E. B. Özhayat

Effect of treatment with fixed and removable dental prostheses. An oral health-related quality of life study

The aim of the study was to evaluate patient-reported effects of treatment with fixed dental prostheses (FDP) and removable dental prostheses (RDP) and relate the change in Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) to the type of treatment and objective dental variables of aesthetics and mastication. Additionally, the purpose of the study was to identify aspects of impairment and improvement that the treatments caused. Fixed dental prostheses treatment was performed in 200 patients and RDP treatment in 107 patients. Gender, age, region of replacement, and number of teeth present and replaced were obtained. The participants completed the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49) before and after treatment. A control group with no need for dental treatment also completed the OHIP-49. All participants had a significant improvement in OHRQoL. The improvement was higher for the RDP group than the FDP group. Removable dental prostheses that replaced only masticatory teeth did not improve the OHRQoL significantly. The improvement in OHRQoL for both the FDP and RDP groups was not at the level of the control group. Higher age was associated with lower improvement in OHRQoL. Higher age, being a woman and having teeth replaced in the aesthetic zone were associated with deterioration in OHRQoL. Both RDP treatment and FDP treatment were associated with a reduction in the problems most frequently reported before treatment. Treatment with RDP was associated with new problems caused by the RDP. Fixed dental prostheses and RDP treatments improved OHRQoL and reduced the number of problems. The RDP participants improved more than the FDP participants.

Oral health-related quality-of-life in patients to be treated with fixed or removable partial dental prostheses

OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to measure and describe the Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life (OHRQoL) in a population about to receive removable dental prostheses (RDP) or fixed dental prostheses (FDP). MATERIALS AND METHODS The Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49) was completed by 410 patients about to receive treatment with either RDP or FDP. Objective variables were: gender, age, number of teeth, type of replacement planned (FDP/RDP) and location (one jaw or both) and zone (aesthetic/masticatory/both) of missing teeth to be replaced. RESULTS Women had a worse OHRQoL than men in the RDP group. Higher age was significantly correlated with a better OHRQoL independent of treatment modality. Participants about to receive FDP in one jaw in the masticatory zone only had a better OHRQoL than RDP participants in the same group. The most frequently reported problems in all groups concerned functional limitations, discomfort and physical disabilities. Little variance in reported items was seen between the sub-groups and social handicap was not frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS The difference in OHRQoL between participants about to receive RDP and FDP was limited. The most frequently reported problems concerned functional limitations, discomfort and physical disabilities. Social handicap was not frequently reported.

Comparison of an individual systematic interview method and the oral health impact profile. Responsiveness and ability of describing treatment effect of oral rehabilitation.

The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life - Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) has shown potential for generating information and measuring Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in oral rehabilitation. The Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) has been widely used in population studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the responsiveness and ability of the SEIQoL-DW and the OHIP-49 to qualitatively describe the change following oral rehabilitation. Twenty-two participants treated with fixed or removable prosthesis were interviewed before and after treatment using the SEIQoL-DW and the OHIP-49 questionnaire. The participants rated the subjective perception of change and answered two global oral rating questions. A clinical examination was performed to identify dental status variables. No significant difference was found between pre- and post-treatment SEIQoL-DW scores. A significant difference between pre- and post-treatment OHIP-49 scores was found. The SEIQoL-DW and OHIP-49 change scores was significantly correlated. The dental status variables such as number of teeth, number of teeth replaced, number of occluding units, type of treatment, extractions and removable dental prosthesis (RDP) before treatment did not influence the change scores. The effect size was low for the SEIQoL-DW (0.15) and moderate for the OHIP-49 (0.60). Improvement in subjective perception of change was related to both improvement and deterioration in change scores. More aspects were mentioned in the SEIQoL-DW compared to the OHIP-49. Based on the change in overall score and effect size, the SEIQoL-DW showed a weaker responsiveness than the OHIP-49. The SEIQoL-DW, however, described the change more detailed than the OHIP-49.

Influence of negative affectivity and self-esteem on the oral health related quality of life in patients receiving oral rehabilitation.

The aim of this study was to investigate if and how the personality traits Negative Affectivity (NA) and self-esteem influenced the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in patients receiving oral rehabilitation. OHRQoL was measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49), NA with a short form of the Eysenck Personality Inventory Questionnaire (EPI-Q), and self-esteem with Rosenbergs Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in 66 patients treated with removable dental prosthesis (RDP). The minimally important difference (MID), effect size (ES), and standard error of the measurement (SEM) were used to clinically interpret the patient-reported effect. The OHIP-49 score was significantly higher and exceeded the MID pre- and post-treatment in participants with high EPI-Q and low RSES score compared to participants with low EPI-Q and high RSES score. The improvement in OHIP-49 score was significant and not limited by high EPI-Q and low RSES score. High EPI-Q score was associated high improvement in OHIP-49 score and the ES of the improvement in participants with high EPI-Q was large and exceeded the MID and SEM. Treatment with RDP improves the OHRQoL regardless of level of NA and self-esteem. High NA is associated with a large effect, but both high NA and low self-esteem is associated with poorer OHRQoL both before and after treatment.BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate if and how the personality traits Negative Affectivity (NA) and self-esteem influenced the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in patients receiving oral rehabilitation.MethodsOHRQoL was measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49), NA with a short form of the Eysenck Personality Inventory Questionnaire (EPI-Q), and self-esteem with Rosenbergs Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in 66 patients treated with removable dental prosthesis (RDP). The minimally important difference (MID), effect size (ES), and standard error of the measurement (SEM) were used to clinically interpret the patient-reported effect.ResultsThe OHIP-49 score was significantly higher and exceeded the MID pre- and post-treatment in participants with high EPI-Q and low RSES score compared to participants with low EPI-Q and high RSES score. The improvement in OHIP-49 score was significant and not limited by high EPI-Q and low RSES score. High EPI-Q score was associated high improvement in OHIP-49 score and the ES of the improvement in participants with high EPI-Q was large and exceeded the MID and SEM.ConclusionTreatment with RDP improves the OHRQoL regardless of level of NA and self-esteem. High NA is associated with a large effect, but both high NA and low self-esteem is associated with poorer OHRQoL both before and after treatment.

Oral health-related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis.

The aims of this study were to measure and describe the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and to identify the complications caused by partial removable dental prosthesis (RDPs) in patients 1-5 years after treatment. Complications were identified in 65 patients who were treated with 83 RDPs (48 upper, 35 lower). OHRQoL was measured using the OHIP-49 before treatment and at the baseline (1-2 months after treatment) and follow-up (1-5 years after treatment) examinations. The types and numbers of oral problems that were experienced were described based on OHIP items with a score of 3 and 4. A significant improvement (P < 0·05) in the total OHIP-49 was registered from pre-treatment (mean 42, SD ± 37) to baseline (mean 29, SD ± 27) and from pre-treatment to 1-5 years after treatment (mean 32, SD ± 30). There was no significant difference between the baseline and 1- to 5-year follow-up examinations. Problems with eating and appearance registered at pre-treatment were improved at baseline and after 1-5 years. Problems with dentures that had been registered pre-treatment were improved at baseline but reoccurred after 1-5 years. The two most frequent complications were ill-fitting RDPs and inflammation of the oral mucosa, followed less frequently by fractures of the clasps. Treatment with RDPs improved OHRQoL, but denture-related problems partly remained, and new problems related to RDPs occurred 1-5 years after treatment. The two most frequent complications were ill-fitting RDPs and inflammation of the oral mucosa.

Validation of the Prosthetic Esthetic Index

ObjectivesIn order to diagnose impaired esthetics and evaluate treatments for these, it is crucial to evaluate all aspects of oral and prosthetic esthetics. No professionally administered index currently exists that sufficiently encompasses comprehensive prosthetic esthetics. This study aimed to validate a new comprehensive index, the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), for professional evaluation of esthetics in prosthodontic patients.Material and methodsThe content, criterion, and construct validity; the test–retest, inter-rater, and internal consistency reliability; and the sensitivity of the index were evaluated in 95 patients in need of oral rehabilitation.ResultsThe content validity was sufficient: Most correlations between aspects of the PEI were low (R > 0.5). The PEI was significantly correlated to the Dental Aesthetic Index (R = 0.52) and could distinguish between subgroups of patients indicating sufficient criterion and construct validity. The test–retest reliability showed an Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.80, the internal consistency reliability showed a Cronbachs alpha of 0.7; and the inter-rater reliability was excellent, with an ICC of 0.94. The PEI could furthermore distinguish between participants and controls, indicating sufficient sensitivity.ConclusionThe PEI is considered a valid and reliable instrument involving sufficient aspects for assessment of the professionally evaluated esthetics in prosthodontic patients.Clinical relevanceWith the validated PEI available, the clinician can directly assess and document the comprehensive esthetics of prosthodontic patients in a structured manner.

Influence of self-esteem and negative affectivity on oral health-related quality of life in patients with partial tooth loss.

UNLABELLED To meaningfully interpret oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measures, the influence of personality traits must be investigated. OBJECTIVES To investigate and quantify the influence of self-esteem and negative affectivity (NA) on OHRQoL. It was hypothesized that low self-esteem and high NA would be associated with worse OHRQoL. METHODS OHRQoL measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49), self-esteem measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), NA measured by the Eysenck Personality Inventory Questionnaire (EPI-Q), global oral rating of oral comfort and controlling variables (gender, age, number of teeth, experience of wearing removable dental prostheses (RDP), location of missing teeth and zone of missing teeth) were collected from 81 patients with partial tooth loss, signed in for treatment with RDP. RESULTS Bivariate analyses showed that the EPI-Q score had the highest correlation with OHIP-49 score (R = 0.5). Both EPI-Q and RSES score had a stronger correlation with psychosocial items than physical/functional items of the OHIP-49. In the multivariate analyses, the controlling variables alone explained 17.75% of the variance in OHIP-49 score, while addition of EPI-Q score, RSES score and both EPI-Q and RSES score explained additionally 11.64%, 6.07% and 14.12%, respectively. For each unit increase in EPI-Q score, the OHIP-49 score increased 5.1 units and for each unit increase in RSES score, the OHIP-49 score decreased 1.1. NA was statistically and clinically significantly higher and self-esteem was statistically significantly lower in patients reporting worse oral comfort. CONCLUSION NA had the strongest and most clinically meaningful influence, but both NA and self-esteem was found to influence OHRQoL; low self-esteem and high NA was associated with worse OHRQoL. This indicates the possibility to explain some of the impact of tooth loss on OHRQoL based on personality traits.

Cobalt release and complications resulting from the use of dental prostheses

Cobalt release from dental prostheses has been shown to elicit allergic reactions in cobalt‐allergic patients. It is therefore important to investigate whether these prostheses are possible sources of sensitization.

Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI) in a population who received prosthetic replacements.Materials and methodsFifty-seven patients who received prosthetic replacement of at least one tooth by means of fixed or removable prosthesis were professionally esthetically evaluated using the PEI and the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) before and after treatment. The participants further evaluated their oral esthetics using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP-Aes) and Orofacial Esthetic Index (OES). Responsiveness was determined by calculating effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) of the change in PEI score, testing the change in PEI score in different subgroups, and correlating the change in PEI score with the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The change in PEI score was compared to the change in DAI score.ResultsThe ES and SRM were large for the change in PEI score. Patients having anterior teeth replaced had a larger improvement in PEI score compared to participants not having anterior teeth replaced. The change in PEI score was moderately but significantly correlated to the change in OHIP-Aes and OES scores. The PEI was more consistent in responsiveness than the DAI.ConclusionsThe PEI shows sufficient responsiveness for use in longitudinal studies and for use as a follow-up measure in clinical practice.Clinical relevanceThe PEI can in a standardized manner monitor and document esthetic improvements and problems as seen by the dentist in clinical practice.

Oral health-related quality of life in socially endangered persons in Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate and describe the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in a socially endangered group of people and to compare the OHRQoL to other patient groups. Material and methods: About 294 socially endangered persons attending a volunteer clinic in Copenhagen Denmark filled in the OHIP-14 questionnaire. The group was compared in mean score and reported problems to a group of patients with tooth loss and about to have a removable dental prosthesis (RDP), a group with tooth loss about to have a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and a control group without tooth loss. Results: Significantly higher OHIP-14 score was seen in the socially endangered group (15.5 (SD 12.6)) compared with the control (1.9 (SD 2.7)) and the FDP group (9.4 (SD 8.2)) but not the RDP group (13.1 (SD 10.5)). This difference was not changed after stratifying in age groups. Problems related to psychological disability, social disability, and handicap were more frequent in the social endangered group than for the other groups. The items pain, tense, diet, relax, life, and function stand out as problems in the socially endangered group compared to the other groups. Conclusion: The OHRQoL is highly impaired in the socially endangered persons and at least to the level of persons with great tooth loss about to have an RDP. The problems seem to be more handicapping in the socially endangered compared with other patient groups known to have high impairment.