showed improvement in renal function, as opposed to patients who discontinued the treatment. Subjects without proteinuria at baseline showed a better improvement compared with subjects with proteinuria. The incidence of graft rejection did not increase. We concluded that a protocol that includes everolimus and lower doses of CNIs is effective for preserving renal function in lung transplant recipients with CKD. We also believe that an early implementation of everolimus, before proteinuria occurs or creatinine clearance is reduced, could lead to better outcomes.