Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. Ceccarelli is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. Ceccarelli.


European Spine Journal | 2002

Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

R. Padua; Luca Padua; E. Ceccarelli; E. Romanini; Gustavo Zanoli; R. Bondì; A. Campi

Abstract. Over the last 10 years, patient-oriented evaluations using questionnaires have become an important aspect of clinical spinal outcome studies. Any questionnaire must be translated and culturally adapted in order to be used with different language groups, and the translated version must then be evaluated for reliability and validity, which are fundamental attributes of any measurement tool. The Roland Disability Questionnaire, a low back pain disease-specific tool, was submitted to translation into Italian and to cross-cultural adaptation following the Guillemin criteria. It was then validated on 70 patients (37 male and 33 female; mean age 58, range: 28–67) suffering from low back pain as assessed by clinical examination, imaging and also electromyography in cases of suspected neurological impairment. The test-retest reliability, assessed with intraclass correlation, was 0.92 and the internal consistency reached a Cronbachs alpha of 0.82. The Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire satisfied the validation criteria, showing characteristics of reliability and validity similar to previously published versions translated and adapted for other countries.


Spine | 2001

Patient outcomes after Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis : A 15- to 28-year evaluation

Roberto Padua; Sergio Padua; Lorenzo Aulisa; E. Ceccarelli; Luca Padua; Emilio Romanini; Gustavo Zanoli; Andrea Campi

Study Design. A retrospective study was performed, using the Short Form-36 Health Survey and the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire, to investigate patient outcomes after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using Harrington rod instrumentation. Objective. To evaluate health-related quality of life and low back pain in a long-term follow-up study of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The commonly accepted surgical treatment for idiopathic evolutive scoliosis is vertebral fusion. It has been suggested that this procedure may cause low back pain and a poor quality of life over the long term. Outcome measures after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have focused mainly on objective parameters such as radiographic measures. However, this information has proved to be correlated only weakly with outcomes that are more relevant to patients, such as functional status and symptoms. Until recently, only a few long-term outcome studies have used standardized and validated patient-oriented tools to evaluate surgically treated patients with scoliosis. Methods. In this study, 70 patients treated with a standard Harrington technique were recontacted and evaluated by means of self-administered questionnaires (Short Form-36 Health Survey and Roland and Morris Disability, clinical examination, and radiographic analysis. Preoperative and follow-up radiographic findings were registered. Relations between radiographic and patient-oriented data were evaluated. Results. A comparison between the current sample and the Italian age-matched normative data for the Short Form-36 Health Survey showed them to have a similar pattern. Findings showed the patient-oriented outcome to be correlated inversely with the extension of vertebral fusion and the preoperative Cobb angle. Conclusion. Long-term follow-up evaluation of Harrington rod fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis showed no important impairment of health-related quality of life, as measured by patient-oriented evaluation.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2009

Variations of the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon: A classification of embryologically explained variations

Carl Dierickx; E. Ceccarelli; Marco Conti; Jan Vanlommel; Alessandro Castagna

BACKGROUND Although the intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps (LHB) usually runs free, different types of fusions with the inferior surface of the capsule are known to be possible. Anatomic variations of this part of the LHB have been previously described and were nearly always considered to be innocent. MATERIALS AND METHODS Out of 2 populations of 1500 arthroscopies each, we collected prospectively and retrospectively all possible variations of the proximal portion of the LHB. RESULTS We included 57 cases (1.91%) of this total population in an attempt to describe the complete range of these form variants: the simple vinculum or pulley-like sling, the partial or complete mesotenon between biceps and capsule, the complete adherent LHB, the double-tendon origin, the reversed-type split-tendon, and the complete absence of the LHB. We suggest a classification of 12 variations of the intra-articular portion of the LHB. DISCUSSION By taking into account an extensive literature review, we suggest that these conditions are congenital and consider them as a result of partial detachment from the mesothelial or synovial fusion with the inferior surface of the capsule. The incidence of these variants and their associated pathologies are investigated. CONCLUSION By offering this new classification and a physiopathologic hypothesis, we try to explain why some of these anatomic variants may also acquire a pathologic significance.


Spine | 2001

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Lumbar North American Spine Society Questionnaire for Italian-speaking Patients With Lumbar Spinal Disease

Roberto Padua; Luca Padua; E. Ceccarelli; Emilio Romanini; R. Bondì; Gustavo Zanoli; Andrea Campi

Study Design. A cross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional study of a sample of lumbar spine patients, with a subsample followed prospectively for retest reliability. Objectives. To assess the Italian version instrument reliability and validity. Summary of Background Data. The orthopaedic outcome measurements have been usually focused on objective parameters as radiograph measures or other technical aspects. However, these parameters are weakly related with outcomes that are more relevant to patients as functional status and symptoms. In the last ten years, the patient-oriented measures have become an important aspect of spinal clinical outcome evaluation. The most common instruments to assess patient perspective are self-administered questionnaires that must be validated by a widely accepted process to evaluate reliability and validity, which are fundamental for every instrumental measure. Methods. The North American Spine Society (NASS) questionnaire was culturally adapted for Italian-speaking people following the Guillemin criteria. The Italian version was tested on 74 consecutive patients who were referred to the authors’ department and suffered from low back pain with leg irradiation. The results were compared with other validated patient-oriented measures. Forty-eight-hour retests were performed on a subsample of 45 patients. Results. The questionnaire was favorably accepted by patients. The lumbar spine pain and disability and neurogenic symptoms subscales showed a high correlation with other patient-oriented measures, as hypothesized, and it also showed good values on test-retest. Conclusions. The questionnaire should be considered for patient health status monitoring and for clinical trials.


Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2007

Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome

R. Padua; E. Ceccarelli; Rosaria Bondì; Andrea Campi; Luca Padua

Despite the clinical success of total knee arthroplasty, little information can be found in the literature about the relationship between certain postoperative physical findings and the outcome. Specifically, is the range of motion related to patient perception of outcome? We performed a cohort prospective study on 48 patients assessed by patient-oriented evaluations (Short Form 36 Health Survey and Oxford Knee Questionnaire) and objective evaluations after total knee arthroplasty. Thirty-four patients were women and 14 were men. The mean age at followup was 71 years (range, 64-80 years) and the minimum followup was 20 months (mean, 28.5 months; range, 20-30 months). We found a positive correlation between range of motion and patient-oriented evaluations in some domains of the Short Form 36 and in the Oxford knee score.Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


European Spine Journal | 2002

Patient-oriented assessment of back pain in pregnancy

Luca Padua; R. Padua; R. Bondì; E. Ceccarelli; Pietro Caliandro; P. D'Amico; O. Mazza; P. Tonali

Abstract. Back pain is a common symptom in women during the last period of pregnancy. Only a few studies using validated patient-oriented tools have been undertaken on this topic. We report on a multicenter study on back pain in women during the last period of pregnancy, which involved seven Italian institutions. Seventy-six women in their 8th and 9th months were studied using the Italian validated version of the Roland questionnaire – a disease-specific patient-oriented tool for low back pain. Sixty-two percent of the women had gone through at least one previous pregnancy, and clinical data concerning both the period before all pregnancies and the period before the current pregnancy were acquired. The study found that 31% of the women had no back pain symptoms (Roland score 0), 40% scored from 1 to 4, 21% scored from 5 to 10, and 8% scored more than 10. With regard to the predictive factor, history of back pain and sciatica before the pregnancy were found to be associated with occurrence of back pain symptoms during pregnancy. Unexpectedly, our results showed that male sex of the fetus seems to be related to occurrence of back pain symptoms during pregnancy. However, back pain was not associated with having gone through previous pregnancies, nor was the Roland score related to the weight before pregnancy or to increment of weight during pregnancy. Evaluation of the patients perspective made it possible to identify predictive factors for occurrence of back pain, thereby furnishing important information for the clinical approach to pregnancy.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2008

Health-related quality of life and subjective outcome after shoulder replacement for proximal humeral fractures

Roberto Padua; Rosaria Bondì; E. Ceccarelli; Andrea Campi; Luca Padua

Shoulder replacement has increased exponentially in recent decades, and previous studies have documented the effectiveness of this procedure. Pain relief, physical functional level, and health-related quality of life, however, were often not assessed. To our knowledge, no published articles have assessed quality of life in shoulder replacement for fracture. The main purpose of this study was to assess the patient-relevant outcomes in patients who underwent shoulder replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Standardized quality of life and shoulder-specific, self-administered questionnaires were used. On the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey, as expected, we observed a lower score in the domain compared with healthy Italian subjects. A surprising finding was that in the General Health and Role-Emotional domains, our sample had a better picture than the healthy one, probably because patients had experienced severe trauma and major surgery previously. These data represent the first step toward the definition of outcome for this procedure. This study does not address the necessity of therapy, but if this were included in future publications, it might provide useful data for therapeutic recommendations.


Musculoskeletal Surgery | 2010

Italian version of ASES questionnaire for shoulder assessment: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

R. Padua; Luca Padua; E. Ceccarelli; Rosaria Bondì; Federica Alviti; Alex Castagna

The patient-oriented measures, represented by self-administered questionnaire, have become an important aspect of clinical outcome assessment. To be used with different language groups and in different countries, questionnaires must be translated and adapted to new cultural characteristics and then validated by a widely accepted process to evaluate reliability and validity, fundamental characteristic for each measure. The aim of the study is to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and to assess the Italian version instrument reliability and validity. The study design is a cross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional study of a sample of patients affected by shoulder disorder with a subsample followed prospectively for retest reliability. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form was culturally adapted for Italian-speaking people, following the simplified Guillemin criteria. Reliability and validity were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 50 consecutive patients affected by shoulder disorder. A sub-sample of 20 patients was followed prospectively for retest reliability. The results were compared with other validated patient-oriented measures. The ASES scales showed a high correlation with other patient-oriented measures, as hypothesized, and it also showed good values with regard to reproducibility, consistency and validity, to the original versions published in English. These findings suggest that the evaluation capacities of the Italian version of ASES are equivalent to those of English language version.


Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | 2005

Shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures

R. Bondì; E. Ceccarelli; S. Campi; Roberto Padua

Displaced proximal humeral fractures represent less than 4%-5% of all fractures. The management of these fractures varies widely and includes conservative treatment, open reduction with internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. Even if shoulder replacement has increased exponentially over the past decades for the treatment of these injuries and has been studied in large series, there is no general agreement on the optimal management of these fractures. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to collect and evaluate the scientific evidence supporting the different treatments for complex proximal humeral fractures, with particular attention to the real value of shoulder arthroplasty compared to nonoperative treatment or internal fixation. A literature analysis was performed on the different strategies, to find the best scientific evidences on this topic.


Musculoskeletal Surgery | 2011

Position of shoulder arthroplasty and clinical outcome in proximal humerus fractures

Roberto Padua; Luca Padua; M. Galluzzo; E. Ceccarelli; F. Alviti; Alex Castagna

Four-part proximal humeral fractures are frequently treated with shoulder replacement. Outcome of this procedure has not been standardized, and there are controversy data on range of motion (ROM) and active function of the shoulder. The aim of this study is to compare shoulder prosthesis position (SPP) in terms of version of humeral head and height of stem with clinical subjective and objective outcome. Fifty patients were treated with shoulder hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fracture or fracture-dislocation of the humeral head. Radiological examination and CT-scan were performed preoperatively and at follow-up. Clinical outcome evaluation included active and passive ROM, and subjective perspective collected through SF-36, OSQ, ASES, and DASH. No significant correlation between stem height and clinical outcome were found. The prosthesis version correlates with all subjective questionnaires. The ROM was not correlated with stem height and prosthesis version. SPP involves clinical outcome, with great relevance of implant version.

Collaboration


Dive into the E. Ceccarelli's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roberto Padua

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luca Padua

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Bondì

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Tonali

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pietro Caliandro

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Federica Alviti

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Campi

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge