Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Duncan J. Summerton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Duncan J. Summerton.


BJUI | 2007

Feminizing genitoplasty in adult transsexuals: early and long-term surgical results.

Jonathan Charles Goddard; Richard M. Vickery; Assad Qureshi; Duncan J. Summerton; Deenesh Khoosal; Tim R. Terry

To examine the early and late surgical outcomes of feminizing genitoplasty (FG) in adult transsexuals in a UK single surgeon practice over a 10‐year period.


European Urology | 2015

Review of the Current Management of Upper Urinary Tract Injuries by the EAU Trauma Guidelines Panel

Efraim Serafetinides; Noam D. Kitrey; Nenad Djakovic; Franklin E. Kuehhas; Nicolaas Lumen; Davendra M. Sharma; Duncan J. Summerton

CONTEXT The most recent European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urological trauma were published in 2014. OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2014 version of the EAU guidelines on upper urinary tract injuries with the emphasis upon diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The EAU trauma guidelines panel reviewed literature by a Medline search on upper urinary tract injuries; publication dates up to December 2013 were accepted. The focus was on newer publications and reviews, although older key references could be included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A full version of the guidelines is available in print and online. Blunt trauma is the main cause of renal injuries. The preferred diagnostic modality of renal trauma is computed tomography (CT) scan. Conservative management is the best approach in stable patients. Angiography and selective embolisation are the first-line treatments. Surgical exploration is primarily for the control of haemorrhage (which may necessitate nephrectomy) and renal salvage. Urinary extravasation is managed with endourologic or percutaneous techniques. Complications may require additional imaging or interventions. Follow-up is focused on renal function and blood pressure. Penetrating trauma is the main cause of noniatrogenic ureteral injuries. The diagnosis is often made by CT scanning or at laparotomy, and the mainstay of treatment is open repair. The type of repair depends upon the severity and location of the injury. CONCLUSIONS Renal injuries are best managed conservatively or with minimally invasive techniques. Preservation of renal units is feasible in most cases. This review, performed by the EAU trauma guidelines panel, summarises the current management of upper urinary tract injuries. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with trauma benefit from being accurately diagnosed and treated appropriately, according to the nature and severity of their injury.


International Journal of Cancer | 2014

Comet assay measures of DNA damage are predictive of bladder cancer cell treatment sensitivity in vitro and outcome in vivo

Karen J. Bowman; Manar M. Al-Moneef; Benedict T. Sherwood; Alexandra Colquhoun; Jonathan Goddard; T.R. Leyshon Griffiths; David A. Payne; Sadmeet Singh; Paul C. Butterworth; Masood A. Khan; Duncan J. Summerton; William P. Steward; Valerie J. McKelvey-Martin; Stephanie R. McKeown; Roger Kockelbergh; J. Kilian Mellon; R. Paul Symonds; George D. D. Jones

Bladder cancer patients suffer significant treatment failure, including high rates of recurrence and poor outcomes for advanced disease. If mechanisms to improve tumour cell treatment sensitivity could be identified and/or if tumour response could be predicted, it should be possible to improve local‐control and survival. Previously, we have shown that radiation‐induced DNA damage, measured by alkaline Comet assay (ACA), correlates bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity in vitro. In this study we first show that modified‐ACA measures of cisplatin and mitomycin‐C‐induced damage also correlate bladder cancer cell chemosensitivity in vitro, with essentially the same rank order for chemosensitivity as for radiosensitivity. Furthermore, ACA studies of radiation‐induced damage in different cell‐DNA substrates (nuclei, nucleoids and intact parent cells) suggest that it is a feature retained in the prepared nucleoids that is responsible for the relative damage sensitivity of bladder cancer cells, suggestive of differences in the organisation of DNA within resistant vs. sensitive cells. Second, we show that ACA analysis of biopsies from bladder tumours reveal that reduced DNA damage sensitivity associates with poorer treatment outcomes, notably that tumours with a reduced damage response show a significant association with local recurrence of non‐invasive disease and that reduced damage response was a better predictor of recurrence than the presence of high‐risk histology in this cohort. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that mechanisms governing treatment‐induced DNA damage are both central to and predictive of bladder cancer cell treatment sensitivity and exemplifies a link between DNA damage resistance and both treatment response and tumour aggression.


European urology focus | 2017

Outcomes of Early Endoscopic Realignment Versus Suprapubic Cystostomy and Delayed Urethroplasty for Pelvic Fracture-related Posterior Urethral Injuries: A Systematic Review

Pieter Jan Elshout; Erik Veskimäe; Steven MacLennan; Yuhong Yuan; Nicolaas Lumen; Michael Gonsalves; Noam D. Kitrey; Davendra M. Sharma; Duncan J. Summerton; Franklin E. Kuehhas

CONTEXT The evidence base for optimal acute management of pelvic fracture-related posterior urethral injuries needs to be reviewed because of evolving endoscopic techniques. The current standard of care is suprapubic cystostomy followed by delayed urethroplasty. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence base comparing early endoscopic realignment with cystostomy and delayed urethroplasty regarding stricture rate, the need for subsequent procedures, and functional outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, and www.clinicaltrials.gov without time or language limitations. Both medical subject heading and free text terms as well as variations of root word were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies and single-arm case series were included, as long as ≥10 patients were enrolled. Data were narratively synthesised in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS No RCTs were found. Six nonrandomised comparative studies and met inclusion criteria and were selected for data extraction. Noncomparative studies with more than 10 participants were included resulting in seven eligible studies. From the comparative papers the results of 219 patients were reported: 142 in the realignment group and 77 in the group undergoing cystostomy with delayed repair. The noncomparative studies reported on a further 150 cases. An overall stricture rate of 49% was evident in the endoscopic realignment group. Of these patients, 50% (28.1% overall) could be managed by endoscopic procedures and 40.3% (18.5% of intervention group) required anastomotic repair. CONCLUSIONS No RCTs were found and the included nonrandomised studies have heterogeneous populations and a high degree of bias. About half of the patients were free of stricture and thus did not undergo delayed urethroplasty in case early endoscopic realignment had been performed. PATIENT SUMMARY This systematic review of literature of urethral trauma revealed there are no well conducted comparative studies of newer endoscopic treatments versus standard treatments which include more extensive surgery. The results of the reports we selected based on specific characteristics are often influenced by variable factors. After careful analysis of these results we can conclude that the newer endoscopic techniques might resolve the risk of urethral injury due to pubic fractures in about half of the patients. Because of various confounders we cannot identify those patients who would benefit from this procedure or who might be possibly harmed.


Journal of Clinical Urology | 2013

Minimising the risk of device infection in penile prosthetic surgery: a UK perspective

Muhammad Elmussareh; Jonathan Charles Goddard; Duncan J. Summerton; Timothy R. Terry

We have reviewed articles published on penile prosthetic infection in Medline and EMBASE databases from 2000 to 2012 with the intention of signposting ‘best evidence’ for the UK prosthetic implanter. Using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (LE), no paper exceeded an LE of 2b and the majority were LE 4 (case series) and LE 5 (expert opinion). This is not surprising from a UK perspective since HES data for 2009 to 2010 reported 263 penile prosthetic surgeries performed in 35 hospitals, with only five hospitals performing 15 or more. Our literature review suggests that the use of antibiotic-coated IPPs and measures aimed at reducing inoculating bacteria into the surgical wound with alcohol skin preparation, a no-touch technique and peri-operative antibiotic use are most important in minimising the risk of device infection. The use of post-operative antibiotics is contentious (LE 5). It remains unproven whether diabetics have a higher rate of prosthetic infection compared to nondiabetics. In cases of re-implantation for mechanical failure, it remains debatable whether a washout technique should be used and indeed uncertainty remains regarding the pathological role of biofilm in the causation of device infection in this scenario. A washout technique during salvage penile prosthetic surgery for device infection is advocated. Further research on biofilm may offer the best chance of reducing the incidence of device infections overall.


European urology focus | 2016

Grey Areas: Challenges of Developing Guidelines in Adult Urological Trauma

Davendra M. Sharma; Efraim Serafetinidis; Arunan Sujenthiran; Pieter-Jan Elshout; Nenad Djakovic; Michael Gonsalves; Franklin E. Kuehhas; Nicolaas Lumen; Noam D. Kitrey; Duncan J. Summerton

Urology Department, St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Asklipieion General Hospital, Athens, Greece; Department of Urology, University Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Department of Urology, Muhldorf General Hospital, Muhldorf am Inn, Germany; Department of Radiology, St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; f London Andrology Institute, London, UK; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y F O C U S X X X ( 2 0 1 5 ) X X X – X X X


European urology focus | 2017

Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review

Arunan Sujenthiran; Pieter Jan Elshout; Erik Veskimäe; Steven MacLennan; Yuhong Yuan; Efraim Serafetinidis; Davendra M. Sharma; Noam D. Kitrey; Nenad Djakovic; Nicolaas Lumen; Franklin E. Kuehhas; Duncan J. Summerton

CONTEXT The management of high-grade (Grade IV-V) renal injuries remains controversial. There has been an increase in the use of (NOM) but limited data exists comparing outcomes with open surgical exploration. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review to determine if NOM is the best first-line option for high-grade renal trauma in terms of safety and effectiveness. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant publications, without time or language limitations. The primary harm outcome was overall mortality and the primary benefit outcome was renal preservation rate. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and complication rate. Single-arm studies were included as there were few comparative studies. Only studies with more than 50 patients were included. Data were narratively synthesised in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seven nonrandomised comparative and four single-arm studies were selected for data extraction. Seven hundred and eighty-seven patients were included from the comparative studies with 535 patients in the NOM group and 252 in the open surgical exploration group. A further 825 patients were included from single-arm studies. Results from comparative studies: overall mortality: NOM (0-3%), open surgical exploration (0-29%); renal preservation rate: NOM (84-100%), open surgical exploration (0-82%); complication rate: NOM (5-32%), open surgical exploration (10-76%). Overall mortality and renal preservation rate were significantly better in the NOM group whereas there was no statistical difference with regard to complication rate. Length of hospital stay was found be significantly reduced in the NOM group. Patients in the open surgical exploration group were more likely to have Grade V injuries, have a lower systolic blood pressure, and higher injury severity score on admission. CONCLUSIONS No randomised controlled trials were identified and significant heterogeneity existed with regard to outcome reporting. However, NOM appeared to be safe and effective in a stable patient with a higher renal preservation rate, a shorter length of stay, and a comparable complication rate to open surgical exploration. Overall mortality was higher in the open surgical exploration group, though this was likely due to selection bias. PATIENT SUMMARY The data of this systematic review suggest nonoperative management continues to be favoured to surgical exploration in the management of high-grade renal trauma whenever possible. However, comparisons between both interventions are difficult as patients who have surgery are often more seriously injured than those managed nonoperatively, and existing studies do not report on outcomes consistently.


Eau-ebu Update Series | 2006

Development and Current Status of the AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter

Hari L. Ratan; Duncan J. Summerton; Steven K. Wilson; Timothy R. Terry


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Is nonoperative management the best first-line option for high-grade renal trauma? A systematic review

Arunan Sujenthiran; Pieter Jan Elshout; Erik Veskimäe; Y. Abu-Ghanem; Steven MacLennan; Yuhong Yuan; Efraim Serafetinidis; Davendra M. Sharma; Noam D. Kitrey; Nenad Djakovic; Nicolaas Lumen; Franklin E. Kuehhas; Duncan J. Summerton


Archive | 2013

Surgical Management of Genitourethral Emergencies

Rowland W. Rees; Duncan J. Summerton; Nim Christopher; David J. Ralph

Collaboration


Dive into the Duncan J. Summerton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolaas Lumen

Ghent University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy R. Terry

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan Charles Goddard

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge