E.E. Koks
VU University Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E.E. Koks.
Risk Analysis | 2015
E.E. Koks; M. Bočkarjova; H. de Moel; J.C.J.H. Aerts
In this article, we propose an integrated direct and indirect flood risk model for small- and large-scale flood events, allowing for dynamic modeling of total economic losses from a flood event to a full economic recovery. A novel approach is taken that translates direct losses of both capital and labor into production losses using the Cobb-Douglas production function, aiming at improved consistency in loss accounting. The recovery of the economy is modeled using a hybrid input-output model and applied to the port region of Rotterdam, using six different flood events (1/10 up to 1/10,000). This procedure allows gaining a better insight regarding the consequences of both high- and low-probability floods. The results show that in terms of expected annual damage, direct losses remain more substantial relative to the indirect losses (approximately 50% larger), but for low-probability events the indirect losses outweigh the direct losses. Furthermore, we explored parameter uncertainty using a global sensitivity analysis, and varied critical assumptions in the modeling framework related to, among others, flood duration and labor recovery, using a scenario approach. Our findings have two important implications for disaster modelers and practitioners. First, high-probability events are qualitatively different from low-probability events in terms of the scale of damages and full recovery period. Second, there are substantial differences in parameter influence between high-probability and low-probability flood modeling. These findings suggest that a detailed approach is required when assessing the flood risk for a specific region.
Economic Systems Research | 2016
E.E. Koks; Mark Thissen
ABSTRACT This paper presents a recursive dynamic multiregional supply-use model, combining linear programming and input–output (I–O) modeling to assess the economy-wide consequences of a natural disaster on a pan-European scale. It is a supply-use model which considers production technologies and allows for supply side constraints. The model has been illustrated for three floods in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Results show that most of the neighboring regions gain from the flood due to increased demand for reconstruction and production capacity constraints in the affected region. Regions located further away or neighboring regions without a direct export link to the affected region mostly suffered small losses. These losses are due to the costs of increased inefficiencies in the production process that have to be paid for by all (indirectly) consuming regions. In the end, the floods cause regionally differentiated welfare effects.
Natural Hazards | 2016
Mattia Amadio; Jaroslav Mysiak; Lorenzo Carrera; E.E. Koks
Flood damage assessments are often based on stage-damage curve (SDC) models that estimate economic damage as a function of flood characteristics (typically flood depths) and land use. SDCs are developed through a site-specific analysis, but are rarely adjusted to economic circumstances in areas to which they are applied. In Italy, assessments confide in SDC models developed elsewhere, even if empirical damage reports are collected after every major flood event. In this paper, we have tested, adapted and extended an up-to-date SDC model using flood records from Northern Italy. The model calibration is underpinned by empirical data from compensation records. Our analysis takes into account both damage to physical assets and losses due to foregone production, the latter being measured amidst the spatially distributed gross added value.
Studies on water management issues | 2012
E.E. Koks; H. de Moel; E. Koomen
Flood risk is an important force in shaping land use patterns. Attention for flood risk is even more important in view of climatic changes that will impact sea-level rise, river discharge and precipitation patterns. Flooding typically results from two types of events: extreme rainfall events and large-scale floods. The former can be defined as inundation due to more rainfall than the water system in a specific area can handle and the latter as a temporary covering of land by water outside its normal confines due to flooding or breaching of the primary or regional defense structures such as dikes.
Water Resources Research | 2017
Paolo Scussolini; Thi Van Thu Tran; E.E. Koks; Andres Diaz‐Loaiza; Phi Long Ho; R. Lasage
One of the most critical impacts of sea level rise is that flooding suffered by ever larger settlements in tropical deltas will increase. Here we look at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and quantify the threats that coastal floods pose to safety and to the economy. For this, we produce flood maps through hydrodynamic modeling and, by combining these with data sets of exposure and vulnerability, we estimate two indicators of risk: the damage to assets and the number of potential casualties. We simulate current and future (2050 and 2100) flood risk using IPCC scenarios of sea level rise and socioeconomic change. We find that annual damage may grow by more than 1 order of magnitude, and potential casualties may grow 5–20-fold until the end of the century, in the absence of adaptation. Impacts depend strongly on the climate and socioeconomic scenarios considered. Next, we simulate the implementation of adaptation measures and calculate their effectiveness in reducing impacts. We find that a ring dike would protect the inner city but increase risk in more rural districts, whereas elevating areas at risk and dryproofing buildings will reduce impacts to the city as a whole. Most measures perform well from an economic standpoint. Combinations of measures seem to be the optimal solution and may address potential equity conflicts. Based on our results, we design possible adaptation pathways for Ho Chi Minh City for the coming decades; these can inform policy-making and strategic thinking.
Environmental Science & Policy | 2015
E.E. Koks; Brenden Jongman; T. G. Husby; W.J.W. Botzen
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences | 2014
Brenden Jongman; E.E. Koks; T. G. Husby; Philip J. Ward
Regional Environmental Change | 2014
E.E. Koks; H. de Moel; J.C.J.H. Aerts; Laurens M. Bouwer
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences | 2015
E.E. Koks; Lorenzo Carrera; Olaf Jonkeren; J.C.J.H. Aerts; Trond G. Husby; Mark Thissen; Gabriele Standardi; Jaroslav Mysiak
Archive | 2012
H. de Moel; E.E. Koks; J.E.C. Dekkers; M.R. Lassche; L.M. Bouwer