Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Durado Brooks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Durado Brooks.


Gastroenterology | 2008

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Bernard Levin; David A. Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S. Andrews; Durado Brooks; John H. Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M. Giardiello; Seth N. Glick; David A. Johnson; C. Daniel Johnson; Theodore R. Levin; Perry J. Pickhardt; Douglas K. Rex; Robert A. Smith; Alan G. Thorson; Sidney J. Winawer

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed among men and women and the second leading cause of death from cancer. CRC largely can be prevented by the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, and survival is significantly better when CRC is diagnosed while still localized. In 2006 to 2007, the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology came together to develop consensus guidelines for the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in asymptomatic average-risk adults. In this update of each organizations guidelines, screening tests are grouped into those that primarily detect cancer early and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps, thus providing a greater potential for prevention through polypectomy. When possible, clinicians should make patients aware of the full range of screening options, but at a minimum they should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that primarily is effective at early cancer detection and a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps. It is the strong opinion of these 3 organizations that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of screening.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2009

Cancer Screening in the United States, 2009: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Issues in Cancer Screening

Robert A. Smith; Kimberly S. Andrews; Durado Brooks; Carol DeSantis; Stacey A. Fedewa; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Otis W. Brawley; Richard Wender

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2008

Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology*†

Bernard Levin; David A. Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Robert A. Smith; Durado Brooks; Kimberly S. Andrews; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M. Giardiello; Seth N. Glick; Theodore R. Levin; Perry J. Pickhardt; Douglas K. Rex; Alan G. Thorson; Sidney J. Winawer

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed among men and women and the second leading cause of death from cancer. CRC largely can be prevented by the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, and survival is significantly better when CRC is diagnosed while still localized. In 2006 to 2007, the American Cancer Society, the US Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology came together to develop consensus guidelines for the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in asymptomatic average‐risk adults. In this update of each organizations guidelines, screening tests are grouped into those that primarily detect cancer early and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps, thus providing a greater potential for prevention through polypectomy. When possible, clinicians should make patients aware of the full range of screening options, but at a minimum they should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps and a screening test that primarily is effective at early cancer detection. It is the strong opinion of these 3 organizations that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of screening.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2001

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

Robert A. Smith; Andrew C. von Eschenbach; Richard Wender; Bernard Levin; Tim Byers; David A. Rothenberger; Durado Brooks; William T. Creasman; Carmel J. Cohen; Carolyn D. Runowicz; Vilma Cokkinides; Harmon J. Eyre

Updates to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines regarding screening for the early detection of prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers, based on the recommendations of recent ACS workshops, are presented. Additionally, the authors review the “cancer‐related check‐up,” clinical encounters that provide case‐finding and health counseling opportunities. Finally, the ACS is issuing an updated narrative related to testing for early lung cancer detection for clinicians and individuals at high risk of lung cancer in light of emerging data on new imaging technologies.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 1997

American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010

Andrew M.D. Wolf; Richard Wender; Ruth Etzioni; Ian M. Thompson; Anthony V. D'Amico; Robert J. Volk; Durado Brooks; Chiranjeev Dash; Idris Guessous; Kimberly S. Andrews; Carol DeSantis; Robert A. Smith

In 2009, the American Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee began the process of a complete update of recommendations for early prostate cancer detection. A series of systematic evidence reviews was conducted focusing on evidence related to the early detection of prostate cancer, test performance, harms of therapy for localized prostate cancer, and shared and informed decision making in prostate cancer screening. The results of the systematic reviews were evaluated by the ACS Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee, and deliberations about the evidence occurred at committee meetings and during conference calls. On the basis of the evidence and a consensus process, the Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee developed the guideline, and a writing committee drafted a guideline document that was circulated to the entire committee for review and revision. The document was then circulated to peer reviewers for feedback, and finally to the ACS Mission Outcomes Committee and the ACS Board of Directors for approval. The ACS recommends that asymptomatic men who have at least a 10‐year life expectancy have an opportunity to make an informed decision with their health care provider about screening for prostate cancer after they receive information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Prostate cancer screening should not occur without an informed decision‐making process. Men at average risk should receive this information beginning at age 50 years. Men in higher risk groups should receive this information before age 50 years. Men should either receive this information directly from their health care providers or be referred to reliable and culturally appropriate sources. Patient decision aids are helpful in preparing men to make a decision whether to be tested. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:70–98.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2013

Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening.

Robert A. Smith; Durado Brooks; Cokkinides; Otis W. Brawley

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2003

Emerging Technologies in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: CT Colonography, Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests, and Stool Screening Using Molecular Markers

Bernard Levin; Durado Brooks; Robert A. Smith; Amy Stone

The American Cancer Societys (ACS) Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group held a workshop on new technologies for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps as part of a regular review of ACS guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. The Advisory Group formally reviewed CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), and stool screening using molecular markers, and also addressed other technologies including capsule video endoscopy. With the exception of immunochemical stool testing, the ACS has determined that at this time there is insufficient evidence to recommend these technologies for routine colorectal cancer screening. Based on recommendations of the Advisory Group, only a minor modification has been made to the ACSs Recommendations for Screening and Surveillance of the Early Detection of Adenomatous Polyps and Colorectal Cancer.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2014

American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines.

Ted A. Skolarus; Andrew M.D. Wolf; Nicole L. Erb; Durado Brooks; Brian M. Rivers; Willie Underwood; Andrew L. Salner; Michael J. Zelefsky; Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching; Susan F. Slovin; Daniela Wittmann; Michael A. Hoyt; Victoria J. Sinibaldi; Gerald Chodak; Mandi Pratt-Chapman; Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2015

American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines.

Khaled El-Shami; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Nicole L. Erb; Anne Willis; Jennifer Bretsch; Mandi Pratt-Chapman; Rachel S. Cannady; Sandra L. Wong; Johnie Rose; April Barbour; Kevin D. Stein; Katherine Sharpe; Durado Brooks; Rebecca Cowens-Alvarado

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2006

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: A consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Douglas K. Rex; Charles J. Kahi; Bernard Levin; Robert A. Smith; John H. Bond; Durado Brooks; Randall W. Burt; Tim Byers; Robert H. Fletcher; Neil Hyman; David A. Johnson; Lynne M. Kirk; David A. Lieberman; Theodore R. Levin; Michael J. O'Brien; Clifford Simmang; Alan G. Thorson; Sidney J. Winawer

Patients with resected colorectal cancer are at risk for recurrent cancer and metachronous neoplasms in the colon. This joint update of guidelines by the American Cancer Society (ACS) and US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer addresses only the use of endoscopy in the surveillance of these patients. Patients with endoscopically resected Stage I colorectal cancer, surgically resected Stage II and III cancers, and Stage IV cancer resected for cure (isolated hepatic or pulmonary metastasis) are candidates for endoscopic surveillance. The colorectum should be carefully cleared of synchronous neoplasia in the perioperative period. In nonobstructed colons, colonoscopy should be performed preoperatively. In obstructed colons, double contrast barium enema or computed tomography colonography should be done preoperatively, and colonoscopy should be performed 3 to 6 months after surgery. These steps complete the process of clearing synchronous disease. After clearing for synchronous disease, another colonoscopy should be performed in 1 year to look for metachronous lesions. This recommendation is based on reports of a high incidence of apparently metachronous second cancers in the first 2 years after resection. If the examination at 1 year is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 3 years. If that colonoscopy is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 5 years. Shorter intervals may be indicated by associated adenoma findings (see Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guideline). Shorter intervals are also indicated if the patients age, family history, or tumor testing indicate definite or probable hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Patients undergoing low anterior resection of rectal cancer generally have higher rates of local cancer recurrence, compared with those with colon cancer. Although effectiveness is not proven, performance of endoscopic ultrasound or flexible sigmoidoscopy at 3‐ to 6‐month intervals for the first 2 years after resection can be considered for the purpose of detecting a surgically curable recurrence of the original rectal cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Durado Brooks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernard Levin

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sidney J. Winawer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John H. Bond

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tim Byers

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge