Duncan J. Clarke

UBA domains of DNA damage-inducible proteins interact with ubiquitin

Rad23 is a highly conserved protein involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER) that associates with the proteasome via its N-terminus. Its C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to humans. However, the cellular function of UBA domains is not completely understood. Recently, RAD23 and DDI1, both DNA damage-inducible genes encoding proteins with UBA domains, were implicated genetically in Pds1-dependent mitotic control in yeast. The UBA domains of RAD23 and DDI1 are required for these interactions. Timely degradation of Pds1 via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway allows anaphase onset and is crucial for chromosome maintenance. Here, we show that Rad23 and Ddi1 interact directly with ubiquitin and that this interaction is dependent on their UBA domains, providing a possible mechanism for UBA-dependent cell cycle control. Moreover, we show that a hydrophobic surface on the UBA domain, which from structural work had been predicted to be a protein–protein interaction interface, is indeed required for ubiquitin binding. By demonstrating that UBA domains interact with ubiquitin, we have provided the first indication of a cellular function for the UBA domain.

Checkpoints controlling mitosis.

Each year many reviews deal with checkpoint con‐trol.(1–5) Here we discuss checkpoint pathways that control mitosis. We address four checkpoint systems in depth: budding yeast DNA damage, the DNA replication checkpoint, the spindle assembly checkpoint and the mammalian G2 topoisomerase II‐dependent checkpoint. A main focus of the review is the organization of these checkpoint pathways. Recent work has elucidated the order‐of‐function of several checkpoint components, and has revealed that the S phase, DNA damage and spindle assembly checkpoints each have at least two parallel branches. These steps forward have largely come from kinetic studies of checkpoint‐defective mutants. BioEssays 22:351–363, 2000.

Dosage Suppressors of pds1 Implicate Ubiquitin-Associated Domains in Checkpoint Control

ABSTRACT In budding yeast, anaphase initiation is controlled by ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Pds1p. Analysis of pds1mutants implicated Pds1p in the DNA damage, spindle assembly, and S-phase checkpoints. Though some components of these pathways are known, others remain to be identified. Moreover, the essential function of Pds1p, independent of its role in checkpoint control, has not been elucidated. To identify loci that genetically interact withPDS1, we screened for dosage suppressors of a temperature-sensitive pds1 allele, pds1-128, defective for checkpoint control at the permissive temperature and essential for viability at 37°C. Genetic and functional interactions of two suppressors are described. RAD23 andDDI1 suppress the temperature and hydroxyurea, but not radiation or nocodazole, sensitivity of pds1-128. rad23 and ddi1 mutants are partially defective in S-phase checkpoint control but are proficient in DNA damage and spindle assembly checkpoints. Therefore, Rad23p and Ddi1p participate in a subset of Pds1p-dependent cell cycle controls. Both Rad23p and Ddi1p contain ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains which are required for dosage suppression of pds1-128. UBA domains are found in several proteins involved in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, though no function has been assigned to them. Deletion of the UBA domains of Rad23p and Ddi1p renders cells defective in S-phase checkpoint control, implicating UBA domains in checkpoint signaling. Since Pds1p destruction, and thus checkpoint regulation of mitosis, depends on ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, we propose that the UBA domains functionally interact with the ubiquitin system to control Pds1p degradation in response to checkpoint activation.

Premitotic chromosome individualization in mammalian cells depends on topoisomerase II activity.

Abstract.When DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) activity is inhibited with a non-DNA-damaging topo II inhibitor (ICRF-193), mammalian cells become checkpoint arrested in G2-phase. In this study, we analyzed chromosome structure in cells that bypassed this checkpoint. We observed a novel type of chromosome aberration, which we call Ω-figures. These are entangled chromosome regions that indicate the persistence of catenations between nonhomologous sequences. The number of Ω- figures per cell increased sharply as cells evaded the transient block imposed by the topo II-dependent checkpoint, and the presence of caffeine (a checkpoint-evading agent) potentiated this increase. Thus, the removal of nonreplicative catenations, a process that promotes chromosome individualization in G2, may be monitored by the topo II-dependent checkpoint in mammals.

Mec1p regulates Pds1p levels in S phase: complex coordination of DNA replication and mitosis.

Genetic evidence suggests that the securin Pds1p is the target of a late-S-phase checkpoint control. Here we show that Pds1p becomes essential once two-thirds of the genome has been replicated and that the coupling of the completion of genome replication with mitosis relies on the regulation of Pds1p levels. Mec1p is needed to maintain Pds1p levels under S-phase checkpoint conditions. In contrast, Rad53p and Chk1p, needed for the stabilization of Pds1p in the context of the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint pathway, are dispensable. Thus, the Pds1p-dependent late-S-phase checkpoint pathway couples replication with mitosis but is mechanistically distinct from the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint. Finally, we show that the inhibition of spindle elongation in early S phase, controlled by the Mec1p/Rad53p branch, is not regulated via Pds1p/Esp1p. This can mechanistically explain the need for branched S-phase checkpoint controls.

The Pds1 anaphase inhibitor and Mec1 kinase define distinct checkpoints coupling S phase with mitosis in budding yeast

In most eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is confined to S phase of the cell cycle [1]. During this interval, S-phase checkpoint controls restrain mitosis until replication is complete [2]. In budding yeast, the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p has been associated with the checkpoint arrest of mitosis when DNA is damaged or when mitotic spindles have formed aberrantly [3] [4], but not when DNA replication is blocked with hydroxyurea (HU). Previous studies have implicated the protein kinase Mec1p in S-phase checkpoint control [5]. Unlike mec1 mutants, pds1 mutants efficiently inhibit anaphase when replication is blocked. This does not, however, exclude an essential S-phase checkpoint function of Pds1 beyond the early S-phase arrest point of a HU block. Here, we show that Pds1p is an essential component of a previously unsuspected checkpoint control system that couples the completion of S phase with mitosis. Further, the S-phase checkpoint comprises at least two distinct pathways. A Mec1p-dependent pathway operates early in S phase, but a Pds1p-dependent pathway becomes essential part way through S phase.

A Topoisomerase II-Dependent Checkpoint in G2-Phase Plant Cells Can Be Bypassed by Ectopic Expression of Mitotic Cyclin B2

DNA topoisomerase II is required for mitotic chromosome condensation and segregation. Here we characterize the effects of inhibiting DNA topoisomerase II activity in plant cells using the non-DNA damaging topoisomerase II inhibitor ICRF-193. We report that ICRF-193 abrogated chromosome condensation in cultured alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum L.) mitoses and led to bridged chromosomes at anaphase. Moreover, ICRF-193 treatment delayed entry into mitosis, increasing the frequency of cells having a pre-prophase band of microtubules, a marker of late G2 and prophase, and delaying the activation of cyclin-dependent kinase. These data suggest the existence of a late G2 checkpoint in plant cells that is activated in the absence of topoisomerase II activity. To determine whether the checkpoint-induced delay was a result of reduced cyclin-dependent kinase activity, mitotic cyclin B2 was ectopically expressed. Cyclin B2 bypassed the ICRF-193-induced delay before mitosis, and correspondingly, reduced the frequency of interphase cells with a pre-prophase band. These data provide evidence that plant cells possess a topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cell cycle checkpoint that transiently inhibits mitotic CDK activation and entry into mitosis, and that is overridden by raising the level of CDK activity through the ectopic expression of a plant mitotic cyclin. Key Words: Plant cyclin B2, Topoisomerase II, ICRF-193, G2 checkpoint, Microtubules

DNA-Damage-Independent Checkpoints: Yeast and Higher Eukaryotes

No Abstract Available Key Words Cell Cycle, Mitotic Checkpoints, Topoisomerase II, Anaphase, Mitotic Exit, Spindle Assembly

DNA catenations that link sister chromatids until the onset of anaphase are maintained by a checkpoint mechanism.

Treatment of Allium cepa meristematic cells in metaphase with the topoisomerase II inhibitor ICRF-193, results in bridging of the sister chromatids at anaphase. Separation of the sisters in experimentally generated acentric chromosomal fragments was also inhibited by ICRF-193, indicating that some non-centromeric catenations also persist in metaphase chromosomes. Thus, catenations must be resolved by DNA topoisomerase II at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition to allow segregation of sisters. A passive mechanism could maintain catenations holding sisters until the onset of anaphase. At this point the opposite tension exerted on sister chromatids could render the decatenation reaction physically more favorable than catenation. But this possibility was dismissed as acentric chromosome fragments were able to separate their sister chromatids at anaphase. A timing mechanism (a common trigger for two processes taking different times to be completed) could passively couple the resolution of the last remaining catenations to the moment of anaphase onset. This possibility was also discarded as cells arrested in metaphase with microtubule-destabilising drugs still displayed anaphase bridges when released in the presence of ICRF-193. It is possible that a checkpoint mechanism prevents the release of the last catenations linking sisters until the onset of anaphase. To test whether cells are competent to fully resolve catenations before anaphase onset, we generated multinucleate plant cells. In this system, the nuclei within a single multinucleate cell displayed differences in chromosome condensation at metaphase, but initiated anaphase synchronously. When multinucleates were treated with ICRF-193 at the metaphase-toanaphase transition, tangled and untangled anaphases were observed within the same cell. This can only occur if cells are competent to disentangle sister chromatids before the onset of anaphase, but are prevented from doing so by a checkpoint mechanism.

Synchronous nuclear-envelope breakdown and anaphase onset in plant multinucleate cells.

SummaryMultinucleate plant cells with genetically balanced nuclei can be generated by inhibiting cytokinesis in sequential telophases. These cells can be used to relate the effect of changes in the distribution of nuclei in the cytoplasm to the control of the timing of cell cycle transitions. Which mitotic cell cycle events are sensitive to differences in the, amount of cytoplasm surrounding each chromosomal complement has not been determined. To address this, we maximized the cell size by transiently inhibiting replication, while cell growth was not affected. The nuclei of 93% of the elongated cells reached prophase asynchronously compared to 46% of normal-sized multinucleate cells. The asynchronous prophases of normal-sized cells became synchronous at the time of nuclear-envelope breakdown, and the ensuing metaphase plate formation and anaphase onset and progression occurred synchronously. The elongated multinucleate cells were also very efficient in synchronizing the prophases at nuclear-envelope breakdown, in the prophase-to-prometaphase transition. However, 2.4% of these cells broke down the nuclear envelope asynchronously, though they became synchronous at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition. The kinetochore-microtubular cycle, responsible for coordinating the metaphase-to-anaphase transition and for the rate of sister segregation to opposite spindle poles during anaphase, remained strictly controlled and synchronous in the different mitoses of a single cell, independently of differences in the amount of cytoplasm surrounding each mitosis or its ploidy. Moreover, the degree of chromosome condensation varied considerably within the different mitotic spindles, being higher in the mitoses with the largest surrounding cytoplasm.