Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. G. G. Verdaasdonk is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. G. G. Verdaasdonk.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2009

Requirements for the design and implementation of checklists for surgical processes

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; P. P. Widhiasmara; Jenny Dankelman

BackgroundThe use of checklists is a promising strategy for improving patient safety in all types of surgical processes inside and outside the operating room. This article aims to provide requirements and implementation of checklists for surgical processes.MethodsThe literature on checklist use in the operating room was reviewed based on research using Medline, Pubmed, and Google Scholar. Although all the studies showed positive effects and important benefits such as improved team cohesion, improved awareness of safety issues, and reduction of errors, their number still is limited. The motivation of team members is considered essential for compliance. Currently, no general guidelines exist for checklist design in the surgical field. Based on the authors’ experiences and on guidelines used in the aviation industry, requirements for the checklist design are proposed. The design depends on the checklist purpose, philosophy, and method chosen. The methods consist of the “call-do-response” approach,” the “do-verify” approach, or a combination of both. The advantages and disadvantages of paper versus electronic solutions are discussed. Furthermore, a step-by-step strategy of how to implement a checklist in the clinical situation is suggested.ConclusionsThe use of structured checklists in surgical processes is most likely to be effective because it standardizes human performance and ensures that procedures are followed correctly instead of relying on human memory alone. Several studies present promising and positive first results, providing a solid basis for further investigation. Future research should focus on the effect of various checklist designs and strategies to ensure maximal compliance.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2006

Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; L. J. Monteny; Jenny Dankelman

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to establish content, face, concurrent, and the first step of construct validity of a new simulator, the SIMENDO, in order to determine its usefulness for training basic endoscopic skills.MethodsThe validation started with an explanation of the goals, content, and features of the simulator (content validity). Then, participants from eight different medical centers consisting of experts (≥100 laparoscopic procedures performed) and surgical trainees (<100) were informed of the goals and received a “hands-on tour” of the virtual reality (VR) trainer. Subsequently, they were asked to answer 28 structured questions about the simulator (face validity). Ratings were scored on a scale from 1 (very bad/useless) to 5 (excellent/very useful). Additional comments could be given as well. Furthermore, two experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, aimed at establishing concurrent validity, the training effect of a single-handed hand–eye coordination task in the simulator was compared with a similar task in a conventional box trainer and with the performance of a control group that received no training. In experiment 2 (first step of construct validity), the total score of task time, collisions, and path length of three consecutive runs in the simulator was compared between experts (>100 endoscopic procedures) and novices (no experience).ResultsA total of 75 participants (36 expert surgeons and 39 surgical trainees) filled out the questionnaire. Usefulness of tasks, features, and movement realism were scored between a mean value of 3.3 for depth perception and 4.3 for appreciation of training with the instrument. There were no significant differences between the mean values of the scores given by the experts and surgical trainees. In response to statements, 81% considered this VR trainer generally useful for training endoscopic techniques to residents, and 83% agreed that the simulator was useful to train hand–eye coordination. In experiment 1, the training effect for the single-handed task showed no significant difference between the conventional trainer and the VR simulator (concurrent validity). In experiment 2, experts scored significantly better than novices on all parameters used (construct validity).ConclusionContent, face, and concurrent validity of the SIMENDO is established. The simulator is considered useful for training eye–hand coordination for endoscopic surgery. The evaluated task could discriminate between the skills of experienced surgeons and novices, giving the first indication of construct validity.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2007

Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery - An observational study

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; M van der Elst; T. M. Karsten; Jenny Dankelman

BackgroundThis study was designed to investigate the incidence of technical equipment problems during laparoscopic procedures.MethodsA video-capturing system was used, consisting of an analog video recorder with three camera image inputs and a microphone. Problems with all technical equipment used by the surgical team, such as the insufflator, diathermy apparatus, monitors, light source, camera and camera unit, endoscope, suction devices, and instruments, were registered.ResultsIn total, 30 procedures were randomly videotaped. In 87% (26/30) of the procedures, one or more incidents with technical equipment (49 incidents) or instruments (9 incidents) occurred. In 22 of those incidents (45%) the technical equipment was not correctly positioned or not present at all; in the other 27 (55%), the equipment malfunctioned as a result of a faulty connection (9), a defect (5), or the wrong setting of the equipment (3). In 10 (20%) cases the exact cause of equipment malfunctioning was unclear.ConclusionsThe incidence of problems with laparoscopic technical equipment is high. To prevent such problems, improvement and standardization of equipment is needed, combined with the incorporation of checklist use before the start of a surgical procedure. Future research should be aimed at development, implementation, and evaluation of these measures into the operating room.


Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies | 2005

Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills.

Jenny Dankelman; Magdalena K. Chmarra; E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; C. A. Grimbergen

With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) the necessity to develop training methods to learn skills outside the operating room (OR) became clear. Several training simulators have become commercially available. However, fundamental research into the requirements for effective and efficient training in MIS is still lacking. Yet in the literature several learning models have been described that may be used when designing the structure of a training program. While learning skills, three stages can be observed: cognitive, associative and autonomous. The learning cycle also includes different learning styles and, moreover, every trainee has his/her preferred learning style. Furthermore, training should be adapted to the level of behaviour: skill‐based, rule‐based or knowledge‐based. Training of complex skills should include multiple performance objectives, such as just‐in‐time supportive information and part‐task practice. Finally, motivation for training can be created by assessment. In conclusion, several theories on learning can be found in the literature. These theories may help in the development of effective training programs for training MIS skills outside the OR.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2007

The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery.

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; R. P. J. van Wijk; Jenny Dankelman

BackgroundPsychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery can be trained with virtual reality simulators. Distributed training is more effective than massed training, but it is unclear whether distributed training over several days is more effective than distributed training within 1 day. This study aimed to determine which of these two options is the most effective for training endoscopic psychomotor skills.MethodsStudents with no endoscopic experience were randomly assigned either to distributed training on 3 consecutive days (group A, n = 10) or distributed training within 1 day (group B, n = 10). For this study the SIMENDO virtual reality simulator for endoscopic skills was used. The training involved 12 repetitions of three different exercises (drop balls, needle manipulation, 30° endoscope) in differently distributed training schedules. All the participants performed a posttraining test (posttest) for the trained tasks 7 days after the training. The parameters measured were time, nontarget environment collisions, and instrument path length.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the groups in the first training session for all the parameters. In the posttest, group A (training over several days) performed 18.7% faster than group B (training on 1 day) (p = 0.013). The collision and path length scores for group A did not differ significantly from the scores for group B.ConclusionThe distributed group trained over several days was faster, with the same number of errors and the same instrument path length used. Psychomotor skill training for endoscopic surgery distributed over several days is superior to training on 1 day.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2007

Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training.

E. M. Blom; E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; L. P. S. Stassen; Henk G. Stassen; P.A. Wieringa; Jenny Dankelman

BackgroundVerbal communication in the operating room during surgical procedures affects team performance, reflects individual skills, and is related to the complexity of the operation process. During the procedural training of surgeons (residents), feedback and guidance is given through verbal communication. A classification method based on structural analysis of the contents was developed to analyze verbal communication. This study aimed to evaluate whether a classification method for the contents of verbal communication in the operating room could provide insight into the teaching processes.MethodsEight laparoscopic cholecystectomies were videotaped. Two entire cholecystectomies and the dissection phase of six additional procedures were analyzed by categorization of the communication in terms of type (4 categories: commanding, explaining, questioning, and miscellaneous) and content (9 categories: operation method, location, direction, instrument handling, visualization, anatomy and pathology, general, private, undefinable). The operation was divided into six phases: start, dissection, clipping, separating, control, closing.ResultsClassification of the communication during two entire procedures showed that each phase of the operation was dominated by different kinds of communication. A high percentage of explaining anatomy and pathology was found throughout the whole procedure except for the control and closing phases. In the dissection phases, 60% of verbal communication concerned explaining. These explaining communication events were divided as follows: 27% operation method, 19% anatomy and pathology, 25% location (positioning of the instrument–tissue interaction), 15% direction (direction of tissue manipulation), 11% instrument handling, and 3% other nonclassified instructions.ConclusionThe proposed classification method is feasible for analyzing verbal communication during surgical procedures. Communication content objectively reflects the interaction between surgeon and resident. This information can potentially be used to specify training needs, and may contribute to the evaluation of different training methods.


Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies | 2009

Serious gaming and voluntary laparoscopic skills training: A multicenter study

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; Jenny Dankelman; Marlies P. Schijven; Johan F. Lange; Mark Wentink; L. P. S. Stassen

This study assesses the issue of voluntary training of a standardized online competition (serious gaming) between surgical residents. Surgical residents were invited to join a competition on a virtual reality (VR) simulator for laparoscopic motor skills. A final score was calculated based on the task performance of three exercises and was presented to all the participants through an online database on the Internet. The resident with the best score would win a lap-top computer. During three months, 31 individuals from seven hospitals participated (22 surgical residents, 3 surgeons and six interns). A total of 777 scores were logged in the database. In order to out-perform others some participants scheduled themselves voluntarily for additional training. More attempts correlated with higher scores. The serious gaming concept may enhance voluntary skills training. Online data capturing could facilitate monitoring of skills progression in surgical trainees and enhance (VR) simulator validation.


Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | 2014

Development and evaluation of an interactive simulation module to train the use of an electrosurgical device

P.D. van Hove; E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; Jenny Dankelman; Laurents P. S. Stassen

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate an interactive Web-based training module for electrosurgery and use of an electrosurgical device. MATERIALS AND METHODS The training module consists of a theoretical part, a device tutorial, and an assessment. For evaluation, participants were recruited at the surgical departments from a university hospital and a non-university teaching hospital and were divided into a training group and a control group. All participants performed the same theoretical and practical tests. The training participants first completed the module before they performed the tests. The control participants immediately performed the tests. Results were compared between the training and control participants. To evaluate face validity, the training participants filled out a questionnaire on their opinion about the module. RESULTS In total, 39 participants were enrolled in the study: 20 in the training group and 19 in the control group. The training group answered significantly more theoretical questions correctly (15.7 versus 9.7; P<.001) and made significantly fewer errors in the practical test (2.2 versus 5.6; P=.007). The participants in the training group rated the usefulness and characteristics of the module with high marks. All of them indicated the module to be of additive value to surgical training programs. CONCLUSIONS Training with an interactive Web-based module has a positive effect on both theoretical and practical competence regarding electrosurgery and use of an electrosurgical device. This module was rated positively by the participants and was indicated to be a useful addition to surgical training programs.


European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology | 2010

Technique for removing a broken intramedullary nail

N. Schouten; E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; M. Van der Elst

Failure of an intramedullary nail in femoral bone nailing is a rare complication. Nevertheless, retrieval of a broken nail and the subsequent repair of the bone is a surgical challenge. The authors present a simple technique to remove a broken spiral blade of an unreamed intramedullary femoral nail (UFN-SB) with a special developed device.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2008

Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying training on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: A randomized controlled trial

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk; Jenny Dankelman; Johan F. Lange; L. P. S. Stassen

Collaboration


Dive into the E. G. G. Verdaasdonk's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenny Dankelman

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. P. S. Stassen

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan F. Lange

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. A. Grimbergen

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. M. Blom

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henk G. Stassen

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. J. Monteny

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Magdalena K. Chmarra

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge