Duane Roth
California Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Duane Roth.
The Astronomical Journal | 2006
R. A. Jacobson; Peter G. Antreasian; J. J. Bordi; Kevin Criddle; R. Ionasescu; J. B. Jones; R. A. Mackenzie; M. C. Meek; D. Parcher; F. J. Pelletier; W. M. Owen; Duane Roth; I. M. Roundhill; J. R. Stauch
We present values for the masses of Saturn and its major satellites, the zonal harmonics in the spherical harmonic expansion of Saturns gravitational potential, and the orientation of the pole of Saturn. We determined these values using an extensive data set: satellite astrometry from Earth-based observatories and the Hubble Space Telescope; Earth-based, Voyager 1, and Voyager 2 ring occultation measurements; Doppler tracking data from Pioneer 11; and Doppler tracking, radiometric range, and imaging data from Voyager 1, Voyager 2, and Cassini.
ieee aerospace conference | 2015
Erick J. Sturm; Todd J. Barber; Duane Roth
The Cassini spacecraft is in its final years. On September 15, 2017, Cassini will plunge deep into Saturns atmosphere never to reemerge; thus concluding its second extended mission and 13 years in orbit around the ringed planet. As of October 2014, the spacecraft is four years in to its seven-year, second extended mission, the Cassini Solstice Mission (CSM). With three years left and only 2.5% of its loaded bipropellant and 37% of its loaded monopropellant remaining, the Cassini project actively manages the predicted end-of-mission propellant margins to maintain a high confidence in the spacecrafts ability to complete the CSM as designed. Accurate spacecraft navigation, rigorous remaining-propellant estimation, and frequent future propellant consumption prediction have resulted in efficient propellant use and a probability of sufficient propellant margin greater than 99%.
SpaceOps 2008 Conference | 2008
Shadan M. Ardalan; Peter G. Antreasian; Kevin Criddle; Rodica Ionasescu; Ralph Jacobson; Jeremy Jones; Richard MacKenzie; Daniel W. Parcher; Frederic J. Pelletier; Duane Roth; Paul Thompson; Andrew T. Vaughan
The Cassini orbiter is the largest and most complex interplanetary spacecraft ever built. Since attaining orbit around Saturn in the summer of 2004, Cassini, along with its Huygens probe, have been continually improving our understanding of Saturn, its satellites, its enigmatic rings system, and of the solar system. One of the hallmarks of the CassiniHuygens Project is the close working relationship between the many teams required to operate such a sophisticated spacecraft. Their ingenuity has enabled them to find new and different ways to improve their processes during Cassini’s prime 4-year orbital tour. This paper will discuss the relationship between Cassini’s Navigation and Spacecraft Teams and the work required to properly configure Cassini’s telemetry system for Navigation. A detailed explanation of how the Navigation Team utilizes spacecraft telemetry and analysis demonstrating the benefits will also be provided. Finally, telemetry requirements for Navigation for future missions will be addressed. I. Introduction Since the summer of 2004, the Cassini spacecraft orbiting Saturn has been working around the clock collecting historic science data and returning it to Earth. The science results have been well documented in papers, journals, mass media, and websites. What is not as extensively documented is the creativity and adaptability of the Cassini Project flight team members to continually improve the manner in which they operate the spacecraft. There are many teams within a project such as Cassini, each with specific responsibilities vital to the success of the mission, and each who must forge close working relationships. This paper will discuss in particular the relationship between the navigation team & the spacecraft operations team, especially the Attitude & Articulation Control Subsystem (AACS), and how continual collaboration between the two teams dramatically improved the spacecraft’s performance and the process by which the spacecraft is flown. Much of the joint effort between the two teams has been spent addressing AACS’s growing concern for the health and safety of the Reaction Wheel Assembly (RWA). A major source of the improvement for Navigation operations was extensive reconfiguration of the AACS telemetry. Examples of how the Navigation team makes the most of the AACS telemetry and its advantages are highlighted. Finally, based on the experience gained from Cassini, telemetry configuration requirements to better serve Navigation’s needs for future missions are offered.
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit | 2008
Duane Roth; Peter G. Antreasian; Shadan M. Ardalan; Kevin Criddle; Troy Goodson; Rodica Ionasescu; Jeremy Jones; Daniel W. Parcher; Frederic J. Pelletier; Paul Thompson; Andrew T. Vaughan
Telemetry data are used to improve navigation of the Saturn orbiting Cassini spacecraft. Thrust induced delta Vs are computed on-board the spacecraft, recorded in telemetry, and downlinked to Earth. This paper discusses how and why the Cassini Navigation team utilizes spacecraft delta V telemetry. Operational changes making this information attractive to the Navigation Team will be briefly discussed, as will spacecraft hardware and software algorithms responsible for the on-board computation. An analysis of past delta V telemetry, providing calibrations and accuracies that can be applied to the estimation of future delta V activity, is described.
SpaceOps 2012 | 2012
Frederic J. Pelletier; Peter G. Antreasian; Shadan M. Ardalan; Brent Buffington; Kevin Criddle; Rodica Ionasescu; Robert Jacobson; Jeremy Jones; Sumita Nandi; Simon Nolet; Daniel W. Parcher; Duane Roth; Jonathon Smith; Paul Thompson
This paper reports on the orbit determination performance for the Cassini spacecraft from July 2008 to December 2011. During this period, Cassini made 85 revolutions around Saturn and had 52 close satellite encounters. 35 of those were with the massive Titan, 13 with the small, yet interesting, Enceladus as well as 2 with Rhea and 2 with Dione. The period also includes 4 double encounters, where engineers had to plan the trajectory for two close satellite encounters within days of each other at once. Navigation performance is characterized by ephemeris errors relative to in-flight predictions. Most Titan encounters 3-dimensional results are within a 1.5 formal sigma, with a few exceptions, mostly attributable to larger maneuver execution errors. Results for almost all other satellite encounter reconstructions are less than 3 sigma from their predictions. The errors are attributable to satellite ephemerides errors and in some cases to maneuver execution errors.
Archive | 2005
John Bordi; Pete Antreasian; Jerry Jones; Cameron Meek; Rodica Ionasescu; Ian Roundhill; Duane Roth
Archive | 2005
Jason R. Stauch; Peter G. Antreasian; John Bordi; Kevin Criddle; Rodica Ionasescu; Robert Jacobson; Jeremy Jones; M. Cameron Meek; Duane Roth; Ian Roundhill
Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS/GNSS 2003) | 2003
Duane Roth; Vijay Alwar; John Bordi; Troy Goodson; Yungsun Hahn; Rodica Ionasescu; Jeremy Jones; William M. Owen; Joan Pojman; Ian Roundhill; Shawna Santos; Nathan Strange; Sean V. Wagner; Mau Wong
Archive | 2007
Peter G. Antreasian; John Bordi; Kevin Criddle; Rodica Ionasescu; Ralph Jacobson; Jeremy Jones; Richard MacKenzie; Daniel W. Parcher; Frederic J. Pelletier; Duane Roth; Jason R. Stauch
2018 SpaceOps Conference | 2018
Julie Bellerose; Duane Roth; Kevin Criddle