E. Bala

Evaluation of optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis using low-contrast visual evoked potentials

Background: Contrast acuity (identification of low-contrast letters on a white background) is frequently reduced in patients with demyelinating optic neuropathy associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), even when high-contrast (Snellen) visual acuity is normal. Since visual evoked potentials (VEPs) induced with high-contrast pattern-reversal stimuli are typically increased in latency in demyelinating optic neuropathy, we asked if VEPs induced with low-contrast stimuli would be more prolonged and thus helpful in identifying demyelinating optic neuropathy in MS. Methods: We studied 15 patients with clinically definite MS and 15 age-matched normal controls. All subjects underwent a neuro-ophthalmologic assessment, including measurement of high-contrast visual acuity and low-contrast acuities with 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, and 1.25% contrast Sloan charts. In patients with MS, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was determined using optical coherence tomography. Monocular VEPs were induced using pattern-reversal checkerboard stimuli with 100% and 10% contrast between checks, at 5 spatial frequencies (8–130 minutes of arc). Results: VEP latencies were significantly increased in response to low- compared with high-contrast stimuli in both groups. VEP latencies were significantly greater in patients with MS than controls for both high- and low-contrast stimuli. VEP latencies correlated with high- and low-contrast visual acuities and RNFL thickness. VEPs were less likely to be induced with low- than with high-contrast stimuli in eyes with severe residual visual loss. Conclusions: Visual evoked potentials obtained in patients with multiple sclerosis using low-contrast stimuli are increased in latency or absent when compared with those obtained using high-contrast stimuli and, thus, may prove to be helpful in identifying demyelinating optic neuropathy.

Neurological Basis for Eye Movements of the Blind

When normal subjects fix their eyes upon a stationary target, their gaze is not perfectly still, due to small movements that prevent visual fading. Visual loss is known to cause greater instability of gaze, but reported comparisons with normal subjects using reliable measurement techniques are few. We measured binocular gaze using the magnetic search coil technique during attempted fixation (monocular or binocular viewing) of 4 individuals with childhood-onset of monocular visual loss, 2 individuals with late-onset monocular visual loss due to age-related macular degeneration, 2 individuals with bilateral visual loss, and 20 healthy control subjects. We also measured saccades to visual or somatosensory cues. We tested the hypothesis that gaze instability following visual impairment is caused by loss of inputs that normally optimize the performance of the neural network (integrator), which ensures both monocular and conjugate gaze stability. During binocular viewing, patients with early-onset monocular loss of vision showed greater instability of vertical gaze in the eye with visual loss and, to a lesser extent, in the normal eye, compared with control subjects. These vertical eye drifts were much more disjunctive than upward saccades. In individuals with late monocular visual loss, gaze stability was more similar to control subjects. Bilateral visual loss caused eye drifts that were larger than following monocular visual loss or in control subjects. Accurate saccades could be made to somatosensory cues by an individual with acquired blindness, but voluntary saccades were absent in an individual with congenital blindness. We conclude that the neural gaze-stabilizing network, which contains neurons with both binocular and monocular discharge preferences, is under adaptive visual control. Whereas monocular visual loss causes disjunctive gaze instability, binocular blindness causes both disjunctive and conjugate gaze instability (drifts and nystagmus). Inputs that bypass this neural network, such as projections to motoneurons for upward saccades, remain conjugate.

Two patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 presenting with profound binocular visual loss yet minimal ophthalmoscopic findings

Two patients with genetically confirmed spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) presented with progressive visual loss. Examination disclosed substantial visual acuity loss, central scotomas, and marked dyschromatopsia. Ophthalmoscopic abnormalities were subtle, with only mild retinal artery attenuation and minimal foveal region pigmentary abnormalities. Both patients had slow saccades and partially limited ductions, although neither reported diplopia. One patient had obvious extremity and gait ataxia, but the other had only an unsteady tandem gait. Results of electroretinography (ERG) were abnormal in both patients. These cases illustrate that SCA7 may present with profound visual loss yet minimal ophthalmoscopic findings and sometimes minimal ataxia. The clues to diagnosis are the abnormal color vision, retinal artery attenuation, abnormal eye movements, and a family history of similar manifestations, which may have gone undiagnosed. Full-field or multifocal ERG will always disclose photoreceptor dysfunction. Genetic testing is now available to confirm the diagnosis.

Mutation screen of the cone-specific gene, CLUL1, in 376 patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Clusterin is a secreted glycoprotein expressed ubiquitously in many tissues that appears to function as a molecular chaperone capable of protecting stressed proteins. It is upregulated in many different forms of neurodegeneration and is thought to represent a defense response against neuronal damage. Clusterin has been found to be a common protein identified in drusen preparations isolated from the retina of donor eyes of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the elderly population of developed countries. A retina-specific clusterin-like protein (CLUL1) showing nearly 25% identity to clusterin at the protein level was recently cloned and shown to be expressed specifically in cone photoreceptor cells. For these reasons, we investigated CLUL1 as a candidate gene for AMD. A mutation screen of the entire coding region of the CLUL1 gene in 376 unrelated patients with AMD uncovered three sequence variations, one isocoding change and two intronic changes. One intronic change appears significantly less frequent in patients with the more severe forms of AMD than in control subjects, suggesting that this variant may reduce the risk for AMD or may be linked to a nearby variant that may reduce AMD risk. Variant alleles of the CLUL1 gene were found; however, none are considered pathogenic. None of the variants identified are predicted to create or destroy splice donor or acceptor sites based on splice-site prediction software.

Mutation screen of β-crystallin genes in 274 patients with age-related macular degeneration

Purpose: The crystallin family of proteins comprise the main structural proteins of the vertebrate lens and have been classified into α-, β-, and γ- families. Several of the β-crystallin proteins have been detected in the retina where they are each localized to different compartments of rod and cone photoreceptors. Functionally, β-crystallins have been implicated in the protection of the retina from intense light exposure. Two members of the β-crystallins, CRYBB1 and CRYBB2, have been identified in drusen preparations isolated from the retina of donor eyes of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the elderly population of developed countries. We therefore investigated CRYBB1 and CRYBB2 as candidate genes for AMD in 274 unrelated patients. Results: A mutation screen of the entire coding region of the CRYBB1gene uncovered eight sequence variations, including three missense changes, two intronic changes and three isocoding changes. A mutation screen of the entire coding region of the CRYBB2 gene uncovered three sequence variations, one isocoding change and two intronic changes. Conclusions: Although variant alleles of the CRYBB1 and CRYBB2 genes were found, none are considered pathogenic.