E. Béatse

Brain Areas Involved in Interlimb Coordination: A Distributed Network

Whereas behavioral studies have made significant contributions toward the identification of the principles governing the coordination of limb movements, little is known about the role of higher brain areas that are involved in interlimb coordination. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to reveal the brain areas activated during the cyclical coordination of ipsilateral wrist and foot movements. Six normal subjects performed five different tasks that were presented in a random order, i.e., isolated flexion-extension movements of the right wrist (WRIST) and right foot (FOOT), cyclical coordination of wrist and foot according to the isodirectional (ISODIR) and nonisodirectional (NON-ISODIR) mode, and rest (REST). All movements were auditory paced at 66 beats/min. During the coordination of both limb segments, a distributed network was identified showing activation levels in the supplementary motor area (SMA), cingulate motor cortex (CMC), premotor cortex (PMC), primary sensorimotor cortex (M1/S1), and cerebellum that exceeded the sum of the activations observed during the isolated limb movements. In addition, coordination of the limb movements in different directions was associated with extra activation of the SMA as compared to movements in the same direction. It is therefore concluded that the SMA is substantially involved in the coordination of the nonhomologous limbs as part of a distributed motor network. Accordingly, the long-standing exclusive association that has been made between this medial frontal area and bimanual (homologous) coordination needs to be abandoned and extended towards other forms of interlimb coordination (nonhomologous).

Mental rotation versus invariant features in object perception from different viewpoints: an fMRI study

It has been proposed that object perception can proceed through different routes, which can be situated on a continuum ranging from complete viewpoint-dependency to complete viewpoint-independency, depending on the objects and the task at hand. Although these different routes have been extensively demonstrated on the behavioral level, the corresponding distinction in the underlying neural substrate has not received the same attention. Our goal was to disentangle, on the behavioral and the neurofunctional level, a process associated with extreme viewpoint-dependency, i.e. mental rotation, and a process associated with extreme viewpoint-independency, i.e. the use of viewpoint-invariant, diagnostic features. Two sets of 3-D block figures were created that either differed in handedness (original versus mirrored) or in the angles joining the block components (orthogonal versus skewed). Behavioral measures on a same-different judgment task were predicted to be dependent on viewpoint in the rotation condition (same versus mirrored), but not in the invariance condition (same angles versus different angles). Six subjects participated in an fMRI experiment while presented with both conditions in alternating blocks. Both reaction times and accuracy confirmed the predicted dissociation between the two conditions. Neurofunctional results indicate that all cortical areas activated in the invariance condition were also activated in the rotation condition. Parietal areas were more activated than occipito-temporal areas in the rotation condition, while this pattern was reversed in the invariance condition. Furthermore, some areas were activated uniquely by the rotation condition, probably reflecting the additional processes apparent in the behavioral response patterns.

The representation of shape in the context of visual object categorization tasks.

To investigate the role of human fusiform gyrus in shape processing, we determined the effect of shape degradation on BOLD contrast in this region with fMRI during three tasks requiring subjects to determine either whether two successively presented nonsense shapes had the same global orientation (OR task); whether two successively presented meaningful objects belonged to the same basic level category (CAT task); or whether two successively presented objects represented the same exemplar of a category (EX task). On the behavioral level, shape degradation by locally shifting the pixels constituting the lines of stimuli had no effect on performance in the OR task, while it was detrimental to performance in the CAT and EX tasks. In comparison to the OR task, both the CAT and EX tasks were associated with activations in the occipitotemporal and parietal cortex. When shape degradation was applied, activation in the middle fusiform gyrus was reduced in all tasks. The occurrence of this effect in the OR task indicates that it is independent of memory representations. The persistence of the effect in both tasks that showed a behavioral effect of degradation suggests that it does not reflect the amount of shape processing performed on the stimuli, but rather the specificity of the final perceptual representation that can be built from the shape information that is available. Other studies have shown effects of stimulus familiarity and task requirements in the fusiform gyrus, suggesting that there is no need to assume different modules for perceptual representation and representation in memory.