E. Espinosa

Serum albumin and other prognostic factors related to response and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The standard therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains to be defined. The poor results from chemotherapy have favored the search for prognostic factors that help identify patients more likely to respond. Our objective was to find factors related to response, the duration of response, and overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. We reviewed the clinical records of 292 patients with non-operable NSCLC, all of whom had a good performance status and had received chemotherapy. Ninety percent were male and the median age was 59 years. The therapeutic regimens included MACC (methotrexate, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and CCNU), cisplatin + vindesine or etoposide, MIP (mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin) and MVP (mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin). In the multivariate analysis, a normal albumin level and the inclusion of cisplatin were related to the achievement of a response (40% if both favorable factors were present). No factors appeared related to the duration of response. The following factors were predictive for survival: weight loss, performance status, lymphocyte count, albumin level, number of metastases and the presence of bone metastases. We conclude that the albumin level identifies a group of patients with advanced NSCLC who are more likely to respond to cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Doctors also suffer when giving bad news to cancer patients

Giving bad news to patients with cancer may generate stress in doctors, who use distancing tactics. The causes of this anxiety come from social conventions and its consequences affect both doctors and their patients. There is no “gold standard” by which stress may be overcome during the interview but we offer some suggestions that may help.

Uracil and tegafur modulated with leucovorin

In spite of the high prevalence of cancer in the elderly, little information is available about the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in elderly patients. In a previous study, the authors demonstrated that the combination of uracil and tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) was active and well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACC). The objective of the current study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen in elderly patients with ACC.

Compliance with a sepsis bundle and its effect on intensive care unit mortality in surgical septic shock patients.

BACKGROUND The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was launched in 2002, aiming at a 25% reduction in mortality in sepsis during a 5-year period. We hypothesized that the compliance with an adapted sepsis bundle would improve intensive care unit (ICU) survival in a cohort of surgical septic shock patients. METHODS A retrospective, observational study was performed in surgical ICUs from two University hospitals. Seven quality indicators were considered to study the compliance with the sepsis bundle in 182 patients: (1) administration of antibiotics within 6 hours from diagnosis of septic shock, (2) initial effective antibiotic treatment, (3) adequate resuscitation within 6 hours after the diagnosis of septic shock, (4) administration of steroids, (5) use of activated protein C, (6) glucose control, and (7) protective ventilation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to make a predictive model to study the probability of survival according to the number of therapeutic guidelines fulfilled and to adjust for other predictive factors. RESULTS Compliance with individual guidelines was considered adequate in more than 60% of the cases, except in the case of glucose control. For all quality indicators, ICU survival was higher in the bundle-compliant patients. Survival (61%) was associated with the fulfilment of increasing number of therapeutic guidelines (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.1; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In surgical septic shock patients, the outcome was significantly related to the number of fulfilled therapeutic guidelines included in a sepsis bundle.

Sequential therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with weekly paclitaxel followed by cisplatin—gemcitabine—vinorelbine. A phase II study

OBJECTIVES New effective therapies are needed to improve the outcome of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the response rate and survival obtained with a sequential regimen of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIb-IV NSCLC were included. They all had measurable disease and a good performance status (0-2 in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale). Chemotherapy consisted of weekly paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 x 6, followed two weeks later by cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14 (CGV). CGV was administered every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were included, 19 (37%) with stage IIIb and 33 (63%) with stage IV disease. After therapy with weekly paclitaxel. 29 partial responses were obtained (56%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 38%-67%), whereas 15 patients had stable disease (29%) and eight had a progression (15%). After CGV, there were four complete remissions (8%) and 24 partial responses (46%), for an overall response rate of 54% (95% CI: 37%-65%). Eight patients had stable disease (15%) and 16 had a progression (31%). No patient progressing after paclitaxel responded to CGV, whereas 5 out of 15 patients with stable disease reached a partial response with CGV (33%). On the contrary, 5 out of 29 patients with a partial response to paclitaxel progressed after CGV (17%). Median survival has not been reached after a median follow-up of 14 months. Median time to progression was nine months. Fifty-six percent of patients remain alive at one year. Two hundred eighty-nine courses of paclitaxel and 170 of CGV were given, with a median of 5.5 and 3.4 per patient, respectively (ranges 2-6 and 0-6. respectively). WHO grade 3-4 toxicities for paclitaxel were: neutropenia in two patients (4/) and peripheral neuropathy in five (10%). Two patients had allergic reactions requiring paclitaxel withdrawal, whereas four (8%) had hyperglycemia >250 mg/ml. Grade 3-4 toxicities for CGV were: neutropenia in ten patients (20%), peripheral neuropathy in six (12%), anemia in four (8%), nausea/vomiting in five (10%). thrombocytopenia in two (4%), and fatigue in four (8%). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that sequential chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel followed by CGV is highly active in patients with advanced NSCLC and has an acceptable toxicity. This schedule deserves further evaluation in a phase III study.

UFT® Modulated with Leucovorin in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Oncopaz Experience

A phase II trial of UFT (Tegafur and Uracil) modulated by leucovorin was undertaken by the Oncopaz Cooperative Group to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A total of 75 patients were given 500 mg/m2 intravenous leucovorin and 195 mg/m2 of oral UFT on day 1, followed by oral leucovorin 15 mg/12 h and 195 mg/m2/12 h of oral UFT on days 2-14. An overall response rate of 39% was obtained, with seven complete responses (9%), and 22 partial responses (29%). The primary toxicity was gastrointestinal, with grade 1-2 diarrhea occurring in 8.5% of courses, and grade 3-4 in 3.5%. Hematologic toxicity was minimal, and there were no deaths due to toxicity. This regimen was active and well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, including those 70 years of age or older.

Rationale and study design for an individualized perioperative open lung ventilatory strategy (iPROVE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPostoperative pulmonary and non-pulmonary complications are common problems that increase morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, even though the incidence has decreased with the increased use of protective lung ventilation strategies. Previous trials have focused on standard strategies in the intraoperative or postoperative period, but without personalizing these strategies to suit the needs of each individual patient and without considering both these periods as a global perioperative lung-protective approach. The trial presented here aims at comparing postoperative complications when using an individualized ventilatory management strategy in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods with those when using a standard protective ventilation strategy in patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery.MethodsThis is a comparative, prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled, four-arm trial that will include 1012 patients with an intermediate or high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The patients will be divided into four groups: (1) individualized perioperative group: intra- and postoperative individualized strategy; (2) intraoperative individualized strategy + postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); (3) intraoperative standard ventilation + postoperative CPAP; (4) intra- and postoperative standard strategy (conventional strategy). The primary outcome is a composite analysis of postoperative complications.DiscussionThe Individualized Perioperative Open-lung Ventilatory Strategy (iPROVE) is the first multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial to investigate whether an individualized perioperative approach prevents postoperative pulmonary complications.Trial registrationRegistered on 5 June 2014 with identification no. NCT02158923.

Cisplatin and UFT modulated with leucovorin for the treatment of Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

We performed a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the cisplatin-UFT-leucovorin (LV) combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-five patients with measurable disease who had not received prior chemotherapy were entered into the trial. The therapeutic regimen consisted of cisplatin 90 mg/m(2) and i.v. LV 500 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by oral UFT 390 mg/m(2)/day (in two doses on days 1 through 14. Patients also received oral LV 15 mg/12 h on days 2 through 14. Seventeen patients required reduced doses of UFT (200 mg/m(2) due to toxicity. Courses were repeated every 28 days for a minimum of three per patient. Three of 25 patients (12%) achieved a partial response (95% CI: 2.6 to 32.2%), two with 390 mg/m(2)/day and one with 200 mg/m(2)/day of UFT. The main side effects were hematological and gastrointestinal. In the courses including 390 mg/m(2)/day of UFT, grade 3-4 toxicity was leucopenia in 18% of the courses, nausea/vomiting in 27%, and diarrhea and epigastralgia in 13% each. Grade 3-4 toxicities for 200 mg/m(2)/day of UFT were leucopenia 2%, nausea/vomiting 9% and diarrhea 7%. In conclusion, this regimen cannot be recommend for the treatment of advanced NSCLC due to its low response rate and high toxicity.