E. Driesschaert
Université catholique de Louvain
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Driesschaert.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2005
Jonathan M. Gregory; Keith W. Dixon; Ronald J. Stouffer; Andrew J. Weaver; E. Driesschaert; Michael Eby; Thierry Fichefet; Hiroyasu Hasumi; Aixue Hu; Johann H. Jungclaus; Igor V. Kamenkovich; Anders Levermann; Marisa Montoya; S. Murakami; S. Nawrath; Akira Oka; Andrei P. Sokolov; R. B. Thorpe
[ 1] As part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, integrations with a common design have been undertaken with eleven different climate models to compare the response of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation ( THC) to time-dependent climate change caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Over 140 years, during which the CO2 concentration quadruples, the circulation strength declines gradually in all models, by between 10 and 50%. No model shows a rapid or complete collapse, despite the fairly rapid increase and high final concentration of CO2. The models having the strongest overturning in the control climate tend to show the largest THC reductions. In all models, the THC weakening is caused more by changes in surface heat flux than by changes in surface water flux. No model shows a cooling anywhere, because the greenhouse warming is dominant.
Journal of Climate | 2008
Gian-Kasper Plattner; Reto Knutti; Fortunat Joos; Thomas F. Stocker; W. von Bloh; Victor Brovkin; David Cameron; E. Driesschaert; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Michael Eby; Neil R. Edwards; Thierry Fichefet; J. C. Hargreaves; Chris D. Jones; Marie-France Loutre; H. D. Matthews; Anne Mouchet; S. A. Mueller; S. Nawrath; A.R. Price; Andrei P. Sokolov; Kuno M. Strassmann; Andrew J. Weaver
Eight earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs) are used to project climate change commitments for the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC’s) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). Simulations are run until the year 3000 A.D. and extend substantially farther into the future than conceptually similar simulations with atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) coupled to carbon cycle models. In this paper the following are investigated: 1) the climate change commitment in response to stabilized greenhouse gases and stabilized total radiative forcing, 2) the climate change commitment in response to earlier CO2 emissions, and 3) emission trajectories for profiles leading to the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 and their uncertainties due to carbon cycle processes. Results over the twenty-first century compare reasonably well with results from AOGCMs, and the suite of EMICs proves well suited to complement more complex models. Substantial climate change commitments for sea level rise and global mean surface temperature increase after a stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gases and radiative forcing in the year 2100 are identified. The additional warming by the year 3000 is 0.6–1.6 K for the low-CO2 IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) B1 scenario and 1.3–2.2 K for the high-CO2 SRES A2 scenario. Correspondingly, the post-2100 thermal expansion commitment is 0.3–1.1 m for SRES B1 and 0.5–2.2 m for SRES A2. Sea level continues to rise due to thermal expansion for several centuries after CO2 stabilization. In contrast, surface temperature changes slow down after a century. The meridional overturning circulation is weakened in all EMICs, but recovers to nearly initial values in all but one of the models after centuries for the scenarios considered. Emissions during the twenty-first century continue to impact atmospheric CO2 and climate even at year 3000. All models find that most of the anthropogenic carbon emissions are eventually taken up by the ocean (49%–62%) in year 3000, and that a substantial fraction (15%–28%) is still airborne even 900 yr after carbon emissions have ceased. Future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 and climate change requires a substantial reduction of CO2 emissions below present levels in all EMICs. This reduction needs to be substantially larger if carbon cycle–climate feedbacks are accounted for or if terrestrial CO2 fertilization is not operating. Large differences among EMICs are identified in both the response to increasing atmospheric CO2 and the response to climate change. This highlights the need for improved representations of carbon cycle processes in these models apart from the sensitivity to climate change. Sensitivity simulations with one single EMIC indicate that both carbon cycle and climate sensitivity related uncertainties on projected allowable emissions are substantial.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2007
E. Driesschaert; Thierry Fichefet; Hugues Goosse; Philippe Huybrechts; I. Janssens; Anne Mouchet; Guy Munhoven; Victor Brovkin; S. L. Weber
A three-dimensional Earth system model of intermediate complexity including a dynamic ice sheet component has been used to investigate the long-term evolution of the Greenland ice sheet and its effects on the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in response to a range of stabilized anthropogenic forcings. Our results suggest that the Greenland ice sheet volume should experience a significant decrease in the future. For a radiative forcing exceeding 7.5 W m(-2), the modeled ice sheet melts away within 3000 years. A number of feedbacks operate during this deglaciation, implying a strong nonlinear relationship between the radiative forcing and the melting rate. Only in the most extreme scenarios considered, the freshwater flux from Greenland into the surrounding oceans ( of ca. 0.1 Sv during a few centuries) induces a noticeable weakening of the AMOC in the model.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2005
Hugues Goosse; Thomas J. Crowley; Eduardo Zorita; Caspar M. Ammann; H. Renssen; E. Driesschaert
An ensemble of simulations performed with a coarse resolution 3-D climate model driven by various combinations of external forcing is used to investigate possible causes for differences noticed in two recent simulations of the climate of the past millennium using General Circulation Models (GCMs). Our results strongly suggest that differences in sensitivity (equilibrium and transient climate response) could be responsible for temperature changes that differ by more than a factor of two between two models. In addition, the spin-up procedure could explain some differences between the simulations during the first centuries of the second millennium. The choice of the forcing reconstruction is found to play a smaller role for the differences in the simulated climate, in the model configurations analyzed here. Furthermore, at decadal scale, internal climate variability can mask the differences associated with different forcing reconstructions.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2008
Didier Swingedouw; Thierry Fichefet; Philippe Huybrechts; Hugues Goosse; E. Driesschaert; Marie-France Loutre
We show by using a three-dimensional climate model, which includes a comprehensive representation of polar ice sheets, that on centennial to millennial time scales Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) can melt and moderate warming in the Southern Hemisphere, by up to 10 degrees C regionally, in a 4 x CO2 scenario. This behaviour stems from the formation of a cold halocline in the Southern Ocean, which limits sea-ice cover retreat under global warming and increases surface albedo, reducing local surface warming. Furthermore, we show that AIS melting, by decreasing Antarctic Bottom Water formation, restrains the weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, which is a new illustration of the effect of the bi-polar oceanic seesaw. Consequently, it appears that AIS melting strongly interacts with climate and ocean circulation globally. It is therefore necessary to account for this coupling in future climate and sea-level rise scenarios.
Climate of The Past | 2007
Pascale Braconnot; Bette L. Otto-Bliesner; Sandy P. Harrison; Sylvie Joussaume; J.-Y. Peterchmitt; Ayako Abe-Ouchi; Michel Crucifix; E. Driesschaert; Thierry Fichefet; Chris Hewitt; Masa Kageyama; A. Kitoh; A. Laine; Marie-France Loutre; Olivier Marti; Ute Merkel; Gilles Ramstein; Paul J. Valdes; S. L. Weber; Y. Yu; Y. Zhao
Climate of The Past | 2007
Pascale Braconnot; Bette L. Otto-Bliesner; Sandy P. Harrison; Sylvie Joussaume; J.-Y. Peterchmitt; Ayako Abe-Ouchi; Michel Crucifix; E. Driesschaert; Thierry Fichefet; Chris Hewitt; Masa Kageyama; A. Kitoh; Marie-France Loutre; Olivier Marti; Ute Merkel; Gilles Ramstein; Paul J. Valdes; L. Weber; Y. Yu; Y. Zhao
Climate Dynamics | 2006
Victor Brovkin; Martin Claussen; E. Driesschaert; Thierry Fichefet; David W. Kicklighter; Marie-France Loutre; H. D. Matthews; Navin Ramankutty; M. Schaeffer; Andrei P. Sokolov
Climate Dynamics | 2005
H. Renssen; Hugues Goosse; Thierry Fichefet; Victor Brovkin; E. Driesschaert; Frank Wolk
Surveys in Geophysics | 2011
Philippe Huybrechts; H. Goelzer; I. Janssens; E. Driesschaert; Thierry Fichefet; Hugues Goosse; Marie-France Loutre