E. Ferrannini

SGLT2 inhibition in diabetes mellitus: rationale and clinical prospects

This Review covers the rationale, physiological consequences and clinical application of pharmacological sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, in whom renal glucose reabsorption might be upregulated, orally active, selective SGLT2 inhibitors improve glycaemic control to a therapeutically useful extent. Chronic administration of several SGLT2 inhibitors dose-dependently lowers HbA1c levels by 0.5–1.5% without causing hypoglycaemia. The unique mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibitors—which does not hinge upon β-cell function or tissue insulin sensitivity—means that they can exert their antihyperglycaemic effects in combination with any other oral antidiabetic drug as well as insulin. Available phase III studies confirm a good tolerability profile. Weight loss owing to urinary calorie leakage may be less than expected, but the negative energy balance offers a valuable clinical benefit. Offloading of sodium can assist blood pressure control. The progressive loss of efficacy in patients with reduced glomerular function will have to be balanced against the possibility of renal protection. The safety issues of genitourinary infections and cancer risk requires careful, proactive monitoring and analysis of robust exposure data, particularly in elderly, frail patients and in patients with impaired kidney function and/or high cardiovascular/cancer risk, who represent an increasing fraction of the population with diabetes mellitus.

Effects of Insulin on Hemodynamics and Metabolism in Human Forearm

We investigated the vascular response (blood flow and resting vascular resistance) and the metabolic response (exchange of metabolites and respiratory gases) to local insulin administration in the forearms of healthy young volunteers with the use of the perfused-forearm technique. In the postabsorptive state, the deep tissues of the forearm (mostly skeletal muscle) took up glucose (mean +/- SE 1.09 +/- 0.17 mumol.min-1.dl-1 forearm vol), beta-hydroxybutyrate (0.267 +/- 0.130 mumol.min-1.dl-1), and O2 (9.96 +/- 1.02 mumol.min-1.dl-1) and released lactate (0.284 +/- 0.098 mumol.min-1.dl-1), glycerol (0.029 +/- 0.012 mumol.min-1.dl-1), citrate (0.091 +/- 0.030 mumol.min-1.dl-1), alanine (0.184 +/- 0.044 mumol.min-1.dl-1), CO2 (7.36 +/- 0.97 mumol.min-1.dl-1), and protons (12.1 +/- 1.4 pmol.min-1.dl-1). Forearm blood flow (by venous occlusion plethysmography) was 2.95 +/- 0.18 ml.min-1.dl-1, and intra-arterial systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 116 +/- 3/76 +/- 2 mmHg. Local indirect calorimetry indicated dominance of fat as the oxidative substrate (RQ 0.76 +/- 0.09) and an energy expenditure rate of 1.03 +/- 0.11 cal.min-1.dl-1 forearm vol. One hundred minutes of intra-arterial insulin infusion (deep venous plasma insulin concn of 125 +/- 11 microU/ml) had no detectable effect on forearm blood flow, resting forearm vascular resistance, heart rate, or blood pressure. Local hyperinsulinemia significantly stimulated glucose uptake (to 4.79 +/- 0.61 mumol.min-1.dl-1 forearm vol, P less than 0.001), lactate and pyruvate release (to 0.710 +/- 0.093 and 0.032 +/- 0.016 mumol.min-1.dl-1 forearm vol, respectively; P less than 0.01 for both), potassium uptake (0.76 +/- 0.22 mueq.min-1.dl-1, P less than 0.001), and free fatty acid uptake (0.123 +/- 0.041 mumol.min-1.dl-1 forearm vol, P less than 0.05); glycerol balance switched to a net uptake (P less than 0.001), alanine release was restrained by 33% (P less than 0.05), and beta-hydroxybutyrate and citrate release were unchanged. Despite these metabolic changes, local rates of substrate oxidation and energy expenditure were not altered by insulin. In contrast, forearm proton release was significantly stimulated by insulin (to 14.8 +/- 1.4 pmol.min-1.dl-1, P less than 0.02). Proton release was also found to be directly related to resting forearm vascular resistance independent of the effect of insulin (multiple r = 0.64, P less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)